The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. New Theories
  4. New Theory: is everything in the universe in motion???
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

New Theory: is everything in the universe in motion???

  • 3 Replies
  • 634 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Hayseed (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 350
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 11 times
  • Naked Science Forum Crackpot
    • View Profile
New Theory: is everything in the universe in motion???
« on: 23/02/2021 13:34:33 »
Motion is absolute.  Set two marbles with a zero relative velocity on your desk.  They are in constant motion.  The invisible entities that make matter are in constant motion.  That motion is the fastest motion possible.  You will never find a physical entity that is not in constant motion.  Whether that entity is mass or field.....it is in motion.

Motion is very different than velocity.  Velocity may be relative, but motion is absolute.
Logged
The proper hardware will eliminate all theory.
 



Offline Kryptid

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 7204
  • Activity:
    38.5%
  • Thanked: 407 times
    • View Profile
Re: Re: Concerns, is everything in the universe in motion???
« Reply #1 on: 23/02/2021 13:52:35 »
Quote from: Hayseed on 23/02/2021 13:34:33
That motion is the fastest motion possible.

I should say not. Heating those marbles up will definitely make their constituent particles move more quickly.
Logged
 

Offline Hayseed (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 350
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 11 times
  • Naked Science Forum Crackpot
    • View Profile
Re: Re: Concerns, is everything in the universe in motion???
« Reply #2 on: 23/02/2021 14:14:08 »
The vibration in the invisible entities would increase, but the speed of the absolute motion would not. The quantity of motion increases, but not the speed of it.

The invisible entities rotate.  No matter how much you heat them......they will continue to rotate at that constant speed.  Only the jiggle, or the wobble of those rotations increase.

This jiggle increase also happens under g or any acceleration.  We currently use this jiggle for our clocks.  And this is why some think that time changes, but in truth, only the clock tick rate changes.  IF we were to use the rotational rate, instead of the wobble(or oscillatory) rate......you would measure a single, absolute time.   Just like the rest of nature sees.
Logged
The proper hardware will eliminate all theory.
 

Offline Kryptid

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 7204
  • Activity:
    38.5%
  • Thanked: 407 times
    • View Profile
Re: Re: Concerns, is everything in the universe in motion???
« Reply #3 on: 23/02/2021 14:17:10 »
Quote from: Hayseed on 23/02/2021 14:14:08
The vibration in the invisible entities would increase, but the speed of the absolute motion would not. The quantity of motion increases, but not the speed of it.

The invisible entities rotate.  No matter how much you heat them......they will continue to rotate at that constant speed.  Only the jiggle, or the wobble of those rotations increase.

This jiggle increase also happens under g or any acceleration.  We currently use this jiggle for our clocks.  And this is why some think that time changes, but in truth, only the clock tick rate changes.  IF we were to use the rotational rate, instead of the wobble(or oscillatory) rate......you would measure a single, absolute time.   Just like the rest of nature sees.


Provide a reputable source for this information. Otherwise, keep it confined to New Theories.
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.083 seconds with 38 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.