The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Technology
  4. Is "CO2 direct to bio-fuel" a realistic alternative to petrochemicals?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Is "CO2 direct to bio-fuel" a realistic alternative to petrochemicals?

  • 1 Replies
  • 5315 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline peppercorn (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1466
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 2 times
    • View Profile
    • solar
Is "CO2 direct to bio-fuel" a realistic alternative to petrochemicals?
« on: 13/12/2009 19:56:32 »
http://newsroom.ucla.edu/portal/ucla/ucla-researchers-engineer-bacteria-149726.aspx

"This new approach avoids the need for biomass deconstruction, either in the case of cellulosic biomass or algal biomass, which is a major economic barrier for biofuel production," said team leader James C. Liao, Chancellor's Professor of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at UCLA and associate director of the UCLA–Department of Energy Institute for Genomics and Proteomics. "Therefore, this is potentially much more efficient and less expensive than the current approach."
« Last Edit: 15/12/2009 08:53:45 by chris »
Logged
Quasi-critical-thinker
 



Offline Nizzle

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 963
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 5 times
  • Extropian by choice!
    • View Profile
    • Carnivorous Plants
Re: Is "CO2 direct to bio-fuel" a realistic alternative to petrochemicals?
« Reply #1 on: 15/12/2009 06:02:54 »
Looks promising.
If they now can further splice the Synecoccus elongatus to become more or less transparent, they'd reach even higher yields in 3D growth vessels due to increased light penetration through the colony.

Side note: I wonder how they'll call the bacterium, since after all that splicing, it's not a Synecoccus elongatus anymore...

As i said before: Biotechnology is the future [;)]
« Last Edit: 15/12/2009 06:04:41 by Nizzle »
Logged
Roses are red,
Violets are blue.
Most poems rhyme,
but this one doesn't
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 

Similar topics (5)

Why do we need to light the rocket fuel for a rocket to take off?

Started by GlentoranMarkBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 17
Views: 13772
Last post 18/06/2021 18:27:36
by Just thinking
Is fuel classified as a low explosive, or high explosive?

Started by tareggBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 5
Views: 8710
Last post 06/02/2012 00:41:08
by CliffordK
Could you fuel an anti-gravity device using nickel magnet to break up water molecules?

Started by thedocBoard Chemistry

Replies: 1
Views: 3100
Last post 27/07/2016 17:19:06
by alancalverd
Will a short, steep road, in low gear, use less fuel than a long, shallow climb?

Started by Atomic-SBoard Technology

Replies: 6
Views: 7107
Last post 26/09/2015 10:08:39
by chris
Do magnets on car fuel lines affect engine running and efficiency?

Started by PumblechookBoard Technology

Replies: 51
Views: 64918
Last post 18/12/2017 17:09:59
by syhprum
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.457 seconds with 33 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.