Naked Science Forum
On the Lighter Side => New Theories => Topic started by: Yusup Hizirov on 11/08/2018 19:59:17
-
1.Why high tides are formed in temperate zones, and not at the equator?
2. Are there alternative theories of tides?
According to the lunar theory of tides, the Earth's crust at the latitude of London, with a frequency of twice a day, rises and falls with an amplitude of about 20 cm, at the equator the swing of oscillations exceeds half a meter (2.5 times more).
https://ru.m.wikibooks.org/wiki/Трудные_темы_курса_физики/Приливные_силы_и_волны
Then why, the highest tides are formed in the temperate zones and not at the equator?
The highest tides on Earth are formed in the Fandi Bay in North America - 18 m, Ungava Bay Quebec - 17m, at the mouth of the Severn River in England - 16 m, in the Bay of Mont-Saint-Michel in France - 15 m, in the mouths of the Sea of Okhotsk, Penzhinskaya and Gizhiginskaya - 13 m , at the cape Nerpinsky in the Mezensky Bay - 11 m.
To answer this question, we need to name 5 gulfs in the equatorial zone, where the height of the tides exceeds 10 meters, otherwise the lunar theory about tides loses logic.
If to argue logically, at the equator the height of the tide should be 35-40 meters.
If, the Bay of Fundy was on the equator, then the height of the tide was 45 meters.
https://www.co-ops.nos.noaa.gov/faq2.html#26
The swirling theory of tides
https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=73127.0 explains this inconsistency by the absence of whirlpools at the equator, as well as cyclones and anticyclones.
To form whirlpools, cyclones and anticyclones, the deflecting force of Coriolis is needed. At the equator, the Coriolis force is minimal and in the temperate zones, it is maximal.
LINK REMOVED
MOD EDIT: DO NOT ADVERTISE YOUR OWN NEW THEORY IN THIS SECTION
-
Not credible ones.
-
There are some competing theories/models of gravitation (Newtonian vs General Relativity, vs gravitons), but once you choose a model, tides are well-described.
-
Not credible ones.
How are their names
-
Why high tides are formed in temperate zones, and not at the equator?
Here's a counter example
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turama_River
it only takes one counter example to show that you are wrong.
A bit of research brings this to light
" It appears that the range of the tides gets larger the further the location from the equator. What causes this?
If you only consider a few locations, this may seem to be true; but it is not the case. Literally hundreds of locations in the extreme north and south latitudes have small tidal ranges, and a number of stations closer to the equator have large tidal ranges. For example, Korea is at roughly the same latitude as most of the U.S. coast. Numerous stations in Korea have a tidal range of more than 20 feet, most of the U.S. coast has a tidal range of 3-6 feet. A number of locations very near the equator which have a tidal range of 15-17 feet."
from
https://www.co-ops.nos.noaa.gov/faq2.html#26
-
Coriolis force is minimal and in the temperate zones, it is maximal.
No, it is maximal at the poles.
One of your problems with the whirlpool idea is that Coriolis effect is not responsible for the speed of the rotation only the deflection; also it is not responsible for the precession which for a gyroscope would be max at equator and zero at the poles.
-
Why high tides are formed in temperate zones, and not at the equator?
Here's a counter example
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turama_River
it only takes one counter example to show that you are wrong.
https://www.co-ops.nos.noaa.gov/faq2.html#26
Q: Where are the highest tides?
Below is a listing of 50 locations from around the world where the largest range of tides that have been observed.
