Naked Science Forum
On the Lighter Side => New Theories => Topic started by: JukriS on 21/02/2007 11:58:28
-
If we dont know how gravity working, we have to ask, is there any gravity at all
I can explain everything with pressure change, so i dont need gravity at all.
Lets take a look this videoclips.
Dont worry about language, we have english text in video.
This video is old one. We need to make new one.
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/?lang=1&noflt=1&haku=%5Bvideo%3A
One simple principle
According to this simple principle (the Savonian theory) the universe consists of only energy and space. Energy is the one and the same energy that has the ability to wrap up into denser space and the ability to open up into less dense energy in space, which does not expand or bend. You can perform an experiment by trying, how a single concentration of energy (you, in this case) can wrap up into smaller space (foetal position), in which less energy is released from you. Then you can try to think how the energy in the core of an atom is always denser and denser, depending on how close the energy is to the center of a separate energy concentration.
Does history repeat itself? People, who believed that the earth was the centre of universe, thought erroneously that the earth stays in its own place and all the celestial objects circle us. Modern theories suggest that all visible objects of the universe mostly stay in a static area in space, which expands in such way that the universe does not expand outwards into existing space. This model requires an additional space dimension, which is rather impossible for people to understand.
The Big Bang
According to the Big Bang theory, in the beginning there was only a very dense concentration of energy and space was created inside this concentration in a big explosion. But what if all this energy begun to open up outwards to a space that already existed?
We do not have to assume that all energy in that concentration opened up evenly. According to my theory, all energy in that concentration begun to push itself away from the center of the concentration while expanding at the same time. When all the energy tried to expand into every direction, it caused an enourmous pressure towards the center, and that pressure kept this energy hot and dense. The farther the energy traveled, the faster it could expand, and thus the faster the movement became.
Let us assume that there was another similar concentration in space, and the energies from these two concentrations collided. As a result, these energies from the two sources no longer had unlimited space to expand into, so instead they were squeezed into separate, smaller concentrations, which then started releasing their own energy waves.
This can explain how smaller particles and separate concentrations were created from two larger concentrations of energy as they were expanding three-dimensionally.
Savor
:);):)
-
Perculiarly my Finnish is limited to tooth, lamb, and rhubarb pie, which does not qualify me to read your site. However you appear to be trying to redefine the whole of physics in different terms. In which case you have a lot of immensely accurate observations to explain, and the lack of maths worries me.
ps I will move this thread to new theories, as it is one.
-
It seems to me that, in your videos, you're saying that all energy concentrations emit energy waves. These energy waves repel each other, explaining the expansion of the universe. You then go on to say that these energy waves cancel each other out and create a pressure differential (gravity). How can the energy waves repel each other AND cancel each other out? If energy repeled itself, wouldn't these hypothetical energy concentrations be unstable? You seem to contradict yourself quite a lot...at least in the videos.
-
Most important video is protons and neutrons = protonit ja neutronit.
How meteor/asteroids burning in ear?
Savor
:);):)
-
This is total rubbish and has no sensible relationship with the most simple physical observations
It is about as sensible as assering that the moon is made out of green cheese!
-
It is about as sensible as assering that the moon is made out of green cheese!
Oh, come on. Are you seriously saying that the moon is not made of green cheese?
-
deleted as inapproprate
-
paul because you want to, thats procrastination really coz tomorrow you'll put it off aswell, really thats sounds to me like somthing you say everyday; to not do somthing. might be wrong through. because you want to is my answer to that. besides you might not be here tomorrow, correct? why assume there is a tomorrow, your saying is silly
Hello Mr/s Jolly. I found it amusing, and somewhat reflective of the society we live in. Just for you i have changed it.
-
there is gravity and ther isnt it depends where in the universe you are, there certainly is on the earth, or are you saying that you want to rename it somthing else? what ever you call that force it still exsists. as we and you all feel it. or are you saying that its percevied so it could be an illusion? which would explain levatation. but i think it dose exist. as if it was just percieved some of us would float.
If you are in spaceships who moving faster and faster, you have same gravity what we have here in earth. Thats you feeling, you dont feel about some power, who keeping you here.
Savor
:);):)
paul because you want to, thats procrastination really coz tomorrow you'll put it off aswell, really thats sounds to me like somthing you say everyday; to not do somthing. might be wrong through. because you want to is my answer to that. besides you might not be here tomorrow, correct? why assume there is a tomorrow, your saying is silly
-
your saying is silly
not as sill as 'boys dreul' which they do not. They may drool, or even druel. Which is the verb of drool.
-
Protons and Neutrons
According to my theory protons and neutrons are similar 3-dimentionally expanding concentrations of energy and they unroll energywaves which have the nature of even smaller 3-dimentionally expanding concentrations of energy. This way protons and neutrons (which we could call with a mutual name) get more energy from the samekind of concentrations nearby and that causet that the protons and neutrons explode / uproll energy towards each other. With this energy they push themselves away from each other with the same respect as they expand.
From the middle of the “surface” towards the centre, the energy is four times denser wrapped and from this point towards the middle of the centre even more four times denser wrapped energy. Therefore in an area which has the same size has 16 times more energy than on the “surface” of the consentration. This distance can be divided in halves in endless times and that makes us ask if there is enormeous amount of dense wrapped energy in the centre of energyconsentration.
In the atom cords of heavy substances these consentrations exist more side by side. Consentrations can push themselves away from each other faster than they expand rarely and then there is a question about atoms going halves. The atoms of heavy substances go halves faster because their centres have more consentrations, which burn each others energy faster and because of that from the cords of heavy atoms it opens up denser energywaves than from the light atomcords. That is not enough because by reason of 3-dimentional expansion it must all the time open up more and more energy from the cords of heavy substances in relation to the atomcords of light substances so that these heavy substances would expand observably as fast as the light substances. So in principle the energy of heavy substances expands faster ja because of that all the substances as we see expand with a increasing speed at the same as they preserve their form and capasity from the point of humans view for a reasonably long periods.
With the help of the videoclip attached, I will show you how the protons and neutrons have always expanded with an increasing speed. It may be difficult for you to accept this theory even though it´s understandable. If I am right about my theory, please remember that people about 500 years ago were in a same situation when Copernicus and Galilei overturned our opinions about the universe. The sun seemed to circle us, but it doesn´t! The objects that drop seem to be moving towards the centre of earth, but according to this new theory they also push themselves away from the centre of earth slower than the surface of the earth and then they only seem to move towards the centre of earth while dropping towards the surface of the earth.
Savor
:);):)
-
Do you think soul surfer realizes how funny he is?
-
Age of globe*
If I am right about my theory, how many times has the globe circulated the sun? It might very well be so, that once the planets have pushed themselves away from the sun much more directly. Not until then when there has become
energywaves from other galaxies has the orbit of each planet bended more curved and settled to the stable speed it has now. So the atoms of the globe have vibrated for 4,5 billion years, but if the globe once did´t circulate the sun nearly as fast as it nowadays does, we can ask how old the globe really is? If the age is counted so that one year is one circuit, so how old is the globe then?
-
Cold fusion*
Apparently nowadays most of the people in science societies don´t presume that the so called cold fusion could be possible. According to my theory it however is possible. As a matter of fact it is a relevant part of the
principles of the universe.
As I understand, observations of cold fusion can be observed in a certain substance, that has hydrogen atoms. A sound (=a certain pressure wave) is conducted to that substance and according to my theory this sound cleans the
energywaves opening up at that that moment from two different hydrogen atomcores with the sound. After that these two cores of hydrogen atom don´t push themselves away from each other at the same relation as they expand.
The other atoms around them continue to expand and push this way these two hydrogen atomcores close to each other with the energywaves that open up from themselves. This is the way that helium atom is born. At the same time it releases so called pure energy, which could maybe be used by a convenient technology.
It is possible, that the solid substance of the sufrace of earth has born like in cold fusion. Maybe the energybundles that came towards the globe and were energic enought caused that the liquid altered to a solid substance.
Maybe the globe once was a gasplanet and a gas altered to a liquid and a liquid to a solid substance.
-
Quasars*
Quasi-stellar objects (QSO)
Is it possible that the visible universe moves in a moment entirely away from the space where it locates now, so that everything expand / explode at the same time and become for example to times bigger than they are now?
Are the galaxies photons of a substance that is in one size larger scale?
Are the quasi-stellar objects formed at the same time when the giant energyconcentrations of the galaxycentres pass by the similar concentrations that come against nearby?
Maybe the whole visible univese moved for the first seven billion years inside a substance that was one scale larger.
Also the photons give way to the photons coming against by waves that open up by themselves. The nearer the passing happens the more the opening energy from the energy concentration comimng against makes the concentration to explode energy in frontsides and with this energy they pass to another direction.
Is the corona of the sun formed when the energybudles coming against the sun pass nearby the energybudles opening up from the sun? Or does there happen straight smashes?
Savorinen
:);):)
-
Stars *
According to my idea, stars are formed out of gigantic, three-dimensionally expanding energy concentrations in the centres of galaxies, which release energy waves with an atomic nature. Energy waves that open up contain expanding quarks.
A sufficient energy pulse from outside sweeps with it the energy waves released by the quarks, which would otherwise push other quarks away in a relation analogous to their expansion. Now, the quarks start to expand and come close to each other in a way similar to cold fusion, forming what is called protons and neutrons, which are similar expanding energy concentrations releasing energy waves.
This explains one of the mysteries in modern physics, that is, how it is possible that new stars still come into existence near the gigantic black holes in galaxy centres. If the black holes indeed had a force that the calculations show, that attractive force ought to prevent the formation of new stars. My idea, in turn, could predict the new stars in the vicinity of the huge black holes in galaxy centres.
Savorinen
:);):)
-
If we dont know how gravity working, we have to ask, is there any gravity at all
I am confident you are correct. There is no gravity: the Earth sucks.
-
The Lightnings
Lightnings exist in a certain weather, when there is a certain kind of pressure variation in atmosphere. At first the energy rapidly explodes from down to up towards a less dense area and this dense energypulse cleans the energy opening from the atomcores with the energypulse up towards a less dense area.
The energybundles of this energic pulse open energy itself forwards. Now one energybundle in this energyfront hits to some atonscore higher up, before the actual energypulse reaches there. It makes really a lot of energy to explode from there. This energy is now directed also to an area that has the least dense energy and locates now down, from where the front of the energypulse (the pilotwave) has cleaned energy upwards with it.This is why the actual lightning strikes straight towards the energypulse that has opened up from downwards.
Look also ”the Tsunami 2004” subject in Geology section.
Many blue jets exist in upper atmosphere and they release really a lot of energy upwards like fans. Is this a mystery to a modern technology?
Let us think, that towards the globe there comes energywaves from space and the energic energybundles of these energywaves meet energybundles that open up from the globe. The energybundles coming from the globe clean with them away from the globe the energywaves that come from energybundles coming towards the globe. Now the energybundles coming towards the globe don´t push themselves separate from each other at the same relation
as they expand. This is how they reach out each other without actually moving towards each other.
The energybundles coming towards the globe unite themselves to more energic energybundles. At the same time they themselves clean with them the energywaves opening up from the upper atmospheres atomcores. At some point one energybundle in that energypulse hits to some three-dimentionally expanding centre of energyconcentration that locates in atomcore of atmosphere.
This makes a lot of energy to explode from that towards a less dence area up above from where the energypulse itself has just cleaned energy with it towards the globe. During the movement of energypulse coming towards the globe, those atomcores from which the energypulse cleaned energy with the pulse, have had time to push themselves away from the centre of the globe so that now the strongly exploding energy can spread powerfully upwards as a fan.
Savorinen
:);):)
-
Tornados*
There are lots of researches about tornados, but this phenomen is still not quite understood.
Often lightnings belong to the birth of tornado. Let us think how the energy of a lightning cleans up the energy opening up from the atomcores of atmosphere with it and the atomcores of that area don´t push themselves away. The atoms outside this area continue pushing themselves away from each other and this is how the atomcores in target area of a lightning push themselves close to each other. This is how a gas statue developes. After that the atom cores start to push themselves forcefully away from each other. The atoms of the statue don´t have the power to push each other towards a less dence area, that is to say upwards so that the statue could stay straight. It twistes itself to a tornado, and its atoms / molecules capture with them the molecules of the atmosphere alongside. This is how masses of air begin to flow towards the tornado on account of variation of pressure.
-
High tide *
The energybundles coming from the moon burn out approximately in a four degree sea storey increasing this way the energy/thickness of energywaves opening up from atomcores. This way the waves are able to push away more
efficient these expanding atomcores of this storey. That causes perceptible thermal expansion and tide phenomen. When the globe has swinged around its axle a quarter this same storey has got colder to a four degree and yet after another swing of quarter that storey gets golder to under four degrees
and expands again faster than other substaces. This causes a new tide.
Water is such an extraordinary substance, that it expands while getting colder to under four degrees. This idea of mine is able to explain that the energywaves opening up from the molecules of water bend more efficient
towards the centre of watermolecules nearby in a water that is under four degrees cold. This way these molecules push each other away more efficient and expand three-dimentionally at the same time.
