0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Abstract - My starting point for the concept of a theory of everything involves a rudimentary ''look'' on the Universe, on relativity and on the quantifiable values of the Universe such as time and distance. In which I will show a correct interpretation of information , thus leading to the relativity, that everything is relative to the ''value'' 0. to be continued ...........................Thoughts so far on abstract please?
Quote from: Thebox on 17/01/2017 11:43:33Abstract - My starting point for the concept of a theory of everything involves a rudimentary ''look'' on the Universe, on relativity and on the quantifiable values of the Universe such as time and distance. In which I will show a correct interpretation of information , thus leading to the relativity, that everything is relative to the ''value'' 0. to be continued ...........................Thoughts so far on abstract please?I don't think we can have an opinion about the abstract because you need to show why you made those statements.After "distance" you should use a comma.Anyway a T.O.E is very hard to develop even if you have an idea of how the universe works and it takes a lot of time. I would recommend you to write some philosophical papers about how you understand the reality.
If you do not master relativity you are going to stub your toe.
Quote from: GoC on 17/01/2017 15:19:39If you do not master relativity you are going to stub your toe.Dude, this guy can't master addition.
Nilak I would like to make a comment about that. As a realest you cannot make something out of nothing. But where did the first something come from?While you cannot disprove the BB the timing does not follow relativity as we know it. Rather than 13 billion years it would take multiple trillions of years to create a 37,200 AU black hole. Claiming different possibilities in the early universe is a circular argument. All possibilities exist that follow math. The BB current theory does not follow math. This is faith based.
Interesting ideas Alex.For " The box":Do you think the universe has a beginning or an end ?
Quote from: GoC on 19/01/2017 12:47:28Nilak I would like to make a comment about that. As a realest you cannot make something out of nothing. But where did the first something come from?While you cannot disprove the BB the timing does not follow relativity as we know it. Rather than 13 billion years it would take multiple trillions of years to create a 37,200 AU black hole. Claiming different possibilities in the early universe is a circular argument. All possibilities exist that follow math. The BB current theory does not follow math. This is faith based.I don't have a clear explanation, only it seem more likely to me that the universe didn't come to existence at a certain point but it has been around forever.
Quote from: Nilak on 19/01/2017 13:54:27Quote from: GoC on 19/01/2017 12:47:28Nilak I would like to make a comment about that. As a realest you cannot make something out of nothing. But where did the first something come from?While you cannot disprove the BB the timing does not follow relativity as we know it. Rather than 13 billion years it would take multiple trillions of years to create a 37,200 AU black hole. Claiming different possibilities in the early universe is a circular argument. All possibilities exist that follow math. The BB current theory does not follow math. This is faith based.I don't have a clear explanation, only it seem more likely to me that the universe didn't come to existence at a certain point but it has been around forever.There is more to it than that, we simply only need to look at the properties of space itself. Space itself seemingly cannot be destroyed, it is in essence ''immortal''. So my thoughts are that something that cannot be destroyed can neither be created, so logically the space always exists and always existed. There is some more intricate details to this thought, but I am sure you will understand the simplicity of this thought.
The smallest motion of the electron is the difference between the past position and present position. So time can be a length.
No I do not think something from nothing is simple.
The Box will continue to believe what ever he chooses to believe, whether it can be supported by experimental evidence or not. The Box is apparently satisfied believing what ever sounds comfortable to his logic and it is a fruitless effort to try and reason with him. He accepts neither Einstein nor the tenants of GR or SR. So why would any of us expect him to accept anything the esteemed members of this noble assemble have to offer?