1

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Einstein's theory of relativity: is this a correct interpretation?

« on: 13/03/2020 23:38:49 »

the question is whether I have the right to an even outdated, but in a sense clear interpretation, that time in both reference frames flows the same way, that is, always t = f

2

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Einstein's theory of relativity: is this a correct interpretation?

« on: 13/03/2020 13:32:45 »

k-speed of light, w-coordinate of the signal in the second system along the x axis, f-time of the second system. The logic is as follows. The speed of light does not propagate instantly - it takes a finite time to travel a constant path per unit time k, but both systems move relative to each other with a finite speed v, so it is already wrong to assume that when both observers notice k, then t = f = 0, nor equal to zero the derivatives of the times, leaving k a finite constant speed. That is, the question in my generalized equalities is not about the constancy of the speed of light itself (despite the fact that I do not deny its constancy), but about the constancy of the law by which it tends to zero in an infinitesimal period of time

3

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Einstein's theory of relativity: is this a correct interpretation?

« on: 12/03/2020 18:53:05 »

Hello, I have a question about a possible revision of Einstein's theory of relativity. The fact is that its root error is indicated by the fact that at the initial moment of time, that is, when all three coordinates of the two systems coincide, we mistakenly decided at some point in time to take the speed as constant c instead of the variable dc, we got that at an infinitely small point in time, a constant final velocity was recorded — obviously, this does not happen. Therefore, when I typed the following expression in wolfram mathematica: {d (x ^ 2) + d (y ^ 2) + d (z ^ 2) == (dk) ^ 2 * (dt) ^ 2, d (w ^ 2 ) + d (y ^ 2) + d (z ^ 2) == (dk) ^ 2 * (df) ^ 2}, he in one of the solutions gave an answer that is quite suitable for the context of the problem in understanding the absolute time (with the Reduce command ) Please explain if it is possible in simple terms, do I have the right to such an interpretation as one of the interpretations, and maybe, if my reasoning is correct, I will incorrectly interpret the theory of relativity itself — but if it’s incorrect, how should I interpret it? Thank you very much!