0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Gonna disagree,
Asymptomatic people have a lower amount of virus and so don't propagate as much virus.
The food market hypothesis is pretty much now dead in the water.
virus 91% and 96% similar to sars cov2 in Bats in Cambodia and Thailand
Sick peoples immune systems are having a harder time responding
Quote from: Jolly2The food market hypothesis is pretty much now dead in the water. It would be more accurate to say "The food market hypothesis is now recognized as only part of the story."- Undoubtedly, many of the early cases picked up COVID-19 through contacts who worked at the food market, or who had visited the food market. That's why it was shut down so quickly, early in the pandemic.- But the WHO team asked for re-analysis of the earliest cases, and recognized nearly as many cases that did not have an obvious association with the food market.- That means there was other cluster(s) of cases whose source has not yet been determined (and it will be pretty hard, a year later!)
Quote from: Jolly2virus 91% and 96% similar to sars cov2 in Bats in Cambodia and ThailandIt was identified quite early that the Hubei province (where Wuhan is located) is too cold to host significant populations of bat species year-round.- The bat coronaviruses published by Wuhan/US researchers around 2015 came from warmer provinces to the south.- Undoubtedly, other bat coronaviruses will be circulating in more tropical countries around China's southern border- The illegal (and legal) wildlife trade does not respect national borders- It just means that the food market is still considered as one epicenter of the human-transmissible COVID-19 outbreak.
Quote from: Jolly2Sick peoples immune systems are having a harder time respondingWhen you say "sick", the usual early viral symptoms of fever, malaise, tiredness, etc
Ok when I was referring to "sick" I was referring to people who were seeing greater cell infection and so greater viral replication, which the immune system was having trouble suppressing,
"Conclusion Approximately one-fifth of the individuals without severe symptoms were asymptomatic, and their viral loads were comparable to those in symptomatic patients. A large proportion of mildly symptomatic patients with COVID-19 or asymptomatic individuals with SARS-CoV-2 showed persistent positive upper respiratory RT-PCR results at follow-up."fromhttps://thorax.bmj.com/content/76/1/61Or"Findings In this cohort study that included 303 patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection isolated in a community treatment center in the Republic of Korea, 110 (36.3%) were asymptomatic at the time of isolation and 21 of these (19.1%) developed symptoms during isolation. The cycle threshold values of reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction for SARS-CoV-2 in asymptomatic patients were similar to those in symptomatic patients."Fromhttps://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/2769235
Quote from: Petrochemicals on 12/03/2021 12:47:0708:51:40Quote from: Petrochemicals on 12/03/2021 12:47:07Quote from: Jolly2 on 12/03/2021 11:56:20Recently published Politco Article speaks of the Wuhan Laboratory as the most likley source of Covid19https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2021/03/08/josh-rogin-chaos-under-heaven-wuhan-lab-book-excerpt-474322Article talk about how diplomats in 2017 and 2018 had expressed concerns about the Wuhan Laboratory in terms of its activities and safety standards. All of which is rather hilarious when the American Laboratory also engaged in the same research actually had a leak and was closed yet isnt even mentioned.Wuhan, I can see why this is in new theories. Why is that?The food market hypothesis is pretty much now dead in the water. Especially as the first recorded patient had no connection to the market at all.My only point with regard to the article was that, while they argue for a laboratory release as the most likely source they simply ignore Fort Detrick which had a leak 4 months before we see the first cases
08:51:40
Quote from: Jolly2 on 12/03/2021 11:56:20Recently published Politco Article speaks of the Wuhan Laboratory as the most likley source of Covid19https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2021/03/08/josh-rogin-chaos-under-heaven-wuhan-lab-book-excerpt-474322Article talk about how diplomats in 2017 and 2018 had expressed concerns about the Wuhan Laboratory in terms of its activities and safety standards. All of which is rather hilarious when the American Laboratory also engaged in the same research actually had a leak and was closed yet isnt even mentioned.Wuhan, I can see why this is in new theories.
Recently published Politco Article speaks of the Wuhan Laboratory as the most likley source of Covid19https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2021/03/08/josh-rogin-chaos-under-heaven-wuhan-lab-book-excerpt-474322Article talk about how diplomats in 2017 and 2018 had expressed concerns about the Wuhan Laboratory in terms of its activities and safety standards. All of which is rather hilarious when the American Laboratory also engaged in the same research actually had a leak and was closed yet isnt even mentioned.
they simply ignore Fort Detrick which had a leak 4 months before we see the first cases