Station Mean Range (feet)
Burntcoat Head, Minas Basin, Bay of Fundy, Nova Scotia 38.4
Horton Bluff, Avon River, Minas Basin, Bay of Fundy, Nova Scotia 38.1
Amherst Point, Cumberland Basin, Bay of Fundy, Nova Scotia 35.6
Parrsboro (Partridge Island), Minas Basin, Bay of Fundy, Nova Scotia 34.4
Hopewell Cape, Petitcodiac River, Bay of Fundy, New Brunswick 33.2
Joggins, Bay of Fundy, Nova Scotia 33.2
Leaf Lake, Ungava Bay, Quebec 32.0
Port of Bristol (Avonmouth), United Kingdom 31.5
Grindstone Island, Petitcodiac River, Bay of Fundy, New Brunswick 31.1
Spencer Island, Bay of Fundy, Nova Scotia 30.5
Newport, Bristol Channel, United Kingdom 30.3
Sunrise, Turnagain Arm, Cook Inlet, Alaska 30.3
Burnham, Parrett River, United Kingdom 29.9
Weston-super-Mare, Bristol Channel, United Kingdom 29.5
Rio Gallegos (Reduccion Beacon), Argentina 29.0
Koksoak River entrance, Hudson Bay, Canada 28.5
Herring Cove, Bay of Fundy, New Brunswick 28.3
Granville, France 28.2
Cardiff, Bristol Channel, United Kingdom 28.1
Leaf Bay, Ungava Bay, Quebec 28.0
Banco Direccion, Magellan Strait, Chile 28.0
Cancale, France 27.8
Bahia Posesion, Magellan Strait, Chile 27.5
Ile Haute, Bay of Fundy, Nova Scotia 27.5
Barry, Bristol Channel, United Kingdom 27.1
----------------------------------------------
The waters of the Gulf of Papua rotate clockwise, forming a huge whirlpool -
gyroscope, which, precessing, reflects a tidal wave in the direction of the Turama River. (there is no data on the flow velocity and the height of the tidal wave).
A similar pattern of tides and tides is observed in all lakes, seas and oceans.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:New_guinea_Turama.png
Your links are contradictory.
-
Your links are contradictory.
If you say that, you clearly haven’t bothered to read the links @Bored chemist took the trouble to post for you.
It says quite clearly that you are wrong in your assertion:
“It appears that the range of the tides gets larger the further the location from the equator. What causes this?
If you only consider a few locations, this may seem to be true; but it is not the case. Literally hundreds of locations in the extreme north and south latitudes have small tidal ranges, and a number of stations closer to the equator have large tidal ranges. For example, Korea is at roughly the same latitude as most of the U.S. coast. Numerous stations in Korea have a tidal range of more than 20 feet, most of the U.S. coast has a tidal range of 3-6 feet. A number of locations very near the equator which have a tidal range of 15-17 feet.”
You are guilty of cherry picking your data.
-
a number of stations closer to the equator have large tidal ranges.
Why are high tides formed in temperate zones, and not at the equator?
I am not the author of this question, in science it has long been asked and this is the Achilles heel of the lunar theory of tides.
To answer this question, we need to name 5 gulfs in the equatorial zone, where the height of the tides exceeds 10 meters, otherwise the lunar theory about tides loses logic.
-----------------------------------------------
According to the lunar theory of tides, the Earth's crust at the latitude of London, with a frequency of twice a day, rises and falls with an amplitude of about 20 cm, at the equator the swing of oscillations exceeds half a meter.
Then why, the highest tides are formed in the temperate zones and not at the equator?
The highest tides on Earth are formed in the Fandi Bay in North America - 18 m, Ungava Bay Quebec 17, at the mouth of the Severn River in England - 16 m, in the Bay of Mont-Saint-Michel in France - 15 m, in the mouths of the Sea of Okhotsk, Penzhinskaya and Gizhiginskaya - 13 m , at the cape Nerpinsky in the Mezensky Bay - 11 m.
-
Why are high tides formed in temperate zones, and not at the equator?
Why do you think they should be highest at the equator?
-
this is the Achilles heel of the lunar theory of tides.
Why?
-
Why are high tides formed in temperate zones, and not at the equator?
Why do you think they should be highest at the equator?
According to the lunar theory of tides, the Earth's crust at the latitude of London, with a frequency of twice a day, rises and falls with an amplitude of about 20 cm, at the equator the swing of oscillations exceeds half a meter.
-
this is the Achilles heel of the lunar theory of tides.
Why?
When high tides are formed in temperate zones, and not at the equator - this is chaos (the absence of logic, this is chaos).
-
When high tides are formed in temperate zones, and not at the equator, it is chaos.
Just saying "it is chaos" doesn't tell us anything.
