0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
one of the basic principles of nature is that the movement is always from the positive to the negative
Quote from: Mitko Gorgiev on 09/12/2019 20:26:20one of the basic principles of nature is that the movement is always from the positive to the negative That logical fallacy is called "begging the question".Also...//www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2G6M3cYJZsshows you are wrong.
So, my assumption is that the paddle wheel is moved by the EM-vortex from below, not from above.
I cannot speak of something which I haven’t experimented with,
The assertion that every TV or oscilloscope uses a cathode ray tube of some sort is about 10 years out of date they have long since been superseded.
But, we know that (in the absence of a magnetic or electrostatic field) the electrons travel in straight lines.
The bottle in the YouTube video, linked in my original post, shows something completely different.
Are you ready to bet with me on this?I am ready.
Quote from: Mitko Gorgiev on 02/02/2020 22:48:58The bottle in the YouTube video, linked in my original post, shows something completely different. Yes.Because it contains low pressure gas (presumably air)The air molecules and ions are thousands of times heavier than the electrons and knock the electrons off course .
Quote from: Mitko Gorgiev on 02/02/2020 22:48:58Are you ready to bet with me on this?I am ready.I'm not taking your money, but feel free to continue to make a fool of yourself.
Quote from: Bored chemist on 03/02/2020 07:19:44Quote from: Mitko Gorgiev on 02/02/2020 22:48:58The bottle in the YouTube video, linked in my original post, shows something completely different. Yes.Because it contains low pressure gas (presumably air)The air molecules and ions are thousands of times heavier than the electrons and knock the electrons off course .So, let's take a more powerful vacuum pump and let's pump the air fully out of the bottle. I claim that nothing will change in respect to the form of the beam. Will you bet with me on this?And please, take my money this time.
Quote from: Mitko Gorgiev on 12/02/2020 18:40:54Quote from: Bored chemist on 03/02/2020 07:19:44Quote from: Mitko Gorgiev on 02/02/2020 22:48:58The bottle in the YouTube video, linked in my original post, shows something completely different. Yes.Because it contains low pressure gas (presumably air)The air molecules and ions are thousands of times heavier than the electrons and knock the electrons off course .So, let's take a more powerful vacuum pump and let's pump the air fully out of the bottle. I claim that nothing will change in respect to the form of the beam. Will you bet with me on this?And please, take my money this time.Please send the money to a charity of your choice.The experiment was already done many times including here.https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=78247.msg588857#msg588857And also, as I pointed out, in CRTs and electron microscopes.
How would an electron flying through space "know" where the walls of the container are in order to change path?
Do you really think that water is the same as a vacuum?It's easy to see how the water molecules can press on eachother and convey a force from the side of the glass to the tornado.But you are making the absurd claim that empty space can somehow do that.
It is full of electricity.