1

New Theories / Can we draw a geometrical representation of gravity?

« on: 01/07/2022 03:54:25 »

I'm building a mind view representation of gravity and polarity based on the latin symbol for infinite which the intersection it's then stretched forwards (in time) as the two semi circles conjoined appearing to be one.

 It's more a 2D/3D way to try to put the picture I perceived as "puncture" into an image translation. Still the proper one would require 4D rendering as it would resemble a cone like structure.
 No precise math involved whatsoever, open to interpretation.
   Still need to see where this will take.

 Derived from the geometrical representation of infinite, while trying to draw a field based on it. Still missing to add inward motion, and rendering it 3D on a sphere. ♾️
  Though the left and right sides which resulted in reversed poles must intersect at the middle of the intersection at the same time.
 When accelerating it sideways it does create a sphere like illusion around the middle.

 Despise the rudimentary drawing it's the way I perceive gravity.

 Actually I was washing clothes and couldn't stop noticing the water flowing 😜🙄

2

New Theories / Molecular chain that would end all life? Causality Firewall of life/ CFL?

« on: 30/06/2022 13:15:54 »

Causality Firewall of life/ CFL.

What would be, if there's any, molecular bound between elements in biology, which if "erased/changed from the universe", would end all organic life form, from the more complex down to a single cell of any organic living being?

 If there's one molecular bound which could achieve that, if removed/changed by causality alone, "what would be the star/planet" effects overall in the cosmos of such "tweak"?
 Would its structure collapse or would not even be noticed?

 Checking the odds of a consious universe/system to evoke causality in order to prevent a paradox once one has achieved the meanings to it rather than only the potential into it as we do.

 "Particles and bounds cannot be magically changed!"
 Before that, it's previously asked again, if organic life could be killed/unmade, by tweaking a single biological molecular bound, and if true, "what" would be the most evident universal effect of "doing it?

   Once if an answer emerges, I'd like to reverse the answer starting from the standard point of a imaginary life form which "had" evolved to sustain itself with other gases such as monoxides or hydrogen.
 That in order to "probe" if the "casualty evoked" by changing the fundamental molecular biological bounds of life as we know, if with any cosmological consequence, could explain part of the present universe state if the same was applied over early life forms based on other gases as well...
 Probing for a "causality firewall", not for life itself but for any life that on itself due it's capabilities can/could invoke casualty as it was doing something.
 Casualty of a mathematical universe could potentially appear or be conscious by as Einstein used to wonder "prevent something from happening", as if it was a self calibrating system.

 So, is there a molecular biological bound which if removed/changed from the table of elements would definitely kill/undo all life as we know, and in the occurrence ensure that the "irritant/Earth's like life" could not possible reemerge as it "is/was" anywhere else?

Just a note: Not externally as in an explosion or radiation exposure, but internally aiming specialty the DNA/RNA in or case, emerging spontaneously from the quantum mechanics.
 Also must/should be restricted to "one single bound" not multiple ones.
 Obviously the cascade effect it's a sequencial domino effect, but that's mere consequence.

 All starting from the most fundamental aspect of consciousness predator and prey, as both are on themselves fundamentally aware/conscious/informed of their condition since birth...

 More than a single bound would not match a binary system.

3

New Theories / Volume/Space/mass/light linked?

« on: 13/06/2022 06:15:21 »

Hello.
 I'll edit it latter on.

 Had this thought experiment with images rather than math, which I really don't understand at all, so I ask:

 It's possible that the photon do have mass and happens that due their configuration can't store it or keep it, therefore their mass occurs one frame behind the next plank?
 As if the warp was to fast to even quantity their mass so instead of giving it to the photons as particles, such mass is lost in the previous frame, and once there mass without a geometrical "particle/vibration" becomes "volume/space"?

 Could it be that the elusive force expanding the universe is the mass of the photonic light emitted by the stars?
 Only visible if observing the past.

 Mass without matter is empty volume?

4

New Theories / Speculating: Is everything an universe of itself?

« on: 24/09/2020 02:21:29 »

Only speculating, what makes THE universe so unique to be studied?
  Isn't my house the universe from the point of view of the inhabitants of the marble that I'm holding over my hand?

  The Marble Earth and the universal house would have different rules and constants when in contrast to the Earth universe wouldn't they?

  The point, i believe is: I look at the Marble Earth, it funnels space as much as space considers it, attributing to it a temporal mass effect that lasts and is recreated at C.
 The funnel the Marble produces, now is measured from a virtual horizon that my room provides, and my room is too small so the planet's horizon provides measurement, acting as a rule for how much "time" the Marble should receive for its mass, and this mass how much time it takes for communicating back with the environment...

