1

New Theories / Why new rocks mean they just cooled?

« on: 30/04/2012 12:17:37 »

Hi,

To judge the age of a rock radio decay method is used, look at how much of uranium for instance has decayed, getting the half life of these minerals age of a rock or body of rocks could be guessed.

So it is assumed that when rock formed from liquid magma state to solid rock state, it started decaying.

Problem is heat does not slow down the decay process, thus either the results are all wrong, there is another reason or decay does slow down when temperature is increased.

Any suggestions?

2

New Theories / Speed of gravity

« on: 29/03/2012 11:05:09 »

Gravity could be defined as field, now some people want to define as wave but I personally don't see it as wave as wave push rather than pull for no apparent reason.

Looking at the rate of expansion on two sides of universe the side where we are moving toward and side where we have moved from, if there is a difference.

Assuming our galaxy as i
Galaxy toward the middle (where we are expanding from) as a
Galaxy toward the event horizon (where we are expanding to) as b.

if rate of expansion = b>i>a than we know the expansion rate and find the speed of gravity.

In case there is no difference and all galaxies expanding at exactly same acceleration (which isn't possible) we could denote that gravity is instantaneous.

Thus difference in acceleration of different galaxies would give us the speed of gravity.

Comments please.

3

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / How much energy is released from an atom of hydrogen?

« on: 28/03/2012 22:54:38 »

How much energy is released from a from a single Hydrogen atom in a Thermonuclear blast?

I tried internet and am totally tired of searching because I couldn't find anything, maybe I don't know how to search properly.

Thanks for help guys.

4

New Theories / Best thing that ever happened to me.

« on: 27/03/2012 20:18:14 »

I have a theory like everyone else here but my problem is I'm not a good mathematician, which is a problem because I'm unable to define my theories in numbers even though I think the idea is good but if it doesn't have backing of math its as good as pointless.

Trust me this is the best thing that has ever happened to me, maybe you guys already know but you should try this... if you don't.

http://creativemachines.cornell.edu/eureqa_download

You put in the result and it will make an equation for you... my dream come true, its not perfect, have to tweak it a bit when it gives final product but trust me its amazing...

Loving it already working on my first equation, it will take few days for it to calculate but I'm in Love...

5

New Theories / Faster than speed of light

« on: 26/03/2012 10:55:58 »

Its just a thought but speed of light is constant this is why its denoted by C.

Lets look at a black hole, can't escape the gravitation pull of black hole because its speed is not enough to escape event horizon.

We don't have information on how much time it takes for light to slow down to speed of 0 and we don't even know the distance it travels before it hits that speed. Now lots of people here would start shouting with speed of light being 0 but in case you want to shout you have to give a "logic" reason why it doesn't escape.

Well that isn't the question, assuming a body moves into a black hole before it hits event horizon its speed might be X, which is less than C but when it hits the point where light was emitted from its speed will be X+C, that is more than speed of light.

I do not see terminal velocities in a black hole because of heat everything is plasma and light could have originated at a point where there is no effect of terminal velocities.

Thus question is does matter in Black hole travels faster than speed of light?

6

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / What makes an atom an atom?

« on: 20/03/2012 08:30:00 »

Its funny that if you change the number of electrons in an atom it becomes an ion.

But if you change number of neutrons it becomes an isotope.

That means only thing that determines atom to be of certain type is proton, but neutron is actually a collapsed proton with electron, how come it doesn't make changes in the structure of the atom?

7

New Theories / Alternative description of atomic structure

« on: 12/03/2012 11:35:16 »

Alternative description of atomic structure.

Current description of atom is bit overwhelming, it has lots of components starting with some basic particles Proton, Neutron and Electron. The structure answers lots of things from very basic thing like periodic table to complex things like how molecules are formed, it doesn’t seem wrong but problem is as soon as you step into complication like Quantum Mechanics it has dual nature of electron, standard model says it is made up of simpler particles like quarks, it simply gets confusing when you apply a mathematical theory behind it that has so many constants that you could change anything and get any answer. People who work with this theory might feel bad when I say this but seriously it doesn’t make sense as a theory where you could plug in your numbers and get an answer, unless we are missing something. Well the point goes against me as well when I say its complex and doesn’t make sense because they could say, “You do not understand it”. Maybe they are right, I don’t understand it this is why I find it complex and insensible.

But I am giving my simpler explanation of things, I’m a simple person and I understand things in simpler way or maybe its just time, Bohr understood electrons like particles going around the proton (in case of hydrogen) and I understand it as a different thing. This is just another explanation of how things could be in reality as we haven’t figured out any right way yet, I have a chance of putting my 2 cents in it.

First thing that doesn’t make sense is consistency, what do I mean by that? It means the size of proton, neutron and electron are same, their charges are same, but nature does not give integers, a rock is not same as another rock, if you pick up two stones they look different have different shapes and are nothing alike. Than why on Quantum level things change that only 3 quarks make up proton? It doesn’t even make sense, that means all quarks are same size, that is not what nature is habituated in giving us integers or numbers. So I can’t understand why 3 quarks would make up a proton or 1 proton would make up hydrogen, it simply doesn’t make sense.