According to the lunar theory of tides, the Earth's crust at the latitude of London, with a frequency of twice a day, rises and falls with an amplitude of about 20 cm, at the equator the swing of oscillations exceeds half a meter.
And is that the only thing that makes a difference?
No, obviously not.
-
The highest tides on Earth are formed in the Fandi Bay in North America - 18 m, Ungava Bay Quebec 17, at the mouth of the Severn River in England - 16 m, in the Bay of Mont-Saint-Michel in France - 15 m, in the mouths of the Sea of Okhotsk, Penzhinskaya and Gizhiginskaya - 13 m , at the cape Nerpinsky in the Mezensky Bay - 11 m.
The swirling theory of tides explains this inconsistency by the absence of whirlpools at the equator, as well as cyclones and anticyclones.
I have sailed in the Severn estuary several times and have yet to encounter these whirlpools you seem to think are present.
-
Again, you are being selective with the data. If you look at a map of the world you will see that the equator passes through very few coastal places whereas the 2 temperate zones include a large number of coastal sites, so your two samples are not comparable.
As I pointed out before, your precession theory would result in larger tides at the equator than anywhere else, so the onus is on you to provide the evidence.
In reality the maximum tidal bulge follows the moon’s orbit which does not follow the equator. Many people mistakenly think it does and so make an incorrect assumption.
You say your "theory" solves all the problems.
Please show us ho you would use it to calculate (as an example) the times of the next few high tides in London, New York or Barcelona or some other place where we can check.
If you can't do that then your idea doesn't even solve the simplest problem.
Unfortunately you are avoiding answering @Bored chemist and looking at your post I can see why.
The length of the tidal wave depends on the diameter of the whirlpool. And the height of the tidal wave depends on the rotation speed of the whirlpool of the orbital velocity of the Earth, and the time of the tilting of the whirlpool (12 hours).
A = V1 • V2 / t
where: A is the amplitude of the tidal wave (precession angle).
V1 - rotation speed of the whirlpool.
V2 is the orbital velocity of the Earth.
t - the time of tilting of the whirlpool (12 hours).
The first problem with this formula is that it does not return an amplitude, it produces a number of square metres per second. That is clearly wrong.
Next problem involves timing:
As is known, everything that rotates, including whirlpools, possess the property of a gyro (yule) to maintain the vertical position of the axis in space, regardless of the rotation of the Earth.
If you look at the Earth from the Sun, the whirlpools, rotating together with the Earth, turn over twice a day, due to which the whirlpools precess (swing by 1-2 degrees) and reflect the tidal wave around the entire perimeter of the whirlpool.
A rigid gyroscope on earth will indeed align itself to the sidereal day which is 4mins shorter than the solar day. However, that gives a number of problems for your theory.
Firstly, we know from observation that the main tide period is period is about 12hrs 25mins - half a lunar day - so two tides take 24hrs 50mins which is the average time for the Earth to rotate once relative to the Moon. This is a hugh difference from your difference of 4mins in 24hrs making your double tide period 23hrs 56mins. Clearly your predictions can never work with this theory.
Your precession theory is also flawed because we are not dealing with a rigid gyroscope, so rather than turning over the water level would rise at one edge until gravity restrained it, leading to a constant level.
I have sailed in the Severn estuary several times and have yet to encounter these whirlpools you seem to think are present.
They don’t exist in the channel or north sea either. He is confusing tidal wave circulation with currents and doesn’t understand the difference.
There are so many false assumptions in these various topics that is hardly worth the effort of replying, especially as the op isn’t listening and just keeps repeating the same old false claims.
-
Yusup Hizirov
If the whirlpools existed and caused the tides, then there should be equally high tides all round them.
Do you have data showing anything like that?
-
Again, you are being selective with the data. If you look at a map of the world you will see that the equator passes through very few coastal places whereas the 2 temperate zones include a large number of coastal sites, so your two samples are not comparable.
Take even wider.
You have the advantage, you collect data at the equator, and I'm in the temperate zone.
According to the lunar theory of tides, the earth's crust at the latitude of London rises and falls twice a day with an amplitude of about 20 cm. At the equator, the swing of oscillations exceeds half a meter (2.5 times more).
