Naked Science Forum
On the Lighter Side => New Theories => Topic started by: cpu68 on 07/04/2023 14:09:08
-
How to increase your IQ level ? How to improve your IQ ?
The level of intelligence ranges from 70 to 200 IQ points, and very rarely exceeds 200 points (in the case of normal, not impaired intelligence). Below 70 points, Intellectual disability begins. Well, it turns out that the level of your intelligence can be raised by 20, 50, 100, 200 and even several hundred points. To do this, you need to tune in and set yourself up to raise the level of intelligence. The mind shifts to a higher level of intelligence with the right effort. In my method, the mind is moved to the target level of intelligence, e.g. 180 IQ points, or 400 points. Initial solutions of the described method were created in 2012. After a few years, it developed into a more complete version.
I initially increased my IQ by 20 points. Then 50, then 100, and finally I got to 400 IQ points. However, this is not the end, after quite a long time I came to the conclusion that I can raise the level of my intelligence up to 1600 points. For this I used a special method of magically reaching this level.
(https://images2.imgbox.com/84/c9/wnVnOWX4_o.jpg)
diagram. Distribution of IQ in population
As a means of supporting the exercise of intelligence, I use music from the radio through headphones, I analyze the musical structure as well as the text. In the case of text, you can test the meaning of a given text at the appropriate level, e.g. 180 points or 500 points, and after the analysis result you can find out that this is this the level of intelligence. Similarly, musical structure starts to sound much better as we raise our IQ level. Listening to music from the radio through headphones is not necessary to raise the level of intelligence, but it can be helpful.
However, the method described does not immediately give huge lasting results. Raising IQ to, say, 400 points is a short-term effect, it is obtained during the IQ-raising procedure and shortly after that, later the level of intelligence drops to a lower level, a permanent IQ increase of about 10 points is obtained. However, constant practice with the described method should bring results after some time. Perhaps after a long time you can permanently raise your IQ to say 400 or 1000 or even 1600 points, it depends on the development of the brain. For a more lasting result, the intelligence-enhancing procedure should be used continuously.
I estimated my IQ at 160 or 250 (230) points. Of course, thanks to the described method, I got an increase in IQ level. With one analysis, I got 160 points, with another analysis, I got 250 (230) points. This second analysis is related to the changes in the structure of the braincase that I have observed in myself, namely its enlargement. This is congenital trait. This is manifested by "falling" eyebrows on the outside. A similar feature can be observed in Einstein, only it is more pronounced in him than in me. Einstein's IQ is estimated to be around 165 points, due to his enlarged braincase he could though have scored as high as 300 (260) points.
(https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/50/Albert_Einstein_%28Nobel%29.png)
photo. Albert Einstein in year 1921. On the photo it is shown "falling" eyebrows, a sign of an enlarged braincase.
However, it should be remembered that above I presented only some estimates of the IQ level. In fact, thanks to the enlarged braincase, a new effect is achieved that is qualitatively different from the usual processes of intelligence. A new quality is achieved.
One time I tested a certain problem at 180 points and using an enlarged braincase. The second result turned out to be clearly qualitatively better than the first. I estimated it at around 250 (230) points. For scaling intelligence that e.g. I have reached 400 points, I use an imaginary scale and scale. Einstein or me can be considered examples of a higher level of evolution, an intermediate link leading to a higher, new species of superman.
The process of intelligence development that can be achieved thanks to the described method can be related to the logistic model, which I used on a large scale in my other research (see New theory of evolution and Sociological theory). I will briefly sketch this model. Well, the graph of this model is a sigmoid curve, or more precisely, a logistic curve (generally a curve resembling the letter S). This model is associated with a rapid transition preceded by a stable period and ended with a stable period. This transition can also be described as a jump, from a lower level to a higher one. These changes are quantitative, but the period of dynamic transition is a cumulative quantitative value.
