What is Trump's opinion about chemtrails?

smart · « **Reply #40 on:** 19/01/2017 23:29:19 »

Quote from: Bored chemist on 19/01/2017 20:44:55

That's an interesting suggestion.
Which direction?
Are you saying that Ignorance of natural weather patterns and atmospheric physics combined with people knowingly telling lies about condensation trails produce the deluded belief that mass geoengineering via some poorly defined thing called "Chemtrails"is actually a real thing

All I'm saying is that Trump will end the criminal activity of unilateral geoengineering: http://chronicle.su/2017/01/16/trump-promises-end-of-chemtrails/

chiralSPO · « **Reply #41 on:** 20/01/2017 02:58:29 »

Quote from: tkadm30 on 19/01/2017 23:29:19

Quote from: Bored chemist on 19/01/2017 20:44:55
That's an interesting suggestion.
Which direction?
Are you saying that Ignorance of natural weather patterns and atmospheric physics combined with people knowingly telling lies about condensation trails produce the deluded belief that mass geoengineering via some poorly defined thing called "Chemtrails"is actually a real thing

All I'm saying is that Trump will end the criminal activity of unilateral geoengineering: http://chronicle.su/2017/01/16/trump-promises-end-of-chemtrails/

I think that news story is not correct. If it is, shame on Donald. But, I don't see any of the tweets ascribed to him in his feed...

smart · « **Reply #42 on:** 20/01/2017 21:04:31 »

Quote from: chiralSPO on 20/01/2017 02:58:29

I think that news story is not correct. If it is, shame on Donald. But, I don't see any of the tweets ascribed to him in his feed...

Why would this be a shame for Trump? I guess Twitter thought police just deleted the tweets...

chiralSPO · « **Reply #43 on:** 20/01/2017 22:28:54 »

Quote from: tkadm30 on 20/01/2017 21:04:31

Quote from: chiralSPO on 20/01/2017 02:58:29
I think that news story is not correct. If it is, shame on Donald. But, I don't see any of the tweets ascribed to him in his feed...

Why would this be a shame for Trump? I guess Twitter thought police just deleted the tweets...

A) twitter police are not censoring the preseident's twitter feed.

B) The tweets, if true, would be shameful for any POTUS for many reasons. If these reasons are not obvious to you, I won't waste my time pointing them out...

Janus · « **Reply #44 on:** 20/01/2017 22:40:54 »

Quote from: tkadm30 on 20/01/2017 21:04:31

Quote from: chiralSPO on 20/01/2017 02:58:29
I think that news story is not correct. If it is, shame on Donald. But, I don't see any of the tweets ascribed to him in his feed...

Why would this be a shame for Trump?

Because it is the equivalent of promising to stop Pink Unicorn attacks.

smart · « **Reply #45 on:** 25/01/2017 11:36:04 »

The sky is pink. (not blue)

Disinformation is futile, but truth is incontrovertible...

Bored chemist · « **Reply #46 on:** 25/01/2017 20:00:33 »

Quote from: tkadm30 on 25/01/2017 11:36:04

Disinformation is futile,

So, why do you keep at it?

Pseudoscience-is-malarkey · « **Reply #47 on:** 28/01/2017 06:04:59 »

Hopefully that it is all nonsense. The world needs less conspiracy theorists... What a monumental waste of space that lot.

ohlala · « **Reply #48 on:** 30/01/2017 12:34:38 »

He wouldnt even know what you're talking about. Wouldn't stop him from vomitting out random words though.

Bored chemist · « **Reply #49 on:** 30/01/2017 21:43:26 »

Quote from: ohlala on 30/01/2017 12:34:38

He wouldnt even know what you're talking about. Wouldn't stop him from vomitting out random words though.

What's the odds for him blaming immigrants and/ or women then proposing to build a wall round the airports?

Jolly · « **Reply #50 on:** 31/01/2017 21:14:07 »

Quote from: tkadm30 on 20/07/2016 13:19:11

Clandestine geoengineering activity seems to have intensified since Bush/Obama were elected. What do you think Trump is going to do? Is a reform of the CIA possible to prohibit geoengineering?