Savorinen
:);):)
-
The tracklevel of planets*
Planets always try to push themselves away from their stars to a area, where they get the least thick energy from the star. And every planet in a way float in an energysea opening from the star (the same way as the fishing float does) plumping around its axle depending which side of the planet is thicker. The thicker side of the planet is plumping down towards the sun (= the "the bottom of the sea).
Also the galaxy is like a plate, this way for example towards the sun there comes more energywaves from other stars in equator level of sun than from the direction of the sunpoles. The sun makes the energywaves of other stars to bend. When the stars pass the sun above, they bend and go gross with the energywaves that have passed the sun beneath. These waves also bend. That is why there is in a way an energyfurrow in a energysea coming from the sun and all the planets take their places according how thick the planets themselves are. This is compared to a thing how the water take its place in a river at the bottom of a valley or a pass.
Savorinen Jukka
:);):)
-
Acceleration +
Why dont we on the globe orbit observe the acceleration away from the Globe?
Same time we also dont observe the acceleration away from the Sun.
The neutrinos coming from the Sun expand three dimensionally and move their kinetic energy to the atomic cores.
Also same kind of energy coming from the Globe expand three dimensionally and move their kinetic energy to the atomic cores of the spaceport on the Globes orbit seperately.
When we move away from the surface of the Globe, we can see more of it.
There will also be more opening energy bunches which expand and move their kinetic energy to other materials on the Globe orbit.
The farer away off Globe s surface we go the more energy can come towards us the outskirts of the Globe. And the outer pressure that push us towards the Globe s surface will decrease relatively.
Savorinen Jukka
:);):)
-
Ice age*
Let us think, that more energy than normally comes towards the sun and this makes the sun open up more energy than usually. Then towards the globe there comes more energy than usually and this causes that the globe begins to push itself away from the sun in a curved orbit faster than normally. The seas and the lakes vaporize more humidity to atmosphere than normally. In some point there woun´t come any more energy towards the sun than normally and
then also there woun´t open up energy from the sun more than usually.
Then the globe is pushing itself further away from the sun and that´s why the temperature of the globe drops rapidly a lot. Then the humidity in the atmosphere freezes and this is how continents become covered with ice. This surface does not totally melt when the globe sinks "deeper" than normally to the energysea that opens up from the sun. When the energywaves coming from the sun have made the globe rise over the "seasurface" in the energysea opening up from the sun, the seas vaporize again strongly and freeze again over the ice cover at the continents.
For some time the movement orbit of the three-dimentionally expanding globe swings more than usually at the same time as the expanding globe pushes itself away from the three-dimentionally expanding sun.
During some time this swinging reduces and the ice begins to melt.
Savorinen Jukka
:);):)
-
The Planets
The heavier substace the planet consists of, the deeper in an energysea opening up from the sun it pushes itself in a curved orbit away from the sun.
A new species of the Planets
http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/press/2006/pr200624.html
The astronomers have located several bizarre light gasplanets.
They move close to their star and circulate around it in 4-5 days.
According to my theory the gasplanets of the solar system push themselves away from the sun further than the rock planets, because the gas planets are lighter.
Why do these even more lighter planets circulate around their stars so close?
Why do the Pioneer sounders have an unexplainable acceleration towards the sun?
According to my theory the atoms of the planets expand and open up energywaves. These waves make the neutrinos to explode their energy towards the atomcores of the planets. This is how a neutrino transfers its kinetic energy.
At some point the atoms of gasplanets have expanded for so long time, that the energywaves opening up from them are able to push the atomcore nextby easily further. Now between the atomcores there doesn´t move relatively such dense energywaves as earlier.
Neutrino that moves between the atomcores of such a light gasplanet don´t affect with dence energy. That is why neutrino does´t explode its energy as much towards that light planets atomcores.
Now the surface of expanding star begins to reach for expanding gasplanet relatively. The gasplanet approaches the star without moving towards it. Then it settles down and pushes it away from its star nearby.
Savorinen
:);):)
-
Saturn*
Do the planets open up more energy from their poles?
That would explain the location of the rings that have been observed around the gasplanets. The material of the rings has found its way to a energyfurrow around the planet and pushes itself away from its expanding planet in that area. This happens also in Uranus case.
This information lets us understand that the gasplanets really do open up more energy from their poles.
http://apod.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap061113.html
At least the energy coming from the sun reflects partly out of the planets and because the planets are round, this energy does not go back towards the sun. Also in case of the Uranus this reflecting energy would form its own share of the energyfurrow, because it it really doesn´t reflect from Uranus towards its rings.
Approximately in 30 years distance there is a big strorm observed in Saturn. The maximum amount of sun points appear in 11 years distance. Saturn itself circulates around the sun once in 29,5 years.
I predict that energywaves come from the galaxy centre in approximately 11 years distance. These energywaves have the nature of the quarks. Because the regular storms of Saturn in 30 years distance last just for a little time, I claim that only one out of three strorms is observed from the globe.
These energywaves in the centre of the galaxy maintain also the red spot of the Jupiter and maybe also can explain the spots of Uranus and Jupiter.
The energybundles heading towards the sun burn out so deep inside the sun that the energywaves coming out of them appear in 11 years delay. When the outcoming energysreams are staunched there are only sunspots left.
Savorinen
:);):)
-
Venus*
Venus rotates around its axle clockwise. The other planets rotate around their axles anti-clockwise. All the planets rotate around the sun anti-clockwise.
Venus is the only planet that has average temperature also at nights in plus degrees, hundres of degrees!
Does the energy that comes from the sun and commits to the Venus open up mostly in mornings of Venus? This would make Venus rotate clockwise around its axle. At the same time Venus would get kinetic energy to a curved orbit, that would take Venus around the sun anti-clockwise.
Suns energy committing to other planets of rock would open up mostly at nights.
The energy of Venus opening up in the mornings is then rotating Venus with downthread in relation to the surface of the energysea opening up from the sun. Does this cause friction that keeps Venus hot?
Jukka Petteri Savorinen
:);):)
-
The heavier substace the planet consists of, the deeper in an energysea opening up from the sun it pushes itself in a curved orbit away from the sun.
Then, according to your hypothesis the very dense Mercury should be out somewhere near the orbit of Pluto. How do you account for its present position?
-
The heavier substace the planet consists of, the deeper in an energysea opening up from the sun it pushes itself in a curved orbit away from the sun.
Then, according to your hypothesis the very dense Mercury should be out somewhere near the orbit of Pluto. How do you account for its present position?
I dont know how dense or thiny Merkurius really are.
That Energysea bottom is sun skin.
Pluto and other small things outside gasplanets orbit get energywaves from gusplanets and thats why they can moving thats high in that energysea what sun open all a time.
Savorinen
:);):)
-
Sun's corona*
Is it so, that new massive photons coming out of sun are seeds of a substance in a galaxy that is one size smaller? When they come out of the sun, they already are far away from each other and so the so called
Inflation-theory is not necessary.
Quasars, that is to say one size smaller substance´s intensive optical phenomenons arise in a corona area. The giant black holes in the centre of the new galaxies receive hits from the photons coming towards the sun. Above all from the energywaves that open up from them and have had time to arise stars that are one size smaller substance.
Also the old photon centres that past the sun receive hits to themselves. This is how they explode more of their energy away from the sun and this is how the light bends while passing for example the sun.
Savorinen Jukka
:);):)
-
Atoms*
New model of an atom
The atomcores expand three-dimentionally, opening up energywaves that have
the nature of electron and photon.
Savorinen Jukka
:);):)
-
Molecules*
The molecules are formed of two or several expanding atoms.
The atoms of the molecules open up expanding molecule´s common energywaves.
In liquids these waves are directed partly beyond the centres of molecules nextby. Between the molecules of the liquid there moves energy for a longer time than in solid substances. This is why often into the molecule of the liquid there comes a larger amount of energy from another direction. With this energy the molecule moves a long journey between the other expanding molecules towards another direction.
Between the molecules of the gases the energy, that comes from the atomcores of the gas, moves even longer journeys. Now there comes relatively even more energy towards the centres of the gas molecules from another direction. That is why the gas molecules are thrown even longer distance between other molecules.
Savorinen Jukka
:);):)
-
The Interaction / The Black Holes
How do the orbs interact with each other?
They open up energywaves, by which they interact with each other.
The less the orb has exterior surface, the less it interacts with other pieces. Also the density of energy matters as well.
In a energy concentration there can be a lot of energy, although it would have just a little exterior surface in relation to other orbs.
The denser the energy in an orb is, the less it has exterior surface in relation to the quantity of energy.
The less exterior surface, the slower the energy opens up away from the orb and the less it interacts with other orbs.
The denser the energy of a piece is, the more efficient it stops to itself for example the neutrinos coming from the stars and also the less there comes neutrinos away from the piece.
There woun´t come any neutrinos of the stars from the direction of a black hole, because they stop themselves to a black hole.
However, towards the black hole there move neutrinos all the time and they expand and open up energywaves, while transfering their kinetic energy with them to the orbs.
From the pieces that move near the black hole loose more neutrinos from the side that it away from the black hole. This is how a certain exterior pressure is formed around the black hole.
The closer to the black hole the piece is, the less energybundles come from backside of the black holes and the stronger the exterior pressure is.
When one understands that all the energy concentrations expand and open up energywaves that have the nature of expanding energyconcentration, one can undestand that the black hole does not draw other pieces towards itself. It devours all the other pieces, because it expands and pushes pieces that locate nearby away from itself slower than the pieces and the black hole itsel do expand.
However, some of the black holes are in a way in a diet. They push the gas that locates nearby away from themselves faster than they expand.
Someone may wonder, why the black hole finally begins to reject the pieces that approach the black hole faster than the black hole and the piece themselves expand. It is based on a fact, that allthough the black hole opens up slowly its energy, do these dense energywaves have large energic particles, which also transfer their kinetic energy with energywaves opening up from themselves towards the expanding atomcores of other orbs.
The modern physics does not understand these large energic particles. According to my theory, the speed of these large energic particles has accelerated just because of the fact, that they also do expand and open up energywaves by which they can make the large energic particles in front of them to speed up all the time.Their speed accelerates slower than the speed of the photons. Correspondingly their speed slows down slower than the photons speed when they move for example towards the sun. The speed of a ship accelerates slower than the speed of a boat. The speed of the ship also slows down slower than the speed of a boat.
This way it is easy to understand how the expanding star that pushes itself away from the expanding black hole explodes a lot of its energy towards the black hole. Those opening and expanding energybudles that come from the expanding black hole make the expanding atoms of a star explode faster than normally. It achieves an illusion that the black hole absorbs with some kind of gravitation from a star the mass of a star towards itself.
In fact, the energy coming from the black hole makes the expanding star to explode its energy much stronger than normally. With this energy that explodes towards the black hole it pushes itself away from the expanding black hole in a curved orbit.
Savorinen Jukka
:);):)
-
Galaxies*
The galaxies rotate like wheels. If there would exist a drafting force, should the galaxies have ten times larger mass than it is at present observed. This is because the farthest stars of galaxies circulate the centre of galaxy so fast. The gravity of observed mass is not able to keep them in their orbits. The stars that circulate the furthest should be thrown away from their tracks.
Although the modern physics does not understand how the gravitation is transfered, it still has found out that galaxies consist of some mystery substace that has this drawing force.
The dark substace is different from the observed substance. Yet it has the the same kind of drawing force as the observed substance has.
No, there is no gravitation!
All the stars of the galaxies have arised from the black holes of the giant centres of the galaxies. They expand three-dimentionally, opening up energywaves that have the nature of atoms. The stars expand and push themselves away from the galaxy centre in a curved orbit in a same relation as they expand.
That is to say that also the furthest stars are thrown away from the centre of the galaxy. The same way as their speed of movement around the galaxy centre lets us suppose. Only this is not observed, because everything expands three-dimentionally in same relation.
Savorinen Jukka
:);):)
-
The Time*
Slow time
The thicker the energy in a concentarion is, the less it has exterior surface. The slower the time is. The less exterior surface, the slower the concentration opens up energy as waves.
For example the new massive photons have a slower time than the old light photons do.
Accelerating time?
The faster the spacecraft moves, the faster it expands. The more the spacecraft expands, the more it affects energy that comes towards.
The more the the spacecraft affects energy coming towards, the faster the spacecraft expands. The more the spacecraft expands, the more it needs energy to accelerate and so on.
To catch up the speed of light, the craft needs all the energy from the universe. The craft heading straightforward may even catch fire before reaching the speed of light.
What if the craft would be formed like discus and rotates around its axl wildly? Does the energyfield forming around the craft prevent that the energy coming towards can not get to the atomcores? Can the discus shaped craft that turns wildly around its axl catch up easier the speed of light?
Savorinen Jukka
:);):)
-
Stopping of light*
The spavecraft and the photon are both made of the same energy than all the other substance/energy is.
The speed of a spacecraft can be accelerated when its fuel/energy is exploded faster than normally. Speed can be slowed down when the spacecraft turns and explodes its energy / fuel more forwards in relation to its movement track.
The energy of a photon has exploded all its way away from three-dimentionally expanding atomcore backwards in relation to its movement track. The speed of a photon slows down in the intermediate agent where sometimes comes more energy to the photon from forwards.
When a train moves forwards, it pushes air in front of it. The air resists the moving of train. Behind the train there is formed a less dense zone that is like a tube. Three-dimentionally expanding molecules of the atmosphere is pushed towards
this zone. They hit in the middle of the tubelike zone and then open up energy from themselves. This energy still does not make the stopped train to move forwards again.