Well, my method provides tools to increase the level of intelligence, the stable period is the initial intelligence of a given person, the transition period is training in increasingly higher levels of intelligence, starting from, say, 180 points through 200, 300, 400, 500 to the final level, usually over 1000 points . The period of relatively rapid progression through intelligence levels can be treated as a jump phase, and reaching over 1,000 points as a new phase of stabilization at the highest level. It could be said that the goal of the development process understood in this way is to achieve an IQ value of over 1000 points. The final level will range from 1000, 1200 points to 1600, 1800, or 2000 or even more points depending on the initial intelligence level which may be 100, 120, 160, 180, 200 or more. The rule of thumb is that the final level should be ten times the starting level.
author of text: Gregory Podgorniak, Poland, year 2023
below description of a high and very high level of IQ up to 185 points, data comes from the IQ and Chess strength website - http://www.jlevitt.dircon.co.uk/iq.htm (http://www.jlevitt.dircon.co.uk/iq.htm)
IQ (Standard deviation = 15), Attributes
185 High natural neuro-kinesthetic control; high curiosity drive; anti trivia; in a hurry
180 New creation
175 Knows intelligent (and right!)
165 Formalisation; beginnings of self confidence; less hiding
160 Interest in logic; paranoia; minor creation; recognises good work; art; music
150 Trivial formalisation
145 Below this level and often above is everywhere found a slavery to conditioning
At the beginning, it is worth practicing on the levels described above.
about the author, My name is Gregory Podgorniak (brn. 01.1977, Szczecinek, West Pomerania, Poland). I am working on field of natural as well as social sciences. During philosophical studies at Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan (1996-1999) I was actively act in student scientific organisation, got a scientific scholarship, and one from my articles titled Circulus vitiosus and fourfold petitio principii in the system of Descartes was published in Humanistic Drafts of Publishing House of Humaniora Foundation in Poznan, no. 6, 1998. Unfortunately certain fate events made impossible to me continuing studies to master's and later doctor's degree. Thence I was forced to be content only with a title of bachelor.
Thanks to deep and penetrating researchings I was able to establish indisputably some number of my past incarnations reaching of ancient period, these data are certain, these incarnations are: Auguste Comte (1798-1857) French philosopher and sociologist, Edme Mariotte (1620-1684) French physicist and meteorologist, Bodhidharma (5th or 6th century) buddhist patriarch, Aenesidemus (1 st century BC) Greek sceptical philosopher, Arcesilaus (315-241 BC) Greek sceptical philosopher, Gorgias (485-380 BC) Greek sophist.
email contact: podgorniakgre@gmail.com
my other threads on this forum:
New theory of evolution - https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=86174.0
New perspectives in physics - https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=85367.0
New theory of social evolution and social structure - https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=86048.0
Structure of electrons, quarks and gluons; preon, preons - https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=86090.0
Photo of subtle body, photo of soul, photo of astral body - https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=86291.0
Newest Quantum Gravity and Theory of Everything, TOE - https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=86332.0
-
The level of intelligence ranges from 100 to 200 IQ points
No , it does not.
You clearly have no idea what you are talking about.
Do you really not understand that about half of people are below average?
-
, I probably got an increase in IQ level to 500 points.
LOL.
-
author of text: Gregory Podgorniak, Poland, year 2023
It would appear that poor Gregory is not a genius, but instead is a nut case.
-
The level of intelligence ranges from 100 to 200 IQ points,
Well that's a bad start, isn't it? 100 is the median, not the minimum. The gaussian 2-sigma points are about 30 (politicians) and 140 (people like us, excluding cpu68).
-
Do you really not understand that about half of people are below average?
Well that's a bad start, isn't it? 100 is the median, not the minimum
Okay, my mistake, I was a bit too hasty. I corrected the first post. However, the rest was correct, as you can see for yourself.
-
So
1. how did you measure your IQ at 400?
2. what's knowledge got to do with it?
3. define good art, or good music.
-
Do you really not understand that about half of people are below average?
Re
And now that more than 50% of UK teenagers proceed to a university education, the logical conclusion is that any graduate under the age of 30 is likely to be more stupid than average.
-
I corrected the first post.
No, you did not.
You left stacks of errors.
-
cpu...you are funny, in a good way.
You seem to have an ability to crack people up...in Giggles!
Good Job & Keep it Up.
lol
-
Good Job & Keep it Up.
