1541
New Theories / Re: Golden ratio and Time
« on: 01/02/2018 09:41:59 »
No worries, apologies for this oversight. The post was aimed at finding why time has been held at one-dimensional, hence the tile " why is time one-dimensional", yet I can now see how this has evolved via the Q and A. Thanks for taking a look though. It wasn't my intention to promote a theory, I was merely looking for all the historical constraints regarding time-theory that has kept time one-dimensional. I thought suggesting an alternative could promote a defence of the policy "why" time is one-dimensional. It didn't pan out that way though. Bear in mind that I really don't want to promote a new theory here. My interest is the historical analysis of how time has been played, and that will probably show up in my posts, doing what I can not to promote new theories. I'm 50 next year, so I'm not thinking I've hit any jackpot theory straight out of school; I'm more interested in why scientific norms are held the way they are, especially about "time". I have a paper, sure, its just a paper. What's more important are the bigger questions, such as stated, "how can we theorise "spooky action at a distance" using linear time"?