[neilep (OP)]

Dear Sir/Madam,

I am writing this letter to express my disappointment with the size of the universe. I have recently become aware of the vast expanse of space and the infinite number of galaxies that exist beyond our own, and I must say, I am not pleased with what I have learned.

I understand that the universe is vast and has no limits, but I cannot help but feel that it is too big for my liking. The idea of being just a tiny speck in the grand scheme of things is overwhelming and makes me feel insignificant. I cannot comprehend the distances involved, and it is a source of anxiety for me.

I would like to request that the size of the universe be reduced to a more manageable size. I understand that this is a tall order, but I believe it is possible. I believe that a smaller universe would provide a sense of comfort and security to many people who feel the same way I do.

Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to your response.

Sincerely,

[neilep (OP)]

I am writing to express my disappointment about the Grand Canyon being too wide. I understand that the Grand Canyon is a natural wonder and its width is a result of millions of years of erosion, but I feel that it is too overwhelming and difficult to take in from one viewpoint.

To resolve this issue, I suggest that the National Park Service consider narrowing the Grand Canyon. This could be done by adding natural barriers, such as rock formations, along the rim of the canyon to create a more intimate and manageable viewing experience for visitors.

I understand that this is a bold suggestion and that there may be concerns about the impact such a project could have on the natural environment. However, I believe that with careful planning and consideration of the environment, it is possible to create a more manageable and enjoyable experience for visitors while still preserving the beauty and majesty of the Grand Canyon.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,

[neilep (OP)]

Dear Sir/Madam,

I am writing to express my frustration with the current standard of having 60 seconds in a minute. I believe that this number is too high and causes unnecessary stress and time constraints in our daily lives.

I understand that the concept of 60 seconds in a minute has been widely accepted and used for centuries, but I believe it is time to reevaluate this standard. Perhaps reducing the number of seconds in a minute would make time feel less rushed and create a more relaxed pace of life.

I hope that you will take my comments into consideration and consider the possibility of making a change to the current standard. I understand that this is a major change and would require a great deal of effort and coordination, but I believe that the benefits would be well worth it.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,

[neilep (OP)]

Dear Sir/Madam,

I am writing to express my disappointment that Sir Isaac Newton was not born in this century. I understand that he lived in the 17th century and made many significant contributions to science and mathematics, but I believe that his presence and knowledge would be invaluable in today's world.

To resolve this issue, I suggest that we consider the possibility of reincarnating Sir Isaac Newton. This could be done through advanced scientific methods such as cloning or genetic engineering, or even through spiritual means. By bringing Sir Isaac Newton back to life, we would have the opportunity to benefit from his incredible knowledge and genius in a modern context.

I understand that this is a complex and unconventional solution, and that there are likely to be many ethical and scientific hurdles to overcome. However, I believe that the benefits of having Sir Isaac Newton back with us in the present day would be immeasurable and well worth the effort.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,

[paul cotter]

Yes indeed, these difficulties can be overwhelming to an ovine brain but they rarely trouble us anthropoid apes.

[Bored chemist]

Dear Sir/Madam,

I am writing this letter to express my disappointment with the size of the universe. I have recently become aware of the vast expanse of space and the infinite number of galaxies that exist beyond our own, and I must say, I am not pleased with what I have learned.

I understand that the universe is vast and has no limits, but I cannot help but feel that it is too big for my liking. The idea of being just a tiny speck in the grand scheme of things is overwhelming and makes me feel insignificant. I cannot comprehend the distances involved, and it is a source of anxiety for me.

I would like to request that the size of the universe be reduced to a more manageable size. I understand that this is a tall order, but I believe it is possible. I believe that a smaller universe would provide a sense of comfort and security to many people who feel the same way I do.

Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to your response.

Sincerely,

https://sites.google.com/site/h2g2theguide/Index/k/krikkit

[alancalverd]

Fortunately science can come to the aid of our ovine correspondent.

Those of us of a crystallographic or medical imaging persuasion spend a lot of our working lives in k-space where the infinite becomes infinitesimal and teeny weeny ripples in the microcosmos are big enough to see.

Any tourist who is overwhelmed by the Grand Canyon is welcome to visit the road from my house to the research park, and study hundreds of natural canyons formed by the confluence of British council officials, British contractors, and British weather. The canyons are just big enough to destroy an alloy wheel or kill a cyclist. There is an annual ritual of "closing the road" just before the end of the financial year, and a few months later a whole new crop of canyons appear, so it's much more dynamic than its transatlantic counterpart, which hardly changes from one century to the next.

I believe work is already in progress to reform the minute, and the abolition of the leap second has already removed one of life's uncertainties. There are however opposing views on the next phase: when I say "just a minute" The Boss starts nagging after 30 seconds, but when she says it, it means as long as it takes to complete a telephone call, feed the dog and change handbags. I think the compromise might be to lengthen the second.

AFAIK there are no ethical objections to resurrection, and there is even a choice of procedures. Christians of my acquaintance are certain that their entire bodies will be restored to life at some time in the future, and adherents of other faiths are certain that minds and spirits are routinely reincarnated on a daily basis, though not necessarily in the same species. So the broad consensus is that Sir Isaac may indeed already be present as a crab louse or  tapeworm, or if not, he will turn up eventually at the same time as everyone else.

[neilep (OP)]

Yes indeed, these difficulties can be overwhelming to an ovine brain but they rarely trouble us anthropoid apes.

oi ! cheeky chappy !!  lol

[neilep (OP)]

Fortunately science can come to the aid of our ovine correspondent.

Those of us of a crystallographic or medical imaging persuasion spend a lot of our working lives in k-space where the infinite becomes infinitesimal and teeny weeny ripples in the microcosmos are big enough to see.

Any tourist who is overwhelmed by the Grand Canyon is welcome to visit the road from my house to the research park, and study hundreds of natural canyons formed by the confluence of British council officials, British contractors, and British weather. The canyons are just big enough to destroy an alloy wheel or kill a cyclist. There is an annual ritual of "closing the road" just before the end of the financial year, and a few months later a whole new crop of canyons appear, so it's much more dynamic than its transatlantic counterpart, which hardly changes from one century to the next.

I believe work is already in progress to reform the minute, and the abolition of the leap second has already removed one of life's uncertainties. There are however opposing views on the next phase: when I say "just a minute" The Boss starts nagging after 30 seconds, but when she says it, it means as long as it takes to complete a telephone call, feed the dog and change handbags. I think the compromise might be to lengthen the second.

AFAIK there are no ethical objections to resurrection, and there is even a choice of procedures. Christians of my acquaintance are certain that their entire bodies will be restored to life at some time in the future, and adherents of other faiths are certain that minds and spirits are routinely reincarnated on a daily basis, though not necessarily in the same species. So the broad consensus is that Sir Isaac may indeed already be present as a crab louse or  tapeworm, or if not, he will turn up eventually at the same time as everyone else.

The thought that Sir Isaac could well be a part of my gut bacteria is comforting and explains my healthy bowel movements  !! lol

if it is not imposing too much, I would dearly love to see some pictures of your locality.....making me very jealous here as a suburban sheepy of London Town.

[alancalverd]

I would dearly love to see some pictures of your locality

Think Oxford, but prettier and more intellectual [other opinions are available].