The Naked Scientists
Toggle navigation
Login
Register
Podcasts
The Naked Scientists
eLife
Naked Genetics
Naked Astronomy
In short
Naked Neuroscience
Ask! The Naked Scientists
Question of the Week
Archive
Video
SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
Articles
Science News
Features
Interviews
Answers to Science Questions
Get Naked
Donate
Do an Experiment
Science Forum
Ask a Question
About
Meet the team
Our Sponsors
Site Map
Contact us
User menu
Login
Register
Search
Home
Help
Search
Tags
Member Map
Recent Topics
Login
Register
Naked Science Forum
On the Lighter Side
New Theories
Lambert's Cosine Law
« previous
next »
Print
Pages:
1
...
3
4
[
5
]
6
7
...
17
Go Down
Lambert's Cosine Law
324 Replies
104952 Views
0 Tags
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
jeffreyH
(OP)
Global Moderator
Naked Science Forum King!
6996
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 192 times
The graviton sucks
Re: Lambert's Cosine Law
«
Reply #80 on:
05/10/2014 02:52:53 »
I now have an equation to determine the radius of the start of the accretion zone around dense objects, including black holes. The conclusions explain the failure of G2 to be consumed by sag a*. It also brings up the possibility that once a black hole forms nothing will ever fall into it. While this sounds like it must be wrong there are reasons for this conclusion. These involve non-violation of light speed and were calculated indirectly from the gravitational binding energy.
Logged
Even the most obstinately ignorant cannot avoid learning when in an environment that educates.
jeffreyH
(OP)
Global Moderator
Naked Science Forum King!
6996
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 192 times
The graviton sucks
Re: Lambert's Cosine Law
«
Reply #81 on:
06/10/2014 22:41:29 »
Gravitational binding energy U is given by U = (3*G*M^2)/(5r). Where G is the gravitational constant, M is the mass and r is the radius to the surface. THe mass must be considered of uniform density. Gravitational acceleration g can then be determined by g = (5*U)/(3*M*r). If we extend the radial distance and consider a drop in density within our new surface boundary then U decreases proportionally. This appears to indicate that density is a critical factor in gravitational calculations. This density can only be expressed through a variation in G which makes it frame dependent. This relates G not only to mass density but to spacetime density.
Logged
Even the most obstinately ignorant cannot avoid learning when in an environment that educates.
jeffreyH
(OP)
Global Moderator
Naked Science Forum King!
6996
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 192 times
The graviton sucks
Re: Lambert's Cosine Law
«
Reply #82 on:
07/10/2014 00:03:36 »
This all indicates that we are chasing a ghost by trying to find a constant value for G.
Logged
Even the most obstinately ignorant cannot avoid learning when in an environment that educates.
jeffreyH
(OP)
Global Moderator
Naked Science Forum King!
6996
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 192 times
The graviton sucks
Re: Lambert's Cosine Law
«
Reply #83 on:
10/10/2014 00:25:26 »
I am now starting work on a universal time dilation gradient with its reference point as the event horizon of a black hole. I will be able to use this gradient in further equations and possibly then link gravitation directly to maxwell's equations.
Logged
Even the most obstinately ignorant cannot avoid learning when in an environment that educates.
jeffreyH
(OP)
Global Moderator
Naked Science Forum King!
6996
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 192 times
The graviton sucks
Re: Lambert's Cosine Law
«
Reply #84 on:
10/10/2014 21:39:49 »
If we take GM as our starting point and find the fractional portion of the mass used in gravitational calculations we can then find the depth of distribution this would be around the surface. This then shows a relationship between the depth of this mass and the radius of the event horizon. The concentration of the mass then reaches a critical point at which the intensity of gravitation produces the energy required to overcome the escaping photons. This surface depth then relates directly to the radius of the horizon. It also shows just how weak the gravitational field is.
Logged
Even the most obstinately ignorant cannot avoid learning when in an environment that educates.
jeffreyH
(OP)
Global Moderator
Naked Science Forum King!
