41
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Has E=mc2 been proved practically?
« on: 20/12/2023 15:27:23 »Have you ever seen a field that is just a single dimension or scalar like most of our constants are?
The Higgs field.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Have you ever seen a field that is just a single dimension or scalar like most of our constants are?
EM energy is a 3 dimensional volume of forces
Given the effects Earth's magnetic field has on people's hearts, what would happen if I rapidly waved a fridge magnet past my heart? Would it disrupt the electrical signals in my heart and cause it to stop?
Dave, we have already been through the whole "solid core" with magnets in your previous thread about the Sun. I gave you three chances to back up your claim with a reputable source three times and you failed. That got the thread locked. Since you are bringing up incorrect material from a locked thread, that means you are circumventing a thread lock. That means it's time to lock this thread as well. Since you have a track record of pushing incorrect notions about tidal forces and magnetic fields, let's add those to the list of forbidden topics (along with the quasars, black holes and Theory D).
2. Why the neutrinos detectors on Earth can only detect the Sun Fusion neutrinos and not the "geoneutrinos" that are created on Earth?
KamLAND has announced more than 100 events and Borexino around 20 that could be attributed to geoneutrinos, with an uncertainty factor of 20-30%. We cannot pinpoint their source, but this overall measurement ? while fairly rough ? is in line with the predictions of the simulations, within the limits of the low statistics obtained.
Do you have an idea what is the energy that is needed to move Hydrogen atom under a pressure of 4 million bars just by one mm?
Don't you agree that some energy is needed for that activity?
Therefore, how can we believe that the mass of hydrogen deep within Jupiter under pressure 4 million bars are swirling without energy lost?
But they have a severe mistake as Jupiter upper atmosphere is "Hot Hot Hot"
If you still believe that the mass of hydrogen deep within Jupiter under pressure of 4 million bars are swirling without energy lost and the 700 c temp at the poles is there without EM energy lost, while the EM is there for free -
This would explain the genetic code of the universe.
2. We also can't just hope that the energy from Jupiter's formation early in the solar system's history would keep so strong magnetic fields for several billion years and still maintain its relatively fast rotation velocity - Jupiter sets full rotation cycle in just about 9 hours.
Somehow, real energy source is needed to create and maintain those magnetic fields and the relatively fast rotation velocity of Jupiter
The idea is to use two micro black holes, perhaps with masses on the order of the Planck mass.Wouldn't such small black holes evaporate faster than any manipulation on them could be done?
Unambiguous detection of individual gravitons, though not prohibited by any fundamental law, is impossible with any physically reasonable detector.[20] The reason is the extremely low cross section for the interaction of gravitons with matter. For example, a detector with the mass of Jupiter and 100% efficiency, placed in close orbit around a neutron star, would only be expected to observe one graviton every 10 years, even under the most favorable conditions. It would be impossible to discriminate these events from the background of neutrinos, since the dimensions of the required neutrino shield would ensure collapse into a black hole.
Cross reference: https://www.scienceforums.net/topic/132749-a-disproof-of-the-principle-and-theory-of-relativity/
It is not acceptable simply to post material onto this forum that you have posted elsewhere, except where the post is specifically pertinent to an ongoing thread. If you start a thread with a post that is for all practical purposes the same as you have posted elsewhere, we will generally assume that you are evangelising, and will act accordingly.
A thought experiment is not a disproof.
Disproof would be signalled by the failure of the GPS system (your satnav would register a speed when you were standing still) or the lights going our because the nuclear power stations had all switched off.
At that point, your duty as a scientist is to explain why. Remember observe - hypothesise - test. So far, the hypothesis holds.
If special relativity is wrong, then gravitational time dilation (General Relativity) cannot be correct. The origin of GPS clock rate increase with altitude could have other explanation.
The paper is not about MOND.
In the presented paper we have considered the possible explanation of observed galactic
rotation curves by the assumption that the observed effect of the flatness can be explained by
some alternative theory of gravity which introduces an extra term which we called �(�).
I lost the link and will post when i find it. Why dont you search for it?
The so called mental body, the higher subtle body, should be observable in the X-ray spectrum.
The problem is that dark electromagnetic forces occupy a volume x,y,z but are massless and therefore cannot we measured physically as material change but only in hindsight as an effect. So have revised the hypothesis as follows
No dark matter or dark energy has been found in space because dark massless forces are needed to balance the WMAP results which I hypothesise as
1 The dark force of mass attraction G is the weakest in distant space volume x,y,z.
2 Electromagnetic dark matter magnoflux spin x,y inertia force of about 5G rotates galactic stars around a magnetic black hole hub
3. Electro-static repulsion of a near 25G dark energy force in z direction is responsible for expanding the universe as stars are assumed as having huge surface plus charges.
This morning I noticed Kryptid had euthanized some rubbish and I tried to say thanks via the drop down box. As soon as I had logged on, most of the final page disappeared and this is not the first time this has happened. Oh well, I'll just have to say it here, THANK YOU Kryptid.
One can also consider the hypothesis that these particles (main particle) are micro black holes that have ended their lives as particles, by evaporating.