0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
The question is asked whether consciousness acts on matter, and it is legit.
@talanum1 apparently they all pretend not to understand this Quantum mind theory which does exist. The question now is to wonder why they pretend not to understand.
Hence quantum mind theory does not exist.
Quote from: Kartazion on 12/03/2022 13:55:26The question is asked whether consciousness acts on matter, and it is legit.Edit: Initial response deleted. This is actually a hijack of the thread (even if the thread is absurd) so I deleted my response.
The soul causes new thoughts, so whether the momentum starts in ions in the brain or in the soul, since the soul starts new mental processes, it creates momentum from nothing.
God starts the program in babies. He says: "live" and then the mind boots up.
Quote from: Colin2B on 12/03/2022 16:39:56Hence quantum mind theory does not exist.You cannot say and assert that it does not exist at all.
I am saying that a scientific theory does not exist.I assume you know the difference between a scientific theory and a hypothetical speculation.
I am saying that a scientific theory does not exist.
Quote from: Colin2B on 12/03/2022 23:34:08I am saying that a scientific theory does not exist.I assume you know the difference between a scientific theory and a hypothetical speculation.You are weird. A theory is a well confirmed explanation for observed facts, and a New Experiments Show Consciousness Affects Matter.//www.youtube.com/watch?v=nRSBaq3vAeY
Quote from: Colin2B on 12/03/2022 23:34:08I am saying that a scientific theory does not exist.Ultimately what we need is a satisfying scientific theory of consciousness that predicts under which conditions any particular physical system - Source: Nature https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-05097-xDo you still confirm that a theory of it does not exist, or is it debatable?
So consciousness isn't the factor that induces the change in outcome.
As the nature article says.We still do not have any such theory.
That's not what they say in the video.
How does the video address reaction times?
Quote from: Bored chemist on 13/03/2022 11:02:07How does the video address reaction times?Like an illusion. Eg. According to theoretical physicist Carlo Rovelli, time is an illusion: our naive perception of its flow doesn’t correspond to physical reality. Indeed, as Rovelli argues in The Order of Time, much more is illusory, including Isaac Newton’s picture of a universally ticking clock. - Source: Nature https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-04558-7
Why don't you start your own thread instead of hijacking talanum1's thread? This thread is about talanum1's fantasy.
But consciousness is intimately related with time; if time doesn't exist, nor does consciousness.
So you still have to explain how the experiment is influenced by consciousness when the human reactions are so slow that the light could have bounced around the apparatus a billion times before anyone was conscious of any outcome.
Who says it doesn't exist?
Like an illusion.Eg. According to theoretical physicist Carlo Rovelli, time is an illusion: our naive perception of its flow doesn’t correspond to physical reality.
Subscribe to nature.