Thank you for your post Zer0
-
1. how did you measure your IQ at 400?
a) For scaling intelligence that e.g. I have reached 400 points, I use an imaginary scale and scale.
b) For example, when I listen to the radio through headphones, there is a problem in a given text, I guess by the quality of its solution that it is, for example, 400 points.
2. what's knowledge got to do with it?
What knowledge do you mean ? please explain your question in more detail.
3. define good art, or good music.
for example, the painting of J. Vermeer, or the music of J.S. Bach
-
I have reached 400 points, I use an imaginary scale and scale.
MY SCALE MUST BE BETTER THAN YOURS BECAUSE IT GOES UP TO 11.
:-)
-
from: alancalverd on 09/04/2023 11:45:25
3. define good art, or good music.
for example, the painting of J. Vermeer, or the music of J.S. Bach
So is a Picasso or a Brassau painting good? Beethoven? Cage? Whale song?
-
I use an imaginary scale
That doesn't sound like a useful scale.
-
It's no less relevant than the pentatonic.
-
It's no less relevant than the pentatonic.
The pentatonic scale is widely recognised, and useful.
But the OP is talking bollocks.
-
But the OP is talking bollocks.
You criticize all new threads as it goes, you should learn to distinguish between valuable ideas and worthless ones.
-
you should learn to distinguish between
valuable ideas and worthless ones.
You should get a mirror.
Have you noticed that everyone is criticising your threads?
Redefining the IQ scale in a way that only applies to you and can only be assessed by you is worthless.
The merit of the real IQ scale is that (in principle) it is objective and scientific.
It's not great but it's much better than your "my IQ went up because I said it did" scale.
There are few ideas less valuable than that.
-
Have you noticed that everyone is criticising your threads?
Not everyone.
Redefining the IQ scale in a way that only applies to you and can only be assessed by you is worthless.
Anyone can create such a scale.
-
Quote from: Bored chemist on Today at 11:18:23
Have you noticed that everyone is criticising your threads?
Not everyone.
Very nearly everyone.
You clearly have no idea what you are talking about.
It would appear that poor Gregory is not a genius, but instead is a nut case.
Well that's a bad start, isn't it? 100 is the median, not the minimum. The gaussian 2-sigma points are about 30 (politicians) and 140 (people like us, excluding cpu68).
The only one who didn't criticise your idea just called you a comedian.cpu...you are funny, in a good way.
You seem to have an ability to crack people up...in Giggles!
Good Job & Keep it Up.
lol
And, re.Anyone can create such a scale.
That's the problem.
Anyone could.
No two scales would be comparable.
So the scales are useless.
What use can you make of your scale where you pretend you have a high IQ?
-
So is a Picasso or a Brassau painting good? Beethoven? Cage? Whale song?
Picasso, Beethoven are good, Brassau, Cage, Whale song are not good
-
So is a Picasso or a Brassau painting good? Beethoven? Cage? Whale song?
Picasso, Beethoven are good, Brassau, Cage, Whale song are not good
I see you are not intelligent enough to appreciate whale song.
Maybe some day...
-
I estimated my IQ at 160 or 250 points.
Have you confirmed that with a standard IQ test?
-
I estimated my IQ at 160 or 250 points.
Have you confirmed that with a standard IQ test?
No, he made it up. I use an imaginary scale and scale.
-
So is a Picasso or a Brassau painting good? Beethoven? Cage? Whale song?
Picasso, Beethoven are good, Brassau, Cage, Whale song are not good
So "good" means something that you are familiar with, understand, or have been told is good. A few days ago Michael Jordan's used basketball boots sold at auction for more than any Beethoven score. It's unlikely that the purchaser will ever wear them, or perform from the original manuscript, so they are art, not practical tools. Why are the boots more "good" than the papers?
-
I estimated my IQ at 160 or 250 points.
I doubt than anyone with an IQ of more than 90 would make an estimate with such a wide error range, particularly as he could measure it to ± 10 points with a single standard test.
-
Have you confirmed that with a standard IQ test?
