Naked Science Forum
On the Lighter Side => New Theories => Topic started by: Spacetectonics on 16/12/2012 08:57:16
-
http://www.spacetectonic.com/index.html (http://www.spacetectonic.com/index.html)
Spacetectonic is discussing changes in the energy fields throughout the universe based on an arithmetic system at the energy field levels.( similar to magma on the planet earth ,which creates all visible materials)
Seeing the universe bounce us some extraordinary comparisons between space constructions and the planet earth at the first instance, although this twin is not exactly the same but some wonders on our green planet put us under a new regime which could explain the universe way of live. UTS is the fundamental of this system which follows space symmetry of SR theory in aggregation to an unique system of measurement which could be the secret behind entire creation.
Universe Theoretical Arithmetic System
A=0,A=1,A=2,A=3,A=4,A=5,A=6,A=7,A=8,A=9 ,A = Infinity when A0 to A9 are equal and IF Degree of “A” spins between 0-360 Degrees in X,Y,Z planes, Clockwise and counter clockwise respectively. “A" will be equal to infinity when it heads outside any of these planes regardless of its direction.
The above phrase is the skeletons of the UTS ,a simulation based on Complex numbers at the energy levels !!
SpaceTectonics assumptions and basics:
First : our existence is based on energy criteria, including what has been known as Higgs field in QM.
Second: Changes in Energy criteria could create/destroy/generate matter/forces, all we could/could not see in the universe.
Third: The above changes are happening based on a unique analytic system I call it UTS,it is embedded in universe symmetry.
Forth: UTS is acting just like Orogeny as on the planet earth , changes in Energy levels .
Fifth: UTS first core is AINE "Universe arithmetic line" an energy based system which is comparable (only in shape) to the UTM ,AINE is a worldwide evolution mathematical program(energy vortex) which push the entire cosmos forward.(literally a numeric system!)Just like a grove for water to follow! Or gravity!
Sixth: UTS is multi-operational system and it is self-adjustable we could effect it and it could change us both way.
Seventh: The planet earth could be used as an instinct model to understand the universe, new stars, black-hole theories, quasars and all other objects and phenomenon we see in universe could have a root of understanding on the planet earth.
-
Does this give rise to a testable theory or is it word salad?
(practically speaking, those are the only two options)
-
Thanks for your comment,
It looks like a salad to me for now, that’s why I put it up in poll!
But if you would like to test some Minerals formation process, i.e. in a LHC simulation or you enjoy Bees/Ants and their beehives/nests in a flooded EMR ground, yes it could be testable!
Obviously they are hard to do tasks, but there must be other safer/cheaper methods!
And about my Tee-ore!
I am sure sometimes in your life you have wondered why in nature, things assemble themselves? How creatures find their way to build their own structures? Why mankind has an extraordinary ability named Mind? And how a flake of snow shapes? How the minerals form. These are very basic facts we come cross them asking about them and 9 out of 10 we get an answer which doesn’t make sense, directing us right to the middle of the bush! Having said that increasing level of intellect about the universe and how for instance Higgs field could gift a mass to an object simply raise a question and that question could be:
“Could a unified energy field(s) become the initiator of all above process when it prearranged in a quantified arithmetic system, to cooperate with the matters and forces in the nature? ”,
that question has originated from the earth .what I mean by the earth, is the wonders which created everything on the planet; from the beach sand to the color of red roses, this includes Earth structural formations, magma and many other systems of activities.
Imagine The UTM system, break it down to the pieces and build it again, not in 2D this time but four dimensions and instead of the coordinates, implant energy fields in it. Now you may see a multi-dimensions grove like pathway, which could interrelate with the living/dead conceptions.
The main core of Spacetectonic is what I called it UTS, I am still trying to find a mode out of and comprehend it, but if you are interested you could follow its update at my webpage! I update it in a geological time frame as it appears!
Cheers
???
-
Don't know, maybe if we ever decide what we really think 'energy' is? To me it's a expression of outcomes, and need those to be expressed.
-
Forgot to add, 'energy' is also observer dependent. It depends on two frames of reference communicating, although I assume that if you ever could become 'at rest' with a photon (not possible:) Which to me is a closest description of 'energy', you should find it to never vary that energy.
==
Maybe one could use red and blueshifts for 'proving' the existence of 'latent energy' existing though? As the photon definitely need to react with 'something' to be gravitationally 'accelerating/blue shifted'. But that would indeed make 'energy' equivalent on some plane to 'gravity' :) And if that is true the equivalence principle between a 'gravity' as expressed in the gravity of a uniformly moving planet, and a constant uniform motion can't be, I think. But maybe there is some way to make sense of that too?
