0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Can anyone tell me what is wrong with the concept of quantum foam inflow, why is it not taken seriously.
2) Dark Energy driving the expansion of space and gravity driving the contraction of space is directly due to quantum fluctuations.
Sorry, not had much spare time recently so havenít replied on your question.
Cahill assumes an absolute motion of earth in space, which he claims to have detected and measured, and this is disputed.
He claims MM experiment did detect absolute motion but the small fringes were ignored as noise. Repeats of the experiment using modern, more accurate equipment and vacuum have shown no fringes.
He requires speed of gravity to be far greater than speed of light which doesnít align with current measurements.
He claims to have detected absolute motion of earth relative to space with zener diodes. Attempts to replicate this have failed and suggest he was seeing effect of local em interference.
The maths in his paper has been heavily criticised.
He claims that the basic tenets of relativity are incorrect:
In other words, he doesnít have a lot of street cred.
neither agreeing nor disagreeing just quoting a few of the ones mentioned in conversations around the community.
Could we exist in a wormhole which is expanding in all directions of space time?
Quote from: dead cat on 27/06/2018 19:05:30Could we exist in a wormhole which is expanding in all directions of space time?In my paper mentioned above I have shown we are evolving between two event horizons where time seems to stop due to time dilation. One at ~13.9+ Gly and the other at the event horizon of the MECO at the center of the galaxy.There is no Dark Energy and the continuum is not expanding. It is just time dilation in both directions, the one we are leaving behind, and the one we are evolving towards.
Space time is observed to be expanding so I do think you may be barking up the wrong tree in an expanding universe.
I neither agree or disagree with him either, but do note others seem to be barking(mad) up the same tree.
these Ďothersí are offering reasoned arguments that are not full of holes
I think Captcass above mentioned we could exist in a wormhole between the event horizon of a primordial BH and a WH.
Quote from: dead cat on 05/07/2018 17:52:20I think Captcass above mentioned we could exist in a wormhole between the event horizon of a primordial BH and a WH. No. In my paper I say we exist in an eternally evolving continuum that appears to exist between two event horizons where time appears to stop due to time dilation. Looking outward the dilation is created by the 2.2686*10-18 s/s acceleration in proper time we all experience in our inertial frames. Looking inward towards the MECO (black hole) at the center of the galaxy the dilation is due to apparent mass accretion. I do not mention, nor do I believe in, "White Holes".
What constitutes your event horizons in your paper. EFE's indicate a BH could produce a WH, do you disagree with this part of the EFE's.
1) Space is a substance which expands and contracts continuously. This expansion and contraction of space is due to quantum fluctuations constantly appearing and disappearing.
The existence of Space is dependent on the existence of matter and quantum fluctuations without which space would not exist.
2) Dark Energy driving the expansion of space and gravity driving the contraction of space is directly due to quantum fluctuations. Would anyone agree or disagree completely with the above statements or agree in part?
In support of the ideas above the following links may cast some light as to where my ideas grew from.https://arxiv.org/pdf/physics/0309016.pdf Quantum foam inflow gravity.https://futurism.com/new-explanation-dark-energy-tiny-fluctuations-time-space/Can anyone tell me what is wrong with the concept of quantum foam inflow, why is it not taken seriously.
In the OP I referred to quantum inflow gravity by R Cahill, I gave a link to his paper, I have found this link refuting his claims https://arxiv.org/pdf/gr-qc/0407059.pdf.However various inflow concepts are persued by many other people.
Just an update;...Three months ago the Editor in Chief agreed to publish the paper. The hold up is on how. As you can imagine, there is a lot of controversy. Bangers are having a hard time with concepts in time.....There are now 2 individuals supporting it and 2 not.......the 2 not did not provide demonstrable reasons why it does not work. It went back, I understand, to them, and perhaps to more, to see if anyone could find a demonstrable way to disprove it.As I say, it has now been 3 months since then......I am encouraged in that 3 months have now passed, regardless of the number of reviewers.....I would remind readers of the current online version to just replace MECOs for black holes (https://arxiv.org/abs/0806.1748) and understand that I also specify in the final, journal, version that the forces at the center of a spherical dilation pit translate the kinetic energy created by dilation into thermal energy.The link, again, is: http://vixra.org/abs/1804.0109This version now has 99 downloads.Thanks again for being patient.