0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Or even Trump isn't stupid enough to believe in it.I remind you that you have yet to provide any actual evidence that it happens .
So let me guess... You think websites like geoengineeringwatch.org are BS?
Quite frankly, I think you're the one that should provide evidences that this is NOT happening.
That's not how science works. There are plenty of very reasonable explanations of contrails that follow from scientific theories, and are very consistent with observations. If you think you have a better explanation, then you have to provide evidence that your explanation is better.
Quote from: Bored chemist on 27/02/2017 21:10:41Or even Trump isn't stupid enough to believe in it.I remind you that you have yet to provide any actual evidence that it happens .So let me guess... You think websites like geoengineeringwatch.org are BS?Quite frankly, I think you're the one that should provide evidences that this is NOT happening.
Well, tat website didn't provide any actual evidence so yes- it's BS.Did you not realise that?Also, you are the one making the extraordinary claim so you are the one who needs to produce evidence.Judging by past experience, the first thing you need to do is find out what evidence means in this context.Here's a hint; so far you have provided precisely zero evidence of any geoengineering on anything but a tiny experimental scale.
Quote from: Bored chemist on 28/02/2017 21:12:57Well, tat website didn't provide any actual evidence so yes- it's BS.Did you not realise that?Also, you are the one making the extraordinary claim so you are the one who needs to produce evidence.Judging by past experience, the first thing you need to do is find out what evidence means in this context.Here's a hint; so far you have provided precisely zero evidence of any geoengineering on anything but a tiny experimental scale.Define "tiny experimental scale". Geoengineeringwatch.org is not BS, it documents the organized assault on atmospheric weather happening on a global scale. You have an attitude problem to ignore evidences from alternative (independent) media sources.
You keep saying there is evidence.Why not just post that evidence?In place of evidence you cite web pages that spout dross.The issue isn't that they are independent or alternative.The problem is that, like you, they don't seem to understand what evidence is.
The "tiny experimental scale" might as well in this context mean the total project costs less then a million dollars.Or that it was a short duration thing to see what happened- then it was written up and not done again.Or a whole lot of other possible variations.
Show us evidence of geoengineering, then we can discuss whether it's tiny or experimental.
My job is to educate you on the risks and potentially harmful effects of clandestine geoengineering activity.
Quote from: Bored chemist on 14/03/2017 19:49:28You keep saying there is evidence.Why not just post that evidence?In place of evidence you cite web pages that spout dross.The issue isn't that they are independent or alternative.The problem is that, like you, they don't seem to understand what evidence is.The main problem is that military planes are dispersing condensantion aerosols over our heads, under our noses and hidden in plain sight. Failure to acknowledge this "evidence" of clandestine geoengineering activity is a serious political, environmental, and public health issue. Quote from: Bored chemistThe "tiny experimental scale" might as well in this context mean the total project costs less then a million dollars.Or that it was a short duration thing to see what happened- then it was written up and not done again.Or a whole lot of other possible variations.You have absolutely no idea what you're baffling about. Unilateral geoengineering activity is happening on a global scale, and this has been confirmed by multiple reports and documentaries over the Internet. Quote from: Bored chemistShow us evidence of geoengineering, then we can discuss whether it's tiny or experimental.It's not my job. My job is to educate you on the risks and potentially harmful effects of clandestine geoengineering activity.
All you have done there is make statements.Saying "Trump eats unicorns" doesn't make it true.Nor does saying "geoengineering is happening" make it true.Either show some real evidence or admit you don't have any.And, for the record, since you are the one making the claim; it damned well is your job to provide the evidence.If you don't understand that about science, you are not in a position to educate anyone.
One of the most expressionistic and powerful of all his studies is Seascape Study with Rain Cloud, painted about 1824 at Brighton, which captures with slashing dark brushstrokes the immediacy of an exploding cumulus shower at sea.
CIA tanker
Quote from: alancalverd on 18/03/2017 16:08:04CIA tanker Precisely.
Quote from: tkadm30 on 18/03/2017 18:21:42Quote from: alancalverd on 18/03/2017 16:08:04CIA tanker Precisely.OK, so, since you think that John Constable painted a picture of a CIA tanker in 1824, I think we can all conclude that you have precisely no idea what you are talking about.
The question is, should I use this discovered talent to run for the US Presidency or Chairman of the IPCC?
Quote from: Bored chemist on 18/03/2017 18:34:34Quote from: tkadm30 on 18/03/2017 18:21:42Quote from: alancalverd on 18/03/2017 16:08:04CIA tanker Precisely.OK, so, since you think that John Constable painted a picture of a CIA tanker in 1824, I think we can all conclude that you have precisely no idea what you are talking about.You have a talent for disforming my quotes into nonsense.