In one of the IQ tests, from H. Eysenck's book Test your IQ (Polish edition), I scored 150 points, but I was very close to 160 points. According to the table in the first post from the IQ and chess strength website, I would have a level of 160 points, not taking into account the enlarged braincase. Among other things, based on this table, I was able to achieve an IQ of 180. A test of a certain problem at the level of 180 points, and using an enlarged braincase, showed that in the latter case I obtained a result clearly qualitatively better than 180 points. I rated it at something like 250 (maybe it was around 230). Probably, however, the latter result will not be shown by standard tests.
-
In one of the IQ tests, from H. Eysenck's book Test your IQ (Polish edition),
There are several tests in the book because any single measurement is likely to be imprecise.
Rather than telling us the result of the one where you fluked a good score, you should tell us the average score you got. (Unless, of course, you are seeking to misrepresent yourself.)
.I scored 150 points, but I was very close to 160 points
150 is not actually very close to 160.
According to the table in the first post from the IQ and chess strength website
LOL
I have actually had my IQ checked properly officially over the course of several months by a real psychologist.
It was measured as 178 (They didn't specify an error margin, which is unfortunate).
A while ago a neighbour asked me if I could play chess.
I said yes, but I'm very bad at it.
She said that was great, because she was hoping to learn.
We played.
She beat me 2 1/2 games out of 3.
She's bright- an artist and medical doctor- and her IQ is comparable with mine.
(Medic students do things like measuring IQ as exercises while studying).
So there's strong evidence that IQ does not determine ability to play chess.
So the web page you have cited is laughable.
(It turns out that, while she didn't play chess, she had spent a lot of time playing draughts aka Checkers)
not taking into account the enlarged braincase.
What enlarged braincase?
Do you mean this?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrocephalus
Among other things, based on this table, I was able to achieve an IQ of 180.
No, you were not.
I obtained a result clearly qualitatively better than 180 points.
No
You actually measured it, using a book and got a result less than 160.
Then you made stuff up.
I rated it at something like 250
You made that up
Probably, however, the latter result will not be shown by standard tests.
Your number will not be confirmed by proper testing.
This is because your number is wrong.
Why can't you grasp that?
-
In one of the IQ tests, from H. Eysenck's book Test your IQ (Polish edition), I scored 150 points, but I was very close to 160 points.
If you think 150 is close to 160, I'd like to do business with you. I don't usually approve of fleecing the innumerate, but some people are just asking for it.
-
not taking into account the enlarged braincase.
Have you done measurements to confirm that you have an enlarged brain case? How exactly did your bones expand?
-
Cpu...i got an IQ score of 10 points.
: )
Any Comments?
-
Cpu...i got an IQ score of 10 points.
: )
Any Comments?
Be fair; as far as I can see, he didn't say that.
He did say stuff that's pretty nearly as daft, but he didn't say that.
-
Have you done measurements to confirm that you have an enlarged brain case? How exactly did your bones expand?
Take a closer look at Einstein's photo:
(https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/50/Albert_Einstein_%28Nobel%29.png)
Albert Einstein in year 1921. On the photo it is shown "falling" eyebrows, a sign of an enlarged braincase. At me, these changes are less severe.
-
Do you expect us to believe that your skull is getting bigger, just because you say so?
If that was possible, this wouldn't happen.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chiari_malformation
And it does.
-
Can I take that as an indication that you didn't actually measure it?
-
Cpu...i got an IQ score of 10 points.
: )
Any Comments?
Be fair; as far as I can see, he didn't say that.
He did say stuff that's pretty nearly as daft, but he didn't say that.
Clarification
Cpu(his nick)...i got an IQ score of 10 points.(self reference)
: ) (playful smile)
Any Comments?
(asking for His response)
He seems to be having Fun with the OP.
I just wanted to join in with him.
Hopefully, He did Not Misunderstand my words.
(daft understand daft)
lol
-
Can I take that as an indication that you didn't actually measure it?
This comes from observing the mentioned feature, I didn't make any measurements.
-
...i got an IQ score of 10 points
You definitely have a higher IQ
-
I didn't make any measurements.
Then you didn't do any science.
To be fair, we guessed.
-
...i got an IQ score of 10 points
You definitely have a higher IQ
[ Invalid Attachment ]
Or perhaps an even Lower IQ.