A similar phenomen happens also to the photon. The photon cleans up a less dense area to the space. Energy comes towards that area from every direction and during the hit the releasing energy makes the photon that just stopped to move again.
This news is essentially related to stopping of light and to the fact how the light just after it has stopped continues to move again.
http://meetings.aps.org/Meeting/DPP06/Event/52026
Savorinen Jukka
:);):)
-
Jupiter*
Does the Jupiter boil? Do the boiling gasbubbles come out from a same area? Is this an explanation to the red spots of Jupiter?
A continuous energy influx comes from the inside of Jupiter towards the surface of Jupiter. The atoms of this energystream expand faster than the atoms of another area. This could explain the fact that atoms of an
energystream push towards a less dense area faster than the atoms of another area.
Does this energystream get more energy towards itself from the expanding energybundles that come from space? Do they burn out in a area between atomcores of the energystream? This is how they would increase the energy of an energystream with themselves. This would also explain the red spot of Jupiter or in other words the continuous energystream that pushes out from the same area.
Savorinen Jukka
:);):)
-
Uranus*
The Uranus is so far pecular gas planet that it circulates the sun atilt.
As I understand, Uranus rolls over its axel so that a specific part of it is all the time towards the centre of the galaxy. From time to time one of the poles is towards the sun and after half a round another pole is towards the sun. Applying my theory one could think that the energybudles of energywaves coming from the galaxy centre effect more to Uranus. They move their kinetic energy to Uranus and this way Uranus pushes itself away from the galaxy centre. Sometimes slower than the sun and sometimes faster than the sun. And of course, the energybundles coming out of sun push Uranus away from the sun in the same relation as the sun and Uranus expand.
Savorinen Jukka
:);):)
-
Electricity*
Metals transmit often electricity very well. According to my theory, this is based on a fact that energywaves opening up from the atomcores of metals move staight towards the atomcores nextby and they don´t expand to every direction like sectors.
Continuously expanding energystream from the core of an expanding atom towards another core of expanding atom.
Maybe between the atomcores of metals there are continuously small plasmatornados.
In this way a lot og empty space exists in a area between atomcores of metals. In this area the three-dimentionally expanding energybundles have room to push each other fast towards a less dense area in a space that does not expand or curve.
The expanding atomcores of the metals have previously expanded close to each other like in cold fusion. After that they don´t have strenght enough to push themselves away from each other faster than they expand / explode.
Now thick energywaves towards the expanding atomcore nextby are sufficient to keep on the energystorm all the time and this way energy flows between the atomcores of metals like an energystream.
Savorinen Jukka
:);):)
-
Examination*
A test
In physics it´s very important to be able to make repeatable tests, that confirm theories.
I have only one repeatable test that I have developed myself and which confirms my theory.
Most of us can perform this repeatable test my themselves physically and every one of us can perform it in our minds.
I can curl up the energy of my body to a embryo position, when less energy opens up away from me. After that I can unfold (=expand/explode open) to a less dense position when energy opens up / explodes away from me more and faster.
According to my theory I myself also explode all the time and my straightening accelerates opening up. This way this repeatable test proves, that opening / exploding / expanding of energy can very well be accelerating in a space that does not expand.
When this test is repeated with several persons, one can get a better image how for example the continually expanding atoms of the globe make pressure towards the centre of the globe without gravitation.
A captured animal can hide and curl up to a dense position. This way it opens up less energy away from itself and is also more difficult to observe.
The energy of the black holes is energy that is extremely at frequent intervals curled up.
Savorinen Jukka
:);):)
-
Black holes time is not so fast what stars time is.
Stars "atoms" shaking/vibration more quickly what stars atoms shaking. Even that, black hole have more thiny/hot energy what stars have.
Black hole atoms are more massive what stars atoms are. Also black holes atoms nucleus dont have so much skin what stars atoms nucleus have. Thats why black holes atoms dont open/expand so guickly whta stars atoms expanding. Also black holes expanding "atoms" nucleus dont open so guickly energy waves what stars atoms nucleus open.
Still black hole have more hot energy what stars have.
I meen, stars dont have so hot energy what black holes have. Still stars atoms nucleus vibration/shaking more quickly what balck holes massive "atoms".
-
Magnetism*
Also the magnetism can be explained by the variation of the pressure. The energywaves that open up are once again in a key position. The separate three-dimentionally expanding energybundles of the waves and how they have interaction with the energywaves that meet them. And of course, how they have interaction after that with the atomcores of a piece. Or in other words how much or how little do they move their kinetic energy to the pieces.
The particles that rotate wildly round their axles have been observed tohave a magnetic field. The best way to observe a particle rotating wildly round its axle is to observe our galaxies. On the other hand the time is such a relative phenomen, that in our point of view the galaxies do not rotate round their axles.
When we observe the galaxy, we can notice that stars rotate around the galaxy centre. These stars open up energywaves to every direction. This way the stars that push themselves away from the centre of the galaxy, open themselves their energy back towards the galaxy centre.
This is how the stars make each others movement tracks to bend away from the galaxy centre.
The situation is different if the particle does not rotate wildly round its axle.
When a magneto and a iron item dash against each other, we can ask does the magneto draw the iron item towards itself. Or is it so that the three-dimentional magneto that advaces with accelerating speed does not push away from itself the three-dimentional iron item that also advances with accelerating speed in same relation as they expand? Now their surfaces crash together because of the variation of pressure, without any drawing force. When we stretch a rubber strip, we can feel the stretching. The atoms of a rubber strip between our fingers push themselves towards a less dense area. The atoms inside the rubber strip are less dense in a area where to the expanding atoms of a rubber strip push each other.
A tension holds because we are pushing ourselves away from the centre of the globe. Our hands diverge at the same relation as they expand. Proportionally our hands don´t draw away from each other. Still the expanding atoms of a rubber strip don´t have time to push one another towards a less dense area so quickly that the tension would fade away from the rubber strip.
We feel also how a iron item strives towards a magneto. This doesn´t base on a fact that the magneto would have a capasity to draw the iron item towards itself. It bases on a fact that the pressure variates. The variation of the pressure is based on expanding of atomcores, opening up energywaves.
The expanding molecules of air in a spacecraft push each other towards the emptiness of space if the door of a spacecraft is opened. The emptiness does not draw the air out. There does not exist any drawing force.
Savorinen Jukka
:);):)
-
How energy can be thiny and not so thiny?
How thiny sun energy was 5 billion years ago?
And how thiny is now? Lets remember that sun is open own energy all that time.
I can go more thiny when i take my legs and my hands near my body and then i am little bit warmth what i am, if i open my legs and hands straight.
At least i dont open my energy so quickly far a way from me
Next text what i put here with good english. There i told how you can be near black hole and moving far a way same way what black hole open energy waves expanding energyparticle moving. There you realase more cold what you realase same area near star.
Even black hole energy is more hot/thiny what star energy is.
This is because black hole energyparticle speed dont acceleration so fast what photons speed acceleration.
So, if you moving same way far a way from star, what you moving far a way from black hole, star photons catch up you and then star interactive with you straigt with photons.
If you moving far a way from black hole same way what black hole energy waves moving, then this expanding particle dont hit you straight.
So, then black hole dont interactive with you straight.
Is doing that indirectly with this expanding energyparticle.
This energyparticle expanding and open energy waves, put that energy dont get you so warmth what star photons get straight.
It is easier acceleration small boat speed what it is acceleration big galley/ship speed.
Photons and big energy energyparticle speed acceleration all a time same way what the expanding and opening energy waves, because they pushing themselfs to area where is not so much energy.
Later same thing with better english
Savorinen Jukka
:);):)
-
The temperature and the time of the black hole
Time in black hole advances slower.
Its "atoms" vibrate slower.
They are more massive and they have less exterior surface.
They expand slower and open up their energy as waves slower.
If the heat of the black hole is compared to the heat of a star according to how fast its "atoms" vibrate, the black hole wouldn´t be as hot as the stars are.
Yet the energy of a black hole is thicker / hotter than the energy of the stars.
If you would push yourself away from the expanding black hole in a same relation as the expanding energybundles do, you would feel colder than pushing yourself away from the star in same relation.
Now there would be three-dimentionally expanding energybundles around you and they would be coming from the expanding black hole.The energywaves from these energybundles around you would not warm you up as much as the expanding energybundles opening up from the stars would when they hit you.
So, if you would push yourself away from the star in a same relation as you push yourself away from the black hole, the photons of a star would reach you.
So the black hole would effect you indirectly with the opening energywaves of the energybundles that open up from the black hole . The star would effect you directly with the energywaves that open up from the star.
The speed of the photons accelerates easier than the speed of the large-energic particles.
The expanding energybundles that push themselves away from the expanding energy concentration make each others speed to accelerate towards a less dense area with the energywaves that open up from themselves.
It´s much more easier to accelerate the speed of a small boat than of a massive ship.
Savorinen Jukka
:);):)
-
How about when the energybundles opening up from the magneto and from the iron item have interaction with each other so that when they fall inside the object nextby (iron item / magneto), they are driven nearby some atomcore of a object and swing around it like comets and continue their journey to that very same direction where they came from?
So now they move their kinetic energy towards a object in a way that the expanding atoms of a magneto push each other towards the expanding atoms ofn iron item and the expanding atoms of an iron item push each other towards the magneto.
With Savor english
Swing around almost half round and continue next atom nucleus. There that energyparticle expanding and pushing that atom that way.
Savorinen Jukka
:);):)
-
Sounders/Probes
The speed of a sounder accelerates when the sounder passes the planet nearby.
When the sounder approaches the planet, it begins to have more interaction with the planet. The energywaves opening up from the planets energybundles make the atomcores of a sounder to explode their energy more. Now these waves make the energybundles coming from the planet explode their energy more towards the atomcores of a sounder ect.
After passing by more and more energy comes from the atomcores of a sounder towards the energybundles coming from the planet and this is how they explode their energy more towards the sounders atomcores.
So now they transfer their kinetic energy more to the sounder.
Savorinen Jukka
:);):)
-
How probes/sounders get more moving energy, when they going near planet.
Planet open massive energyparticle who dont have a lot of skin. So, this energyparticle dont interactive with probes atoms nucleus so much what old energyparticle, who coming from space. That why this energyparticle who coming from space, pushing probes and then that probes orbit change same way what panet skin.
When probes coming near planet, probes atoms nucleus get more and more hits and thats why prpbes nucleus start to open more energy.
That energy hits energyparticle who coming from planet and thats why this massive energyparticle start to expanding more and more energy. So they giving more and more ginetic energy for probes atoms nucleus.
Later with good english.
Savorinen Jukka
:);):)
-
When the sounder goes by the planet, more massive energybudles come towards
the sounder from the planet. These energybundles have less exterior surface
and this way they can have interaction with the atomcores of the sounder
less than the energybundles that come from the space.
The energybundles coming from the space make the orbit of a sounder to bend
in accordance with the planet with the energywaves opening up from
themselves. So they expand and bombard this expanding atomcore with a
radiation that opens up from themselves. This radiation contains very small
exploding energybundles.
Little by little the charge of a sounder changes and more and more energy
begins to open up from its atomcores.
Now the more massive / more energic energybundles coming from the planet get
more and more hits towards themselves and begin this way to transfer more
and more kinetic energy towards the sounder with the help of energywaves
that open up from themselves.This is why the speed of a sounder accelerates
when the sounder moves away from the planet.
Savorinen Jukka
:);):)
!!!!! Magnetism !!!!!!
-
A Riddle from Savolainen*
There are a lot of rollerskaters on a flat floor.
The only equipment they have are the skates and pelota rackets.
These skaters stay still at their positions and the distance between them is
from five to ten meters. A lot of balls come towards them.
They are not allowed to use their feet for example for skating. The only
thing that they can use their feet is to stay in balance and be able to keep
their feet in such a position that the skates point straight ahead.
How can they make themselves to move forward?
Savorinen Jukka
:);):)
-
Let us think that outside the galaxy there would come an energy concentration towards the centre of the galaxy. Now there would come a lot of energy from the stars of the outer circle and this way the orbit of this energy concentration would bend according to the centre of the galaxy.
The energy coming from the centre would however start to push it little by little away from the centre of the galaxy and this way it would be thrown after a scant half round away from the galaxy. With a faster speed than it came to the galaxy.
When it now hits the galaxy centre, it would explode strongly and move all its kinetic energy towards it.
If we drop an item into a roundabout, it will be thrown away from the roundabout with speed.
Savorinen Jukka
:);):)
-
There are a lot of rollerskaters on a flat floor.
The only equipment they have are the skates and a safety clothing.
These skaters stay still at their positions and the distance between them is
from five to ten meters. A lot of exploding handgrenades come towards them.
They are not allowed to use their feet for example for skating and also they
are not allowed to explode the handgrenades behind their backs. The only
thing that they can use their feet is to stay in balance and be able to keep
their feet in such a position that the skates point straight ahead.
How do they can move forward?
Exploding handgrenades come from magnets. Skaters are the atom nucleus of the steel item.
