Naked Science Forum
Non Life Sciences => Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology => Topic started by: syhprum on 27/01/2011 11:04:30
-
E-ELT is a proposed 42m telescope due to be constructed in Brazil (I remember as a boy wondering if the Hale 200" would ever be completed)
An excellent article here lists the technical problems and observing strategy here.
http://www.eso.org/sci/facilities/eelt/science/doc/drm_report.pdf
-
does that Acronym stand for European Excessively Large Telescope? ...Enviably Large, Enormously large, Elephantine Lens...
I must admit I have never understood the physics of why we cannot use a myriad of small mirrors bolted together. I have three aluminium discs on my desk that are manufactured to an incredibly low error tolerance and yet they are mass produced and fairly cheap (HDD platers - now used as coasters).
I will read that ESO prgramme with interest - thanks
-
Whew...
A big "summary" for a big telescope.
I suppose I must ask if there is a large benefit of having 100 off-axis mirrors pointed towards a single photo receptor versus having an array of a hundred telescopes each with their own photoreceptors, and able to be focused either together, or independently.
A distributed array wouldn't have to be located at the same site either.
-
The advantage of the large single mirror is sensitivity multiple telescopes can offer advantages of resolution although separation distance are limited compared with radio telescopes because of phase stability requirements.
-
does that Acronym stand for European Excessively Large Telescope? ...Enviably Large, Enormously large, Elephantine Lens...
I must admit I have never understood the physics of why we cannot use a myriad of small mirrors bolted together. I have three aluminium discs on my desk that are manufactured to an incredibly low error tolerance and yet they are mass produced and fairly cheap (HDD platers - now used as coasters).
I will read that ESO prgramme with interest - thanks
Imagine bolting lots of them together. The thickness of the composite disk would be the same, but the weight and length would be bigger. It would be too floppy.