 I'm seeing multiple funnels with objects stored in them, floating inside the funnels, being levitated by a sort of falling /accelerating constant, while mass insist for them to stay inside the funnel...so they are actually on the same place, andis the funnel that is moving in function of the objects.
  Now if the Marble is to communicate with another Marble on my other hand, it must "climb up" it's funnel, and move straight towards the other funnel, and then it will have to "climb down" inside it's time, the both aspects happening at the same time...

 If of a certain geometry, time "starts to take (too much) time" for the line to communicate with the other side of the opposite funnel, and the C frames start to be elongated to make sure the communication is happening, even if the straight line is to become a curved one, and after more time, space decides to start to mold itself to match the parameters and needs to suit the communication from A to B...

 If my radio signal can no longer reach the radio tower as it "need to do by law", the radio tower or my receptor must be dragged towards me in compensation, or me to it... if "I'm at multiple locations at the time", the signal would choose to be updated in pulses...

 Mind a little bit off at the starting of building an idea, but: Is time a vortex in space geometry  caused by mass effect to be scaled up and or down? If so, gravity should be erased from the dictionary along with the considerations of it's very existence as a thing?

 if time takes too much time to climb out the pit, it is delayed forever away from it's original strain, it tries to adopt another , wondering if mass it's not lossless time, as if a portion the expansion lost it's bus, or perhaps decided that it has already arrived at the end of that local universe, unable to leave, stays there, forever... as long as that interference exists.

5

New Theories / Atmosphere is what's compromissing the double-slit conclusion?

« on: 26/08/2018 20:18:58 »

Time connects all 4 dimensions, reason why the act of observing affects the whole experiment.
  Not magic, simple quantum entanglement, one isolated action causes a ripple of infinite possibilities within the environment, like domino's.
 So is very easy to visualize that if one gets a falling object, on the quantum perspective (with a present observer) there is the necessity (of the observer) to imply that the object must make some sort of sound, the sound must have a pre-determinate speed, and each and every single aspect is intricate with the other in a specific arrow, mix all that on dimensions you got arrow of time, spinning towards infinity, therefore, individual particles entangled to each other, each one with their specific local time due different frames of reference.

  Even so, the observers necessity is what is implying the reality to "do or be", remove that, still dot-wave at the same time (only and only when) time is relative.
 Time is relative only if one have more than one point of reference, on this case, the (eye,mind,toughs,flesh,wherever).

 The "observer" is the point of reference itself in comparison to the electron it is observing, therefore, (Observer) by offering a point B to the straight line, added "environment" to the arrow.

 In a nut shell, until there was a B point of reference, the electron only needed to seek the curvature of the arrow of time, from the machine towards infinity, point B added + one direction, and since light is constant at C, the only possible outcome is one particle spiting into waves of possibility in between A+B+C, and each wave interfering with each other.


 Dot-Wave configuration, not at the same time still a single DOT, but projected and overlapped towards itself at C towards infinity, until mass.

 Seems backwards, light as a product of space-time?

6

New Theories / Dark Energy

« on: 04/03/2018 00:44:26 »

Einstein was right, cosmological constant for Dark Energy (EMF)
 No universal expansion ratter the interaction of EMF's, (interaction of particles on the quantum level/ Illusion Gravity)
 And dark matter being nonexistent and the gravitational pull being represented by the Dark energy sort of backing over space-time fabric?

 Does any of that make sense?

7

New Theories / Electromagnetism/Gravity behaves like "turning spheres insideout?

« on: 03/06/2017 22:56:04 »

Try to forget about photon as being a (particle) such as a solid ball that bounces back on mirrors...

  Thing as photons as a stationary frame on their own frame, that do not move or travel, but that happen at C.
 A is C, B is C, and C is the last frame of C of a straight line on space...
  Photon A is not Photon B, Photon B is no longer photon A or C...
  They are the same thing, same configuration(recipe) for a particle, but seems to be a geometrical problem on it's shape..

 Photon can't store energy, it does not acknowledge yxz around him, photon only knows it's own horizon, it's on itself a interference pattern happening on space, over it, like a wave on an ocean, the wave and the ocean were but the same thing...

