The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Life Sciences
  3. Physiology & Medicine
  4. Does smoking prior to pregnancy pose a threat to a future child's health?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Does smoking prior to pregnancy pose a threat to a future child's health?

  • 7 Replies
  • 21379 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Shaul (OP)

  • First timers
  • *
  • 1
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
Does smoking prior to pregnancy pose a threat to a future child's health?
« on: 16/05/2008 12:52:13 »
My daughter smoke and plan to have a baby. She claim there is no real scientific real proof that smoking before being pregnant is dangerous to the child.
Can someone help me and give a reference to a big ( many persons ) research which does proof it?

thank you
« Last Edit: 21/04/2009 18:35:04 by chris »
Logged
 



Offline RD

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 9094
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 162 times
    • View Profile
Re: Does smoking prior to pregnancy pose a threat to a future child's health?
« Reply #1 on: 29/06/2008 20:30:23 »
Quote
Evidence has shown that women who smoke whilst they are pregnant have a 25% higher risk of giving birth to a stillborn baby. The more cigarettes that are smoked, the higher the risk.

There is an 82% chance of giving birth to a baby with a lower birth weight. Many mothers wrongly believe that giving birth to a lighter baby will mean an easier birth, however this is by no means the case. Giving birth to a low-weight baby can bring with it no end of complications and health problems for the child.

Low-weight babies can be expected to have severe health problems such as breathing disorders, bronchitis and ear infections especially in the first two years of their life. They are more likely to be admitted into intensive care after being born and could even face being disabled. Some may even die shortly after birth.

According to statistics, 20 - 30% of the babies who are born with a low birth weight do so because their mother smoked throughout pregnancy. Giving birth to a low-weight baby may have long-lasting negative effects on the child's growth and development. A premature birth can also result in a low birth weight baby and smoking increases this risk by around 30%.

Low-weight babies usually weight around 250 g less than a normal and healthy baby. Newborns who weigh in at less than 5½ pounds could suffer from birth defects such as a cleft lip or a cleft palate. This is more likely if the mother smokes over 20 cigarettes a day. They could even be born with severe disabilities like cerebral palsy or they could have problems with their spinal cord, ears or eyes.

http://www.helpwithsmoking.com/smoking-and-pregnancy/smoking-breastfeeding-birth.php
Logged
 

Offline Madidus_Scientia

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1451
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
Re: Does smoking prior to pregnancy pose a threat to a future child's health?
« Reply #2 on: 30/06/2008 14:56:59 »
That's about smoking while pregnant, he meant smoking before being pregnant. As long as she quits smoking before she starts trying to get pregnant I wouldn't think it would have an adverse effect on the baby, but it obviously helps to have as healthy a mother as possible.
Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 27787
  • Activity:
    91%
  • Thanked: 933 times
    • View Profile
Re: Does smoking prior to pregnancy pose a threat to a future child's health?
« Reply #3 on: 30/06/2008 19:33:51 »
Unless I'm missing something here I understand that lots of women are pregnant, at least for a while, before they know it. Unless they quit smoking before trying to get pregnant they would end up smoking while pregnant which is undesirable.

That's before you look into the fact that quitting is difficult, being pregnant can me problematic too. Why not get used to one thing at a time?

Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline Andrew K Fletcher

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2333
  • Activity:
    0%
  • KIS Keep It Simple
    • View Profile
Re: Does smoking prior to pregnancy pose a threat to a future child's health?
« Reply #4 on: 03/07/2008 09:39:50 »
Well given that during the great wars and the many years that followed them women and men smoked like the troupers, in fact the armed forces used to give out cigarettes to the forces A lot of people have forgotten this.

Yet women got pregnant and carried on smoking and these tobacco reared children don't appear to be affected by the ordeal of mum being a smoker.

Logically though smoking can't be any good for either mum or her baby/s but it is an interesting point that needs to be looked into.

And far from there being a lot of still born babies we had a population explosion following World War 2
« Last Edit: 03/07/2008 09:41:22 by Andrew K Fletcher »
Logged
Science is continually evolving. Nothing is set in stone. Question everything and everyone. Always consider vested interests as a reason for miss-direction. But most of all explore and find answers that you are comfortable with
 



Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 27787
  • Activity:
    91%
  • Thanked: 933 times
    • View Profile
Re: Does smoking prior to pregnancy pose a threat to a future child's health?
« Reply #5 on: 03/07/2008 19:01:12 »
It isn't the general idea of the armed forces to keep people alive. If they wanted to do that they wouldn't put them where they get shot at.
There will have been lots of children born to smoking mothers . The stats show that these children were generally a little less healthy than those whose mothers didn't smoke.
Nobody said smoking while pregnant will kill the baby; they just said it's statistically better not to.

As for "And far from there being a lot of still born babies we had a population explosion following World War 2" well, a lot of couples were inconvenienced in terms of procreation by the husband being away being shot at.
Also many people thought that life was tricky enough with the war going on so they postponed starting a family. Yet more might have decided to celebrate the outbreak of peace by having sex.
Probably not a lot to do with smoking really.

Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline Raghavendra

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 833
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Quantum
    • View Profile
    • Raghavendra
Re: Does smoking prior to pregnancy pose a threat to a future child's health?
« Reply #6 on: 21/04/2009 12:30:32 »
Quote from: Shaul on 16/05/2008 12:52:13
My daughter smoke and plan to have a baby. She claim there is no real scientific real proof that smoking before being pregnant is dangerous to the child.
Can someone help me and give a reference to a big ( many persons ) research which does proof it?

thank you
smoking has thousands of chemical effect, and the scientists proved, there is no turn back, it affects the pregant lady....

It should be avoided.. it can cause disease for the child...
Logged
 

Offline Don_1

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 6889
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 14 times
  • A stupid comment for every occasion.
    • View Profile
    • Knight Light Haulage
Re: Does smoking prior to pregnancy pose a threat to a future child's health?
« Reply #7 on: 21/04/2009 13:21:24 »
I think she may have had the baby by now Raghavendra!
Logged
If brains were made of dynamite, I wouldn't have enough to blow my nose.
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 

Similar topics (5)

Is distilled water or tap water better for your health?

Started by thedocBoard Physiology & Medicine

Replies: 39
Views: 17025
Last post 03/08/2016 11:31:45
by evan_au
Cool.. Weird.. New Stuff!! (or future stuff...)

Started by SeanyBoard Technology

Replies: 29
Views: 18939
Last post 11/12/2018 07:38:37
by alancalverd
The evolution of man "Homo Sapiens" 200 thousand years into the future

Started by Alan McDougallBoard Plant Sciences, Zoology & Evolution

Replies: 6
Views: 17932
Last post 18/11/2008 18:57:49
by Alan McDougall
Is this "Ultra deep hydroelectric/geothermal power plant" the future?

Started by Wolfhart WillimczikBoard Technology

Replies: 2
Views: 3889
Last post 16/10/2016 15:02:27
by Wolfhart Willimczik
Are bees the health and safety, risk-assessment gurus of the insect world?

Started by thedocBoard Plant Sciences, Zoology & Evolution

Replies: 0
Views: 6134
Last post 15/02/2010 12:26:30
by thedoc
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.159 seconds with 52 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.