0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Geezer on 24/07/2010 21:11:44I must say I'm a bit disappointed by the lack of reaction to my Norwegian joke.Probably rather too subtle for you lot.No I got it, very good
I must say I'm a bit disappointed by the lack of reaction to my Norwegian joke.Probably rather too subtle for you lot.
It is still not funny but then nothing funny has come out of Norway, except for their Eurovision entries.
That one's "awa tae the side" too!Ye need tae shove a carriage return between the pictur and the ural.
Quote from: Geezer on 26/07/2010 04:48:13That one's "awa tae the side" too!Ye need tae shove a carriage return between the pictur and the ural.The URL was directly under the image on FireFox, but not IE.
Quote from: Make it Lady on 24/07/2010 22:01:02It is still not funny but then nothing funny has come out of Norway, except for their Eurovision entries. Ah! You must be missing the satire gene then. Were your ancestors German by any chance?
Quote from: Geezer on 26/07/2010 04:48:13That one's "awa tae the side" too!Ye need tae shove a carriage return between the pictur and the ural.I've inserted the blank line as you requested, but the URL was directly under the image on FireFox (my usual browser), but appears different on IE ... [ Invalid Attachment ] No blank line between bottom edge of image and URL on IE, (so blame uncle bill for the wonky URLs).
When I viewed it (on IE8) I think the URL was to the right of the image as if the image and the URL were on the same line of text. My window is quite wide, so perhaps they were on the same line and IE8 saw no reason to word wrap the URL to the next line. If I had shrunk my window width it might have put the URL beneath the image.Maybe that's got something to do with it?
Window width (and character size) would be factors determining whether the URL was on the side or the next line,however FireFox and IE do seem to display the URL differently even on wide windows ...
Quote from: RD on 27/07/2010 02:37:17Window width (and character size) would be factors determining whether the URL was on the side or the next line,however FireFox and IE do seem to display the URL differently even on wide windows ...I don't doubt it! No doubt each will say the other is wrong []I think what I saw looked like the upper example. Is that IE8?