0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
String theory says particles are strings. This does not rhyme with particles made of different quarks since strings are alike.
Vibrating in inverse ways
Particles are made of quark-antiquark pairs.
If there is no time reference then there is no way for two strings to vibrate in inverse ways.
Particles are made of quark-antiquark pairs. If there is no time reference then there is no way for two strings to vibrate in inverse ways. Therefore at least a time reference is to be encoded into particles. Then there is the problem of how to encode mass, charge, color charge and isospin into the vibration.
I stated a reason for it to be wrong: not that I don't understand it:Quote from: talanum1 on 15/05/2021 12:35:20Particles are made of quark-antiquark pairs. If there is no time reference then there is no way for two strings to vibrate in inverse ways. Therefore at least a time reference is to be encoded into particles. Then there is the problem of how to encode mass, charge, color charge and isospin into the vibration.Vibrating in inverse ways means the following: when one string is in state: Inverse Wave.png (1.51 kB . 410x187 - viewed 2219 times)the other is in state: Wave.png (1.55 kB . 429x193 - viewed 2128 times)and so on for the wave to evolve.We see in any case the two strings are the same at the zero points.
There is a difference between pure and applied science.
For example, diamonds in a pure science; geological POV, are assumed to take millions of years to form at high temp and pressures. In applied science, we can make diamonds in the lab in a fraction of the time with hot presses and catalysts.