Apparently Trump is a Big Alex Jones fan and a 9-11 truther- So maybe he also believes in the whole chemtrial thingy(whatever that is); But, I doubt he´ll be able to do that much about the CIA, he might try, it was afterall the CIA that drove the Russian hacking story. But that is all basically because too many big military corporations and the CIA also have a vested interests in keeping tencions between Russia and America high, so they can sell arms to Poland along with the other nations in the area.

All in all I have no idea what Trump will do about chemtrials or the CIA involvement in it- if there even is any: Surely it would be the Air force more then the CIA. JFK tried to destroy the CIA, but I dont think Trump will.

Jolly · « **Reply #51 on:** 31/01/2017 21:39:40 »

Alex Jones on Trump apparently maybe yeah, but Alex does now have a contract to sell pentagon stuff

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lZaD-H_j3pU

yor_on · « **Reply #52 on:** 02/02/2017 14:44:09 »

Hmm, probably that it is the Chinese doing it, or thug-backs, Could be Mexicans though? Maybe women? Mexican Women? With Chinese ancestors?
=

Glad you asked btw, been on my mind too.

Jolly · « **Reply #53 on:** 04/02/2017 02:31:58 »

Quote from: tkadm30 on 20/07/2016 13:19:11

Clandestine geoengineering activity seems to have intensified since Bush/Obama were elected. What do you think Trump is going to do? Is a reform of the CIA possible to prohibit geoengineering?

They had this very discussion:- Alex Jones on the Joe show
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yhueGQHTU-o

Bored chemist · « **Reply #54 on:** 05/02/2017 13:58:21 »

Quote from: Jolly on 04/02/2017 02:31:58

Quote from: tkadm30 on 20/07/2016 13:19:11
Clandestine geoengineering activity seems to have intensified since Bush/Obama were elected. What do you think Trump is going to do? Is a reform of the CIA possible to prohibit geoengineering?

They had this very discussion:- Alex Jones on the Joe show
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yhueGQHTU-o

That's not a discussion, it's a rant.
There doesn't seem to be any actual evidence involved- just some DJ's uninformed opinion.

Until someone actually shows that there is any actual geoengineering happening, there's no real point in this thread.
Trump's opinion of it will be the same as it is of everything else: "Can I get votes out of this?"

Jolly · « **Reply #55 on:** 07/02/2017 22:41:57 »

Quote from: Bored chemist on 05/02/2017 13:58:21

Quote from: Jolly on 04/02/2017 02:31:58
Quote from: tkadm30 on 20/07/2016 13:19:11
Clandestine geoengineering activity seems to have intensified since Bush/Obama were elected. What do you think Trump is going to do? Is a reform of the CIA possible to prohibit geoengineering?

They had this very discussion:- Alex Jones on the Joe show
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yhueGQHTU-o
That's not a discussion, it's a rant.
There doesn't seem to be any actual evidence involved- just some DJ's uninformed opinion.

Until someone actually shows that there is any actual geoengineering happening, there's no real point in this thread.
Trump's opinion of it will be the same as it is of everything else: "Can I get votes out of this?"

there is no rant there.

This is a RANT https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oGgN-uk5o9w

Although I perfer this one:-

Bored chemist · « **Reply #56 on:** 20/02/2017 21:50:24 »

Trump probably thinks chemtrails invaded Sweden.

Jolly · « **Reply #57 on:** 21/02/2017 00:10:32 »

Quote from: Bored chemist on 20/02/2017 21:50:24

Trump probably thinks chemtrails invaded Sweden.

smart · « **Reply #58 on:** 26/02/2017 22:05:27 »

If the POTUS doesn't address the geoengineering (chemtrails) issue, it basically means he doesn't have the power to stop it or is not willing to.

Bored chemist · « **Reply #59 on:** 27/02/2017 21:10:41 »

Quote from: tkadm30 on 26/02/2017 22:05:27

If the POTUS doesn't address the geoengineering (chemtrails) issue, it basically means he doesn't have the power to stop it or is not willing to.

Or even Trump isn't stupid enough to believe in it.
I remind you that you have yet to provide any actual evidence that it happens .

What is Trump's opinion about chemtrails?

smart (OP)

smart (OP)

smart (OP)

smart (OP)