The Naked Scientists
Toggle navigation
Login
Register
Podcasts
The Naked Scientists
eLife
Naked Genetics
Naked Astronomy
In short
Naked Neuroscience
Ask! The Naked Scientists
Question of the Week
Archive
Video
SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
Articles
Science News
Features
Interviews
Answers to Science Questions
Get Naked
Donate
Do an Experiment
Science Forum
Ask a Question
About
Meet the team
Our Sponsors
Site Map
Contact us
User menu
Login
Register
Search
Home
Help
Search
Tags
Member Map
Recent Topics
Login
Register
Naked Science Forum
On the Lighter Side
New Theories
G.O.D. designer IS compatible with Science. Fresh perspective.
« previous
next »
Print
Pages:
1
[
2
]
Go Down
G.O.D. designer IS compatible with Science. Fresh perspective.
23 Replies
11080 Views
0 Tags
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
mirormimic
(OP)
Full Member
52
Activity:
0%
Phonetics= picture owing idios
Re: G.O.D. designer IS compatible with Science. Fresh perspective.
«
Reply #20 on:
26/09/2012 00:23:21 »
look closely at this image.
I will explain in further posts
Logged
A picture is worth........!
mirormimic
(OP)
Full Member
52
Activity:
0%
Phonetics= picture owing idios
Re: G.O.D. designer IS compatible with Science. Fresh perspective.
«
Reply #21 on:
26/09/2012 01:11:33 »
In the lower left of the image I have depicted an “atom.” This is represented by a small “shape” that is colored violet, blue and indigo. This “atom” or “photon” (invisible light source) is represented as though we could see it and its “shape quality.” Really this part of the equation (the left side ..vector) is invisible. We can only understand its energy light and quality after it is communicated to the reflective plane. Everything pictured on the left side (first square with image inside, then gradually being copied or fractled back into the plane) is representing the “atom” from varying distances (illusion of distance). These various distances from atom is a product of the atom being reflected to a surface then continuing to reflect to other surfaces. Once the atom is reflected from surface to surface then it appears that each representation of the atom gradually shrinks. (Yet! If we were way back to the right looking toward the surface, then the atom would appear to expand.) .
The red lines emanating from the light source (atom, photon or particle of light) simulate the light ray. The path of the light ray is going toward the reflective plane (the surface or horizon= the first reflected square in the succession of squares). The path of light ray is implanted upon the screen .and arrives at the screen at such and such angle. This would describe the reflective plane as relatively deviating from parallelism to light ray.
You see that the atom is represented at all points ( All squares) either larger or smaller due to the copying of itself. This continual perpetuation of the light source is dictated by mirror to mirror reflection.
The quality of 3 dimensions is described as ‘emergent’ due to the properties of refraction. The surface reflection of each successive square represents the horizon of each “creature;” represented as big or small relative to the first surface reflection occurring on the first square. This horizon represents the farthest point of each object ; and would represent the geometric extent of the space allotted for each fractled mass object (or entity). This would represent a reflected ‘skin or membrane’ and would result from light reflecting to a surface.
Each reflected square in the succession is representing also a certain volume of space. This area, from geometric surface through the thickness, describes the geometric object as having such and such shape as well such and such diametric area; from circumference ( skin, membrane or horizon) down through the space, to a perceived center.
Note: All points in the circle or sphere are exactly as all other points; where a true center is precluded as occurring. Rather, all points are reflecting on the surface and reflecting the light source. So the real center of all mass objects is actually found outside the reflective plane. This “center” represents the singularity of all points of mass to the sole point of light outside the plane.
You will notice that on the right side (reflective mass side) I depicted stars. Yet! On the left side I did not depict these points of light. This is designed to show that everything on the left side (the true quality and energy of light) is actually invisible! Yet, once the invisible light (dark energy) is reflected, then we catch a glimpse and can visibly see what is happening on the ‘dark matter’ side. The only way to perceive the nature of True Light and True Energy is for this Light and Energy to reflect itself. Due to the reflective and refractive properties of the plane, what is invisible is communicated to perspective points of visible light and “mass” Along with this visible representation of light ( Where “mass” merely represents reflected light) comes the corresponding volume of energy and quality afforded to the mass.
Light that is un-refracted is invisible. This states that dark energy is actually bulk light ( Argumentatively: Dark Matter) and we can only see this light when we observe mass objects. This would state that mass objects are merely the refractive forms of pure white light photon.
Not only is the atom (particle light and energy) reflected to the shapes appearing in each square, but all reflected stars are also representative of atom(s) being reflected. The closer the mass is to the atom the smaller the mass will appear to be. The farther from the light source the reflective plane is that receives the light, the larger the reflected light will be (or reflective system: I.E; nebula, galaxy or universe.
Yet we would have to ascertain which reflections are occurring on the surface and which mass objects represent the surface reflection undergoing a strange sort of continual copying. Supper symmetry!
Where super symmetry refers to “continual symmetry” of the same symmetric shape occurring on the surface; and relative to the ultimate symmetry residing on the left side.
The left side, as described, is full of dark energy. We do not refer to “dark” as “black” rather we understand it to mean: Invisible to the human eye.
Note: Notice that all images to the right are representative of the “color” of the “atom”..inverted. I will discuss the relevance of this latter on.
«
Last Edit: 26/09/2012 01:16:22 by mirormimic
»
Logged
A picture is worth........!
mirormimic
(OP)
Full Member
52
Activity:
0%
Phonetics= picture owing idios
Re: G.O.D. designer IS compatible with Science. Fresh perspective.
«
Reply #22 on:
26/09/2012 01:52:07 »
Further illustration.
