The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Profile of CPT ArkAngel
  3. Show Posts
  4. Topics
  • Profile Info
    • Summary
    • Show Stats
    • Show Posts
      • Messages
      • Topics
      • Attachments
      • Thanked Posts
      • Posts Thanked By User
    • Show User Topics
      • User Created
      • User Participated In

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

  • Messages
  • Topics
  • Attachments
  • Thanked Posts
  • Posts Thanked By User

Topics - CPT ArkAngel

Pages: [1]
1
New Theories / Did the universe begin life inside a black hole? or MC Squared theory.
« on: 06/02/2021 02:18:17 »
Note: This topic was split off from: https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=81590.0 Did the universe begin life inside a black hole? - moderator.

If the Universe was inside a black hole, it was the black hole itself, whatever a black hole is.

My two cents theory:

All black holes inside the Universe are rotating. In a black hole, matter is organized in a very simplified way, information is conserved in an equivalent of folding. There is matter, which is spacetime itself, from the inner horizon up to the outer horizon. Only when all the Universe forms a single black hole, the inner horizon vanishes The black hole stops rotating and we get a singularity of the Higgs field. There is no singularity of the EM field nor of the gravitational field. Every bit of information is its own center and its singularity, and it is connected with every other bits of the Universe in a kind of causal set, only once with the EM field and also only once with the gravitational field. The Higgs field produces a flat space with a finite horizon but your horizon is unreachable because it moves with you while it is expanding or contracting. Asymmetries are the fundamentals. There is an unstable quasi-static black hole at both ends. Time has only one direction.

Inflation doesn't need a special energy, it is caused by the gravitational blue shift of massive particles vs the expansion of the surrounding vacuum energy in an early phase. The speed of light is constant everywhere. Time is absolute but the passage of time is relative. This is the wavelength that is changing. You must take account of the expanding horizon to solve special relativity.

Elementary particles are spinors of EM spacetime intersecting the gravitational spacetime. All elementary particles have an electric charge, including the neutrinos. Neutrinos wavelength oscillates near more massive particles and they only interact at three specific wavelengths (the value of the electric charge oscillates and they become virtually interactionless). The electron tunnel effect is the same mechanism... Dirac wins.

The expansion may be represented by a lagging gravitational field behind the EM field. Matter is positively charged when highly compressed because the electron wavelength is longer than those of the proton constituents. As the Universe is cyclical, you need a negatively charged counterpart which should have its own Higgs. This counterpart is also related to the second and third families of particles through the W and Z bosons. This is Dark Matter. Dark matter only interacts with ordinary matter in the EM spacetime field near the static black hole. The Higgs produces all elementary particles. This is the basic quantization number. Its mass = proton mass divided by the fine structure constant with corrections due to the W and Z. The neutrinos are key parts to understand.

There could be two families of Dark matter with two beautiful Higgs particles. Unfortunately, they are only observables through gravity... In the contrary, why would the second and third families be unstable? At what point the second and third families become stable bits of information and why? Where the multiple Higgs meet each other.

Every time an experiment verifies entanglement relations it is also a demonstration of the Higgs field. Remember that the Higgs field is faster than light, which means it is a synchronization field, not an energy field. All particles of the Universe are entangled (at least for each individual type of matter-DM) in a complex quantized relation, which means detectors are a key part of the solution.

The volume of the Universe is proportional to the number of particles in it. If there is no new particle produced, the Universe collapse. This includes gravitons, that's why it is the volume and not the surface... The Universe must reach a maximum size because there are no infinities...!!!

Gluons are gravitons. A graviton is made of two gluons because it is a dual relation.


2
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Was the Casimir effect observed with charged plates?
« on: 18/12/2013 23:13:15 »
Does anyone know if the Casimir experiment was made with charged plates (-+ and ++ or --)?

If so, what was the result?

3
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / What's the difference between grav. waves and tidal effect?
« on: 14/05/2013 00:21:35 »
How to differentiate gravitational waves from tidal effects?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_wave

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tidal_force

Its seems to be the same effect, isn't it?

4
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Could transverse velocities explain anomalous ultra red shifted galaxies?
« on: 23/08/2012 02:06:41 »
Could transverse relativistic velocities explain anomalous ultra red shifted galaxies?

The relativistic transverse doppler effect produces a red shift. Thus any relativistic transverse component of velocity will produce a higher red shift!

What do you think?




