The "SACRED TRIANGLE" of the ancient Egyptians and the Fibonacci sequence.

nootelepat · « **on:** 28/11/2019 09:21:00 »

The "SACRED TRIANGLE" of the ancient Egyptians and the Fibonacci sequence.

Bored chemist · « **Reply #1 on:** 28/11/2019 12:31:39 »

So?
I mean, it's pretty obvious from the way that the sequence is constructed that you can make the latter members by adding up former ones
8+13= 21
8+13+13= 34
[8+13]+[8 +13 +13] =21+34 = 55
[8+13+13] +[8+13+8 +13 +13] =34+55= 89

And I guess Osiris is a bit miffed about the number 4 having been left off the sequence.
So, you haven't really said anything worthwhile.

nootelepat · « **Reply #2 on:** 28/11/2019 13:32:28 »

3 + 4 + 5 = 12
This is a direct access to the 12-digit number system.

3 * 4 * 5 = 60
This is a direct access to the 60-digit number system.

Bored chemist · « **Reply #3 on:** 28/11/2019 15:06:54 »

They chose 12 s a number system because it is 2*3*2.
It's convenient to have a number base with lots of factors, and you get those by multiplying numbers, rather than by adding them.

Similarly, putting a factor of 5 into the mix gives you 2*3*5=30. Another factor of 2 gives 60.

It's nothing to do with addition, nor 3,4,5 triangles.

nootelepat · « **Reply #4 on:** 30/11/2019 05:16:49 »

3 is the second triangular number (after 1)
1, 3, 6, 10, 15, 21, 28, 36, 45, 55

4 is the second square number (after 1)
1, 4, 9, 16, 25

5 is the second square pyramidal number (after 1)
1, 5, 14, 30, 55

Here it is, the true WISDOM of the ANCIENTS !!!

Petrochemicals · « **Reply #5 on:** 30/11/2019 05:25:34 »

All the numbers on a roulette wheel add up to 666 !

nootelepat · « **Reply #6 on:** 30/11/2019 06:17:11 »

Yes, indeed :
1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 7 + 8 + 9 + 10 = 55
11 + 12 + 13 + 14 + 15 + 16 + 17 + 18 + 19 + 20 = 100 + 55
21 + 22 + 23 + 24 + 25 + 26 + 27 + 28 + 29 + 30 = 200 + 55
31 + 32 + 33 + 34 + 35 + 36 = 180 + 21

55 + 100 + 55 + 200 + 55 + 180 + 21 = 666

55 and 21 are numbers from the Fibonacci sequence !!!
1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55 ...

Kryptid · « **Reply #7 on:** 30/11/2019 06:28:38 »

May I ask what the "theory" is?

nootelepat · « **Reply #8 on:** 30/11/2019 06:34:22 »

I don't know. I'M not a philosopher !

Kryptid · « **Reply #9 on:** 30/11/2019 06:35:29 »

Quote from: nootelepat on 30/11/2019 06:34:22

I don't know. I'M not a philosopher !

So why did you post this thread in the "New Theories" section? Is this even science?

nootelepat · « **Reply #10 on:** 30/11/2019 06:41:34 »

And WHO knows what "science" is ?!

Kryptid · « **Reply #11 on:** 30/11/2019 06:43:46 »

Quote from: nootelepat on 30/11/2019 06:41:34

And WHO knows what "science" is ?!

A lot of people (scientists, in particular).

nootelepat · « **Reply #12 on:** 30/11/2019 06:49:48 »

These are the people WHO make mistakes ten TIMES, a HUNDRED times ... And these clowns-call themselves "scientists"!!!

Kryptid · « **Reply #13 on:** 30/11/2019 06:51:47 »

Quote from: nootelepat on 30/11/2019 06:49:48

These are the people WHO make mistakes ten TIMES, a HUNDRED times ... And these clowns-call themselves "scientists"!!!

So what is your definition of science?

nootelepat · « **Reply #14 on:** 30/11/2019 07:01:06 »

Let such questions be answered by idle philosophers !

Kryptid · « **Reply #15 on:** 30/11/2019 07:03:09 »

Quote from: nootelepat on 30/11/2019 07:01:06

Let such questions be answered by idle philosophers !

So you don't even know what science is and therefore can't argue that this thread is even about science. Why should we bother keeping this thread around?

nootelepat · « **Reply #16 on:** 30/11/2019 07:11:59 »

Because NO one KNOWS what will be science in 10 years.

The Spoon · « **Reply #17 on:** 30/11/2019 08:44:30 »

Quote from: nootelepat on 30/11/2019 07:11:59

Because NO one KNOWS what will be science in 10 years.

Certainly not superstitious numerology nonsense like this.

nootelepat · « **Reply #18 on:** 30/11/2019 12:55:15 »

This is not superstition. It's good math.
Science BEGAN in the temples.
The first scientists were priests and monks !

Bored chemist · « **Reply #19 on:** 30/11/2019 13:05:30 »

Quote from: nootelepat on 30/11/2019 12:55:15

The first scientists were priests and monks !

And then things changed.
If the Book doesn't agree with the evidence science rejects the Book and the priests reject the evidence.

But that's not the point here.
The fact is that your display of primary school level arithmetic doesn't actually tell us anything, does it?

Can water be lifted using electrical equivalents of ancient water wheels? Started by newrobertBoard Technology	Replies: 22 Views: 16656	04/12/2014 22:40:14 by syhprum
If the universe used to be smaller, why aren't ancient galaxies clustered in one area? Started by thedocBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology	Replies: 7 Views: 3089	22/09/2016 23:02:03 by syhprum
Who invented soap? What did ancient humans use? Was it safe/Did it work? Started by MusicforawhileBoard Famous Scientists, Doctors and Inventors	Replies: 3 Views: 9369	24/08/2019 14:26:26 by yor_on
How did ancient philosophers deduce the size and shape of the Earth? Started by chrisBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology	Replies: 4 Views: 3143	14/06/2015 18:29:27 by chiralSPO
Are Graham Hancock's ideas about ancient civilisations credible? Started by XanthanGumBoard Geology, Palaeontology & Archaeology	Replies: 1 Views: 3063	27/07/2016 04:26:56 by JimBob

The "SACRED TRIANGLE" of the ancient Egyptians and the Fibonacci sequence.

nootelepat (OP)

nootelepat (OP)

nootelepat (OP)

nootelepat (OP)

nootelepat (OP)

nootelepat (OP)

nootelepat (OP)

nootelepat (OP)

nootelepat (OP)

nootelepat (OP)

Similar topics (5)