0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Yes we do.For example, we consider the light that falls on the solar panels of a satellite and provides it with power.Why do you make categorical statements which are so obviously wrong?
A big misconception ...... is your attempt to redefine light.
they emit no light so why call photons light when they emit no light.
No photons emit any electromagnetic radiation of any form.
No, I am redefining the photon.
A big misconception ...
that's like saying a train moves at the speed of a train
I would like to know why photons are referred to as light?
Because they are.
photons are dark
No, they aren't.
So if photons are eliminated
They aren't.
Quote from: Kryptid on 28/08/2021 07:03:22Light" is a word with a generally well-accepted definition. Arguing that such a word means something different than what the dictionaries claim it does is a bit of an oxymoron. If you are going to create a new definition for something, you might as well create a new word to go along with it.My topic states that it is light that we see I have used the word light a number of times I have not denied that we see light and use light so why do I have to redefine the word light to you.
Light" is a word with a generally well-accepted definition. Arguing that such a word means something different than what the dictionaries claim it does is a bit of an oxymoron. If you are going to create a new definition for something, you might as well create a new word to go along with it.
they are not light until...
I ask you to provide a dictionary definition that supports your position.
Yes they are.
Really? 4 pages discussing if light is real?
You have already redefined it.
And why say they move at the speed of light and yet they are referred to as being light that's like saying a train moves at the speed of a train very strange.
So if photons are eliminated why can't we see light travelling through the vacuum of space?