Personally, if Yours is 100/150/200+
Is there any Specific reason as to Why it Matters?
(*Note* - Please do NOT go to the Website in the Image, it is Not Safe!)
-
Or perhaps an even Lower IQ.
Judging by your posts you have an IQ above 100. If you want to conduct a reliable test of your intelligence, I recommend Eysenck's already mentioned book, Test your IQ (maybe the edition in your country, because you do not specify your location in your profile). He is a well known psychologist and has prepared really reliable tests that do not underestimate intelligence as it often happens.
-
Or perhaps an even Lower IQ.
Judging by your posts you have an IQ above 100. If you want to conduct a reliable test of your intelligence, I recommend Eysenck's already mentioned book, Test your IQ (maybe the edition in your country, because you do not specify your location in your profile). He is a well known psychologist and has prepared really reliable tests that do not underestimate intelligence as it often happens.
Do you plan to include any science in this thread?
-
@cpu
Not so fond of the Gentleman you mentioned.
Won't try his book.
I usually do Not recommend products, hence won't name any Reliable IQ testing options.
So, how does one increase IQ Level without knowing what level they are currently on?
(You yourself seem to be on various different levels such as 160/230/450 etc, how then would you judge or measure your Progress?)
& Even if you could, how would you mitigate Unconscious Bias?
-
@cpu
Not so fond of the Gentleman you mentioned.
Won't try his book.
I usually do Not recommend products, hence won't name any Reliable IQ testing options.
So, how does one increase IQ Level without knowing what level they are currently on?
(You yourself seem to be on various different levels such as 160/230/450 etc, how then would you judge or measure your Progress?)
& Even if you could, how would you mitigate Unconscious Bias?
Zero,
Do you understand that he's just making stuff up?
-
So, how does one increase IQ Level without knowing what level they are currently on?
(You yourself seem to be on various different levels such as 160/230/450 etc, how then would you judge or measure your Progress?)
You can probably assume that you have an IQ below 180 points, so it is possible to raise your IQ to this or higher levels.
It is indeed difficult to measure my progress, but what matters to me is that I reach, for example, 400 points and that I can do it.
-
It is indeed difficult to measure my progres
The only measurement you have says your IQ is less than 150.
All your other claims are just stuff you made up.
-
So, how does one increase IQ Level without knowing what level they are currently on?
(You yourself seem to be on various different levels such as 160/230/450 etc, how then would you judge or measure your Progress?)
You can probably assume that you have an IQ below 180 points, so it is possible to raise your IQ to this or higher levels.
It is indeed difficult to measure my progress, but what matters to me is that I reach, for example, 400 points and that I can do it.
I then could Similarly take an Online IQ Test n score a 0.
After 10mins, repeat the same Test n score 100.
Therefore, Assuming that by every passing minute my IQ increased by 10points.
(Unexpected Results come from False Assumptions)
& I do Not think i need to explain it to you what people who score a 0 are defined as on a mental scale.
Hence me scoring a 0 is an example of limits on going higher up the scale, with No Limits on going lower.
I don't have any Doubts whatsoever you reaching 400.
I've read a tad bit on the Neuroplasticity of the Brain.
But perhaps you should not have any doubts either that your 400 could be considered Equivalent to my 100.
Anyways, IQs aside, Why do you feel your skull is Enlarging?
It's been the same way since childhood, runs in the family, or something very recent which you are noticing right now?
Hope there aren't any Symptoms associated with it, like Headaches, Nausea, Vomiting, Blurred visions, Balance problems, Personality or Behavioral changes?
(i know these are super personal questions, i do Not expect an Answer atall, but I'd wish for you to atleast be Honest with your Own Self)
& Yaa, if possible, plz tell B.C. a silly joke n make him giggle again.
: )
(I Dare You)
-
Anyways, IQs aside, Why do you feel your skull is Enlarging?
It's been the same way since childhood, runs in the family, or something very recent which you are noticing right now?
Hope there aren't any Symptoms associated with it, like Headaches, Nausea, Vomiting, Blurred visions, Balance problems, Personality or Behavioral changes?