If to argue logically, at the equator the height of the tide should be 35-40 meters.
If, the Bay of Fundy was on the equator, then the height of the tide was 45 meters.
-
Again, you are being selective with the data. If you look at a map of the world you will see that the equator passes through very few coastal places whereas the 2 temperate zones include a large number of coastal sites, so your two samples are not comparable.
Take even wider.
You have the advantage, you collect data at the equator, and I'm in the temperate zone.
According to the lunar theory of tides, the earth's crust at the latitude of London rises and falls twice a day with an amplitude of about 20 cm. At the equator, the swing of oscillations exceeds half a meter (at the equator 2.5 times more).
If to argue logically, at the equator the height of the tide should be 35-40 meters.
Have you evidence for that assertion?
-
Again, you are being selective with the data. If you look at a map of the world you will see that the equator passes through very few coastal places whereas the 2 temperate zones include a large number of coastal sites, so your two samples are not comparable.
Take even wider.
You have the advantage, you collect data at the equator, and I'm in the temperate zone.
According to the lunar theory of tides, the earth's crust at the latitude of London rises and falls twice a day with an amplitude of about 20 cm. At the equator, the swing of oscillations exceeds half a meter (2.5 times more).
If to argue logically, at the equator the height of the tide should be 35-40 meters.
If, the Bay of Fundy was on the equator, then the height of the tide was 45 meters.
Have you evidence for that assertion?
All these data are on the Internet.
https://ru.m.wikibooks.org/wiki/Трудные_темы_курса_физики/Приливные_силы_и_волны
The earth's crust at the latitude of Moscow, with frequency twice a day, rises and falls with an amplitude of about 20 cm. At the equator, the swing of oscillations exceeds half a meter.
https:/.../dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/enc_geo/6965/приливы
https:/.../slovar.wikireading.ru/1092227
-
Again, you are being selective with the data. If you look at a map of the world you will see that the equator passes through very few coastal places whereas the 2 temperate zones include a large number of coastal sites, so your two samples are not comparable.
Take even wider.
You have the advantage, you collect data at the equator, and I'm in the temperate zone.
According to the lunar theory of tides, the earth's crust at the latitude of London rises and falls twice a day with an amplitude of about 20 cm. At the equator, the swing of oscillations exceeds half a meter (at the equator 2.5 times more).
If to argue logically, at the equator the height of the tide should be 35-40 meters.
If, the Bay of Fundy was on the equator, then the height of the tide was 45 meters.
Have you evidence for that assertion?
All these data are on the Internet.
https://ru.m.wikibooks.org/wiki/Трудные_темы_курса_физики/Приливные_силы_и_волны
So thanks to them, the earth's crust at the latitude of Moscow, with frequency twice a day, rises and falls with an amplitude of about 20 cm. At the equator, the swing of oscillations exceeds half a meter.
https:/.../dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/enc_geo/6965/приливы
https:/.../slovar.wikireading.ru/1092227
My apologies. The question should have been 'do you have any credible, peer reviewed sources to back up your assertion'.
-
The Earth's crust moves about that far when (or at the same frequency as) the moon passes over.
What doesn't seem supported is the conjecture that "If to argue logically, at the equator the height of the tide should be 35-40 meters.
If, the Bay of Fundy was on the equator, then the height of the tide was 45 meters.
-
Why high tides are formed in temperate zones, and not at the equator?
According to the lunar theory of tides, the Earth's crust at the latitude of London, with a frequency of twice a day, rises and falls with an amplitude of about 20 cm, at the equator the swing of oscillations exceeds half a meter (2.5 times more).
https://ru.m.wikibooks.org/wiki/Трудные_темы_курса_физики/Приливные_силы_и_волны
Then why, the highest tides are formed in the temperate zones and not at the equator?
The highest tides on Earth are formed in the Fandi Bay in North America - 18 m, Ungava Bay Quebec - 17m, at the mouth of the Severn River in England - 16 m, in the Bay of Mont-Saint-Michel in France - 15 m, in the mouths of the Sea of Okhotsk, Penzhinskaya and Gizhiginskaya - 13 m , at the cape Nerpinsky in the Mezensky Bay - 11 m.
