[Black hole (OP)]

Of course we'll just ignore Newtons Third Law and Coulombs law then and forget that a Higgs field or atoms potentially have the components to push back ?

Nothing about free protons or free electrons violates any of the laws of physics. You'd know that if you were an actual physics professor (but you're not, are you?).

Can you please provide a link to your claims ?

https://www.britannica.com/science/cathode-ray

You'll find that what you are suggesting are not true proton beams or electrons beams  , the physics of the universe does not allow for the momentum of free electrons or protons .

And so I see that you are still stuck on that same nonsense about protons and electrons. You talked about this same thing when you were here last time. And yet you think I can't recognize that you're Thebox? I'd straight up ban you, but I need to convince the other moderators that it's you first. Unfortunately, I'm occupied with other things at the moment so that will have to wait. Enjoy your time here while you have it.

As I have said previous you are really only relying on what is written rather than the physical facts .

An electron surrounded by electrons can not physically be displaced because the confinement is equal and proportional to the surrounding protons attraction .

In quantum field theory , a HIggs field has to be likewise in polarity to atomic matter or there'd be a stationary visual universe . No body would be in motion and that is based on the electrodynamics of moving bodies .

I said earlier about your accusations but in due respect your conversation has upgraded so I may stick around for a while unless you carry on convincing yourself I am somebody else .

[Kryptid]

As I have said previous you are really only relying on what is written rather than the physical facts .

You know science textbooks are written based on the physical facts, right? It's a fact that electrons and protons can be separated. It's been done many times over.

An electron surrounded by electrons can not physically be displaced because the confinement is equal and proportional to the surrounding protons attraction .

That sentence doesn't make sense.

In quantum field theory , a HIggs field has to be likewise in polarity to atomic matter or there'd be a stationary visual universe . No body would be in motion and that is based on the electrodynamics of moving bodies .

More nonsense. The Higgs field doesn't have a polarity. It's electrically neutral.

[Origin]

An electron surrounded by electrons can not physically be displaced because the confinement is equal and proportional to the surrounding protons attraction .

In quantum field theory , a HIggs field has to be likewise in polarity to atomic matter or there'd be a stationary visual universe . No body would be in motion and that is based on the electrodynamics of moving bodies .

Black hole is pretty funny, his post sound like an Onion science story.

[Bored chemist]

As I have said previous you are really only relying on what is written rather than the physical facts .

If they were (and they aren't, btw) they would still be doing better than you. You are relying on dross which you made up without knowing the facts.

[Black hole (OP)]

As I have said previous you are really only relying on what is written rather than the physical facts .

If they were (and they aren't, btw) they would still be doing better than you. You are relying on dross which you made up without knowing the facts.

I am starting to think I have entered some alternative reality on this forum , the people replying do not seem to be able to think .  It is interesting that I am using facts , simple facts such as Coulombs laws .

This is the first time I believe you have replied and again it lacks impression for a science post .

Fact one :Every substance in the Universe is energy relative to space

Fact two: The energy of any volume is divided proportionally throughout the volume .

Fact three: E=/t

It is absurd for any of you too deny these simple physics facts !

[Black hole (OP)]

More nonsense. The Higgs field doesn't have a polarity. It's electrically neutral.

Hooray , finally you've got something correct ! Indeed the HIggs field does not have a single polarity or the movement of bodies would not be possible . The Higgs field would have too have two poles , a negative and a positive pole that converged to create an electrical neutral pole , like wise and equal too:

 E =

Can you explain to the readers what pole an Electron  and Proton field convergence creates ?

[Kryptid]

The Higgs field would have too have two poles

No, it doesn't.

[Black hole (OP)]

The Higgs field would have too have two poles

No, it doesn't.

I suggest you reconsider your answer ! 

If force +ve is equal to force -ve then the momentum of the mass is  ?

[Kryptid]

If force +ve is equal to force -ve then the momentum of the mass is  ?

There is no answer because the question doesn't make sense.

[Origin]

I am starting to think I have entered some alternative reality on this forum , the people replying do not seem to be able to think .  It is interesting that I am using facts , simple facts such as Coulombs laws .

This is the first time I believe you have replied and again it lacks impression for a science post .

Fact one :Every substance in the Universe is energy relative to space

Fact two: The energy of any volume is divided proportionally throughout the volume .

Fact three: E=/t

It is absurd for any of you too deny these simple physics facts !

Almost every single thing you say is wrong, it's amazing.

[Bored chemist]

Is the exclamation mark in the thread title a negation operator?