Savorinen Jukka
:);):)
-
Magnetism*
When an iron item is brought close to a magneto, the energybundles opening up from them have interaction with each other.The energybundles opening up from a magneto slow down the energybundles that come from an iron item and the energybundles coming from the iron item slow down the energybundles coming from the magneto.
This way their speed does not accelerate. When the energybundles coming from the magneto get inside the iron item and energybundles coming from the ironitem get inside the magneto, they make the atomcores of the magneto and iron item themselves to go to the orbit so that they turn around scant half a round and then are thrown to the same direction where they came from. The speed has accelerated in a same than the speed of a sounder does while passing the planet.
Now the energybundles are directed straight towards some expanding atoms core and they explode there.
This is why we can feel how the magneto and a iron item aspire towards each other when they locate close enough each other.
The repulsion of two magnetos can be explained so, that the magnetos make eac others atomcores to explode their energy towards each other. Perhaps a part of the energybundles are directed straight towards the atomcore of a magneto nextby.
Let us think that the atoms of a magneto and iron item are galaxies.
If there comes from outside an energyconsentration towards the centre of the galaxy, does this energyconsentration get so much energy as waves from the stars of the external circle of the galaxy. Now these energywaves make this energyconsentration to explode its energy away from the galaxy centre. The orbit of the energyconsentration bends according to the galaxy centre.
Energybundles come also towards the energyconsentration from the centre of the galaxy. These energubundles are more massive and they have less external surface. The longer time the energycentre locates nearby the hot centre of the galaxy, the more the massive energybundles coming from the galaxy centre begin to have interaction with the atomcores of the energyconsentration.
The denser energywaves the atomcores of the energyconsentration do open, the more the energybundles coming from the galaxy centre get hits towards thenselves and the more they do explode their energy towards the atomcores of the energyconsentration and also the more they move their kinetic energy
towards the atomcores of the energyconsentration.
Now the speed of the energyconsentration begins to accelerate and it pushes itself away from the galaxy centre faster than the "surface" of the galaxy centre. The further the energyconsentration pushes itself from the galaxycentre, the more it has stars behind it and the more its speed accelerates away from the galaxy centre.
This way we can explain without using the drawing force, how the energybundles coming from the magneto and from an iron item turn around the atomcore inside the magneto and an iron item scant half a round and are then thrown powerfully towards some atomcore, where they explode and move their
kinetic energy towards it.
:);):)
-
The overquantity and underquantity of the electrons
The so called electron quantity of atoms is based on how dense energywaves open up from the atomcore.
These waves make the energybundles that move in an area between atomcores to explode their energy towards the atomcores ect.
If some energybundle that moves in an area between atomcores cleans up with itself more energy opening up from the atomcore than it opens itself towards the atomcore, the atom can have a dificit of electron that stays.
That happens because from the atomcore there does not come so much energy that it would make the energybundles passing by the atomcore to explode their energy as much towards the atomcore ect.
If an energybundle that explodes in an atomcore is directed to the atomcore, it will open now more energy from the atomcore and this way the overquantity of the electron stays.
The overquantity of the electron stays because a denser energywave from the atomcore makes the energybundles passing by to explode more of their energy to the core of the atom ect.
:);):)
-
External pressure*
A stronger external pressure is directed to the black hole than to the other orbs.
This is because the massive and a little external surface possessive energybundles opening up from the black hole don´t have interaction with the expanding energybundles that pass by the black hole.
Now the expanding energybundles passing by the black hole push each other towards the black hole with the energywaves opening up from themselves. This is why more three-dimentionally expanding energybundles go towards the black hole.
They also move their kinetic energy more towards the pieces that locate nearby the black hole than the energybundles opening up from the black hole can move their kinetic energy towards the pieces close to the black hole.
:);):)
-
The charge of a corpuscule*
Why does the positively charged corpuscule bend at its track in a magnetic field?
The track of a corpuscule can bend only when the corpuscule explodes its energy more towards one side than the opposite.
The corpuscule holds its charge because the energy opening up from it makes the small energybundles coming towards it to unite as in cold fusion.
The energybundles opening up from the corpuscule clean the energywaves of the smaller energybundles that come towards the corpuscule with them away from the corpuscule. Now the small expanding energybundles coming towards the corpuscule don´t push themselves away from each other. They expand and reach out each other without actually moving towards each other.
The corpuscule itself continues to expand and this way it gets more exploding energybundle hits. This is why the corpuscule is able to keep its charge, still opening up energywaves, which make the energywaves coming towards the corpuscule thicker and the energybundles passing by to bend towards the corpuscule ect.
Let us think about that different kind of energywaves come from the magneto and these energywaves have for example lots of extremely small expanding energybundles. Now the energywaves that open up from positively charged corpuscule won´t be able to make the much smaller enrgybundles to bend towards the corpuscule.
This way the positively charged corpuscule explodes more of its energy away from the magneto and the orbit of a corpuscule bends a little towards the magneto.
:);):)
-
Corpuscule?!?
The charge of a particle*
Why does the positively charged particle bend at its track in a magnetic field?
The track of a particle can bend only when the particle explodes its energy more towards one side than the opposite.
The particle holds its charge because the energy opening up from it makes the small energybundles coming towards it to unite as in cold fusion.
The energybundles opening up from the particle clean the energywaves of the smaller energybundles that come towards the particle with them away from the particle. Now the small expanding energybundles coming towards the particle don´t push themselves away from each other. They expand and reach out each other without actually moving towards each other.
The particle itself continues to expand and this way it gets more exploding energybundle hits. This is why the particle is able to keep its charge, still opening up energywaves, which make the energywaves coming towards the particle thicker and the energybundles passing by to bend towards the particle ect.
Let us think about that different kind of energywaves come from the magneto and these energywaves have for example lots of extremely small expanding energybundles. Now the energywaves that open up from positively charged particle won´t be able to make the much smaller enrgybundles to bend towards the particle.
This way the positively charged particle explodes more of its energy away from the magneto and the orbit of a cparticle bends a little towards the magneto.
:);):)
-
Photon in a optical fiber cable*
The light is possible to make move along the optical fibre cable even though the cable is wavekind bend.
The photons move in accordance with the cable, because in a curve they get more energy from the outer circle of the curve and this is how the photon explodes its energy towards the outer circle of the curve and makes the orbit to bend in accordance with the cable. Surely the cable is in an inner edge denser. The photon aspires to continue its movement straight ahead, but in a curve more energy comes towards it from the outer circle. Now the frontside of a photon that locates in a curve side begins to explode more of
its energy away from the photon and this way the orbit of a photon bends in accordance with the optical fibre cable.
In an double-slit experiment a sensitive sensor opens up denser energy from some zones and when a photon falls into a zone where denser energy comes towards, the photon starts to explode more of its energy forwards from its other side and this way it twists itself towards a zone where denser energy comes towards it. So in a space there exists in a away immaterial "optical fiber cables", through which the photons are guided towards certain zones in a sensitive sensor.
When one remembers that the photons themselves are three-dimentionally expanding, so to say exploding concentrations of energy its easy to understand that they make these zones to explode their energy more away from the sensitive sensor ect.
:);):)
-
Maybe, maybe not?!?
E = m * c^2 * RT/(pV) * |c|
Units are E = kg * (m/s)^2 * 1 * 1
Now for the arithmetical operations' unit can have E = Joule (in other words J = kg * m^2 / s^2 )
?
Savor
:);):)
-
Post from my friend
" Dear Sir,
>
> Here is a new theory suggesting that everything is energy.
>
> E = (mgh * ½mv^2) * RT/(pV) * |c|
>
>
> mgh = potential energy
> ½mv^2 = kinetic energy
> R = (gas) constant
> T = temperature
> p = pressure
> V = volume
> |c| = mass specific heat capacity, absolute value only
>
>
>
>
> Feel free to use, copy, review, do what ever You would like to do with this theory."
-
What about now?
E = (mgh + ½mv^2) * nRT/(pV) * |c|
:);):)
-
GRAVITATION*
1. The surface of the expanding globe pushes us away from the centre of the globe in the same relation as we and everything else expand.
2. Energy flows as waves between the atomcores of the globe and the expanding eneregybundles in these waves get hits towards themselves from the from the energybundles that open up from the atomcores. That is why they open up their energy towards the atomcores and move this way their kinetic energy to the expanding atomcores.
3. There comes energywaves also from the space and these waves have energybundles that have had interaction with eachother by the energywaves that open up from themselves. From these energywaves that open up they have received themselves energyfields at the same principle than the centers of the galaxies have received energyfiels around them from the stars. So the stars have arised from the energywaves that come from the giant energy concentraions of the galaxy centres and can be assumed to be particles of a substance of larger size. This way the energybundles comimg from the space move their kinetic energy more towards the atomcores of the globe than the energybundles that move between the atomcores of the globe do.
4. When one remembers that for example the energywaves opening up from the globe have interaction with the energywaves coming towards the globe, one can easily understand this theory. In other words to say, the energybundles that push themselves away from the globe clean / absorb with themselves the opening energywaves coming from the energybundles that move towards the globe. Now the energybundles moving towards the globe expand without pushing themselves away from each other. That is why a larger amount of them move towards the globe than would have moved if the globe did not open up energy as waves away from itself.
The external pressure towards the orb is so based on what kind of energywaves the orb itself opens up away from itself, because the energywaves opening away make the energy in a way to bend towards the orb.
The interior pressure pushing away from the orb is based on how massive small energybundles the piece itself opens up away from itself.
The smaller energybundles are, the less they get hits from the expanding energywaves of the atomcores. The massiver and the smaller energybundles the orb itself opens up, the less they have interaction with the atomcores of the pieces nearby the orb and the less they move their kinetic energy towards them.
Simply it does not exist any so called drawing force. That is why it is unnecessary to even try to make an explanation how the so called drawing force would transfer.
:);):)
-
Freezing water*
Let us imagine that the expanding footballs are water molecules which open up expanding table tennis balls, so to say energy as waves in every direction.
When the temperature of the water is over four degrees, the table tennis balls are partly directed beyond the footballs nextby. Then a different amount of energy (=table tennis balls) is directed towards the footballs from different directions.
When the temperature of the water gets down under four degrees, those table tennis balls are directed all the time less and less beyond the footballs nextby.
This happens because the table tennis balls coming towards twitch with them even smaller balls that open up from the table tennis balls and then these table tennis balls that move to a same direction don´t push themselves away from each other at the same relation as they expand themselves. Then the footballs expand faster than the table tennis balls coming towards them do spread.
Now a bigger and bigger part of the expanding table tennis balls hit to the expanding football nextby and this way the footballs finally lock out to expand side by side so to say the water freezes.
The more table tennis balls hit directly to the footballs nextby, the more energic the expanding footballs have strenght to push themselves away from each other and this is why the water expands when its temperature gets down under four degrees.
This is when towards the water there doesn´t come so much energy as waves outwards and this way the water molecules can find a well-balanced way to expand side by side.
PS. I describe the water molecules bigger than the energybundles locating in energywaves opening up from them are. Surely for example there exists a lot more energy in the atom cores than there is in electrons, but still the electrons cover the space more than the atom cores do. In so called electrons there exists considerably less dense energy than the energy in atom cores is.
When an electron coming from the atomcore nextby reaches the expanding atomcore, it moves to a denser form. The energywaves opening up from the separate expanding energybundles of the electron burn out when they meet energybundles opening up from the atomcore and then snatch themselves along them away from the atomcore towards which the electron is heading.This way the capacity of the
electron is reduced in a relation to the atomcore and finally the electron itself burns out to the energy
opening up from the atomcore and snatches with it away from the atomcore that it had just headed.
Later from that and from all the other energy coming outwards from the atomcore rises new electrons (according to my theory).
-
Entropy = Expanding stuff
Its meaning stuff who expanding all a time
It is that simple
Peace and love
:);):)
-
A logical story
How do the particle coming from the space move their kinetic energy more
towards the atomcores of heavier substaces?
According to my theory this is how it should be, because a hammer drops to
the surface of the moon at the same time as the feather does!
The massiver the atomcore is, the denser energywaves it opens up and the
more it possesses so called electons.
The denser energywaves the expanding atomcore opens up, the more it makes
the expanding particle passing by to explode energy towards itself.
And this is how all the atoms get an equal amount of kinetic energy
(towards that piece in whose neighbourhood the atom locates) from the
expanding particles coming from the space.
When for example the surface of the globe simultaneously pushes itself away
from the centre of the globe, we don´t have to try to explain how the globe
draws the items towards itself. Everything can be explained with the
variation of the pressure. The pressure pushes all the expanding atoms of
the expanding globe away from the centre of the globe and the external
pressure keeps us on the surface of the expanding globe.
So you can forget all about the gravitation and start to wonder how the
universe really works.
The accelerating movement of all the substance away from one certain point
that is really far away from the visible universe, may take the visible
universe in a moment away from the space where it locates now and at the
same time all energy concentrations have had room to expand
three-dimentionally.
The speed of the galaxygroups that move ahead us accelerate faster than our
speed and their speed accelerates more the further they are from us. The
speed of the galaxygroups behind us accelerates in relation to us slower the
further behind us they move. Because of the expanding of the sector the
galaxygroups moving by the side of us draw away faster the further they
locate from us and this is how the common redshift can be explained without
a magical expanding of the space.