5
General Science / Have you heard of the Alien Hand Syndrome?
« on: 15/12/2011 19:07:44 »
A strange consequence of brain damage disconnecting some flow of information between the two hemispheres. Very interesting...

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-12225163

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alien_hand_syndrome

Do we all have a double personality?

Prior to this post, i was watching a TV program about this syndrome. They said that the alien personality is unconscious because it lacks any form of cognitive language...

6
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Is the universe endless?
« on: 03/09/2011 07:50:55 »

Is the universe endless?

What i know is that if it is, it will take an infinite time to learn about it.  [:D]

7
The Environment / Do you still believe climate change is not mainly due to mankind?
« on: 07/07/2011 04:56:44 »
Science under attack, this is the title of a documentary made by the president of the Royal Society, sir Paul Nurse. Everyone should watch this. I think it is an honest point of view.

http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/science-under-attack/

About GM food, the main problem i see is the behaviour of some large companies in the way they promote their products, not on the GM food in itself, unless it is not properly tested...

8
New Theories / What shape is the electron New Theory Corollary?
« on: 06/07/2011 11:07:14 »
Sorry :o)

See my Theory here (specially pages 4 to 6): http://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=34413.0

And read my posts here: http://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=39757.0

In very short, the HUP (uncertainty principle) is caused by:

A- Entanglement between all elementary particles of the universe (1st level=50%, 2nd=25%, 3rd=12.5%, ...);
 +
B- the electric charge is equally the mass charge, it always propagates at the speed of light;
 +
C- an elementary particles possess an angular momentum of h/2π and a spin of 1/2.

The whole universe is totally causal excepted, probably, living entities, naturally... This would be the cause of evolution... [;D]


9
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Is there any experiment showing anti-neutron without a doubt?
« on: 16/05/2011 01:51:32 »
I am searching a proof of the existence of the anti-neutron but i can't find anything really convincing.

A neutron seen upside down looks like an anti-neutron (looking at its magnetic moment).

Does the anti-neutron beta decay have been observed with its anti-proton and positron?

10
New Theories / If we are in a holographic world, what would be the implications?
« on: 03/04/2011 08:52:33 »
If we are in a holographic world, what it would imply according to you? What would it mean?

11
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Have antiquarks been observed?
« on: 10/12/2010 01:41:22 »
Have antiquarks been observed?

Quarks have a very short life. How do they end their life?

12
New Theories / Could the photon be the sole elementary particle?
« on: 09/10/2010 01:41:22 »
taken partly from another of my post:

A quantum of light (a photon), may possess an infinitesimal energy and always travel at C in vacuum.

Matter can be convert into light and light into Matter. There is a working wave model for particles in Quantum theory.

Light is a very simple electromagnetic wave. It seems evident that light is the basic building block of everything. For those who would say that the electromagnetic force is not fundamental, i would reply that how can it be if a photon may have an infinitesimal energy?

I know it sounds too easy to be true and it turns everything upside down but it is logical and beautiful...
 
If a photon wave enter a highly curved spacetime region, it could catch its tail: the wave could close on itself. It would stop moving at the speed of light according to outside observers, it would appear to them as a particle and it would even create a gravitational field... You just need curving spacetime and light... Every type of particles and forces could be a question of energy density and relativistic movement (including spinning)with only some quantum states possible (arising from the electromagnetic field)... The same way the magnetic field is a relativistic effect of the electric field, the weak and nuclear force could be a relativistic effects of the electromagnetic field.

Only very high energetic photons (very short wavelength) could create matter and antimatter particles having a nuclear field. Less energetic photons created electrons and other particles, including dark matter, without a nuclear field.

I have been thinking about this for many days now and i don't see any contradiction with existing proved theory that could deny this theory. Only if light travels at a slower speed than C in vacuum and light have a non zero mass (which is possible) i did not find anything wrong, there is always an easy explanation... It even explains gravity...



13
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / all physics formulas
« on: 07/10/2010 06:49:35 »
Here is a link to almost all physics formulas:

http://www.box.net/shared/m1e8xl38ks

You can download it  [:)]
I did not find anything related to black holes  [:(]

14
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Creation of Dark Matter at the BigBang?
« on: 21/09/2010 06:21:19 »
Dark Matter is supposed to interact with gravity and electroweak forces. According to the usual timeline of the first minute after the Big Bang ( http://www.fact-index.com/t/ti/timeline_of_the_big_bang.html ), Matter and Antimatter formed after gravity and the the strong nuclear forces appeared (electroweak force act like the strong nuclear one) (10^-43 to 10^-33 second). The electroweak force appeared (as itself) during the annihilation of Matter and Antimatter (10-^33 to 10^-5).


