0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I have tried in vein to have conversation and to make corrections to science where it is incorrect.
Quote from: Thebox on 26/08/2017 14:07:54I have tried in vein to have conversation and to make corrections to science where it is incorrect.The problem has been and always shall be that you're always wrong since you don't know what you're talking about. I've tried in vain to persuade you to first learn the material that you're claiming is wrong before you decide that its wrong. In all cases you've claimed something is wrong based solely on your lack of understanding the physics. Your response has always been that you're right, its the world that's wrong and you "refuse to learn material that is wrong to prove that its wrong" which is the worst conceivable mistake a person can make. E.g. you can't tell a checkout girl at the supermarket that she gave you the wrong change unless you first learn arithmetic.Until then nobody on Earth will take you seriously. Especially when you misuse terms like "cult". Nobody here is so dumb as to listen to you.
Quote from: Kryptid on 13/03/2018 20:46:36Quote from: Thebox on 13/03/2018 14:24:43We were having a lovely conversation. Pleased define new theory or new ideas to me? There is no point in the section if I am going to get it locked for no reason. It wasn't your physics concepts that were the problem. The problem was in the form of inflammatory responses such as saying that Bored Chemist was "full of "beans"", "funny and deluded", that his "subjective opinion is not needed or welcome", calling yourself a "better scientist" than him and that "Einstein was an idiot".Now you explained it like that, looking back, I was not very nice and apologise to Mr C, I am getting insulted elsewhere and wrongly took it out on Mr C, my sincere apologies. c I do not understand why he keeps replying nonsense to everything when I try to be strictly objective. Anyway thanks ...
Quote from: Thebox on 13/03/2018 14:24:43We were having a lovely conversation. Pleased define new theory or new ideas to me? There is no point in the section if I am going to get it locked for no reason. It wasn't your physics concepts that were the problem. The problem was in the form of inflammatory responses such as saying that Bored Chemist was "full of "beans"", "funny and deluded", that his "subjective opinion is not needed or welcome", calling yourself a "better scientist" than him and that "Einstein was an idiot".
We were having a lovely conversation. Pleased define new theory or new ideas to me? There is no point in the section if I am going to get it locked for no reason.
1 + 1 = 1
when I try to be strictly objective.
What I'm trying to do is to ensure that anti-scientific nonsense posted here is challenged.
So you are saying that if people do not agree with science and have new ideas, it is all nonsense?
Quote from: Thebox on 14/04/2018 15:01:40So you are saying that if people do not agree with science and have new ideas, it is all nonsense? No.I am saying that things which clearly do not make sense are not science.
If something is not making sense to you, do you think this could just be you do not understand the thing that is not making sense to you?
Quote from: Thebox on 14/04/2018 15:15:50If something is not making sense to you, do you think this could just be you do not understand the thing that is not making sense to you? While you're gone, please try learning how to write in English properly, dear physchotic professor... tk
When you have gone perhaps you should try some maintenance on your neurological networking skills . I think your processor is malfunctioning . Personal message : You can't break that which is already broken as with your poor use of single spacing when you're writing . Additionally I think you may have Schizophrenia and should consult a doctor .
physchotic