0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I mean the intrinsic mass of the quark particles.In a proton mass is encoded as added points of space on a circle in a construction of two half-Riemann spheres and one half-Riemann anti-sphere, where an anti-sphere is a sphere made of left out points of space.The gluons can be one dimensional and fit on the edges of the spheres. Hence the gluon fields don't need to be modeled as flux tubes.
However - take out the gluons from the proton and its mass would be Zero.
Picture you are on a spaceship. As we approach the speed of light, the universe would appear contracted through our window. This would be a local reference illusion, caused by our velocity and space ship's mass dragging along local space and time for the ride. The entire universe is not doing this. If we slow down, the universe would now to expand. This would look, out our window, just like the BB in a microcosm, but it would be connected to the local impact of mass on our local reference.
@puppypower If you have your own theory, it's probably better etiquette to provide a link to your theory instead of interjecting it into someone else's. Having said that, this is very interesting...
Mass is equated to energy via the Einstein equation E=MC2. However, there is a difference between mass and photon. Photons can travel the speed of light, but mass cannot travel that fast. This tells me that rest mass is at higher potential than rest photons.
If the universe began with energy; photons, that suddenly condenses into mass particles, since the mass has to go less than the speed of light, we will get a slow down of reference, by default.
Just consider the mighty EM that the CERN facility can generate. Unfortunately, not even one photon could be created over there.
The LHC has 1232 bending magnets. Each one of them produces photons when they accelerate (bend) the path of protons.- This is a major energy loss when the LHC is storing protons with constant energy.See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synchrotron_radiation#Synchrotron_radiation_from_accelerators
- So the LHC does generate energetic photons (gamma rays), and carefully maps their direction and energySee: https://home.cern/news/news/experiments/alice-through-gamma-ray-looking-glass
So, it doesn't generate new particles
Each quark is actually a "cell" of EM energy.
The LHC doesn't generate new photons/particles pair out of nothing or out of virtual particles.Therefore, I wouldn't use the statement as: "the LHC does generate energetic photons (gamma rays)" but I will say that the LHC extract energetic photons (gamma rays) from existing matter as proton.
This is consistent with another connected theory I proposed, in another topic.
The million dollar question is, if matter is at higher potential than the speed of light reference
Quote from: puppypower on 06/03/2021 12:03:12This is consistent with another connected theory I proposed, in another topic. Well, since Dave's idea is wrong, that suggests that yours is too.
QuoteQuote from: Bored chemist on 03/03/2021 18:07:33on a scale of "the size of a proton" - of the order of a femtometre (10^-15 M)- the effect would be something like 10^36 times bigger.so the total "mass" is:10^36 x 1.02 MeV/c2 = about 10^36 MeV/c2Now let's find how many Proton is needed for that mass:10^36MeV/c2 / 938 MeV/c2 = about 10^33 protons.So, based on your answer, in an empty space of a proton size, there could be a total 10^36 photons which represent a mass of 10^33 protons.Is it real?If so, please backup that understanding by real article.If it is just an imagination, then why do you continue with those lies?What do you gain with that? What is your real mission?
Quote from: Bored chemist on 03/03/2021 18:07:33on a scale of "the size of a proton" - of the order of a femtometre (10^-15 M)- the effect would be something like 10^36 times bigger.
QuoteQuote from: Dave Lev on Today at 09:47:34The LHC doesn't generate new photons/particles pair out of nothing or out of virtual particles.Therefore, I wouldn't use the statement as: "the LHC does generate energetic photons (gamma rays)" but I will say that the LHC extract energetic photons (gamma rays) from existing matter as proton.This is consistent with another connected theory I proposed, in another topic.
Quote from: Dave Lev on Today at 09:47:34The LHC doesn't generate new photons/particles pair out of nothing or out of virtual particles.Therefore, I wouldn't use the statement as: "the LHC does generate energetic photons (gamma rays)" but I will say that the LHC extract energetic photons (gamma rays) from existing matter as proton.
The million dollar question is, if matter is at higher potential than the speed of light reference, where did the energy come from? It would be like a rock starting on the ground and suddenly reaching the stratusphere.
How long are you going to continue with those lies?
We can continue more and more so the 100 rocket should move at 10 times the speed of light.
For all of the other readers out there, I want to point out that this technique will not allow you to exceed the speed of light. Accelerating from below the speed of light up to the speed of light would require infinite energy. Relativity forbids what Dave Lev is suggesting.
Well, why do you offer the following imagination?
Well. every speed must be reference to something and I have simple answer to your question:It is called Rocket Over Rocket, or Galaxy over galaxy.