0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
The point I am making, briefly, is that an impulse engine can be made, yet we need to think outside the square, and that means sacrificing a few long held "beliefs", one of which is central to "negative energy", namely the idea of "anti-matter",
Quote from: opportunity on 21/11/2018 02:56:31The point I am making, briefly, is that an impulse engine can be made, yet we need to think outside the square, and that means sacrificing a few long held "beliefs", one of which is central to "negative energy", namely the idea of "anti-matter",Antimatter is real.https://home.cern/news/news/physics/still-making-tracks-eighty-years-positronWe have pictureshttps://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/95918/why-does-the-spiral-of-a-positron-have-a-larger-radius-than-that-of-an-electronSo your idea is wrong.You should now stop posting about it.Continuing to post about something which you know to be wrong is trolling.
This could be a slow process...Anti protons also clearly exist We have pictureshttps://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=i&source=images&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwiO6rnfvufeAhXt4IUKHbBRDJ4Qjxx6BAgBEAI&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.sciencesource.com%2Farchive%2FProton-Antiproton-Collision-in-Bubble-Chamber-SS2405191.html&psig=AOvVaw0-tyrA_evmQ5hxiQ9HvwHt&ust=1542958564061025Antimatter is real.Your idea is wrong.Are we going to have to run through the entire gamut of antiparticles one at a time, before you accept the very simple fact that you are wrong?
the practicality of anti-particles across the entire spectrum of standard elementary particles become problematic.
Quote from: opportunity on 22/11/2018 08:27:46 the practicality of anti-particles across the entire spectrum of standard elementary particles become problematic.And, since, in every case where we have looked, they do actually exist, your idea is, as you put it "problematic".Or, as I put it; your idea is wrong.
Quote from: Bored chemist on 23/11/2018 07:32:57Quote from: opportunity on 22/11/2018 08:27:46 the practicality of anti-particles across the entire spectrum of standard elementary particles become problematic.And, since, in every case where we have looked, they do actually exist, your idea is, as you put it "problematic".Or, as I put it; your idea is wrong.Excuse me. My goodness. You're not even a physicist, right?My quoted statement is valid.Positrons are a natural decay process in the field of the weak nuclear force, but all other anti-particles are "very" problematic. "In other words" (and is English you're first language or science you're first field) these particles "do not predominate in reality".Who are you to twist my words?
an impulse engine can be made, yet we need to think outside the square, and that means sacrificing a few long held "beliefs", one of which is central to "negative energy", namely the idea of "anti-matter"
Bored Chemist, no, these particles are "inferred" to exist, and no not last more (as you quote) than 10^-23 seconds, yet "less than".....read the abstract. Have you read the article btw? They are problematic. Anything that lasts less than 10^-23 seconds is problematic. Read the abstract again
Quote from: opportunity on 23/11/2018 23:58:02Bored Chemist, no, these particles are "inferred" to exist, and no not last more (as you quote) than 10^-23 seconds, yet "less than".....read the abstract. Have you read the article btw? They are problematic. Anything that lasts less than 10^-23 seconds is problematic. Read the abstract again Something that short lived is a problem.However the actual physical evidence shows pictures of antiparticles.Those pictures show the tracks of particles.Even if the particles are travelling practically at the speed of light, the few centimetres of track show that the particles existed (at least) for a time equal to the time taken for light to traverse a few cm.That's about 10^-10 seconds.OK, that's not long.But, for you to "mistake" 10^-10 seconds for 10^-23 seconds is equivalent to losing 13 orders of magnitude.It's like muddling the distance across town, with the distance across a (small) molecule.
This is the abstract of the link you posted:Bubble Chamber Event. Resonances last typically for a mere 10 (-23 power) s and therefore leave no discernible track in a bubble chamber. But by calculating back from the energies and angles of the particles that are detected, physicists can infer that a resonance has existed. In this picture from a bubble chamber at Berkley, an antiproton, coming from below, annihilates with a proton to produces two negative pions, a neutral pion and two positive pions. The negative pions move off to the left, the positive pions to the right, while the pi-zero is undetected. The lower pi-plus decays to a muon, the short piece of track, and then to a positron, which curls out of the picture. The information in the picture ins consistent with the lower-energy pions, the lower tracks on left and right-being the decay products of a resonance state known as the omega.
Gentlemen ( except the BS artist ) ,
Quote from: Professor Mega-Mind on 20/11/2018 14:08:34What's an Impulse Engine ? If it is a rocket with an ISP of a billion , I will call it that !