No that's not it. My enlarged braincase is a congenital trait. I've had it since birth. Of course, there are no adverse symptoms associated with it, I function completely normally.
Einstein had it congenital too. See the photo in the first post in this thread.
-
I've had it since birth.
So it can't possibly be the explanation for any supposed recent increase in your intelligence.
Face reality.
You may have learned some stuff, but your IQ is essentially the same as it was.
You have just deluded yourself into thinking it has increased.
The rest of us are not joining in with your delusion.
-
I had seen an interview of Marilyn Mach Vos Savant.
Felt she had Purposefully chosen a specific hairstyle to make her head look large.
She seemed Wise & Intelligent, until she opened her mouth.
Light sure travels faster than Sound.
Honestly, i donno if having a High IQ is a Boon or a Bane.
Being a SmartyPants, surrounded by Village Idiots.
Where ever second thing that every second person says, irks & irritates you.
I personally would Never put myself in a position, where i self assess my IQ to be over 400.
Imagine the dreaded distress in which I'd breathe my last breath...
Knowing i had an IQ higher than Einstein & Hawking combined..
To look back thru my life n see no Inventions made, no new Discoveries in my name, no Nobels, no fortunes n no fame.
Realizing, i had All the Chances to Win, but still ended Losing badly in the Game.
@OP
I wish you all the very Best, on your IQ Quest, may you indeed find Success.
(U dont need a big brain,
a big heart would suffice.
it must be a great feelin to be smart,
but feels even better to be nice)
TC!
-
Listening to music from the radio through headphones is not necessary to raise the level of intelligence, but it can be helpful.
-
If you believe this nonsense
Well, it turns out that the level of your intelligence can be raised by 20, 50, 100, 200 and even several hundred points.
there's no reason for us to think you are right when you say things like this
Listening to music from the radio through headphones is not necessary to raise the level of intelligence, but it can be helpful.
is there?
-
Einstein or me can be considered examples of a higher level of evolution, an intermediate link leading to a higher, new species of superman.
-
Einstein or me can be considered examples of a higher level of evolution
The correct wording is, "Einstein or I".
-
Einstein or me can be considered examples of a higher level of evolution
How many kids have you got?
-
How many kids have you got?
I have no kids.
-
How many kids have you got?
I have no kids.
Then we can confidently state that you are not
leading to a higher, new species
-
Phew!!, that's a major source of relief, BC. Maybe we should discreetly suggest a vasectomy?
-
Anyone can claim to have an IQ of 400. Providing evidence for it is another matter.
-
Anyone can claim to have an IQ of 400. Providing evidence for it is another matter.
Either we've seen no evidence of that from the OP in the forum ... or we're all too dumb to recognise it!
-
(https://images2.imgbox.com/84/c9/wnVnOWX4_o.jpg)
Distribution of IQ in population
-
(https://images2.imgbox.com/84/c9/wnVnOWX4_o.jpg)
Distribution of IQ in population
Did you notice that it doesn't go up to 400?
That's because nobody has an IQ that high.
And that means you are a fool or a liar to have written this.
I initially increased my IQ by 20 points. Then 50, then 100, and finally I got to 400 IQ points.
-
I set a lightning wallpaper (lightning touching the ground) as my computer desktop background. That it resides both in my consciousness and unconsciousness, starting the process of discovery. However, this invention must be used appropriately, because care must be taken to prevent people from being struck by lightning. You can set wallpaper, but don't experience real lightnings.
-
I set a lightning wallpaper (lightning touching the ground) as my computer desktop background. That it resides both in my consciousness and unconsciousness, starting the process of discovery. However, this invention must be used appropriately, because care must be taken to prevent people from being struck by lightning. You can set wallpaper, but don't experience real lightnings.
Did you think that post was related to the real world?
Have you discussed these ideas with your doctor?
-
Reading cpu68 threads lowers my IQ.
-
You can set wallpaper, but don't experience real lightnings.
I have a friend who has been struck by lightning twice. It doesn't seem to have given him any superpowers.
-
I have a friend who has been struck by lightning twice. It doesn't seem to have given him any superpowers.
I should write: "You can set wallpaper, but don't experience in imagination real lightnings."