When the stars formely arised relatively all at the same time, the new light
did not meet with the light coming towards and this is how the expanding
photons could make their speed to accelerate easily at the same relation as
they expanded three-dimentionally. So the expanding photons also open up
energywaves with which they push eacother away from eachother. The old light
assembles for example when it comes towards the sun, because it meets energy
that comes towards it and makes the photons to explode their energy more
forwards in relation to the motiontrack. Still the common redshift of the
light does not vanish entirely from the old light.
Peace and love!
-
For example in the sun the energy is denser than outside the sun. In the
atom cores of the sun the energy is denser tham in an area between the atom
cores. In the protons and in the neutrons the energy is denser than in an
area between them. In the quarks the energy is denser than in an area
between the quarks ect.
When one can understand that all the energyconsentrations do expand and
emit their energy, one can also understand that there is less dense energy
in the area between the energyconsentrations than in the
energyconsentrations themselves.
There is no reason to doubt that the neutrinos and the photons also do
expand and emit their energy according to the entropy.
Peace and love
:);):)
-
No gravity
How does kinetic energuy transfer
No dark matter
Peace and Love
-
What???????????????????????????????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
-
What ?
It that I am he which invented how macrocosm seriously functioned.
Truly this small truth from all to prove its that we are one and same energy. We him which experiences all matters our by way of and like this you too you are small part we him which experiences all our by way of.
Tätä Onesimpleprinciple thought was initially nice to work and develop! Just now when understand that all energy is quite probably one and same energy, understands that each from the thought hearing gets for itself burden! If we are one and same energy, so then all which we do to our another, comes with the same done rather like to our self. Also all prayers of all persons are directed to us all. Then is futile accuses some outsider God from all dreadfulness. Then is futile to believe somewhere to the outside God. Then should believe to his self and then held (?) Tell to all people this small truth from all, whereby knowledge of mankind grows and perhaps by way of that try better time to the all mankind!?! Are we bad God / Luoja/Älykäs or silly ) designer? We which Want to forget self ourselves and finally find ourselves? If, so we are probably notso good mortal? What dreadfulness olemmakaan made self to our self? It is difficult to understand to make war, violence etc. On the other hand eternity is rather long time. In eternity have time to experience one and another. If we are one and same energy, so then we he we have at least experienced by way of the mankind, really in the rich colours pleasure and grief! Everything is difficult to accept and understand! Just are we he got punishment from each our act at the same time? If each act is directed to us to our self in other words if we he experiences all matters our by way of, so then so is! If Onesimpleprinciple.com on the sides presented thought is right, so then everyone which slow to common knowledge coming of this thought, slows its time whereby persons around world start to help another each others unselfishly. Time whereby we do matters together to our self in other words to all people! Time whereby person is not predator to another to people! If you are sure that with these on the sides presented thought pictures wrong mode of action of macrocosm. You can forget its happily. The self find _________________ Olemmeko ourselves? Do they be connected different religions and science already our during?
Savor
Man/Woman can fall ill so that together in the human body is many different person. If one from the persons to perceive that perhaps they also are all the same person, can this one person continues in the same body their condition other with different persons , without trying tell them truth so that they are all the same person? If different persons besides try to damage another each others even though they have same body, so do hold possible truth seer to become silent and try to live own canting their truth, piittamatta from right truth? Or should he after all try to tell this possible truth to the even one different person?
-
More than in this proof to it from the expansive Sun radiates expansive neutrino, which move to their kineticenergy Globe to expansive to the atoms' cores. Neutrino so expand and radiate enegy away towards themselves. Produce radiation can't observe. Let think about galaxies to be big neutrino! In the galaxies' centres are colossal particle which is developed themselves round from the energy field's star which radiate extremely small particle in the relationship galaxy centre to colossal energiaconcentration (to big vestige). Galaxies so are big particles which are originated really a long distance visible outside visible universe , as being energy from concentrating on which still to explode and radiates energy waves which have galaxies personality. On his journey galaxies centres explode energyconcentration have interacted themselves avutuvien with the energy waves , which have atom personality. Stars so are originated from the galaxy's centre and they radiate to their energy and so on. At same time in the way to the neutrino born around themselves energy field and to the herring!
Now pioneerproblem gets their explanation so that from Sun come neutrino interact it with the more atoms cores, what further off from Sun they get, because they have time to interact with each other and develop for itself energy field which radiates neutrino business energy to the atoms' cores!
In other words should pioneerprobes of expansive speed then accelerate according to this thought ? Yes, but expansive gas planets the pace picks up more and like this pioneerprobes is observed towards the inexplicable acceleration, Sun!
In other words expansive neutrino don't move to their kineticenergy of fixed to the atoms' cores so much as gaseous ingredients.
Crucial is of course understand it that in the planets' centre is hard pressure and neutrino move to their business energy to the planets' centres powerfully and from there its come across atom from the atom to all to the planets' atoms and also to the planets' moons. Truly moons atoms get business energy from the neutrino also direct!
http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?no_d2=1&sid=08/08/29/1227239
-
The evidence is increasing all the time!
The entire visible universe of energy is coming from one direction and moving in any direction.
Now, the background radiation has been detected differences in support for this idea!
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7440217.stm
Detailed measurements made by the satellite have shown that the fluctuations in the microwave background are about 10% stronger on one side of the sky than those on the other.
Sean Carroll conceded that this might just be a coincidence, but pointed out that a natural explanation for this discrepancy would be if it represented a structure inherited from our universe's parent.
Meanwhile, Professor Carroll urged cosmologists to broaden their horizons: "We're trained to say there was no time before the Big Bang, when we should say that we don't know whether there was anything - or if there was, what it was."
If the Caltech team's work is correct, we may already have the first information about what came before our own Universe.
.
-
Evidence of the claims / predictions!
Opposition 1
Neutrino transfer the kinetic energy of atoms in kernels.
Proof
http://arxivblog.com/?p=596
Opposition 2
The entire visible universe of energy is moving away from one point on which is really far away from the visible universe outside!
Proof 1
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7440217.stm
Proof 2
http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/080923-dark-flows.html
-
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/l2
"Because the MOVEMENT takes place towards a less dense area, then the visible universe MOVES as an entity away from that one point that is really far away from the visible universe and where the energy is much denser than it is in a visible universe."
As if the mysteries of dark matter and dark energy weren't vexing enough, another baffling cosmic puzzle has been discovered.
Patches of matter in the universe seem to be moving at very high speeds and in a uniform direction that can't be explained by any of the known gravitational forces in the observable universe. Astronomers are calling the phenomenon "dark flow."
The stuff that's pulling this matter must be outside the observable universe, researchers conclude.
When scientists talk about the observable universe, they don't just mean as far out as the eye, or even the most powerful telescope, can see. In fact there's a fundamental limit to how much of the universe we could ever observe, no matter how advanced our visual instruments. The universe is thought to have formed about 13.7 billion years ago. So even if light started travelling toward us immediately after the Big Bang, the farthest it could ever get is 13.7 billion light-years in distance. There may be parts of the universe that are farther away (we can't know how big the whole universe is), but we can't see farther than light could travel over the entire age of the universe.
Mysterious motions
Scientists discovered the flow by studying some of the largest structures in the cosmos: giant clusters of galaxies. These clusters are conglomerations of about a thousand galaxies, as well as very hot gas which emits X-rays. By observing the interaction of the X-rays with the cosmic microwave background (CMB), which is leftover radiation from the Big Bang, scientists can study the movement of clusters.
The X-rays scatter photons in the CMB, shifting its temperature in an effect known as the kinematic Sunyaev-Zel'dovich (SZ) effect. This effect had not been observed as a result of galaxy clusters before, but a team of researchers led by Alexander Kashlinsky, an astrophysicist at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md., found it when they studied a huge catalogue of 700 clusters, reaching out up to 6 billion light-years, or half the universe away. They compared this catalogue to the map of the CMB taken by NASA's Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) satellite.
They discovered that the clusters were moving nearly 2 million mph (3.2 million kph) toward a region in the sky between the constellations of Centaurus and Vela. This motion is different from the outward expansion of the universe (which is accelerated by the force called dark energy).
"We found a very significant velocity, and furthermore, this velocity does not decrease with distance, as far as we can measure," Kashlinsky told SPACE.com. "The matter in the observable universe just cannot produce the flow we measure."
Inflationary bubble
The scientists deduced that whatever is driving the movements of the clusters must lie beyond the known universe.
A theory called inflation posits that the universe we see is just a small bubble of space-time that got rapidly expanded after the Big Bang. There could be other parts of the cosmos beyond this bubble that we cannot see.
In these regions, space-time might be very different, and likely doesn't contain stars and galaxies (which only formed because of the particular density pattern of mass in our bubble). It could include giant, massive structures much larger than anything in our own observable universe. These structures are what researchers suspect are tugging on the galaxy clusters, causing the dark flow.
"The structures responsible for this motion have been pushed so far away by inflation, I would guesstimate they may be hundreds of billions of light years away, that we cannot see even with the deepest telescopes because the light emitted there could not have reached us in the age of the universe," Kashlinsky said in a telephone interview. "Most likely to create such a coherent flow they would have to be some very strange structures, maybe some warped space time. But this is just pure speculation."
Surprising find
Though inflation theory forecasts many odd facets of the distant universe, not many scientists predicted the dark flow.
"It was greatly surprising to us and I suspect to everyone else," Kashlinsky said. "For some particular models of inflation you would expect these kinds of structures, and there were some suggestions in the literature that were not taken seriously I think until now."
The discovery could help scientists probe what happened to the universe before inflation, and what's going on in those inaccessible realms we cannot see.
http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/080923-dark-flows.html
-
"Because the MOVEMENT takes place towards a less dense area, then the visible universe MOVES as an entity away from that one point that is really far away from the visible universe and where the energy is much denser than it is in a visible universe."
As if the mysteries of dark matter and dark energy weren't vexing enough, another baffling cosmic puzzle has been discovered.
Patches of matter in the universe seem to be moving at very high speeds and in a uniform direction that can't be explained by any of the known gravitational forces in the observable universe. Astronomers are calling the phenomenon "dark flow."
The stuff that's pulling this matter must be outside the observable universe, researchers conclude.
When scientists talk about the observable universe, they don't just mean as far out as the eye, or even the most powerful telescope, can see. In fact there's a fundamental limit to how much of the universe we could ever observe, no matter how advanced our visual instruments. The universe is thought to have formed about 13.7 billion years ago. So even if light started travelling toward us immediately after the Big Bang, the farthest it could ever get is 13.7 billion light-years in distance. There may be parts of the universe that are farther away (we can't know how big the whole universe is), but we can't see farther than light could travel over the entire age of the universe.
Mysterious motions
Scientists discovered the flow by studying some of the largest structures in the cosmos: giant clusters of galaxies. These clusters are conglomerations of about a thousand galaxies, as well as very hot gas which emits X-rays. By observing the interaction of the X-rays with the cosmic microwave background (CMB), which is leftover radiation from the Big Bang, scientists can study the movement of clusters.
The X-rays scatter photons in the CMB, shifting its temperature in an effect known as the kinematic Sunyaev-Zel'dovich (SZ) effect. This effect had not been observed as a result of galaxy clusters before, but a team of researchers led by Alexander Kashlinsky, an astrophysicist at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md., found it when they studied a huge catalogue of 700 clusters, reaching out up to 6 billion light-years, or half the universe away. They compared this catalogue to the map of the CMB taken by NASA's Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) satellite.
They discovered that the clusters were moving nearly 2 million mph (3.2 million kph) toward a region in the sky between the constellations of Centaurus and Vela. This motion is different from the outward expansion of the universe (which is accelerated by the force called dark energy).
"We found a very significant velocity, and furthermore, this velocity does not decrease with distance, as far as we can measure," Kashlinsky told SPACE.com. "The matter in the observable universe just cannot produce the flow we measure."
Inflationary bubble
The scientists deduced that whatever is driving the movements of the clusters must lie beyond the known universe.
A theory called inflation posits that the universe we see is just a small bubble of space-time that got rapidly expanded after the Big Bang. There could be other parts of the cosmos beyond this bubble that we cannot see.
In these regions, space-time might be very different, and likely doesn't contain stars and galaxies (which only formed because of the particular density pattern of mass in our bubble). It could include giant, massive structures much larger than anything in our own observable universe. These structures are what researchers suspect are tugging on the galaxy clusters, causing the dark flow.
"The structures responsible for this motion have been pushed so far away by inflation, I would guesstimate they may be hundreds of billions of light years away, that we cannot see even with the deepest telescopes because the light emitted there could not have reached us in the age of the universe," Kashlinsky said in a telephone interview. "Most likely to create such a coherent flow they would have to be some very strange structures, maybe some warped space time. But this is just pure speculation."
Surprising find
Though inflation theory forecasts many odd facets of the distant universe, not many scientists predicted the dark flow.
"It was greatly surprising to us and I suspect to everyone else," Kashlinsky said. "For some particular models of inflation you would expect these kinds of structures, and there were some suggestions in the literature that were not taken seriously I think until now."
The discovery could help scientists probe what happened to the universe before inflation, and what's going on in those inaccessible realms we cannot see.
http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/080923-dark-flows.html
-
Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of undeclared?