6996
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 192 times
The graviton sucks
Re: Lambert's Cosine Law
«
Reply #85 on:
10/10/2014 21:50:29 »
It could be that most of the gravitational energy in a mass is confined and only a small portion of the flux leaves the mass at its surface. This cannot be determined without an investigation of this surface depth at increasing densities in relation to gravitation forces. If this depth equals the radius at the horizon this would answer some questions. It may also confirm the frozen star hypothesis.
Logged
Even the most obstinately ignorant cannot avoid learning when in an environment that educates.
jeffreyH
(OP)
Global Moderator
Naked Science Forum King!
6996
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 192 times
The graviton sucks
Re: Lambert's Cosine Law
«
Reply #86 on:
10/10/2014 23:43:40 »
The speed of light can be determined by the equation 1/(G*50). This equation can be rearranged to find the exact value for G in the local frame. The factor of 50 relates to the fraction of mass across the surface found by using GM.
Logged
Even the most obstinately ignorant cannot avoid learning when in an environment that educates.
jeffreyH
(OP)
Global Moderator
Naked Science Forum King!
6996
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 192 times
The graviton sucks
Re: Lambert's Cosine Law
«
Reply #87 on:
11/10/2014 00:00:24 »
Therefore 1/50c = G.
Logged
Even the most obstinately ignorant cannot avoid learning when in an environment that educates.
jeffreyH
(OP)
Global Moderator
Naked Science Forum King!
6996
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 192 times
The graviton sucks
Re: Lambert's Cosine Law
«
Reply #88 on:
11/10/2014 10:24:58 »
A while ago whilst investigating the 2GM in Shwarszcchild's calculation I came across the factor of 0.02 which I knew was important but didn't know why. Well 0.02 = 1/50 and now I know why. [8D]
Logged
Even the most obstinately ignorant cannot avoid learning when in an environment that educates.
jeffreyH
(OP)
Global Moderator
Naked Science Forum King!
6996
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 192 times
The graviton sucks
Re: Lambert's Cosine Law
«
Reply #89 on:
11/10/2014 16:05:54 »
Our G value is in seconds per meter so if we take the reciprocal 1/G this gives 50*c which may well be the speed of gravity. The speed is then 14,983,877.348 km/s. This would be why gravity cannot be detected easily. You would need to take 50 equally spaced measurements and look for a repeating pattern of vibrations that could not be explained any other way.
«
Last Edit: 11/10/2014 16:15:05 by jeffreyH
»
Logged
Even the most obstinately ignorant cannot avoid learning when in an environment that educates.
jeffreyH
(OP)
Global Moderator
Naked Science Forum King!
6996
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 192 times
The graviton sucks
Re: Lambert's Cosine Law
«
Reply #90 on:
11/10/2014 17:08:06 »
The electromagnetic spectrum could them be linked to gravitation by interference of the wavelength of the graviton with that of the photon. That is if the graviton exists.
Logged
Even the most obstinately ignorant cannot avoid learning when in an environment that educates.
jeffreyH
(OP)
Global Moderator
Naked Science Forum King!
6996
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 192 times
The graviton sucks
Re: Lambert's Cosine Law
«
Reply #91 on:
13/10/2014 00:06:47 »
Just for good measure I have attached a plot of a composite wave interaction with a standing wave.
Logged
Even the most obstinately ignorant cannot avoid learning when in an environment that educates.
jeffreyH
(OP)
Global Moderator
Naked Science Forum King!
6996
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 192 times
The graviton sucks
Re: Lambert's Cosine Law
«
Reply #92 on:
13/10/2014 21:33:16 »
Attached is a model representing the removal of the gravitational component from a compressed mass. The length contraction decreases to zero through the progression. The gravitational constant has been replaced by the 1/50 factor. This plot starts with a mass compressed within its event horizon radius. The length contraction dies off gradually until during the last 20% the rate of change increases dramatically.
«
Last Edit: 13/10/2014 21:35:55 by jeffreyH
»
Logged
Even the most obstinately ignorant cannot avoid learning when in an environment that educates.
jeffreyH
(OP)
Global Moderator
Naked Science Forum King!