To answer this question, we need to name 5 gulfs in the equatorial zone, where the height of the tides exceeds 10 meters, otherwise the lunar theory about tides loses logic.
If to argue logically, at the equator the height of the tide should be 35-40 meters.
If, the Bay of Fundy was on the equator, then the height of the tide was 45 meters.
https://www.co-ops.nos.noaa.gov/faq2.html#26
The swirling theory of tides https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=73127.0 explains this inconsistency by the absence of whirlpools at the equator, as well as cyclones and anticyclones.
To form whirlpools, cyclones and anticyclones, the deflecting force of Coriolis is needed. At the equator, the Coriolis force is minimal and in the temperate zones, it is maximal.
If these facts have not convinced you, ask questions, we will convince.
-
According to the lunar theory of tides, the Earth's crust at the latitude of London, with a frequency of twice a day, rises and falls with an amplitude of about 20 cm, at the equator the swing of oscillations exceeds half a meter (2.5 times more).
https://ru.m.wikibooks.org/wiki/Трудные_темы_курса_физики/Приливные_силы_и_волны
Then why, the highest tides are formed in the temperate zones and not at the equator?
So you think that solid rock and liquid water behave the same way? Seriously?
-
For I am the God of science.
Ask questions at the level of your status.
Seriously?
-
For I am the God of science.
Ask questions at the level of your status.
Seriously?
Whilst reading and comprehension don't seem to be your your strong points, look at this again. Have you not noticed that it is a quote from another forum member?
-
For I am the God of science.
Ask questions at the level of your status.
Seriously?
1. Whilst reading and comprehension don't seem to be your your strong points, look at this again.
2. Have you not noticed that it is a quote from another forum member?
1. This is due to the inaccuracy of the translation.
2. Ask this question where you read it, there is more information you need.
-
For I am the God of science.
Ask questions at the level of your status.
Seriously?
For I am the God of science.
Ask questions at the level of your status.
Seriously?
In answer to For I am the God of science.
Ask questions at the level of your status.
Seriously?
1. Whilst reading and comprehension don't seem to be your your strong points, look at this again.
2. Have you not noticed that it is a quote from another forum member?
1. This is due to the inaccuracy of the translation.
2. Ask this question where you read it, there is more information you need.
You indi2. Ask this question where you read it, there is more information you need.
For I am the God of science.
Ask questions at the level of your status.
Seriously?
For I am the God of science.
Ask questions at the level of your status.
Seriously?
In answer to For I am the God of science.
Ask questions at the level of your status.
Seriously?
1. Whilst reading and comprehension don't seem to be your your strong points, look at this again.
2. Have you not noticed that it is a quote from another forum member?
1. This is due to the inaccuracy of the translation.
2. Ask this question where you read it, there is more information you need.
You indi2. Ask this question where you read it, there is more information you need.
You are claiming this is a quotye from Kryptid. It is not - hence my point about reading and comprehension not being one of your strong point. Look again at Kryptid's posts - this is not a statement he is making, he is quoting your friend TheBox. Claiming otherwise is dishonest.
-
Give me a link to the question TheBox.
-
Give me a link to the question TheBox.
What are you going on about?
-
Ask questions at the level of your status.
Seriously?
Why are so many people on this discussion board blind? I put Thebox's quote in my signature because it was so ridiculous that I couldn't ignore it. It even says, "Quote from: Thebox on 14/05/2018 08:57:39". Please try harder next time.
Here is a link to the post where he calls himself the "God of science": https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=73259.msg541982#msg541982:
GRRRRR, just no , I am not having it, you are insulting my intelligence.
Space is not tangible, it is verifiable that space cannot be destroyed.
I am correct and ''you'' are incorrect.
I am the hero of my story and the hero does not give in to subjective dogma and cognitive control, the hero kick's ass on the dance floor.
Let's dance, I am the genius in this story , not ''you'' .
For I am the God of science.
Now, do you really think that solid rock and liquid water behave the same way?
