The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Technology
  4. Can we use isotopes that decay faster for nuclear power?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Can we use isotopes that decay faster for nuclear power?

  • 6 Replies
  • 5898 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Karsten (OP)

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 701
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
    • Fortunately still only a game
Can we use isotopes that decay faster for nuclear power?
« on: 04/03/2009 16:56:34 »
My students asked me this twice now and I did not have a good answer. I hate when that happens.

The trouble with radioactive material seems to be that some of it stays radioactive quite long. Other materials decay in milliseconds. Why do we use the materials that take so long to decay in a nuclear power plant? Could we use some that have a much shorter half life?

My guess is that the material has to be radioactive to be useful in a nuclear power situation and if it has a very short half life it is basically already gone by the time we find it in the ground. All that is left is the stuff with the half life of millions of years. But that is just a guess.

Any real answers?
Logged
I got annoyed with looking
at my own signature
 



Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 27456
  • Activity:
    99%
  • Thanked: 920 times
    • View Profile
Can we use isotopes that decay faster for nuclear power?
« Reply #1 on: 04/03/2009 18:48:54 »
Essentially you already have the right answer. Very nearly all the radioactivity on earth is derived from  uranium and thorium which have long enough half lives not to have already decayed.
There are traces of things like carbon 14 made by cosmic / solar ray interactions in the upper atmosphere but these are too rare to generate any useful power.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline RD

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 9094
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 161 times
    • View Profile
Can we use isotopes that decay faster for nuclear power?
« Reply #2 on: 04/03/2009 20:45:01 »
Short lived radioactive isotopes are used in medicine ... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technetium-99m_generator
Logged
 

Offline Karsten (OP)

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 701
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
    • Fortunately still only a game
Can we use isotopes that decay faster for nuclear power?
« Reply #3 on: 05/03/2009 01:03:01 »
Quote from: RD on 04/03/2009 20:45:01
Short lived radioactive isotopes are used in medicine ... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technetium-99m_generator

And we cannot run nuclear reactors with those short-lived isotopes?
Logged
I got annoyed with looking
at my own signature
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 27456
  • Activity:
    99%
  • Thanked: 920 times
    • View Profile
Can we use isotopes that decay faster for nuclear power?
« Reply #4 on: 05/03/2009 06:53:55 »
The only way to make them is to use a nuclear reactor based on uraninum.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 



Offline Karsten (OP)

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 701
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
    • Fortunately still only a game
Can we use isotopes that decay faster for nuclear power?
« Reply #5 on: 05/03/2009 12:35:17 »
Aha. Very good. This makes sense. Thanks.
Logged
I got annoyed with looking
at my own signature
 

Offline swansont

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • 62
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
Can we use isotopes that decay faster for nuclear power?
« Reply #6 on: 06/03/2009 19:18:48 »
We don't run most reactors on decay, we use induced fission (except for things like radioisotope thermal generators, which convert the heat from decay into electricity).  Fission has the advantages of being able to control the output, so you can effectively shut it down when you want to, and releasing more energy than in a typical decay, by a large factor (decay energies are typically several MeV, while fission of U-235 releases about 200 MeV).

So the materials used in the power plant have to have the long half-life.  If they had decayed away, there would be no fuel.
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 

Similar topics (5)

Which clock is faster: clock in ISS or clock in geostationary satellite?

Started by hamdani yusufBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 12
Views: 5094
Last post 28/12/2020 11:13:15
by evan_au
Is Boron power "Fission" or "Fusion"?

Started by evan_auBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 6
Views: 6619
Last post 08/02/2016 22:47:48
by alancalverd
Do chimp sperm cells swim faster than human sperm cells ?

Started by Yair DozaBoard Cells, Microbes & Viruses

Replies: 1
Views: 8683
Last post 28/03/2010 18:34:05
by RD
Light faster than light - sideways?

Started by SmeggitBoard General Science

Replies: 4
Views: 8944
Last post 22/02/2004 01:34:09
by tweener
Why Do Finger Nails Grow Faster Than Toe Nails ?

Started by neilepBoard Physiology & Medicine

Replies: 3
Views: 9902
Last post 14/01/2008 23:37:09
by JnA
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.165 seconds with 50 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.