So what do I propose? Lets not confuse ourselves over this and propose that protons (word proton is only use for our understanding) are made up of smaller particles that have no minimum size, they could be as small as they could get and they are everywhere, lets call it dark matter for reference or actually. I call them matter particles because I like to call them something that make sense matter particles make up matter, sounds good enough.

But there is a problem, if matter particle (Dark matter) could form higher particles (like protons), why in the world they are free in the middle of no where and not forming particles? Hmm true, so lets add another thing, energy. Well I thought energy was matter, we know that E=MC², that is perfectly fine the formula is true but its talking about amount of energy that could reside in a given amount of atom multiplied by speed of light raise to two, it doesn’t need to say that energy equals to mass. Thus energy is separate from mass, they are totally different things, yes mass or matter particles in our case need energy to form higher level particles but energy cannot be formed or created in the universe that is filled up with dark matter as it would not convert to energy, i.e. energy and matter are two separate things.

So fine if we take energy and matter as two different form, how does that help?

First of all we got ride of integers and secondly now we could imagine atom in a totally different way. So lets put the rules here first, matter + energy = atom.

But that really doesn’t explain electron are electrons energy? No, electron is a field, its neither wave or particle, it’s a simple field of charge created when matter particles and energy comes together. Let me try to give you what’s in my mind, energy is like water that is able to attract matter (which is like dust), thus forming clay, more dust you put onto it, it will accept but at a point it’ll not be able to hold the dust and atom would decay.

So if M>E than we have decay.

In case you put more water on this dust it has to lose the extra water (now for sure water example doesn’t do it any justice but it has to do) to surrounding balls of clay, but in case you still put more water it will radiate as some kind of energy.

Thus, if E>M than we have radiation.

So basically we got ride of not only Integers but also of strong and weak forces as decay could easily be explained.

Prediction: At 0 Deg K, everything will decay much faster, increasing the temperature should slow down its decay, because more energy you put in more particles like dust could it hold, that means at point of radiation things would not decay or decay very slowly.

Now for sure above prediction is not in line with current theories but it says what it says, I’m sure you people have google and could find the right answer.

So what is electron? Electron is a field generated by the amount of energy in an atom, so if you increase the amount of energy the negative field would get larger and if you decrease the amount of energy it would get lower.

Thus formation of light (waves), yes I do not consider light as particle or photon not only because it doesn’t make sense but there is no method to show its production, i.e. there is no mechanism that shows how light could be produced as photon if electron field jumps from higher to lower orbit. But yes if same electron field moves from higher level to lower level it would radiate light as a wave.

Thus this is how atom in my theory looks like, you people are first of all the smart people I have put my theory across, till now I talked about this to people who don’t understand anything about science and I want people to hear me and tell me if I’m wrong.

Though I was writing about “atomic charge time” a concept in my theory that explains why we have “photo electric effect” and explaining the same with wave phenomenon, I stopped writing it and wrote this because people I’m going to talk to first should understand what I’m talking about before my assumptions and why I assume like that.

You are welcome to question me on this, I know I could be totally wrong but for the time being this is what makes sense to me and if I could learn from my mistakes than great.

This surely is a big paper and I’m expecting your comments on it even though I’m scared to read them because I still have to get used to the fact of being rejected.

8

New Theories / Why when things are heated they become lighter?

« on: 05/03/2012 09:13:33 »

Before you answer please read below, I know that when any gas is heated the density for it changes, the density get lower that means area it occupies gets more and because of its density it gets lighter and goes upward.

Great but problem is why less dense objects are lighter? For instance...

E=MC² so M=E/C²

Thus more energy you increase (by heating something) more massive it gets, if its more massive than it should have more gravitational pull because matter with higher mass have more gravitational pull, but it doesn't work.

Why? Why higher energy object have less gravitational pull if we consider gravitational pull is directly proportional to mass than it would mean heating something would make it less massive? Does it mean higher energy level electrons are less massive?

Or does it mean energy and matter are not proportional?

9

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / How is light produced from an atom?

« on: 27/02/2012 07:03:50 »

I would really want to know how is light produced from an atom, for instance Hydrogen, if we heat hydrogen and it starts glowing it gives off light. Energy converted from heat to light.

I know that when energy is put in the system it excites electron and it jumps to higher orbit than it loses energy and moves back to lower orbit releasing a photon, I couldn't find information about how is that photon is produced. A mechanism, a process please. Not some magical reason for production of photon. There is no mechanism in electron jumping that could produce a photon, doesn't make sense to me.

Thanks



Mod edit - I've formatted the subject as a question, to help keep the forum tidy and easy to navigate.

10

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Earth Gravity anomaly

« on: 23/02/2012 15:32:55 »

Earth gravitational anomaly is a physical problem where gravity of the earth is different in different places, some think they have the answer while others think it doesn't answer completely.