The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Profile of simplified
  3. Show Posts
  4. Topics
  • Profile Info
    • Summary
    • Show Stats
    • Show Posts
      • Messages
      • Topics
      • Attachments
      • Thanked Posts
      • Posts Thanked By User
    • Show User Topics
      • User Created
      • User Participated In

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

  • Messages
  • Topics
  • Attachments
  • Thanked Posts
  • Posts Thanked By User

Topics - simplified

Pages: [1]
1
New Theories / Is my equation exacter than Einstein's equation?
« on: 23/12/2012 06:58:03 »
I have created equation for gravitational slowing of time to avoid gravitational  length contraction.
                            T=T_o/(1-2GM/Rc^2)^[(1+v^2/c^2)/2]
v - speed of atomic clock in gravitation
Is this equation exacter than Einstein's equation?

2
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / What is the fastest star in our galaxy?
« on: 07/10/2012 13:39:40 »
What is the fastest star in our galaxy(relatively of the galactic core)?

3
New Theories / New factor of length contraction without relative time.
« on: 24/07/2012 11:20:59 »
A forward part of travelling object is reduced. A back part of travelling object is extended. Therefore we see light speed always the constant.

                        b=c/[(c-v*cos a)*g)

b- factor of length contraction
v- speed of object
c- light speed
a - angle between direction of motion and direction of measurement
g - gamma factor

This formula is made according to laws of measurement of speeds.

4
New Theories / Law of motion
« on: 18/04/2012 16:37:41 »
Quantity of motion=(E/m)^1/2 * t

E-kinetic energy
m -mass
t - time resieved by the kinetic energy
Quantity of motion-overcome distance(meters)

5
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Are photons faster in cold or hot transparent environment?
« on: 06/04/2012 15:34:55 »
Are photons faster in cold or hot transparent environment?

6
New Theories / Law of time
« on: 10/02/2012 16:37:39 »
Time of motion exists and time of expectation exists.Overcome distance is time of motion(unit of measurement is second of motion =299792458 m)
                     t'^2+t^2 = 1 second of general time
t' - time of motion per second
t - time of expectation per second

7
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Does time define distribution of energy of recoils?
« on: 02/02/2012 16:23:27 »
For example I am in free space.I have an ability to radiate a trillion identical photons.In what case I receive more kinematic energy:1) if I radiate all the photons simultaneously
            2)if I radiate all the photons in current of one second.
            3)if I radiate all the photons in current of one day ?
(I radiate all the photons in one direction)

8
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Can electromagnetic lunar accelerator of interstellar spacecrafts be more useful
« on: 28/01/2012 15:48:10 »
Can electromagnetic lunar accelerator of interstellar spacecrafts be more useful than earth's such accelerator?

9
New Theories / What is energy?The new version.
« on: 06/12/2011 14:31:48 »
Gravitational stream through object similar to the jet engine, is energy.Huge gravitational stream freezes time of object.Gravitational stream is real and is not relative.Braking of object is not simple because then you should stop or redirect current of the gravitational river.

10
New Theories / ?Energy of photon is not relative.
« on: 02/12/2011 17:09:22 »
Traveling photon has changing energy in gravitation field, and this energy is not relative for any object in the universe.Your travel to source does not change energy of photon relatively of you if photon is far to you.It changes energy of photon if photon is near to you,and then your gravitational field changes energy of the photon for every object in the universe. [:P]

11
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / How do scientists define distance until a galaxy?
« on: 25/10/2011 14:45:38 »
How do scientists define distance until a galaxy?

12
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Can gravitational slowing of time be in neutral gravitational field?
« on: 31/08/2011 18:58:05 »
Can gravitational slowing of time be in neutral gravitational field? For example in center of a mass?

13
New Theories / How many does gravitation increase frequency of wave of light?
« on: 28/07/2011 10:51:10 »
Gravitational factor - k = 1⁄√(1-2GM/Rc²)
Our eyes don't count quantity of waves of light per second.They define lengths of photons waves.We can see violet shift in gravitational field in k times, this means length of the photon wave is contracted by k² ,because our eyes use contracted lengths of own instruments by k.All it means gravitation does not increase frequency of wave of a photon relatively of far observer. However it does not mean gravitation does not increase energy of photons.

14
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Does gravitational field increase energy of a photon?
« on: 17/07/2011 07:04:43 »
Hi naked scientists.
Gravitational field increases frequency of a photon. Does it increase energy of the photon?                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       

15
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / How to define impulse of a rotating sphere?
« on: 10/07/2011 04:26:42 »
Axe of rotating sphere is motionless relatively of me.I know mass of the sphere and speed of rotating of the sphere.The density of the sphere is homogeneous.How to define impulse of  the rotating sphere relatively of me?

16
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / How to calculate speed of light on surface of the Sun relatively coordinates o?
« on: 29/05/2011 13:49:02 »
simplified asked the Naked Scientists:

How to calculate speed of light on surface of the Sun relatively coordinates of a far observer?
I can calculate speed of light slowed by time:
T=T_0/√(1-2GM/Rc²)
T=1.000002123658*T_0
then speed of light=299791821 m/s
But i think this slowing is insufficient.

17
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Why we can see a gravitational delay of light?
« on: 19/03/2011 15:32:33 »
If light speed is unchanging and gravity reduces distance,then why we can see a gravitational delay of light? [:o]

18
New Theories / Does my formula work?
« on: 10/12/2010 12:13:59 »
Humanity have not right universal formulae [:D]I show:

Kinetic Energy = m'c²
p = c√(m'²+2m'm)               [:P]
v=c√(m'²+2m'm)/(m'+m)

p - momentum
v - speed
m - gravitation mass
m' - a turned mass  into energy
c=299792458  m/s



Mod edit - please make sure you put a question in the box labelled "Your Question".

19
New Theories / Why do physicists not recognize law of speeds measurement?
« on: 15/07/2010 07:04:11 »
One second of slow time covers more events than one second of fast time does. Any object overcomes greater distance in a second of the observer with slow time, than overcomes in a second of the observer with fast time. Therefore the measured speed by observer with slow time should be more than the same  measured speed by the observer with fast time.

Pages: [1]
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.072 seconds with 61 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.