0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Once the salt is dissolved, now the same heavy salt will be found everywhere as though its weight does not matter. Gravity is sort of suspended by other things, or else all solutions would show a density gradient and never become uniform.
Quote from: puppypower on 29/03/2021 14:48:00The driving force is an electron in motion; electrons moving between the Calcium metal and oxygen atom, creates a magnetic field.And a picosecond or two later when they have moved, the magnetic field collapses because they are in longer in motion.Did you not realise that?I guess not, because if you actually had a clue what happens, you wouldn't have wasted time with that picture of current flowing in wires.Quote from: puppypower on 29/03/2021 14:48:00This means these electrons begin with opposite spin that will magnetically attract to other; two wires with opposite currents. However, the oxygen by placing these in her 2p-orbitals can create a super stable 3-dimensional wire situation, that has 6 currents and 6 wiresIn reality, there are no wires, no currents and no magnetic fields.Quote from: puppypower on 29/03/2021 14:48:00I am trying to develop the water side of life, using accepted principles,Then you need to start by learning what the accepted principles are.They include things like "the importance of evidence".CaO is not magnetic.Quote from: puppypower on 30/03/2021 15:08:48Hydrogen bonding is a more of a specialty thing for states of life.Most of the hydrogen bonds in the world are in ocean water and ice- not life
The driving force is an electron in motion; electrons moving between the Calcium metal and oxygen atom, creates a magnetic field.
This means these electrons begin with opposite spin that will magnetically attract to other; two wires with opposite currents. However, the oxygen by placing these in her 2p-orbitals can create a super stable 3-dimensional wire situation, that has 6 currents and 6 wires
I am trying to develop the water side of life, using accepted principles,
Hydrogen bonding is a more of a specialty thing for states of life.
Quote from: puppypower on 30/03/2021 15:08:48Once the salt is dissolved, now the same heavy salt will be found everywhere as though its weight does not matter. Gravity is sort of suspended by other things, or else all solutions would show a density gradient and never become uniform. There is a concentration gradient.It is very small.You can calculate it or, if you use the very high local gravity (gradient) in a centrifuge, you can even exploit it.It is important to recognise that your idea was based on something that isn't actually true, or led to a conclusion that is not true.This means your idea is wrong.You should ditch it, rather than wasting time and bandwidth on it.Here's the proof that the concentration of salt is not uniform as your wrong idea predicts.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buoyant_density_centrifugation
The gradient does not change anything, since even a gradient is displaying an anti-gravity looking affect.
It is always in motion generating a magnetic field.
However, as the magnetic fields of electrons cancel each other, in atomic orbitals, it may appear that the lack of magnetic output, means stationary.
he oxygen atom is magnetic heavy in terms of the EM force.
This hidden energy can help break strong covalent bonds with little input energy.
I was using ideal solutions,
to make this complex colligative anomaly easier to explain.
I have discussed surface tension as analogous to 2-D water surfaces. While water, as pure water, is more 3-D, in affect, since water-water interactions, in water, is more than a 2-D surface. Beyond these, there are also 1-D and 0-D water scenarios to complete the water set.
Quote from: puppypower on 31/03/2021 13:53:49I have discussed surface tension as analogous to 2-D water surfaces. While water, as pure water, is more 3-D, in affect, since water-water interactions, in water, is more than a 2-D surface. Beyond these, there are also 1-D and 0-D water scenarios to complete the water set.You have discussed lots of tosh.We can look at water that's tightly bound to, for example, an enzyme.It's still water shaped. It's not a point, it's a triangle. It's clearly actually 3D.And your idea is just tripe.
I said this water analysis was not pure science
Are you aware your stick figure shape of water; triangle, is there to make it easier for new students to learn?
This discussion is to create a foundation for a new version of applied science.
This can be done with recycling old data
detailed observations
The secret recipe of Coco Cola is hidden,
Modeling water in terms of its interactions, as the 0-D to 3-D analogy, comes in handy for simulation,
This approach allows water to reflect the organics, without all the organic clutter, that makes simulation very cumbersome.
The main premise is water and the organics of life are copartners in life.
Water by itself does not create life.
using a water side analysis.
I would like to discuss chaotropes and kosmotropes,
which are things dissolved in water
extend its bandwidth
Since life on earth formed in water and is bathed in water, the solvent water inhibits these condensation reactions, thereby requiring energy input to proceed forward.
chaotrope or chaotropic agent: any substance that increases the transfer of apolar groups to water because of its ability to decrease the ‘ordered’ structure ...
kosmotropic(Adjective): Describing ions (normally small, with a high charge density) that stabilize intermolecular interactions in water, especially by stabilizing hydrogen bonds
Quote from: puppypower on 29/04/2021 15:32:21Since life on earth formed in water and is bathed in water, the solvent water inhibits these condensation reactions, thereby requiring energy input to proceed forward. NoAmide formation (all things being equal) is typically exothermic.https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2002/p2/b108041e#!divAbstract
requires about 125 kJ/mole of added energy.
