21

New Theories / New Theory: Can more than one electric items together generate electromagnetic radiation?

« on: 28/08/2019 23:52:05 »

"When you have an electrified particle that moves, it generates electromagnetic radiation."

Only under certain conditions.  Most particles move without radiating.  A field......is NOT radiation.

The M field of current is field alignment, not radiation.

"If you have a bunch of electrified particles moving with different charges and that altogether have neutral charge, will this still generate electromagnetic radiation?"

Yes........it is how an antenna element radiates.  The mechanics of this is unknown to modern science.

Modern science does not know how to measure the velocity of EM, because they don't know when to start the clock.  And they assume that the emission duration is the same as the absorption duration.  This is false.

It also depends on your reasoning outlook.  If a constant velocity bullet is coming at you at 1000 meters a second, and you are moving towards/away from the direction of bullet at 200 meters a second, does the velocity of the bullet change?  Your movement affects the duration of the bullet's velocity, not the bullet's velocity.  The period changes, not the velocity.

22

New Theories / Equivalence Principle

« on: 12/08/2019 01:31:42 »

I think there is a difference. between a windowless room and a spacecraft.  Arrange two clocks in line with the suspected force.  If the clocks have different rates...it's gravity and if the clocks are equal, it's a rocket ship out in space.

The problem occurs when the rocket ship flies thru a gravity field.  In this case, rotate two clocks across a diameter horizontally. And two clocks rotating in a vertical diameter.  Comparing clock rates and clock rotational position, should indicate the strength and direction of a gravity field.

23

New Theories / What is Mankind's Greatest Tool?

« on: 27/07/2019 02:08:49 »

Man's first and greatest tool.......a sharpened stick.  A stick with a pointy end.

For thousands of years, men have pointed their sharp sticks to the dark skies.

They have measured the direction, the angle and the time, to the light spots in the night sky.

And for the light spots that moved........everyone's pointy sticks showed that these moving lights traveled in a elliptic path around the sun.  Every one of them.

So, being good scientists, they started to mathematically study ellipses.  Have you ever done this....mathematically study an ellipse?  Some think that an ellipse is a simple thing, but they are not.  And with further close study, the planet ellipses are not perfect, they have small deviations, which are explained as anomalies.....external gravitational effects.

I would like to propose an alternate solution to an elliptical orbital path.  I believe this THIS is the way that nature makes an ellipse.

Mathematically an ellipse has two centers, or origins.  I believe that these two centers are located in the wrong position.  And I also believe that these two origins are perpendicular to each other.  AND, that one of the origins is moving.

So, to construct a natural ellipse, first draw the Main origin.  Will we use the center of the sun for this, but we need one more condition.  The radius that comes from the main origin(sun) can only swing in the sun's equatorial plane.  So take the average distance from the sun(we will use 93 million miles), and draw a center line around the sun at 93 M miles on the sun's plane.  Now, go to that center line, that center line, now becomes, the origin of the second circle of the ellipse.  Attach another radius the the center line.  This radius is about 1.5 millions miles long.  This radius is perpendicular the the first radius.  So, what we have is a radius of 93 M miles((R1) and another radius of 1.5 M miles(R2).  Again, these radii swing/sweep perpendicular to each other.

The real magic of this, is the rotational ratios.  For every one rotation of R1, we have one rotation of R2.

If we stand on the center line, and follow the earth around the sun for a year......the earth will rotate at a 1.5Mmile R from that center line one time.  So the earth's first rotation has a R of 1.5 M miles, which takes one year, and the earth's second rotation has a R of 93 M miles and takes one year.  Catty corner rotations.

So, a planetary orbit has TWO rotations.  And one origin is static and the other origin is moving.  The orbit is actually a CLOSED(circular) HELICAL path.  With a pitch of 1.

BUT.....if you look at the orbit from on top the sun, the path will APPEAR to be an ellipse......but in reality, it is a helix.   If we change the length of R2........we can vary the apparent flatness of the ellipse.  But as long as the rotational ratio remains at 1 to 1......it will appear as a ellipse.  Also.......the length of R2.....determines the inclination from the sun's equatorial plane.  AND the flatness of the "ellipse"........which really isn't there.

You can find the R2 of any planet.  Just take the perigee and subtract it from the apogee....this gives the diameter of the first R2 rotation.  Divide that by 2 for the R2 radius.

The other thing to consider is this.........all of the gravitational theories have to satisfy this elliptical path.........which is not there.


Nature's ellipse is much more elegant.  What a beautiful motion.