# Naked Science Forum

## On the Lighter Side => New Theories => Topic started by: simplified on 10/02/2012 16:37:39

Title: Law of time
Post by: simplified on 10/02/2012 16:37:39
Time of motion exists and time of expectation exists.Overcome distance is time of motion(unit of measurement is second of motion =299792458 m)
t'^2+t^2 = 1 second of general time
t' - time of motion per second
t - time of expectation per second
Title: Re: Law of time
Post by: artpiecemalpasso on 11/02/2012 02:21:02
interesting does this pertain to my Idea or is this a solo theory of yours??? International Creaters rights copy right laws of 1967, Dated and published and if so does it work. :D My theory on The abscence of the future and past as realm of space, can be found at my blog site dated three weeks ago. I took down all post on this site, but if your interested in working this out please let me know
Title: Re: Law of time
Post by: simplified on 11/02/2012 10:36:11
interesting does this pertain to my Idea or is this a solo theory of yours??? International Creaters rights copy right laws of 1967, Dated and published and if so does it work. :D My theory on The abscence of the future and past as realm of space, can be found at my blog site dated three weeks ago. I took down all post on this site, but if your interested in working this out please let me know
If your theory is short  then you can show to me.I can not exactly translate.
Title: Re: Law of time
Post by: simplified on 11/02/2012 17:57:56
Excuse me.

T^2=t^2+t'^2
T - general time
t' - time of motion
t - time of expectation
Title: Re: Law of time
Post by: artpiecemalpasso on 11/02/2012 19:35:28
Beautiful work without innovation, you could of collaborated with be but you chose to try and take credit for my theory now the battle begins and time will tell. My theory on time will always be known but yours a cheap nockoff of the original idea. Just remember the creator rights on the international copy right laws of 1967. Good day
Title: Re: Law of time
Post by: simplified on 12/02/2012 05:19:33
Beautiful work without innovation, you could of collaborated with be but you chose to try and take credit for my theory now the battle begins and time will tell. My theory on time will always be known but yours a cheap nockoff of the original idea. Just remember the creator rights on the international copy right laws of 1967. Good day
International copy right laws are not laws of physics.I at all don't study them.And  the Hooke's rights  did not worry Newton at all. :P
Title: Re: Law of time
Post by: artpiecemalpasso on 12/02/2012 06:46:59
Arrogance is the down fall of man and you are no exception. Thank you for walking into my web. ;) Yes it was that easy.
Title: Re: Law of time
Post by: simplified on 12/02/2012 07:24:42
Arrogance is the down fall of man and you are no exception. Thank you for walking into my web. ;) Yes it was that easy.
Does your web have the formula?
Title: Re: Law of time
Post by: imatfaal on 12/02/2012 08:53:42
I am locking this thread pending investigations of plagiarism.  Both participants in this thread please note: DO NOT allow this to overflow into other threads - any peep of this argument in a different topic will end up with posts deleted and posting rights suspended.

imatfaal / moderator