0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
In my theory the Hadean Eon should be placed before and the Archean Eon after the formation of the moon.
In my theory Archean and Proterozoic Eons should merge together characterized by increasing sea levels and global temperatures.
As the earth expands further its atmosphere will get thinner, global temperatures will drop, primary productivity and biodiversity reduced, at some point the oceans will freeze entombing the remains of life. At this stage the earth will look like Mars and I will head to Venus.
So in your lifetime
people will travel to Venus for some reason.
Quote from: Origin on 04/02/2023 15:56:22So in your lifetimeNo. I am glad not to live that long.Quote from: Origin on 04/02/2023 15:56:22people will travel to Venus for some reason.By the time the earth will freeze Venus could be ready for colonization. I can't find any other warm place to go.
No. I am glad not to live that long.
Quote from: Yaniv on 01/02/2023 07:10:42No. Science has not published the results of the experiment.Even if it did, the results couldn't contradict conservation of mass because conservation of mass has been proven.Quote from: Yaniv on 01/02/2023 07:10:42Is she God ?A person doesn't have to be God in order to discover a mathematical proof. Remember the Pythagorean theorem? A2 + B2 = C2 in Euclidean space. That is also a proof. Pythagoras wasn't God.Do you know what Noether's theorem is?Quote from: Yaniv on 01/02/2023 07:10:42The results of the experiment have not been published to rush to conclusions.It's not "rushing to conclusions" when you already have proof. Even if weight did drop with a temperature increase, that is something that would have to be simultaneously consistent with conservation of mass.
No. Science has not published the results of the experiment.
Is she God ?
The results of the experiment have not been published to rush to conclusions.
My theory predicts PE2 particles (anti-protons) should be unstable in a positively charged universe.