-
According to the lunar theory of tides, the Earth's crust at the latitude of London, with a frequency of twice a day, rises and falls with an amplitude of about 20 cm, at the equator the swing of oscillations exceeds half a meter (2.5 times more).
https://ru.m.wikibooks.org/wiki/Трудные_темы_курса_физики/Приливные_силы_и_волны
Then why, the highest tides are formed in the temperate zones and not at the equator?
So you think that solid rock and liquid water behave the same way? Seriously?
Absolutely right.
-
Absolutely right.
Alright then. Get back to me when you find instances of whirlpools, wind-blown waves, currents and tsunamis inside of Mount Everest.
-
According to the lunar theory of tides, the Earth's crust at the latitude of London, with a frequency of twice a day, rises and falls with an amplitude of about 20 cm, at the equator the swing of oscillations exceeds half a meter (2.5 times more).
https://ru.m.wikibooks.org/wiki/Трудные_темы_курса_физики/Приливные_силы_и_волны
Then why, the highest tides are formed in the temperate zones and not at the equator?
So you think that solid rock and liquid water behave the same way? Seriously?
Absolutely right.
The gravity of the moon does not reach the rock and the water.
-
The gravity of the moon does not reach the rock and the water.
So you think the Earth has some kind of force field that keeps the Moon's gravity out now?
We know for a fact that the Moon's gravity does reach Earth and it can even be detected. Watch the following clip from Mythbusters starting at the 30:00 mark:
They state that they were able to detect the Moon passing overhead using their gravity meter.
-
The gravity of the moon does not reach the rock and the water.
That is strange, because if it didn't, the moon would not orbit the earth, it would travel in a straight line and fly off into space....
-
The gravity of the moon does not reach the rock and the water.
So you think the Earth has some kind of force field that keeps the Moon's gravity out now?
We know for a fact that the Moon's gravity does reach Earth and it can even be detected. Watch the following clip from Mythbusters starting at the 30:00 mark:
They state that they were able to detect the Moon passing overhead using their gravity meter.
Now let them measure gravity and tides at the equator, "there it is 2.5 times larger".
-
Now let them measure gravity and tides at the equator, there it is 2.5 times larger.
So now you agree that you were wrong when you said, "The gravity of the moon does not reach the rock and the water"? Also, gravity is not 2.5 times stronger at the equator. Where did you get that idea from?
-
Why high tides are formed in temperate zones, and not at the equator?
According to the lunar theory of tides, the Earth's crust at the latitude of London, with a frequency of twice a day, rises and falls with an amplitude of about 20 cm, at the equator the swing of oscillations exceeds half a meter (2.5 times more).
https://ru.m.wikibooks.org/wiki/Трудные_темы_курса_физики/Приливные_силы_и_волны
Then why, the highest tides are formed in the temperate zones and not at the equator?
The highest tides on Earth are formed in the Fandi Bay in North America - 18 m, Ungava Bay Quebec - 17m, at the mouth of the Severn River in England - 16 m, in the Bay of Mont-Saint-Michel in France - 15 m, in the mouths of the Sea of Okhotsk, Penzhinskaya and Gizhiginskaya - 13 m , at the cape Nerpinsky in the Mezensky Bay - 11 m.
To answer this question, we need to name 5 gulfs in the equatorial zone, where the height of the tides exceeds 10 meters, otherwise the lunar theory about tides loses logic.
If to argue logically, at the equator the height of the tide should be 35-40 meters.
If, the Bay of Fundy was on the equator, then the height of the tide was 45 meters.
https://www.co-ops.nos.noaa.gov/faq2.html#26
The swirling theory of tides
https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=73127.0 explains this inconsistency by the absence of whirlpools at the equator, as well as cyclones and anticyclones.
To form whirlpools, cyclones and anticyclones, the deflecting force of Coriolis is needed. At the equator, the Coriolis force is minimal and in the temperate zones, it is maximal.
If this post does not convince you of anything, you need to escape from this forum and science (quickly).
-
If this post does not convince you of anything, you need to escape from this forum and science (quickly).
I guess that would leave you as the only member of the forum, now wouldn't it?
Funny how you ignored my questions about whether the Moon's gravity reaches the Earth or not.
-
If this post does not convince you of anything, you need to escape from this forum and science (quickly).