Would you have been able to predict in this video
through
Dark flow phenomenon?
http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/080923-dark-flows. html
-
That YouTube video is just plain ridiculous. Whoever made it understands neither physics nor cosmology. Quasars could be galaxies beyond the visible universe? If they're beyond the visible then, by definition, they must be invisible. And what does "invisible" mean? Yes, WE CAN'T SEE THEM!
The 2nd link doesn't work.
-
You should look about that video and some other!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pF41G3gGYHA (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pF41G3gGYHA)
http://www.youtube.com/profile_videos?user=Etimespace (http://www.youtube.com/profile_videos?user=Etimespace)
Here i told 28.5.2008, there can be phenomena like dark flow. Lets using google translation!
"The baby Galaxies
http://www.ursa.fi/blogit/ta/index.php?title=hubble_paljasti_massiiviset_vauvagalaksi&more=1&c=1&tb=1&pb=1 (http://www.ursa.fi/blogit/ta/index.php?title=hubble_paljasti_massiiviset_vauvagalaksi&more=1&c=1&tb=1&pb=1)
Maybe these baby galaxies are from different energyconcentration than older galaxies. If so, then the baby galaxies could be moves to detect this.
Both concentrations of energy, therefore, are located in the visible universe outside and they are expanded, and emit energy waves with a galaxy nature.
Heitämpä So ilmoille suspicion here!
RemonttiJukteri"
-
You should look about some video first!
http://www.youtube.com/profile_videos?user=Etimespace
-
When star born, it was different kind of situation for light what we have today!
When the stars are born, was moving in space, much less fotoneita than today. The old light is not faced with very little light to the future! How does that seemed to light and how the current situation now affects arising from the light?
.
-
Bose-Einstein condensate!
Could it be possible that the particles of a laserbeam absorb the energy
radiating from the expanding qvarks with them?
This way energy radiating from the separate atomcores can not reach the
expanding atomcores nextby?
After that expanding qvarks of the separately expanding atomcores overlapp.
An energyconcentration that has composed of very dense energy has born and its hot / dense energy is able to keep itself hot / dense.
This way the energy of Bosen-Einstein condensate does not radiate nearly at all its energy away from itself!
(Maybe later The expanding qvarks have locked themselves to expand side by side?)
In the area between the expanding qvarks the moving photon meets so much dense energy that its movement slows down significantly.
For example the speed of a runner slows down involuntarily when the runner meets a traffic jam, but as soon as the runner meets a less dense space that does not transform, he can accelerate his speed. To accelerate his speed the runner must transform his body energyto a less dense energy! In other words the runner must make the substance that he consists of to transform faster than usually in a certain area to a less dense energy.
If the energy f a photon passing through the Bosen-Einstein condensate does not transform it is based on the fact that the particules are able to
recycle the energy they meet! Also the cores of expanding atoms are able to recycle the energy coming towards the core!
Did you know that everything that exists, it is one and the same thing which we canname energy.
This energy is not the matter, instead it is what exists inside of the atomic
nucleus of the matter and its density changes all the time to less density.
When there is no energy coming from outside, then it gets cold because the energy emission does not get from the atomic nucleus more of this energy to burst.For this reason, throughout expanding atomic nucleus do not push themselves away from each other so powerfully as earlier, at which point that into the atomic nucleus comes more of this energy in particles.
At the end, the so called quarks existing in different atomic nucleus interlace and form a quark unit.
Also, the energy existing inside the quarks changes all the time to less dense energy,moreover quarks burst out energy waves.
In the center of a quark unit big enough arises a sufficient pressure, whereupon quarks get to burst a lot of
energy towards each other. Therefore this quark unit starts to emit abondant energy from itself.
This way from the absolute zero we jump straight to high temperatures.
Let's talk about temperature in the absence of atom's oscillations, but rather how much energy one piece emits.
Also there is a meaning about the density of the emission: How the particles are and how close they are to one another.
.
Hot in the direction of cold!
Dense in the direction of a less dense space!
The space does not change!
The energy transforms to a less dense energy!
At the same time an energy that is transforming to a less dense energy, pushes itself towards an area where exists less energy. This happens because the energy transforming to less dense doesn´t have te room to stay in a equally small area that doesn´t change.
Also the energy in the qvarks transforms all the time into a less dense energy.
From outside there doesn´t come almost at all energy towards the atomcores when reaching the absolute zero point. To atomcores in which the energy transforms all the time into a less dense energy. This way the expanding
atomcores do not expload their energy towards each other and they don´t push themselves away from each other so powerfully.
Eventually the qvarks of the separate atomcores interlock with each other. A big consentration of the qvarks has developed. Also in the middle of the centre a pressure has been developed. This pressure is based on a fact that
the qvarks radiate their energy towards each other. With this energy they push themselves away from each other according to the same relation as they expand.
An adequate pressure is developed in the middle of the big expanding consentration of the qvarks and this pressure makes the qvarks to explode a lot of their energy towards each other.
This is why a lot of energy begins to burst / radiate from the qvark consentration.
This is how extremely cold turns in a moment into extremely hot.
The heath is not a atomcores. The vibration of the atoms is consequence of outward coming energy that reaches the atomcores.
The so called "Caloric" is not a chemical element.
"Caloric" is the one and the same thing that exists in all atomcores. It can be called energy. Or with any other name.
Energy transforms all the time to a less dense energy in a space that does not change.
Also the movement of all the atoms of the world happens towards cold in other words towards a space where is less energy!
The expanding atoms push themselves towards a less dense area in space.
The energy of the planets push themself away from the sun in a curved orbit. There is more and denser energy than outside the sun.
The stars push themselves in a curved orbit away from the centre of the galaxy where is more and denser energy than in the outside of the galaxy.
The energy of the visible universe pushes itself away from the area that exists really far outside the visible universe.In that area there exists more and denser energy than in the visible universe. Outside that area energy is less denser.
The energy of the visible universe pushes itself towards the cold. In other words towards a less dense area in a space that does not change.
-
The modern theory of Quantum_chromodynamics (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_chromodynamics) is your mainstream competitor in Quark theory.
I notice you spell your hypothetical particles qvarks. I'm not sure if it is an invention of yours, or are you developing a new version of QCD? It might be helpful if you look over the huge body of experimental evidence that exists. Any new theory would have to be compatible with those experiments.
Quantum chromodynamics (abbreviated as QCD) is a theory of the strong interaction (color force), a fundamental force describing the interactions of the quarks and gluons making up hadrons (such as the proton, neutron or pion). It is the study of the SU(3) Yang–Mills theory of color-charged fermions (the quarks). QCD is a quantum field theory of a special kind called a non-abelian gauge theory. It is an important part of the Standard Model of particle physics. A huge body of experimental evidence for QCD has been gathered over the years.
-
Sorry! Quarks, of course! I think, that quarks are same kind o expanding energyconcentration who emit expanding energy...
I write that for some other dude!
"
You cant see, heard, taste, feel or smell space or
angel, doll, seraph, cherub
So, it is empty statement to say. space expanding!
You cant make any test with space!
If some thing changing in any way, it stay some location/position, where that thing can changing.
Energy changing in space who dont changing, you know?
If space changing, space post to be some place, where space can changing.
So, you have a very stupid theory!
You have a energy who change in space who change some place?
Maybe our energy it is that space who expanding in back space who dont change!
If you are stupid like people before Kopernikus and Calileo Calilei, who believe that Sun take a round, you can forget my right idea.
You BELIEVE expanding space, even you cant make any test with space!
You cant see how space expanding!
You see how old light it is redshifting, because photons expanding and emit energy and with that energy expanding photons pushing themselfs and thats why old light it is redshifting!
And yes. Sun energy making now energyball, who have a 9 - 10 billion light years diameter/splitter.
So, thats proof, Sun energy expanding all a time!
Also all atoms nucleus energy expanding all a time.
You cant told how atom nucleu can hang electrons some orbit!
Electrons dont stay outside atom nucleus!
Electrons moving to next atom nucleus and get that expanding more energy outside expanding atom nucleus......"
.
-
You must be losing a lot of content in the translation to English; it is difficult for me to get the gist of your post. You say you don't like the idea of space expanding; I don't like that idea either. So now we have a problem. How do we explain the observations that seem to indicate that space is expanding?
Right now an alternative good and solid explanation does not exist. So, whether we accept the expansion as real or not, we have to pay attention to it. Most physicists seem to feel strongly that the expansion of space is real.
-
Solar commas / gas planets commas / tornadoes hurricanes
sunspots / gasplanets spots / tornados / hurricanes
The pressure variation.
Pressure changing.
Space counting particles that penetrate the solar / gasplanets and rock planets in.
they increase the amount of energy that comes out of the sun / gas planets / rock planets!
Sometimes, the energy starts to be diverted out from a specific region. This creates the river of energy that causes these phenomena. When the sun out of future energy river is up, the weather Sunspot.
Jupiter in this energy river continues to flow out of the same area all the time. Jupiter's red spot, you know!
www.onesimpleprinciple.com site is the old text. I need to update your site such as the phenomena of context!
Atoms nucleus expanding, emit energywaves who have a nature of expanding electrons and expanding particle who also emit expanding energy!
We can explain everything with pressure fo changing!
.
-
If we dont know how gravity working, we have to ask, is there any gravity at all
I am confident you are correct. There is no gravity: the Earth sucks.
Very appropriate; I vote best post in thread [:)]
-
Maybe that new idea from Savo is right one?
http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/41615/description/Effects_of_the_weather%2C_underground
Atoms nucleus expanding and emit energywaves who have a nature of expanding electrons and expanding particle who also emit expanding energy!
Electrons just moving with light speed to the next expanding atoms nucleus and get this one expanding energy normal quiclier etc. In liguid and gas, that energy can moving long way and get some molecul expanding more energy some other direction and thats why molecul can moving between other expanding molecul in liguid and gas!
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/l2
-
That is an interesting link JukriS. I mean the one about detecting muons from deep within an old iron mine. I can't get much out of your concept, however. I can't imagine electrons moving at the speed of light. It has been suggested in some speculative musings that negotiation for photon exchange between electrons might take place at the speed of light, then once the deal is made, the actual transfer is instantaneous.
If I glean correctly, you seem to be suggesting that everything in the universe is expanding. So we here on earth feel the earth's expansion as gravity. I have trouble making that scenario work. How would the property of matter called inertia fit into that concept?
Your link about the underground weather study brings a thought to mind; in the study they measure muons. Muons are just a small piece of the air molecule that underwent fission. All the other constituents of the air molecule must be somewhere undetected.
-
Well, you have had a busy time making videos [:)] I have so far looked at five or so of them. Let me see if I have the concept.
The major premise seems to be that space is expanding; this includes the space inside molecules, atoms, and quarks. With that premise you explain gravity as acceleration we feel from the expanding earth. Then you go on to show that the premise can explain other observables in the universe.
First, I would ask: Why do you find it necessary to rethink physics? There must be some part of the mainstream thinking that you find totally unacceptable. You need to explain what that is. I would find it difficult to accept the notion that all of space is expanding at an expanding rate, and has been doing so for billions of years.
-
Space is not expanding or curving.
Atoms expand in space, which is not expanding!
if you do the test particles, and you want to see them pass on the kinetic-energy songs, you have to remember also expanding particles and radiating energy.
The new particles are the hot / dense and have little external surface in relation to the amount of energy which they contain.
That is why the new particles do not affect the interaction of atoms with the cores.
Old-particle interactions seem more. To transfer energy to atoms nucleus. (kinetic energy or heat energy. Whatever you want.)
This explains why the dark energy does not exist. There is only one and the same energy.
Distant galaxy will be the particles are changed travel during not so much high-density energy. They are bigger in relation to the amount of energy which they contain. They radiate their energy faster. They share more energy, that makes them explode more energy away from self, etc. New hot / dense particle time is slow!
The old light photons have time to become less high-density energy, and they are radiating energy to each other. In the energy of photons are pushing each other out away from each other. In this way the light is stretched. Overall, the Red has moved/redshifting, you know!
-
Jukri - please keep the discussion of one topic to one thread, rather than starting new ones - it helps people to follow and understand if all of the replies are in one place.
I'll lock this thread and merge the others together.
Thanks!
-
For example, the Sun will change with time by red giant!
The same phenomenon in a micro world. Also the particles are changing with time by "red giant". Receive more hits and more explosive energy away from themselves! Kinetic energy, you know!
Just think, a little explosion microcosmos supernova! Begins to move the kinetisenergy, with power!
-
Space is not expanding or curving.
Atoms expand in space, which is not expanding!
if you do the test particles, and you want to see them pass on the kinetic-energy songs, you have to remember also expanding particles and radiating energy.
The new particles are the hot / dense and have little external surface in relation to the amount of energy which they contain.
That is why the new particles do not affect the interaction of atoms with the cores.
Old-particle interactions seem more. To transfer energy to atoms nucleus. (kinetic energy or heat energy. Whatever you want.)
This explains why the dark energy does not exist. There is only one and the same energy.
Distant galaxy will be the particles are changed travel during not so much high-density energy. They are bigger in relation to the amount of energy which they contain. They radiate their energy faster. They share more energy, that makes them explode more energy away from self, etc. New hot / dense particle time is slow!
The old light photons have time to become less high-density energy, and they are radiating energy to each other. In the energy of photons are pushing each other out away from each other. In this way the light is stretched. Overall, the Red has moved/redshifting, you know!