-
I should write: "You can set wallpaper, but don't experience in imagination real lightnings."
When you write stuff like this it's hard to believe your IQ is 400.
-
If you do suffer from vividly imagined lightning, you may have petit-mal epilepsy or degeneration of the optic nerve. See your GP.
If you suffer from an imagined IQ of 400, see a psychiatrist, or run for President of the USA.
-
When you write stuff like this it's hard to believe your IQ is 400.
If you suffer from an imagined IQ of 400, see a psychiatrist, or run for President of the USA.
Correction. I reach IQ not 400 points, but 1600 points.
-
When you write stuff like this it's hard to believe your IQ is 400.
If you suffer from an imagined IQ of 400, see a psychiatrist, or run for President of the USA.
Correction. I reach IQ not 400 points, but 1600 points.
No. You did not reach 1600
And you really should see a doctor about these delusions; urgently.
-
Correction. I reach IQ not 400 points, but 1600 points.
Time, then, for some remedial mathematics. Pray tell, us, O Wise One, the probability of anyone occupying that point on the IQ distribution curve.
-
the probability of anyone occupying that point on the IQ distribution curve.
After reading my text (first post), anyone can take this point or close to it, e.g. 1400 or 1200 points. Alan, you too can take this or a close point.
-
After reading my text (first post), anyone can take this point or close to it, e.g. 1400 or 1200 points. Alan, you too can take this or a close point.
I can't help but notice that you only have an IQ 400. I'm sorry that you can only reach a measly 400 when as you point anyone else could get an IQ of 1200 to 1400.
-
After reading my text (first post), anyone can take this point or close to it, e.g. 1400 or 1200 points. Alan, you too can take this or a close point.
So why don't you answer the question?
-
So why don't you answer the question?
Geeze, leave the poor guy alone, he can't answer the question because his IQ is only 400! That's about 1/3 of our IQ (after we listen to a couple of songs of course).
-
So why don't you answer the question?
According to the old model, the probability of reaching this point is very small. But according to the new distribution model, this value could turn out to be higher. Whether it is possible to permanently achieve 1,600 points is another matter. Perhaps so, after a sufficiently long period of training.
-
Well if the op has such an iq then I reckon many posters, myself included, must have near infinite quotients. Nothing to worry about, it's just iq inflation.
-
After reading my text (first post), anyone can take this point or close to it, e.g. 1400 or 1200 points.
That's just not true, is it?
-
I think there should be a category of banning, not based on the poster breaking a rule, but because their delusions are such that they ought to be getting professional help of the kind a forum can't provide.
-
Good point. On the "sciencemadness" forum which deals with chemistry there was a category named "detritus" into which threads of no value were placed. This practice ceased a number of years ago, I don't know the reason.
-
The method I propose should bring specific results.
-
The method I propose should bring specific results.
Yes, it should.
But it doesn't.
-
The process of intelligence development that can be achieved thanks to the described method can be related to the logistic model, which I used on a large scale in my other research (see New theory of evolution and Sociological theory). I will briefly sketch this model. Well, the graph of this model is a sigmoid curve, or more precisely, a logistic curve (generally a curve resembling the letter S). This model is associated with a rapid transition preceded by a stable period and ended with a stable period. This transition can also be described as a jump, from a lower level to a higher one. These changes are quantitative, but the period of dynamic transition is a cumulative quantitative value.
Well, my method provides tools to increase the level of intelligence, the stable period is the initial intelligence of a given person, the transition period is training in increasingly higher levels of intelligence, starting from, say, 180 points through 200, 300, 400, 500 to the final level, usually over 1000 points . The period of relatively rapid progression through intelligence levels can be treated as a jump phase, and reaching over 1,000 points as a new phase of stabilization at the highest level. It could be said that the goal of the development process understood in this way is to achieve an IQ value of over 1000 points. The final level will range from 1000, 1200 points to 1600, 1800, or 2000 or even more points depending on the initial intelligence level which may be 100, 120, 160, 180, 200 or more. The rule of thumb is that the final level should be ten times the starting level.
-
It is also conceivable to increase your IQ level by more than 10 times