I guess that would leave you as the only member of the forum, now wouldn't it?
Funny how you ignored my questions about whether the Moon's gravity reaches the Earth or not.
Before you write a post, you need to read the topic. (adhering to a minimum of morality).
Answer 182, 184:
https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=73127.180
-
If this post does not convince you of anything, you need to escape from this forum and science (quickly).
I am convinced that you don't know what you are talking about.
-
If this post does not convince you of anything, you need to escape from this forum and science (quickly).
I guess that would leave you as the only member of the forum, now wouldn't it?
Funny how you ignored my questions about whether the Moon's gravity reaches the Earth or not.
Before you write a post, you need to read the topic. (adhering to a minimum of morality).
Answer 182, 184:
https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=73127.180
I rebutted both those posts of yours at the time.
Since they are known not to be true, there's not much point telling people to read them.
-
Before you write a post, you need to read the topic. (adhering to a minimum of morality).
Answer 182, 184:
https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=73127.180
So you're still dodging my question...
-
Moon's gravity reaches the Earth or not.
Before you write a post, you need to read the topic. (adhering to a minimum of morality).
Answer 182, 184:
https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=73127.180
-
Before you write a post, you need to read the topic. (adhering to a minimum of morality).
Answer 182, 184:
Why should he read two wrong posts?
Just answer the question.
-
1. Why should he read two wrong posts?
2. Just answer the question.
These two sentences contradict each other.
-
1. Why should he read two wrong posts?
2. Just answer the question.
These two sentences contradict each other.
How is reading two posts that say something that's not true, going to answer the question?
Why are you unable to answer his question unless he reads some posts that don't say anything?
-
Kryptid said that he no longer participates in the discussion of the topic. So the question was closed.
-
Kryptid said that he no longer participates in the discussion of the topic. So the question was closed.
Whether @Kryptid participates or not has no effect on whether this topic is closed.
This topic is open to anyone.
-
"Tidal force" in the equatorial zone is the same everywhere.
Then why, the height of the tides is different.
-
I think the general "volume" of water is greater around the equator, and thus owing to the pull of the mass beneath the water table there would "have to" be more variation at the poles. Yet in the event of polar melting, that ice would be held as water more equatorial, yet of course the idea of tidal fluctuations "outside" that equatorial rim still the norm.
The basic issue is the centrifugal effect of the spin of the planet holding the mass of water "more" equatorial, hence tidal influences "more" polar. Apologies for not highlighting that point I was underwriting.
Here's something interesting that ocean wildlife appears to be yielding to:
https://www.smh.com.au/environment/climate-change/sydney-s-marine-life-turning-troppo-as-coral-other-species-head-south-20180904-p501ns.html
Another issue:
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/australiaandthepacific/kiribati/9127576/Entire-nation-of-Kiribati-to-be-relocated-over-rising-sea-level-threat.html
-
"Приливная сила" в экваториальной зоне везде одинакова.
Тогда почему, высота приливов разная.
?
-
Kryptid said that he no longer participates in the discussion of the topic. So the question was closed.
That does not stop you answering the question he asked, does it?
-
"Tidal force" in the equatorial zone is the same everywhere.
Then why, the height of the tides is different.
-
"Приливная сила" в экваториальной зоне везде одинакова.
Тогда почему, высота приливов разная.
And what does that mean? Why don't you use the language that is used on the forum?
-
"Tidal force" in the equatorial zone is the same everywhere.
Then why, the height of the tides is different.
-
"Tidal force" in the equatorial zone is the same everywhere.
Then why, the height of the tides is different.
As has been explained to you previously, because of local topography. You choose to ignore it though , because it does not fit in with your fantasy.
Please answer my question above.
-
1. Because of local topography, the amplitude of the tides can not be so different, at the same height of the tidal wave.
2. On top of many questions, please repeat the question.
-
1. Because of local topography, the amplitude of the tides can not be so different, at the same height of the tidal wave.
What does that even mean?
And the question was as to why you are posting in Russian when people on the forum do not understand this language as you well know, but chose to ignore.
-
"Tidal force" in the equatorial zone is the same everywhere.
Then why, the height of the tides is different.
What will be the final answer?