1
The Environment / Re: Global Warming. long term effects.
« on: Yesterday at 14:44:40 »
How did you come to the conclusion that you understand this issue better than all the professionals?
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Some people forget to check that there isn't a "period stopping pill" before complaining that there is no "period stopping pill".I presume it's by analogy with thisQuote from: OPWarp Speed PillWhy call it "Warp Speed"?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Warp_Speed
But considering that the relevant pill has been round for over half a century, it just highlights the OP's lack of understanding.
Well done. That is the thread title. I am amazed people are so forgettable even after the media has drummed into their skulls over the past 3 years.
Numerous contraceptive pills have been proposed for both sexes which last 6 to 12 months. Sure you can google them.It is your job to provide evidence.
Please do so.
Incidentally, you said "pill" so we are not talking about depot injection products like depo provera.
Numerous contraceptive pills have been proposed for both sexes which last 6 to 12 months. Sure you can google them.It is your job to provide evidence.
Invariant transformationIsn't that a contradiction in terms?
i am being realistic
A single Pill that stops periods for at least 6 months or better still a year without intervention is the required standard desired.
I presume it's by analogy with thisQuote from: OPWarp Speed PillWhy call it "Warp Speed"?
And it's the outliers that need "treating", not the women.Do you remember the biological urges?Yes; and the thing you seem to not grasp is that, like most teenage boys, I didn't screw any women who weren't happy with the idea.
Well you said it.
'most'
Always outliers
It's a binomial distribution or a Maxwellian distribution
Do you remember the biological urges?Yes; and the thing you seem to not grasp is that, like most teenage boys, I didn't screw any women who weren't happy with the idea.
Were you joking or did you really not understand the NPC comment?You appear to be in the wrong forum. This is not the games forum.Are you deliberately missing the point, or just... well missing it for some other reason?
Just speak plain english. I dont understand your convoluted phrases and metaphysical allusions
That looks like too much workBecause it's just a matter of taking a pill each day, instead of 3 weeks on and 1 week off, it's actually less work than taking the pill "conventionally, which is a fairly commonly used medicine.
A single Pill that stops periods for at least 6 months or better still a year without intervention is the required standard desired.Desired by whom?
It would also stop the huge waste of 15 billion sanitary pads every month.Welcome to the 20th century; other options are available.
Were you joking or did you really not understand the NPC comment?You appear to be in the wrong forum. This is not the games forum.Are you deliberately missing the point, or just... well missing it for some other reason?
Just speak plain english. I dont understand your convoluted phrases and metaphysical allusions
You appear to be in the wrong forum. This is not the games forum.Are you deliberately missing the point, or just... well missing it for some other reason?
A famous survey said men think about sex every 7 seconds.That survey is now used as an example of "how to do a bad survey".
OK, This is the bit where you make it utterly clear that you do not know what you are talking about.It has.
Where?
Anyway no answers to the original question.Yes there is.
No.
Are you deliberately missing the point?counting their paces and then multiplied the number of paces by the length of their stride they would disagree on the length of the perimeterSurely the disagreement would be of the order of (the uncertainly of stride length multiplied by the number of paces) plus (one average stride multiplied by the uncertainty of counting) for each participant. You can take the root sum of squares for your best prior estimate of the limit of disagreement.