If we reduce the energy need, in advance, all the various postulated energy sources become more effective.
Quote from: puppypower on 30/04/2021 13:59:16 requires about 125 kJ/mole of added energy.https://xkcd.com/285/Quote from: puppypower on 30/04/2021 13:59:16If we reduce the energy need, in advance, all the various postulated energy sources become more effective.If you could change the energy needed to do something (particularly something reversible like a peptide bond), you would break the conservation of energy.So we know that you can't.If the formation of a peptide is more favourable in an oil environment than in a water one then the difference is exactly compensated by the energy needed to get the reactants into, and the products out of, the oil.
Catalysis does the same thing
Another colligative property consideration is entropy.
Quote from: puppypower on 02/05/2021 16:04:54Another colligative property consideration is entropy.It's not a colligative property.Did you mean an intensive property?https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intensive_and_extensive_properties#Examples_2
Entropy has a connection to the colligative properties.
The colligative properties do not depend on the character of the solute.
Solute character is primarily defined by the EM force.
Colligative properties are not related to the EM force, but have more of a connection to mass and gravity.
Higher pressure has more mass based inertia per particle.
Pressure is a common artifact of gravity. The atmospheric pressure, the pressures under the oceans and the pressure at the core of the earth are all dependent on the earth's gravity.
Boiling point elevation and freezing point depression are also pressure dependent
Entropy is a state variable
Water vapor has more entropy than liquid water. The equilibrium between these two states is connected to pressure.
Temperature is connected to heat,
If you look at the electron, the electron remains one particle, even at the most extreme particle collider conditions. The electron has both mass and negative charge.
Temperature and heat impacts everything in any given state of matter.
I suppose we can heat one particle in a gas with a laser.
At steady state the entire gas volume will share the heat.
Quote from: puppypower on 05/05/2021 15:05:43Entropy has a connection to the colligative properties.It has a connection to the game of scrabble.But that doesn't mean it is the same thing.Quote from: puppypower on 05/05/2021 15:05:43The colligative properties do not depend on the character of the solute. And entropy is not one ot them.Quote from: puppypower on 05/05/2021 15:05:43Solute character is primarily defined by the EM force.Unless we are talking about non polar materials...Quote from: puppypower on 05/05/2021 15:05:43Colligative properties are not related to the EM force, but have more of a connection to mass and gravity.Tosh.Entropy works just fine in zero gravity.Quote from: puppypower on 05/05/2021 15:05:43Higher pressure has more mass based inertia per particle.NoInertia is dependent on (and proportional to) mass. It has nothing much to do with pressure.I'm getting bored of this.It may be quicker if I simply highlight the things you actually got right.Quote from: puppypower on 05/05/2021 15:05:43Pressure is a common artifact of gravity. The atmospheric pressure, the pressures under the oceans and the pressure at the core of the earth are all dependent on the earth's gravity. YepQuote from: puppypower on 05/05/2021 15:05:43Boiling point elevation and freezing point depression are also pressure dependent Quote from: puppypower on 05/05/2021 15:05:43Entropy is a state variableQuote from: puppypower on 05/05/2021 15:05:43Water vapor has more entropy than liquid water. The equilibrium between these two states is connected to pressure. Quote from: puppypower on 05/05/2021 15:05:43Temperature is connected to heat,Quote from: puppypower on 05/05/2021 15:05:43If you look at the electron, the electron remains one particle, even at the most extreme particle collider conditions. The electron has both mass and negative charge. Quote from: puppypower on 05/05/2021 15:05:43Temperature and heat impacts everything in any given state of matter.Quote from: puppypower on 05/05/2021 15:05:43I suppose we can heat one particle in a gas with a laser.Quote from: puppypower on 05/05/2021 15:05:43 At steady state the entire gas volume will share the heat.Pretty much everything else you wrote is meaningless or wrong.
You seem to be good at memorizing and repeating the status quo but to innovate you need to be able to make new connections.
He has to work unde the consensus assumption mass and charge were two separate things, which was a bad assumption for the electron.
Quote from: puppypower on 08/05/2021 12:13:35You seem to be good at memorizing and repeating the status quo but to innovate you need to be able to make new connections. You keep on calling mistakes "new connections"Why do you do that?Quote from: puppypower on 08/05/2021 12:13:35He has to work unde the consensus assumption mass and charge were two separate things, which was a bad assumption for the electron.There's an example of you being wrong.Mass and charge ARE two different things; it's not an assumption, but an observation.