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/l2
-
Okay; I think I'm getting the concept. You have flat space-time in the classic sense. Space is not expanding but everything in space is expanding.
I'll have to work on understanding how that develops into the explanations you provide.
-
Black holes time is very slowly!
Also black holes expanding and emit high energy particle who also expanding slowly and thats why they dont interactive with expanding atoms nucleus. They dont giving kineticenergy for atoms nucleus!
Thats why expanding black holes eat everything! because black holes dont push expanding stuff far away from expanding black holes!
There is mystery for today science. High energy particle. There is coming some wave of high energy particle and then is take a time and finally coming new wave etc. Just remember, black holes time is very slowly!
Space* » Black holes*
Black holes*
The Interaction / The Black Holes
How do the orbs interact with each other?
They open up energywaves, by which they interact with each other.
The less the orb has exterior surface, the less it interacts with other pieces. Also the density of energy matters as well.
In a energy concentration there can be a lot of energy, although it would have just a little exterior surface in relation to other orbs.
The denser the energy in an orb is, the less it has exterior surface in relation to the quantity of energy.
The less exterior surface, the slower the energy opens up away from the orb and the less it interacts with other orbs.
The denser the energy of a piece is, the more efficient it stops to itself for example the neutrinos coming from the stars and also the less there comes neutrinos away from the piece.
There woun´t come any neutrinos of the stars from the direction of a black hole, because they stop themselves to a black hole.
However, towards the black hole there move neutrinos all the time and they expand and open up energywaves, while transfering their kinetic energy with them to the orbs.
From the pieces that move near the black hole loose more neutrinos from the side that it away from the black hole. This is how a certain exterior pressure is formed around the black hole.
The closer to the black hole the piece is, the less energybundles come from backside of the black holes and the stronger the exterior pressure is.
When one understands that all the energy concentrations expand and open up energywaves that have the nature of expanding energyconcentration, one can undestand that the black hole does not draw other pieces towards itself. It devours all the other pieces, because it expands and pushes pieces that locate nearby away from itself slower than the pieces and the black hole itsel do expand.
However, some of the black holes are in a way in a diet. They push the gas that locates nearby away from themselves faster than they expand.
Someone may wonder, why the black hole finally begins to reject the pieces that approach the black hole faster than the black hole and the piece themselves expand. It is based on a fact, that allthough the black hole opens up slowly its energy, do these dense energywaves have large energic particles, which also transfer their kinetic energy with energywaves opening up from themselves towards the expanding atomcores of other orbs.
The modern physics does not understand these large energic particles. According to my theory, the speed of these large energic particles has accelerated just because of the fact, that they also do expand and open up energywaves by which they can make the large energic particles in front of them to speed up all the time.Their speed accelerates slower than the speed of the photons. Correspondingly their speed slows down slower than the photons speed when they move for example towards the sun. The speed of a ship accelerates slower than the speed of a boat. The speed of the ship also slows down slower than the speed of a boat.
This way it is easy to understand how the expanding star that pushes itself away from the expanding black hole explodes a lot of its energy towards the black hole. Those opening and expanding energybudles that come from the expanding black hole make the expanding atoms of a star explode faster than normally. It achieves an illusion that the black hole absorbs with some kind of gravitation from a star the mass of a star towards itself.
In fact, the energy coming from the black hole makes the expanding star to explode its energy much stronger than normally. With this energy that explodes towards the black hole it pushes itself away from the expanding black hole in a curved orbit.
-
http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/42877/title/Nanoclusters_seem_to_skirt_physics_law
"In simulations, tiny loophole allows colliding nanoclusters to increase speed after impact
By Laura Sanders
Web edition : Friday, April 17th, 2009
font_down font_up Text Size
access
Enlargemagnify
FAST GETAWAYIn simulations, nanoclusters made up of several hundred atoms occasionally rebounded with more energy than each started with.Hiroto Kuninaka and Hisao Hayakawa
Nobody’s above the law. But tiny clusters of colliding atoms may duck below the second law of thermodynamics. In simulations, researchers in Japan found that in rare cases, tiny clusters of atoms ricochet off each other faster than their approaching speeds. The results, which appeared in the March Physical Review E, seem to violate the second law’s requirement that any work squanders a little bit of energy in the form of waste heat, leaving the system a little more disheveled, with higher entropy.
In collisions big enough to see, like those between a tennis ball and a gym floor, the speed of an object’s approach is always faster than its speed after impact. A tennis ball dropped against the floor bounces a little slower and comes up shorter on each bounce because a small amount of the ball’s energy is siphoned off in the form of waste heat.
In the nanoworld, though, the new results suggest that normal rules do not always apply.
Researchers Hisao Hayakawa, of Kyoto University, and Hiroto Kuninaka, of Chuo University in Tokyo, developed a computer program to model head-on collisions of squishy clusters of several hundred atoms called nanoclusters. At speeds between 3 and 5 meters per second (less than 12 miles per hour), most of the clusters in the simulation stuck together like two candied apples in the sun. Others just bumped into each other and moved away at a slower rate than their approach, like two colliding bocce balls on a lawn.
But about 5 percent of the time, the colliding nanoclusters actually sped up after bumping, exhibiting what the researchers call a super rebound. During these rebounds, the outgoing energy exceeds the incoming energy, meaning that in these collisions, the system overall lost entropy, hence the apparent second law violation.
“It’s an interesting observation. For me, it was also counterintuitive,” comments Jörn Dunkel, a theoretical physicist at the University of Oxford in England.
This super bounce comes from the random internal fluctuations of motions in the atoms that make up each nanocluster, the study researchers say. Depending on the exact motions, some fluctuations can give the collision an extra boost, like an extra springy trampoline.
But this extra boost only works in tiny systems, not trampolines, which are made up of zillions of atoms. “Nanoscale physics involves such unexpected events,” says Hayakawa.
When the researchers increased the size of each nanocluster in the simulation to over 1,000 atoms, the super bounce disappeared entirely. “In order to see a violation of the second law, you need a very small number,” says Dunkel.
These clusters get around the second law of thermodynamics on a statistical technicality: The average speed of all the outgoing nanoclusters is less than the approaching speed. Even though individual nanoclusters appear to violate the second law occasionally, the average behavior of all the nanoclusters falls squarely in line with the law’s constraints.
The second law statistically describes large collections of atoms, like those in a tennis ball. Tiny groups of atoms, which are susceptible to large energy fluctuations, live outside of the second law. Just as a person can’t break a law that isn’t on the books, individual nanoclusters can’t really violate the second law in a meaningful way.
Furthermore, Dunkel points out, the simulation is conducted in a perfect world. The real world, however, is messy, with things like oddly-shaped objects, variable temperature, and worst of all, gravity. These confounding imperfections make a real experiment tough.
“It’s difficult to experimentally realize the conditions,” says Dunkel. “I wouldn’t say it’s unrealizable, just demanding.” To precisely control the temperature, shape and initial speed of the nanoclusters will be a challenge.
But Hayakawa thinks that experimentalists will see this effect soon. “I believe that it will not take a long time to report the super rebound of nanoclusters in experiments,” he says.
And once researchers have observed the super rebound, Hayakawa and Kuninaka plan to test whether it is possible to extract the surplus energy from these rebounds. To do so, a macroscopic machine will be needed to convert the surplus energy from the microscale super rebounds. But such a task will be difficult, since this conversion will eat up all the energy gained in the first place, says Hayakawa."
Photon is not reflected in self-atom on.
Photon does not start up in no time at the speed of light. Its energy is the accelerated pace away from the expansion of the atomic core/nuclei.
Photon will go towards the expansion of the atomic cores, and will then in the future of energy-wave pressure variation when a new photon. In fact, the core of atom towards reaching photon to return to "the end", that is absorbed by atoms in the core for future energy-waves, etc.
This phenomenon, therefore, can be explained so that the material away from the future and more quickly than the substance of the moving atoms, have the NOT same atoms as the material moved the atoms were.
The substance is moving towards the atoms of a substance in the outer surface of the atoms with interlocked and cause hard-pressed surface of the substance of the atoms and deeper in between the atoms, when the energy becomes less strong high-density power and energy of this substance in the surface of the atoms ejected faster pace away from the material as the material gone atoms moved towards the material.
The simple matter was multiplied complicated.
-
The mountains*
Neal Adams has developed "Theory of Expanding Planets"-model about how the planets expand three-dimentionally. According to Neal once the wasnt just one continent rounded by a sea, but the old continents were the only surface of the globe.´The three-dimentional expanding has torn apart the continents from each other. Neal doesn´t talk about accelerated expanding, so his theory needs gravitation.
According to my theory there is no observable expanding if there is not enough variation of the pressure.
Once for example a supernova explosion that happened nearby the globe brought an energywave dence enough towards the globe. The energic energybudles of this wave pushed themselves through the atomcores of the
globe deep inside the globe (for example up to ten kilometres). These energybudles cleaned with them energywaves coming from the atomcores. The expanding atoms of the globe that located outside this area, pushed the atomcores of that area closer to each other. At the same time the expanding atomcores of that area expanded close to each other like in cold fusion. This is how heavier substaces originate and in this case I mean the shelf.
If the separate energybudles of a energypulse that came towards the globe were quarks or protons/neutrons, they would have brought more substance deep underneath the globes surface. This developes a pressure that is bigger than normally to that area and this pressure accelerates the substace of that area to push itself away from the focal point of the globe. This is how the mountains developed. This excess pressure makes also the globe to expand in that area so much that it is noticeable afterwards.
-
What are you actually asking?
It would help if you could condense your post into a succinct question, which should also form the thread title. This is our forum policy.
This will ensure that more people respond to your post.
Chris
-
My question.
Am I right?
Space is not expanding.
Atoms in the nucleus, the energy expands.
Atoms in the kernel/nucleus of the energy makes the whole period of work or energy straightens or explode or expand all a time in space who dont change at all!
Is this the case?
Extra space dimensions does not exist!
Is this the case?
Space is not curving!
Is this the case?
There is no dark matter at all!
Is this the case?
There is no dark energy at all!
Is this the case?
-
We are all seeking answers to such questions. Many of us have a quick hunch now and then and could make assertions based upon the hunches. But when we have no evidence to back up the hunches, we usually don't make the assertions.
-
Entropy proofs that energy expanding all a time.
Inside atoms nucleus is only expanding energy, nothing else.
We dont need expanding space or curving space or dark matter or dark energy or extra dimensions!
.
-
Entropy proofs that energy expanding all a time.
Inside atoms nucleus is only expanding energy, nothing else.
I do not understand.
-
I mean energy explode all a time in space who dont change at all.
All the phenomens can be explained by one force and this force is the pressure.
We can describe by people what happens in the atomcores all the time. For example one thousand people can go to the space and curl up close to each other. Now we have made an energyconsentration of people that covers a certain spot of the space. We know that the biggest part of the atoms is empty space. Also between people there exists empty space that does not expand or curve.
Now these people can begin to straighten or in other words to open up and this way they push themselves away from each other. One can observe the hardest pressure in the middle of this human energyconsentration and people who locate in the middle must do an enormeous job so that they woun´t
flatten in the centre. These people in the centre sweat the most. This is excactly the same thing that happens without gravitation for example in the centre of the earth and in the centre of the sun.
The density of the human energyconsentration reduces and the people push themselves away from the centre of the human energyconsentration. Now for a little while we can observe a phenomen of gravitation without a drawing force (that actually does not exist) on the surface of the human energyconsentration.
In my opinion the space does not expand or curve. If it would expand, could you describe how does the space expand?
It is easy to describe how the energy all the time turns into a less dense energy in the atomcores, so I think that it is time to forget all about the magical expanding and curving of the space. You can also forget all the spare spacedimentions, the dark substance and the dark energy.
So the space does not expand or curve!
The atomcores expand and open up expanding electrons and expanding photons and they beam their expanding energy as waves away from themselves. This is how it goes!
When you look at the galaxy, you can understand that the energy inside the galaxy is denser than outside the galaxy. If you look at a star, you can understand that energy inside the star is denser than outside the star. This way you will know for sure that the energy inside the atomcore is denser than outside the atomcore. It is not difficult to understand that the energy inside the protons / neutrons is denser than outside of them and the energy inside the qvarks is denser than outside the qvarks and so on...
It it also easy to realize that outside the visible universe the is an area, where is really much more energy than the visible universe has all together and the energy some where out there is much denser than than it is in a visible universe. Still in that area far away from the visible universe there is no centre point where the energy would be denser than outside it.
That three-dimentionally expanding energyconsentration that bems energywaves with the nature of the galaxies, is formed also from separate three-dimentionally expanding energyconsentrations ect. And so the smaller separate energyconsentrations we talk about, the denser and denser the
energy is all the time.
So the atomcore does not have a centre point, where the energy would be denser than outside it. There is no centre point also at the universe, outside which the energy would be less denser.
Because the MOVEMENT takes place towards a less dense area, then the visible universe MOVES as an entity away from that one point that is really far away from the visible universe and where the energy is much denser than it is in a visible universe.