If Dark Matter was created at the same time as Matter, the electroweak force should have acted like the strong nuclear force, so creating Matter. So it means that Dark Matter was created first, then created Matter and an excess of Dark Matter was left... This excess can only be, if some Dark Matter did not condensed into Matter. But how could it be if it possess an electroweak field acting like a strong nuclear field? And what created Antimatter? Dark Antimatter? If there was Dark Antimatter, where is it now? We should see remnants of it...

Is the momentum of electroweak field for a spinning particle of Matter and Antimatter not absolute but rather relative? If Dark Matter possessed, at its creation, a net positive momentum of the electroweak field,  there would have been a preferential momentum at the Matter-Antimatter creation process. This would explain the asymmetry of Matter vs Antimatter...


Maybe, there is Dark Antimatter with an absolute negative electroweak field momentum... Dark energy... But, in my opinion, Dark Energy should have appeared at time zero in order to start the Big Bang... What do you think?
 

15
The Environment / Is economic growth compatible with keeping a viable environment for humankind?
« on: 19/09/2010 21:31:49 »
Is economic and population growths and keeping a viable environment for humankind incompatible?

I have been thinking about this for a long time. In my knowledge, all governments of the world but Bhutan's compete for economic growth. Technology, knowledge and education are not growing fastly enough to attain a viable resources gathering rate in this context. Shouldn't we be yelling at our governments to stop population growth before it is too late? Is there other solutions? Green energies take much space like solar panels and wind turbines. Most people think that those kinds of energy are just not sufficiently efficient, but if we have more space...? Many people told me that i don't like children and that is why i want to reduce population (i am egocentric) but the truth is, our children (and their children) will have much bigger problems than we have. Moreover, creating economic growth by having more children is totally egocentric because we are counting on future generations to work for us, so we have a better life when we will be old.

About Bhutan's government environmental policies: http://www.undp.org.bt/environment.htm

Mod edit: Please phrase your topic as a question to keep with forum policy.  Thanks!

16
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Does the Sun contain dark matter?
« on: 16/09/2010 01:35:59 »
http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/43718

It's a tremendous challenge to do this experiment i guess... What do you think?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutrino_detector

17
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / center of the universe?
« on: 14/09/2010 00:49:24 »
Does anyone know about people trying to find and observe the coordinate of where the big bang occur? I don't find anything...

18
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Could black holes explain dark matter and dark energy?
« on: 08/09/2010 06:27:03 »
What if black holes have a stronger gravitic field than G  (G is not a constant for a black hole) at a scale of galactic proportion and they have a repulsive anti gravitic field at a larger scale (G is negative)? As black holes become larger, they would cause an acceleration of the expansion of the Universe... 

19
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Does light curves space and time?
« on: 26/08/2010 05:55:16 »
Does light curves space and time?

20
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / interesting question about photons energy and speed measurement
« on: 26/08/2010 04:57:50 »
Photons can be represented entirely as an electromagnetic field vectors in space and time with a unique frequency. This frequency is a measure of its energy. E=hν (h being Planck constant). The frequency is space time dependent (Doppler effect). Hence the photon energy is dependent and uniquely dependent on space time.

(one interesting point is that space time can be define relatively to a photon energy field)

If you travel in a parallel direction  to the photon direction, and accelerate until you reach the speed of light relative to your initial position, the photon energy you measure will increase until it is infinite  (when you travel at C, theoretically speaking because we all know it is an unattainable speed) according to the frequency shift relative to your change in velocity. As your velocity increase, your time measurement decrease until it stop when you reach C. So, if your time measurement decrease, you measure a higher photon frequency.

On the contrary, if you accelerate in the opposite direction to the photon direction, the photon energy you will measure will decrease until it reaches zero at the moment you travel at the speed of light relative to your initial position.

My question is: is there an accelerated trajectory where you will always measure the same photon energy? Because if there is one or more, it means the photon needs a coupling particle or photon traveling in another direction in order to keep the information of space time... Maybe there is not because of the variation in the elecromagnetic field of the photon relatively to all possible accelerated trajectory...?

Pages: [1]
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.083 seconds with 64 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.