« on: Yesterday at 15:38:53 »
All right, thanks for the clarification about blood cells.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Ok you are going to have to be more specific as to what you call an antigen
Clearly Type 0 blood has a foundational quality that all bodies see as self, rather then it not having antigens on its surface
Not necessarily, a virus would have to mimic a Typo 0 blood cell membrane.
So clearly a cell wall of a virus would be seen as an antigen
the surface of a cell is also an antigen if the body doesnt recognize it as self.
Nobody else on the internet argues that its a cartoon. You are alone on that one.
But it could recognise the cell membrane as foreign
What antigens do pollen have? Or cat hair or dog hair? None as fair as I am aware, yet all elicite an immune response as allergy.
But distance is within a reference frame.
They contain approximately the whole vaccine, try looking them up on Wiki.
It just seems that the regurgitation of established theories laid down long ago is doing nothing to explain away the point
CoronaVac, BBIBP-CorV, Covaxin, WIBP-CorV, CoviVac and QazVac and there are others in the pipeline.
Not all actually
Again kryptid, this contrary to frames of reference
Are you literally now suggesting that the only immunological response from a persons immune system from vaccination is from anti bodies?
You trying to be dishonest here? Because to suggest All vaccines only target the bodies use of anti bodies though s protein recognition is utterly untrue.
A regulatory Tcell may well touch a virus between the S proteins and be activated.
The m RNA shots induce a limited immune response compared to inactived virus vaccines.
To suggest all vaccine act the same way as the mRNA through s protein recognition is just wrong.
A diminished activity which will only increase with new variations, beside that deminsied response allows more space for mutations to happen.
just enough to relieve the force on the surface.
Also an issue that the mRNA vaccine is uniquely teaching the body to target the s protein
they are effective against the primary virus but as they are dedicated to the S protein recognition we are going to see any virus with a different s protein avoid the immune response.
I don't believe you are correct, the cells targeted by the vacine produce the spike proteins which then are released into the blood stream.
Next, the cell displays the protein piece on its surface.
You can watch ''how mRNA vaccines work' from Harvard university on YouTube.
If you are accelerating, then by definition, you are not "getting nowhere".Watt ? If I apply a force to create an acceleration of 10ms2 against gravity (which is 10ms) I get nowhere. So against gravity , a force of 10N per kg is not considered acceleration ? Why would this be justified in relativity ?Where does the energy go to (you are not allowed to say heat) What is resisting the acceleration and how ?
(The watt is described as holding constant against one newton)
Bret Weinstein was discussing a paper recently that was suggesting that the spike proteins were actually damaging the body. It was in his last dark horse podcast, I think the study was from Berkeley but dont quote me on I'm not 100%