-
This item starts by quoting a reasonable research report and then veers off to JukriS hobby horse and is more suited to the new theories area with his other paosts
-
http://www.sciencenews.org/view/feature/id/42632/title/Strings_Link_the_Ultracold_with_the_Superhot
Perfect liquids suggest theory’s math mirrors something real
By Tom Siegfried
April 25th, 2009
Shadows live in a simple world. They glide effortlessly across any sort of surface, oblivious to the higher dimension of space in which 3-D bodies move, collide and sometimes block the paths of rays of light.
Shadows have no idea how important that third dimension is, and how objects in it endow those very shadows with their quasi-physical existence. Indeed, the laws of shadow physics all depend on the third dimension’s presence. And just as the clueless inhabitants of the shadow world require an extra dimension to explain how they exist and interact, reality for humans may also depend on an invisible dimension or dimensions unknown.
Physicists, in fact, have long pondered possible higher dimensions beyond the familiar four — three of space and one of time — that describe ordinary experience. Such extra dimensions have emerged as essential features in a sophisticated mathematical pastime known as superstring theory. Believed by some theorists to be the ultimate building blocks of all physical reality, superstrings are supposedly inaccessible to experimental study. If they exist, they would be far too small to detect directly —enlarging a superstring to the size of an amoeba would be the equivalent of making an ant as big as the visible universe. Similarly, the extra dimensions that strings require would probably be far too small to detect by available methods.
So string theory has long remained in the physics version of The Twilight Zone, disconnected from the ordinary world of sight and sound. But now the extra-dimensional math has begun to audition for Reality TV. For the first time, superstring theorists can point to a place where their formulas help other physicists understand something they can see in their experiments.
One such experiment generates matter in its most fiery form —simulating the temperatures of the Big Bang itself. Another probes matter most frigid — atoms vastly colder than even the depths of outer space. At both extremes, matter behaves surprisingly like a liquid, contrary to all expectations. More surprising still, explaining this behavior apparently requires an extra dimension of space, something that superstring theory conveniently provides. And so the scientists who study hot matter, cold matter and string matter have found themselves sharing common ground in an extra-dimensional world.
“It surprised the heck out of us two years ago when we started realizing that this was the case,” says physicist Peter Steinberg of Brookhaven National Laboratory on Long Island, N.Y. “It’s a once-in-a-generation convergence of scientific communities. None of us really saw this coming.”
Steinberg and other scientists discussed the new developments recently in Chicago at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. Speakers at a session there described the surprising confluence of different physics fields as a sort of perfect storm, with the eye centered on the esoteric idea of a “perfect liquid.”
Liquids are usually the Goldilocks state of matter, the not-too-hot, not-too-cold, cohesive yet shapeless assemblages of molecules that exist only in a relatively narrow range of temperatures. Colder, and matter typically becomes solid — rigid and crystalline. Hotter, and matter turns gaseous, with molecules flying about freely and occasionally colliding. Hotter still, and a gas should become plasma, with electrons torn from atoms to form an electromagnetic mélange of charged particles, a gas with flash.
When the universe was very young, and still superhot from the aftermath of the Big Bang, plasma should have been the only state of matter around. And that’s what scientists at Brookhaven expected to see when they smashed gold ions together at 99.99 percent of the speed of light using a machine called RHIC (for Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider). RHIC physicists thought the ion collisions would melt the gold’s protons and neutrons into a hot plasma of quarks and gluons at a temperature of a trillion kelvins, replicating conditions similar to those a microsecond after the birth of the universe. But instead of a gaslike plasma, the physicists reported in 2005, RHIC served up a hot quark soup, behaving more like a liquid than a plasma or gas.
“It’s given us a certain amount of consternation about what to call this stuff,” says Barbara Jacak of the RHIC team. “It certainly shows liquidlike properties.”
An ordinary plasma’s electrically charged particles should block the path of light, for example, just as a thick fog dampens the beams of a car’s headlights. But light passes right through RHIC’s quark-gluon soup, says Jacak. And free-flying quarks would easily be able to zip through the rarefied molecules of a gas, like a bowling ball scattering any pins in its way. But even the heaviest quarks get stuck in the soup.
“That is really astounding,” Jacak says. “It’s as if these bowling pins stopped the big giant bowling ball, and the only way they could do that is if they are somehow tied together with strings.”
Soon after the RHIC experiments, string theorists realized that their strings might be tying the bowling pins together, explaining the odd liquidlike behavior of the quark-gluon plasma. That was a spectacular realization in itself. But around the same time, another branch of physics found itself dipping into a perfect liquid, this time made from cold lithium atoms.
Very cool
access
Enlargemagnify
In 2002, physicists at Duke University first created what they called a stable, strongly interacting gas of cold atoms, using the isotope lithium-6. Using laser beams to confine and cool the lithium atoms, researchers produced an atomic cloud with a temperature lower than a tenth of a millionth kelvins — barely above absolute zero.
Curiously, when researchers released the cigar-shaped cloud from its laser prison, it expanded at its sides, but not at the tips. Such an odd “elliptical flow” also described the expanding cloud of quarks and gluons produced at RHIC.
“It’s quite remarkable that we have such different systems, yet we have this common behavior,” says Duke’s John E. Thomas, who also spoke at the Chicago meeting.
Such similar flow seemed especially surprising given the wide disparity of the two systems, with a temperature difference of 19 orders of magnitude separating them. In both cases, the flow seemed to signal the features of a liquid — and a liquid with extremely low resistance to flow. Both cases constituted what physicists call a “strongly coupled” system, in which the particles exhibit collective behavior.
Strongly coupled systems are like a baseball stadium with a big crowd, where the fans can perform the wave, rather than a poorly attended game with the crowd so “weakly coupled” that nobody else notices if one fan stands up. In strongly coupled systems, string theory–based calculations suggest, there is a limit to how low the resistance to flow, or viscosity, can go. A liquid with that lowest possible viscosity earns the label “perfect,” and both the hot RHIC soup and the cold lithium cloud turn out to be nearly as close to perfect as possible.
This formula for perfection is actually a ratio of viscosity to entropy — a measure of disorder that depends on the system’s temperature. For a perfect liquid, the viscosity-entropy ratio is a very small number (about 0.08 in units derived from certain fundamental constants). For ordinary water, the ratio is 380 times higher than that theoretical minimum; liquid helium’s ratio is only 0.7, still about nine times higher than perfection. But both RHIC’s soup and the lithium atoms approach the theoretical limit even more closely. Cold lithium’s ratio is less than 0.5, and the quark-gluon soup is in the neighborhood of 0.2.
Not only does string theory predict the perfect liquid limit for the viscosity-entropy ratio, string math also offers an explanation for how the cold and hot worlds can be so similar. Both systems can be described as something like a shadow world sitting in a higher dimension. Strongly coupled particles are linked by ripples traveling through the extra dimension, says Steinberg, of Brookhaven.
String math describing such ripples stems from an idea called the holographic principle, used by string theorists to describe certain kinds of black holes. A black hole’s entropy depends on its surface area — as though all the information in its three-dimensional interior is stored on its two-dimensional surface. (The “holographic” label is an allusion to ordinary holograms, where 3-D images are coated on a 2-D surface, like an emblem on a credit card.) The holographic principle has value because in some cases the math for a complex 3-D system (neglecting time) can be too hard to solve, but the equivalent 4-D math provides simpler equations to describe the same phenomena.
One of the two systems is a realm of four spatial dimensions where the string math describes gravity and quantum theory; the other is the 3-D world of quarks and gluons. Usually the math for describing each of these systems looks very different. But string theory’s extra dimension allows the math to be transformed in ways that show the two systems to actually be equivalent — in technical terms, the systems are “dual” to each other.
“The bottom line is we can exploit all this, because we can use … easy computations in the gravity system to compute hard-to-compute things in the dual system,” Johnson said at the Chicago meeting.
So just as shadow physics is hard to explain without knowing about objects in the third dimension, quark physics makes more sense using the 4-D math. Quarks can be viewed, for instance, as the endpoints of strings that vibrate in an extra dimension, and that explains how they can be so strongly coupled. Precisely the same math can then also describe the collective behavior of the cold lithium atoms. As Johnson points out, viscosity is all about how neighboring pieces of a fluid communicate with each other. With an extra dimension, that communication can take place as disturbances in the higher dimensional space, explaining the perfect liquid behavior.
Strings strike back
In recent years it has become popular to criticize string theory as out of touch with reality. Popular books have been written by scientists, some prominent and others not so prominent, arguing that string theory makes no predictions that experiment can test, that its fundamental objects can’t be observed, that physicists have wasted their time on an enterprise that isn’t even scientific to begin with.
Such arguments leave an impression of utter unfamiliarity with the history of science. In times past, the same kinds of aspersions were cast against quarks, neutrinos, even the very existence of atoms. Superstrings are in good company. And string theory’s limit on how low viscosity can go now seems to have established that string math does indeed mirror something real in nature. “This may well be the first prediction from string theory to be validated by experiment,” Steinberg writes in a recent paper (arxiv.org/abs/0903.1474).
Superstrings’ success with perfect liquids does not, of course, establish that the whole theory is the correct description of the universe. Much work remains to figure out how much of reality string theory actually captures beyond the realm of perfect liquids. But the usefulness of superstring math in these instances argues strongly that those equations capture something true. Establishing that truth for certain will still not be easy.
It’s not surprising, of course, that such groundbreaking science should be difficult and controversial. Advances in physics today are naturally much tougher to achieve than they used to be —because the problems remaining to be solved are precisely those that have resisted solution for so long.
“A new truth always has to contend with many difficulties,” the German physicist Max Planck said decades ago. “If it were not so, it would have been discovered much sooner.”
Check out, what i speak about earlier!
18.02.2009 11:44
"(Maybe later The expanding qvarks have locked themselves to expand side by side?)"
.
-
Lets check out that first
http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=4955212n
and then that news
http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/42877/title/Nanoclusters_seem_to_skirt_physics_law
And then you just have to think!
I am sire, you found what i think!
[;)]
-
you found what i think!
[;)]
Never in a million years I suspect will I find out what you think.
-
Can I have a piece of history?
-
And third, remember onesimpleprinciple idea with the atomic model
Nuclei of atoms explode all the time and radiate energy waves, which are expanding atomic nuclei to each other to blow energy to each other and thus expanding atomic nuclei tönivät each other away from each other at the same rate as all grow!
If you watched the cold fusion hot topic in the video think about those who are able to shoot the liquid atoms ytimiin of ammunition with atoms in the liquid core "mined" for clean energy, which is more ammunition than the munition containing energy.
(self-munitions, as in all others, is of course also of the one and only pure energy, as we all are!)
Projectile can think of the electron which is spread around a hundred smaller energyconcentration that go nuclei of atoms and then to explode away from a example 111 on the energy and concentration that.
Ammunition does not cease, because they are fed into the liquid all the time.
-
Atomic core, therefore, has to be mined by one and the same matter which is composed of all the energy.
Atoms ytimethän extract from each other all the time the energy in the energy waves are in their own hands all the time radiates out from within.
Now it is only accidentally invented a method of producing energy extracted from a controlled more than the extraction energy is used.
Atomic bomb atoms extracted from the energy of each other rather wildly out.
The heat, therefore there is no vibration of atoms, but it is how much energy is moving atom cores in the region between. That energy that travels around the cores of atoms in the region between the shares of energy from atomic nuclei are composed. and it receives the energy of atoms nuclei vibrate, because the root of the energy reaching the entire period of an explosive core of atomic energy to explode out of reverse himself.
all the nuclei of atoms consisting of the so-called. protons and neutrons which are similar throughout the period of explosive concentrations of energy which radiate energy waves, and these so-called "waves. protons / neutrons tönivät each other away from each other at the same rate as the expansion.
The substance does not change the energy, but energy is changing throughout the period of less high-density energy!
-
http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/42988/title/Blob_may_signal_monster_galaxy_feeding
Galaxys born inside to outside.
Galaxys centre is very big and very density energyconcentration who exploding all a time and radiate exploding energywaves who have nature exploding atoms!
-
Suitable for two Galactic center of the huge energy of the collision early enough to relieve a lot of energy. If a collision arises, before the stars have had time to arise out of a protruding from the energy created perhaps the only gas.
Onesimpleprinciple philosophy of the Galactic center huge big focus on energy will radiate energy waves in need of future energy that causes the pressure fluctuations, creating the stars.
When the two giant energy of the collision is at an early stage, the energy released will not be responsible for future energy-much, and you will generate a gas which radiates energy, which brings the gas concentration would have been guided by the other huge energy mergers themselves over long distances, when a sufficiently energetic particles has not been reached towards the gas and it is through the stars does not unable to reach the birth.
-
i dont understund physics who say that particle dont radiate/emit energywaves!
I think that kind of physics it is very stupid physics!
What it is entropy, if particle dont exploding and emit/radiate energywaves?
I think, everything it is just about entropy, you know?
-
It's sometimes hard to tell is someone is trolling, being dumb, or both.
Entropy is a measure of the disorder of a system. S=k ln (W) IIRC.
Nothing to do with explosions, no matter how much you like them.
-
Not so much trolling; more a matter of no self discipline and the attractions of cloud cuckoo land, I think.
-
JukriS makes some nice videos. If it is this obsession with an explosive construct for matter that is driving this creativity, it is a good thing. The videos are very creative. The ideas they explore are not persuasive.
-
Art is not Science, however.