Naked Science Forum

On the Lighter Side => That CAN'T be true! => Topic started by: Concept on 06/03/2018 19:03:16

Title: Should cancer managed naturally be assessed?
Post by: Concept on 06/03/2018 19:03:16
Different measures of inflammation should be helpful since a compromised immune system that is fighting other things can't fight the cancer.
Also HbA1c or A1c since sugar is linked to cancer.
Title: Re: Should cancer managed naturally be assessed?
Post by: RD on 07/03/2018 02:06:45
... sugar is linked to cancer ...

Is a myth ...
Quote from: cancerresearchuk
There’s no evidence that following a “sugar-free” diet lowers the risk of getting cancer, or boosts the chances of surviving if you are diagnosed.
http://scienceblog.cancerresearchuk.org/2017/05/15/sugar-and-cancer-what-you-need-to-know/
Title: Re: Should cancer managed naturally be assessed?
Post by: Concept on 07/03/2018 02:11:06
You can watch that. I have lived and experienced it first hand.
Most disease is an inflammation process caused by toxins and sugar is an extreme toxin in our modern life and also involved in the proliferation of cancer cells.
Title: Re: Should cancer managed naturally be assessed?
Post by: RD on 07/03/2018 02:17:36
... toxins ...
See ... https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Toxin

... sugar is an extreme toxin in our modern life and also involved in the proliferation of cancer cells.
The human body runs on sugar, called glucose.
Title: Re: Should cancer managed naturally be assessed?
Post by: Concept on 07/03/2018 02:20:36
... toxins ...
See ... https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Toxin

... sugar is an extreme toxin in our modern life and also involved in the proliferation of cancer cells.
The human body runs on sugar, called glucose.

I'm not going to convince you. I have only studied functional medicine for 6 years every waking moment, cured myself and seen thousands of recoveries.
My comment is to the person who asked the question. I'm done responding dark ages medical science. :)
Title: Re: Should cancer managed naturally be assessed?
Post by: RD on 07/03/2018 02:25:05
... I have only studied functional medicine for 6 years ...
You've wasted your time (& ours), see ...  https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/functional-medicine-the-ultimate-misnomer-in-the-world-of-integrative-medicine/ (https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/functional-medicine-the-ultimate-misnomer-in-the-world-of-integrative-medicine/)
Title: Re: Should cancer managed naturally be assessed?
Post by: Concept on 07/03/2018 02:29:19
... I have only studied functional medicine for 6 years ...
You've wasted your time (& ours), see ...  https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/functional-medicine-the-ultimate-misnomer-in-the-world-of-integrative-medicine/ (https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/functional-medicine-the-ultimate-misnomer-in-the-world-of-integrative-medicine/)

No I have not. The OP was asking a question and he and any future reader can look at my suggestion. You are wasting your time and spreading dark ages medicine causing the clear epidemic in disease. Open your eyes.
If the original poster has any more questions he is welcome to message me.

functional medicine is far from quackery. Sure there are a lot of quacks out there. A lot of them. There are bad people that give a bad name to just about anything. Functional medicine is helping thousands of people through logic and solid science based on evolution. For example, if you think Dale Bredesen's work is quackery then you are a fool.

As for toxins, obviously there is a much deeper definition of toxin. Anything can be toxic if out of balance. If you think it's natural for humans to consume ~150 pounds of sugar per year up from about 2 pounds per year 200 years ago without consequences then good luck on that one too. Then obviously you get into the types of sugars, added refined sugar, protein breaking down into sugar, fructose vs glucose metabolism, simple carbohydrates, complex carbohydrates. Throw the complexity of environmental toxins.
Title: Re: Should cancer managed naturally be assessed?
Post by: RD on 07/03/2018 08:06:58
... if you think Dale Bredesen's work is quackery then you are a fool ...

In my experience, anyone with an MD qualification who has gone alternative / integrative, has a skeleton in their closet,
which is the reason they've gone over to "the dark side" : quackery.   


* Dale E Bredesen, California medical licence G45163.png (31.62 kB . 968x444 - viewed 3108 times)


* I cannot find Dr Bredesen's US TradeMarks ''Bredesen Protocol', ''MPI Cognition'', ''ReCODE Protocol''.png (30.45 kB . 990x616 - viewed 3151 times)