Total Members Voted: 6
Voting closed: 16/02/2021 12:16:31
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Because the amount of energy in an atom is far greater than the spacetime events of positive and negative attraction you postulation creates
In the case of truly fundamental particles, such as quarks and neutrinos, they aren't made of anything smaller (as we can best tell, experimentally).
Something being conceivable does not make it true. In science, you need experiments or observations that allow you to potentially falsify assertions. Have you done those experiments?
Why would it need to?Is it sending Xmas cards?
I made protons and electrons with my mind - they talk to me telepathically: I know it's not imagination.
How are we meant to distinguish this from psychosis?
Do you recognise that your posts don't make scientific sense?
So they are made of nothing. Why then not consider them made of spacetime events?
I made protons and electrons with my mind
they talk to me telepathically
I know it's not imagination.
Evidence please.
Evidence please. Since when can subatomic particles talk?
How? Wouldn't you need some kind of physical corroboration in order to know that? If so, then what is this corroboration?
I have evidence but it is subjective.
It would seem not to make sense to you because you believe in point particles or strings.
You need to be telepathic to know.
The happenings were outside my head.
Quote from: Petrochemicals on 13/01/2021 20:05:18Because the amount of energy in an atom is far greater than the spacetime events of positive and negative attraction you postulation createsAll of spacetime copied twice could have enough energy..
So, it's not science then.
How do you know?
So are you saying that your model is not capable of being investigated scientifically?
This would be noticed if fabricated from space time events.
It can be tested by someone who is also telepathic.
It's science: I can tell you how to make particles of your own (Earth does not like this).
It can be tested:
I know where I end and the World begins.
It can be tested: it predicts the fields will behave differently from that expected of a point, at very close distances from the particle.
Telepathy is scientificly proven: the proof is on the Internet.
Proof: Suppose they are points. Then it should be possible to superimpose two of them with the same spin.
They could tell me things I didn't know.
Not a proof; it's a non sequitur.
No it isn't, and a lot of lies are on the internet.
Some of the things they told you (and which you posted here) don't make sense.So you don't actually "know" them. You just think you do.
I can prove they aren't points. Proof: Suppose they are points. Then it should be possible to superimpose two of them with the same spin.
See: https://www.whiteoutpress.com/scientists-prove-mental-telepathy-real/https://www.insidescience.org/video/telepathy-realhttps://anomalien.com/scientific-evidence-of-telepathyhttps://www.alittlesparkofjoy.com/telepathywww.yogebooks.com/english/atkinson/1910telepathy.pdf
a lot of lies are on the internet.
I didn't post anything they told me.
I made protons and electrons with my mind - they talk to me telepathically