The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Profile of Paul25
  3. Show Posts
  4. Topics
  • Profile Info
    • Summary
    • Show Stats
    • Show Posts
      • Messages
      • Topics
      • Attachments
      • Thanked Posts
      • Posts Thanked By User
    • Show User Topics
      • User Created
      • User Participated In

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

  • Messages
  • Topics
  • Attachments
  • Thanked Posts
  • Posts Thanked By User

Topics - Paul25

Pages: [1]
1
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Is length infinitely contracted for a photon at c?
« on: 26/03/2020 01:47:07 »
Is length infinitely contracted for a photon at c?
Or to put another way could a photon have a longer length when travelling as a wave before it collapses into a particle on measurement?

2
New Theories / Is a Particle an Anti-Black Hole?
« on: 22/03/2020 10:10:23 »
As 2 black holes approach each other their event horizons would briefly reduce in radius before enveloping each other, essentially light is being pulled out of the event horizon since there is a change in the equilibrium of the gravitational field surrounding the black holes. During this phase some energy may be released from the event horizon. This example exaggerates the effect for the sake of clarity, but the 2nd object could actually be of a much lower mass for this to happen.

If this process is inverted then you end up with the same action as electron excitation where the electron briefly goes up an energy level before dropping back down again and releasing the energy as photons.

3
New Theories / The thumbprint of a creationary element, or just a coincidence?
« on: 20/03/2020 04:52:54 »
◊If an object were to fall at the earth's gravitational acceleration (g=9.8m's2) for an earth year it would reach of speed of light (+1%), this is unique in our solar system.

Could this be evidence for some relationship between a stars mass, the orbital period of planet, the planets mass and the possibility of life arising on that planet? And if so could it also be a signature of some 'creationary element'?

4
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Particles and Black Holes
« on: 18/03/2020 09:29:57 »
Shouldn't a particle satisfy the necessary density to qualify as a black hole?

5
New Theories / Boundary of the Universes
« on: 11/03/2020 12:07:15 »
Gravity aberrates (or disperses) time and space. To any observation of a black hole this has the effect of stretching space in such a way as to diminish the area of it's actual size to what appears to be the event horizon, like pulling over a blanket this also draws the background stars with it (to an observer).

Imagine a region of huge density surrounding an observer in half a sphere or a dome shape, if the region has sufficient density to form a black hole the region should contract to a much smaller event horizon around its axis, with the appearance of the background stars on the opposite side being stretched (aberrated or dispersed) across the dome side toward the area of greatest density due do gravitational lensing. You could call it a time/space funnel, due to gravity's effect on time the region has a slower rate of time relative to the other, a dipole arrangement. (See Dipole Repeller & Shapley Attractor)

In a black hole gravity's cumulative effect produces an escape velocity of c, the region could be said to have a rate of time of zero relative to an outside observers rate of time of 1. Within that region is another black hole where the rate of time could be said to be -1. There would be a band where the rate of time would be somewhere between these values outside the event horizon. Ok, so the numbers used are arbitrary as long as their proportions are maintained relative to each other and could stretch to infinity.  Alternately it could be thought of as a relativistic speed of 1c,2c,3c.., light speed has not actually been exceeded because these areas now are isolated causally. In such a way the shells are quantized. 

What is described is a temporal flip on the classical to quantum boundary, it's inverted equivalent is on the sub atomic scale, again where energy required approaches infinity. This is allowed for if charge and parity are also inverted to maintain symmetry. (See CPT symmetry)

The electromagnetic field of a particle is a dispersion in it's surrounding spacetime in the same way light is dispersed to produce a spectrum when passed through a prism, hence the parity between Newton's and Coulomb's laws. A particle has at it's poles a forward time opposing an inverted time converging in a field with a direction of flow known as the lines of force. Again a dipolar arrangement.

When particles meet at short range they will align themselves to the opposing field of its partner, positive time field of one particle contacts the inverted time field of the other particle(s). This creates a very strong coupling - the strong force.

On the edge of the universe matter is of a lower density producing less gravitational time dilation and hence a faster rate of time. This gives the appearance of an inflationary expansion relative to our reference frame of higher density. This matches observations of galaxies in low density regions which appear to orbit too fast and should fly apart. If you were in that region however, your time would appear to be normal but other regions of space (of higher density) would appear to be running too slowly. An observation is largely dependent on how much mass density is behind both the observer and observed for this effects the direction and magnitude of the flow of time which distorts a measurement.

As 2 black holes approach each other their event horizons would briefly reduce in radius before enveloping each other, essentially light is being pulled out of the event horizon since there is a change in the equilibrium of the gravitational field surrounding the black holes. During this phase some energy may be released from the event horizon. This example exaggerates the effect for the sake of clarity, but the 2nd object could actually be of a much lower mass for this to happen. If this process is inverted then you end up with the same action as electron excitation where the electron briefly goes up an energy level before dropping back down again and releasing the energy as photons.

Our universe consists of black holes one inside the other like a Russian doll and we exist on the thin boundary between them, the extended event horizon or photon sphere, only we don't see it that way due to the aberration. The rate of time is an infinite continuous expansion in either direction, inward and outward.

Pages: [1]
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.051 seconds with 29 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.