6996
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 192 times
The graviton sucks
Re: Lambert's Cosine Law
«
Reply #93 on:
13/10/2014 22:18:49 »
The equation for our starting point is
whose units are cubic seconds per cubic meter. In other words 3 dimensional time in 3 dimensional space. This is a much better solution than using G.
Logged
Even the most obstinately ignorant cannot avoid learning when in an environment that educates.
jeffreyH
(OP)
Global Moderator
Naked Science Forum King!
6996
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 192 times
The graviton sucks
Re: Lambert's Cosine Law
«
Reply #94 on:
14/10/2014 23:49:28 »
Attached are two plots. One calculating g using the gravitational constant and the other using a factor of 1/50c. The question is this; is the factor of 50 actually a constant. We view gravity from an isolated bubble and have limited data on differing strength gravitational fields. This is one thing I am looking into. The other is gravitational interaction at the particle level.
Logged
Even the most obstinately ignorant cannot avoid learning when in an environment that educates.
jeffreyH
(OP)
Global Moderator
Naked Science Forum King!
6996
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 192 times
The graviton sucks
Re: Lambert's Cosine Law
«
Reply #95 on:
15/10/2014 01:33:09 »
Although the results match there is a real problem in using c in the denominator. Instead this should be L which then represents simply the distance traveled by light in 1 second. G is used as a unit conversion and can be calculated approximately by using hbar/(lP^2C^3). However we need a unit conversion that instead of producing G will produce the unit value of 1. So hbar/(lP^2C^3) requires such a factor before being added to our equation. The reciprocal of this equation will give us this value as a constant. Then it needs to be determined what this constant means.
«
Last Edit: 15/10/2014 01:59:00 by jeffreyH
»
Logged
Even the most obstinately ignorant cannot avoid learning when in an environment that educates.
jeffreyH
(OP)
Global Moderator
Naked Science Forum King!
6996
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 192 times
The graviton sucks
Re: Lambert's Cosine Law
«
Reply #96 on:
15/10/2014 02:21:04 »
So fingers crossed our equation for g should be (hbar*M)/(lP^2*c^2*L*r^2). Of course the Planck length would need to be recalculated using 1/50c in place of G to get an adjusted value but ignoring units.
Note: Changed g to G related to the 1/50c factor.
«
Last Edit: 16/10/2014 02:16:56 by jeffreyH
»
Logged
Even the most obstinately ignorant cannot avoid learning when in an environment that educates.
jeffreyH
(OP)
Global Moderator
Naked Science Forum King!
6996
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 192 times
The graviton sucks
Re: Lambert's Cosine Law
«
Reply #97 on:
16/10/2014 02:20:24 »
I have not checked the results for the above equation for consistency yet. The point of interest is that the factor of 50 has disappeared. This suggests that there can be no energy loss in gravitation. So no link with dark energy/matter. Dark energy is entirely separate from gravitation.
Logged
Even the most obstinately ignorant cannot avoid learning when in an environment that educates.
jeffreyH
(OP)
Global Moderator
Naked Science Forum King!
6996
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 192 times
The graviton sucks
Re: Lambert's Cosine Law
«
Reply #98 on:
16/10/2014 03:52:13 »
Well now like Joyce's Finnegan's wake we go back to the start with:
-
-
What about replacing G with 1/50c in this equation? The other point of note here is that we have 3 constants in the left hand term. That is G, Pl and Pm. It was shown that the factor of 50 can cancel out but in this case it would still be present, I think. This is the next project. To incorporate gravitation into the electromagnetic wave equation. In this way a formula for the affect on the wave over time by gravitation can be developed. Hopefully!
Logged
Even the most obstinately ignorant cannot avoid learning when in an environment that educates.
jeffreyH
(OP)
Global Moderator
Naked Science Forum King!
6996
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 192 times
The graviton sucks
Re: Lambert's Cosine Law
«
Reply #99 on:
16/10/2014 03:53:15 »
Then it will be back to the standing wave interaction. [:0]
Logged
Even the most obstinately ignorant cannot avoid learning when in an environment that educates.
Print
Pages:
1
...
3
4
[
5
]
6
7
...
17
Go Up
« previous
next »
Tags:
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...