The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. New Theories
  4. New theory of social evolution and social structure
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

New theory of social evolution and social structure

  • 25 Replies
  • 1504 Views
  • 2 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline The Spoon

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 777
  • Activity:
    0.5%
  • Thanked: 19 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
    • View Profile
Re: New theory of social evolution and social structure
« Reply #20 on: 03/02/2023 07:23:23 »
Quote from: aspagnito on 02/02/2023 15:21:04
ʃ Mathematics = Physics
ʃ Physics = Chemistry
ʃ Chemistry = Biology
ʃ Biology = History
ʃ History = Archeology
ʃ Archeology = Anthropology
ʃ Anthropology = Sociology
ʃ Sociology = Psychology
ʃ Psychology = Philosophy
ʃ Philosophy = Religion
Your point is?
Logged
 



Online Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 29150
  • Activity:
    81%
  • Thanked: 1069 times
    • View Profile
Re: New theory of social evolution and social structure
« Reply #21 on: 03/02/2023 08:37:13 »
Quote from: Origin on 18/01/2023 00:05:55
Quote from: cpu68 on 17/01/2023 18:59:34
However, I invite you to read the whole thing
If the synopsis peaks my curiosity I will, otherwise I don't think so.
If I point out that the word is "piques" then this thread will serve some tiny purpose.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 
The following users thanked this post: Origin

Offline aspagnito

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • 52
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
    • View Profile
Re: New theory of social evolution and social structure
« Reply #22 on: 03/02/2023 09:40:13 »
Quote from: The Spoon on 03/02/2023 07:23:23
Quote from: aspagnito on 02/02/2023 15:21:04
ʃ Mathematics = Physics
ʃ Physics = Chemistry
ʃ Chemistry = Biology
ʃ Biology = History
ʃ History = Archeology
ʃ Archeology = Anthropology
ʃ Anthropology = Sociology
ʃ Sociology = Psychology
ʃ Psychology = Philosophy
ʃ Philosophy = Religion
Your point is?
It's fantasy that created humans. It's social interactions that made us discover the undiscovered. Christ had blood type of B-, and after Christ the blood type B (individualist type blood) was popular in Europe. That made the science grow. Also alchemy (originated from naive thinking about christianity - Christ prove on the Cross that one can have input on things one shouldn't have input on). Also Christ prove that against all other religions physical is profanum and spiritual is sacrum - so everyone might do disguisting things in science saying, the dignity factor was okay. And in XI-XIII century the roman Catholic Church stated the thing we now call system. And that was the basis for scientiffical method. Those things proove that We're getting somewhere - evolution is not blind, and there is a reason why we have both legs, armse, belly, back, neck and head. Humanoid is the highest form in the Universe.

p.s. I'm not saying Christ had kids. I'm saying it was a sign.
Logged
 

Offline The Spoon

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 777
  • Activity:
    0.5%
  • Thanked: 19 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
    • View Profile
Re: New theory of social evolution and social structure
« Reply #23 on: 03/02/2023 11:26:10 »
Quote from: aspagnito on 03/02/2023 09:40:13
Quote from: The Spoon on 03/02/2023 07:23:23
Quote from: aspagnito on 02/02/2023 15:21:04
ʃ Mathematics = Physics
ʃ Physics = Chemistry
ʃ Chemistry = Biology
ʃ Biology = History
ʃ History = Archeology
ʃ Archeology = Anthropology
ʃ Anthropology = Sociology
ʃ Sociology = Psychology
ʃ Psychology = Philosophy
ʃ Philosophy = Religion
Your point is?
It's fantasy that created humans. It's social interactions that made us discover the undiscovered. Christ had blood type of B-, and after Christ the blood type B (individualist type blood) was popular in Europe. That made the science grow. Also alchemy (originated from naive thinking about christianity - Christ prove on the Cross that one can have input on things one shouldn't have input on). Also Christ prove that against all other religions physical is profanum and spiritual is sacrum - so everyone might do disguisting things in science saying, the dignity factor was okay. And in XI-XIII century the roman Catholic Church stated the thing we now call system. And that was the basis for scientiffical method. Those things proove that We're getting somewhere - evolution is not blind, and there is a reason why we have both legs, armse, belly, back, neck and head. Humanoid is the highest form in the Universe.

p.s. I'm not saying Christ had kids. I'm saying it was a sign.
That word salad is utter nonsense. Blood type being due to popularity? Do you think people choose their blood type. Even by the standards of this section, this crap is a new low.
Logged
 

Offline cpu68 (OP)

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 39
  • Activity:
    4.5%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
    • View Profile
Re: New theory of social evolution and social structure
« Reply #24 on: 11/02/2023 20:19:47 »
The Gaussian curve (a normal distribution) has found its application in psychology. So far, it has not been used in sociology, except for statistics. As it turns out, it can take a prominent place in sociological theory, which is a great novelty. However, the use of the logistic curve - to describe social evolution - seems revolutionary, and is even greater novelty (see first post in this thread).
« Last Edit: 12/02/2023 11:22:44 by cpu68 »
Logged
 



Offline cpu68 (OP)

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 39
  • Activity:
    4.5%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
    • View Profile
Re: New theory of social evolution and social structure
« Reply #25 on: 07/03/2023 14:50:47 »
The formulation of the cognitive sociological theory, theory of cooperation and the use of the brain model and the neural network are also a big novelty.
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags: social evolution  / social structure 
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.698 seconds with 47 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.