0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
… You may know that the wave-particle concept of matter comes out of a new way of thinking about the universe that I call the Infinite Spongy Universe (ISU) model. The ISU is a model of the universe that I have been expounding on since I showed up here eighteen months ago (May 2017). I am a self-proclaimed quantum thinker with no credentials to speak of, and so undertaking the task of presenting what I will portray as the new paradigm may go relatively unnoticed. That will give me the space and time it will take me to present the idea of quantum gravity as best I can, and I will eventually reach a point where I say, “There it is, what do you think?”.
Light passing through an obstatcle produces a diffraction, a Wave, eg a spectum, a slit.
As a photon enters into a slit it may or may not diffract.
If the the photon diffracts, it creates an interference pattern.
If a another photon follows directly after the diffracting photon and doesnot diffract, and instead immerses itself into the wave interference pattern of the preceeding photon while maintaining zero disturbance, it will registers itself on the screen as an intact photon traveling in a dispersed photon's diffraction pattern. The double slit in this experiment is not a valid blind. A single slit will also create an interference pattern, although not as intense as a double slit pattern. The double slit's produces a more intense pattern with additional interference fringes, but the fact remains that both register photon hits in an interference pattern over time. Why would one photon diffract and another would not passing through the same slit? Ask David Cooper about two particles sharing light information between themselves and it's effect on their acceleration. La Repteux also has an interesting theory on the particles having a push pull relationship particle in regards to mutual acceleration. Maybe they're both right! lol.
My apologies. I do admire your conscientious work.
Given that the energy carried by directional gravitational wave fronts net out in terms of the accumulated amount of energy at any point, arriving from all spherical directions, there is an extremely high probability that there will be an imbalance in the net directional amount of wave energy accumulated at each point in space, at any point in time.Those point by point imbalances, all taken together, constitute the whole of space, and the “whole of space” perfectly describes the gravitational wave energy density profile of space.
...Everyone knows that gravity acts upon anything with mass. Consider this, if we are made up of neutrino's we shall exert our presence towards the electron, and hence are pulled towards the core of the mass object.This would lead to Quantum Gravity.
Quote from: phil_mansell on 07/01/2021 11:12:39...Everyone knows that gravity acts upon anything with mass. Consider this, if we are made up of neutrino's we shall exert our presence towards the electron, and hence are pulled towards the core of the mass object.This would lead to Quantum Gravity.Perhaps so. To get a better grasp of your scenario, are you envisioning a universe that has always existed, or one with a beginning?17131, 17260, 17450, 18681, 19219,20603,
That conversation with Phil went nowhere, but it appears he went elsewhere. Too bad because I think he was about to disclose the nature of quantum gravity.My response to the question I asked Phil is that the universe has always existed, i.e., there was no beginning. And I feel comfortable adding that space and time are infinite and eternal. Anyone disagree?
At this point, I'm tempted to say, "You have to think Big"