One might be able to argue that gravity communicates with matter, possibly? That matter and gravity are not the same, but rather must come to be as a result of each other?? Doesn't make much sense that one, does it :)
-
The point with a uniformly moving planet is that all experiments you do should turn out the same, no matter your speed, or choice of mass/planet, loosely speaking. What that says is that whatever 'energy' one want to define to a uniformly moving planet, and one would definitely want that if one want the idea of gravity and energy to be equivalent, the same, then why does it disappear? It's not expressed locally, only between those frames of reference, as we can see by accelerating a planet to then let it move uniformly again, doing the same experiments again, finding no difference (locally that is).
-
Hi Spacetectonics,
I've moved your thread as it's discussing new ideas in physics rather than being science Q&A or discussion of existing physics. For future reference, new theories belong in this forum, while discussions of "mainstream" ideas in physics can go in the Physics and Astronomy forum.
-JP, moderator
-
-JP, moderator
[/quote]
Thanks JP and sorry for any inconvenience,
Reason I Have put this on that page was its future trend, which will drift into Higgs field/spins/coupling ,quantum numbers and in general"the main stream of physics ", as you have probably notice I have started the main thread Under a discussion board not a poll,but that is fine I shall move the incoming questions to the physics page.Unfortunately I have forgotten to check the no-Comment bottom ;if any!! :)
Thanks for your attention,
Cheers,
-
A Theory of Everything would unify all the fundamental interactions of nature: gravitation, strong interaction, weak interaction, and electromagnetism. Because the weak interaction can transform elementary particles from one kind into another, the ToE should also yield a deep understanding of the various different kinds of possible particles.
My tee-ore though is all the way around!it some-times makes sense to me !
It is based on some reasoning from the "earth" and I call it a hypothesis ,that is why it is on the board!
Here is an introduction!
Looking to the universe from geology prospective (material, non-consciousness/Non-supernatural)
1) Everything from the Center of the earth into the last top molecule –particle in the atmosphere, has been made of the energy, we can burn them melt them change them but we cannot do the same to that space-time yet!
2) Space-time is equivalent to the energy too somehow, where magma on the earth, is doing the task.
3) A comparison between magma/minerals and universe/matter brings awfully similar concept, where the energy level changes in magma/space-time, minerals/matters could form.
4) At the electron level for instance “quantum numbers” are reasoning the energy level of the matter, in geology same thing is leading the show, (energy level) in magma defines the mineral type(Heat, chemical,…).
5) Energy fields exist throughout the universe and they are crucial for existence of the Byronic matter.
6) Now the question is what could act as a coupling feature to relate these changes at the energy field(s) and led them to creation/destruction of matter/forces(4) and the rest?
(I stop this section here [For TOE] and finished it with this: “There could be a quantified/self-organized energy field(s) to carry these tasks)
7) for #6 we have some options, a very complicated mathematical controls (i.e. calculating the Higgs boson quantum numbers in a 34 pages of formulas) or a very simple system to be comprehend-able for an ant (please see those researches done on “math and ants” at my website, basically they are representing that not a big brain is needed to appreciate math, so could it possibly be a signal of an arithmetic system imbedded in the universe itself, or something similar?
(I understand if you ask now, how they could use it? good question but no answer yet).
8) before going to number 9…..I shall have to say, Energy level at the electron for instance, is based on the angular momentum of it(more A.M , bigger the distance(orbit) and higher the energy??(Or I may be wrong!), please see the previous posts.
and here it is:
Assumption number one:
imagine wild life uses math to do their tasks; for now (I am aware of the genetic claims but none has been proved yet as far as I know!).
What type of math is required to do its task?
Simple one.
What it may look like?(lets imagine you are in the middle of the ocean and you are trying to find your way back home ,just like those 12 century sailors!)
A 3 Dimensions system (or may be 4D) of Universal arithmetic/energy vortex!
How they may use it?
AS a reference point!
How they could interact with it?
In conjunction to a coupling system I named it UTS!
Could we test this, before take it to calculations levels?
May be there are many candidates up there but as a stupid question, have we ever experienced founding of NACL in a distorted Space-time?
End of the section 1 !
-
I think that many physicists would agree that you can understand much about the physical universe if you can successfully model the energy levels (of galaxies, stars, planets, molecules, atoms, electrons and subatomic particles) using mathematics.
I think that you could use the flow of magma within the earth as an analogy to convective processes happening in the Sun, and perhaps some of its effects, like oscillating magnetic fields.
But I think that it is harder to use common events on Earth to model other events in the Sun, like hydrogen fusion, simply because the conditions that favour extensive hydrogen fusion do not happen on Earth.
Be aware that even a Theory Of Everything may not be usable for calculating Everything; at large scales, the underlying quantum effects are less visible, and it is usually easier to use a physical approximation rather than the more accurate quantum calculations.