Here we add a relative observer who is looking at the first surface reflection and is not focused on any other successive reflections. This observer sees light photon reflected to the screen (horizon) and sees a monkey. That is to say: The geometric shapes recorded on the surface and as qualitatively colored forming the likeness of a monkeys face. The beach ball was added as well to simulate the shapes appearing on the screen. This really represents a relative observer receiving light photon through the processes innate to the visual processes, followed by the brains interpretation of the shape and color of the ball and monkey. Is the surface of the human eye to be considered as an accompanying (or the sole) horizon relative to light photon?
«
Last Edit: 27/09/2012 22:46:35 by mirormimic
»
Logged
A picture is worth........!
mirormimic
(OP)
Full Member
52
Activity:
0%
Phonetics= picture owing idios
Re: G.O.D. designer IS compatible with Science. Fresh perspective.
«
Reply #23 on:
28/10/2012 17:30:36 »
Supersymmetry is explained relative to the principles of reflection. Although the presumption is that:
"So far, there is no direct evidence for the existence of supersymmetry."( Reference: Wicipedia: Supersymmetry)....":
This seems to ignore the reality that the "mirror effect" is demonstrative evidence that reflection can produce supersymmetry. How so?
If one stands in front of a mirror their image is duplicated exactly as it is. The only deviations would be if you hold up your right hand then your representation/image in the mirror hold up "its" left. Further; If the real person ( as opposed to the mirror image) were to spin a top clockwise in front of the mirror then the representation of the top (in the mirror) shows the direction as counterclockwise. This seems to fit the definition of supersymmetry; as:
'relating elementary particles of one spin to other particles that differ by half a unit of spin and are known as superpartners..."(Wicipedia: Suppersymmetry).
There has been an argument that "mirror matter" is ONLY an expression of the "doubling" phenomenon and that it differs from suppersymmetry merely because supersymmetry:
'is a continuous symmetry relating particles with different spin...." where; "mirror matter" is a "discreet symmetry..."( Quotations derrived from: "The Encyclopedia Of Science: Mirror Matter")
It seems that these statements fail to realize that what occurs relative to mirror reflection is NOT confined to just something reflected into a mirror.( i.e,..symmetric doubling of an image). If these statements did soley define mirror reflection as a discreet phenomenon and as confined merely to an object or light as reflected to ONE plane then such may appropriately be called a separate phenomenon from supersymmetry.
However we are forgetting that while mirrors do double and object; if a reflective plane is relative to another reflective plane then reflections "continue" to repeat. With this added to the equation then mirrors are not just confined to producing "doubles"nor are they to be confined to producing simple symmetric equivalents of the object mass or light reflected. Rather: If we factor in the perpetual "doubling"( after the first stage of reflection then a perpetual copying of the original image.. into infinity) that occurs when one mirror faces another, then this produces a "continuous symmetry;" with all reflections related to one another. Thus if the "loose" interpretation is that: The "difference" between symmetry and supersymmetry relative to the "mirror effect" is the abscence of "continuity,".. relating particles with different spin," then we have ignored that mirrors that reflect to mirrors DO produce a continual reflection; continuity of symmetry; continuity of sameness. Thus:
We should not confine our persceptions tojust the 'doubeling effect' relative to mirror matter but as well should acknowledge that perhaps the forces involved in the processes of the universe are themselves expressions of the reflective princiles.( expand our view to accomodate the reality that mirror to mirror reflection produces supper symmetry as well). We cannot narrow our view that just the objects produced are evidentiary "miiror matter" ( of elementary elements) but should expand our relative awareness to accomodate the possibility that the invisible PROCESSSES also follow set principles of reflection and continuity.
I have tried to speak on this by defining how the "mirror effect" ( producing many principles and guided by many invisible as well visible processes) could represent strings. I do not mean that "mass object" strings are attatched to one another and that we just cannot see them. However I am stating that the processes that occur due to the relativity of light to reflective planes, continually "connects" one point to another or to others. The 'string' is not literal, rather demonstrates a.. relatonship.. between the elementary particles and their equivalent reflections.( E=mc2) A relationship that is defined by stating:
Energy is attached to its reflection(s). And if, one end of a string(E) is attached to a reflective plane(the other end of the string=mc), and if after this initial reflection this plane is also relative to another/other plane(s), then a continuous "stringing" occurrs as: Linking all reflections to the original, progenitor end of the string( Side E). In this scenario the strings are described not as literal strings but as reflective points that are relative to preceeding and suceeding reflective points; all produced because one plane is reflecting to another plane( or others) producing the perpetual reflections innate to the "mirror effect."
This would seem to both define symmetry ( a mirror image doubling of a .."thing") as well as supersymmetry( subsequent, "continual" reflecting that occurs when one mirror reflects to another). If this is so then we discover that reflection ( "mirror effect") can produce both symmetry( "discreet"-surface) and supersymmetry( continual). The only difference would be that an object or phenomonen as symmetrically percieved is only reflecting light or energy to its plane while having NO relativity to the reflective surface of another( or other) planes. The object that is considerately ( or percieved to be so) supersymmetric would be that one reflective plane is reflecting TO another reflective plane( producing continual symmetries.) Thus this demonstrates that both the 'discreet symmetry" and the "continuous symmetry" are both explained relative to the same process. Mirror effect! This may reconcile the discreet to the continuous as being representations ( perspectively or infinitly) of the same thing.
«
Last Edit: 28/10/2012 17:43:35 by mirormimic
»
Logged
A picture is worth........!
Print
Pages:
1
[
2
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
Tags:
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...