 It's the dilatation overlapping itself at the rate of C... A present>B present>C present> D future
                                                                       Erased     past   (you)  past (you) past      Empty
                                                                                                    (C)      /      (C)
                                                                                                     Frozen Frame

 Space is not at C, but space holds the potential to C itself on the presence of the photonic interference, and photon only borrows a track on gravity to follow a path...
  On mater that path is a straight line towards infinity but around the electron, conserving energy, extracting it and adding it to the electron, forcing it to spin...
  On light the electron is always ahead and the energy extracted by the photon interference is left behind, the electron does not absolve thus there is no mass to be gained, temporarily that electron is about to become a ordinary photon....

  The electron is a construction created, sustained and codependent of this interference we assume to be a particle that bounces over mirrors... Photon is a configuration for particle...
  I believe we have never isolated nor counted or shoot individual photons, we have being just using electromagnetic fields to cheat the photon as a particle!
  All we may be doing is isolating random interference under "our rules"...

 We are creating the photon we are all theorizing...
  Everything particle interference is presented on resting space, it starts to C the surroundings, I picture this C much like a sphere that is constantly flipped from inside out the reference, although not physical movement, more like a pattern...

 Imagine the electron/or a planet, now imagine that space is like a sphere created by some sort of structure, and that the present of individual "references" such as particles and celestial bodies force this sphere to re-start itself on that point...
  Now imagine that the dilatation of earth is now i'ts own particular universe:

 Now observe one of those experiments where the sphere is flipped inside out without producing any narrow corners on it, and put earth at the center, assuming that the flipping sphere is earths dilatation(space)...
  Is mere speculation but I thing electromagnetic field reveal just that, we may be focusing on the electromagnetic visible lines, like on that iron dust experiment with magnetic...
  I'm focusing not on the lines but on the why the lines are there, the invisible stuff in between...


 Leading every time more to the possibility that each electron magnetic source and field is constantly interacting with space itself, forcing it to individually produce "fields" and each field a flat horizon/disk, particular "universes" for each particle and planet out there...
  C for me is sometimes represented like a flipping inside out sphere "invisible on space" that does not move the particles, but that happens wherever the particle is presented, and the horizon of each particle the thing that allows it to be able to move in any direction...  But not because the particle on the center is moving, the interaction of one "flipping sphere" with other and with the very big sphere that comprehend them is what does...
  I mean something that masses do not orbit each other, instead that one horizon interacts with the other horizon...
  Planet and particles again being just a meaning to an end, to start the engine, leading to the conclusion that is not objects interacting with one another, but space interacting within itself by the existence of such objects...

  Would that be completely wrong, sort of for certain?

ps.: For reference this is the most practical video of what I'm trying to conceive above...
  The sphere is dilatation caused by earth at the center.
  The sphere is both dilatation "and on" space...
 There is no limit for the sphere, that sphere only represents earth's dilatation "personal universe" that coexists within a much larger space...
 The presence of earth's magnetosphere is just delimitation a point of reference.... Sort of restarting universal electromagnetic pattern causing the property to C itself...

  Iron dust on paper only reveals the outlines of the true process, suggesting here that the slightest form of electromagnetism is constantly creating references and the existence of those references stimulate space to create particular spheres "fields" and one sphere"field" tarts to interact with one another...

From 1:23m up to 1:133m constant and cyclic on and for each point of reference = Representation of C
  C does not exist without reference, meaning could be a property of space that only exists on the presence of a point of reference and only on that frame of reference...

8

New Theories / Dark Matter: Energy produces mass or is it submitted to it?

« on: 04/01/2017 02:11:34 »

 Think about this.

 Photons.
 On this tough we will exchange the concept of what is a photon, and to not complicate with the regular assumption "photons" will keep being the energy presented on light, but just as for reference.
  On this speculation, photon B here would be the tinny particles of energy that composes light.
 In addition every time I mention gravity, I'll be inadvertently refereeing to it as Photon B..

 I'll try to make it shorter, so people with more scientific knowledge can think about the impossibility..

 There we have our Sun, and here we have the Earth.
 Let's suppose that "Light/photons A" have being suddenly started to be emitted towards Earth.
 Those photons A are but smallest amount of quanta of energy, they are light itself.
  But they, photons A/light are traveling "trough" something, that was previously there, on that scenario, space. As photons A have just started from being emitted (at C) from the sun towards earth, lets assume that space and time where already there.
   Space and time are in correlation? Yes they are!
 The existence of space and time are codependent? Yes they are!
 Both are the same thing? No they are not!

Now let's introduce photons B(gravity)
  Photons B would be the gravitational waves, they on this example, where not originated from space, but they are happening on space due the existence of energy. So we could theoretical assume that gravity is a final product of the energy and space themselves...
  All the aspects of all there is, here, will be interpreted as being an equation, and as result gravity is a "final" product. It, gravity does not belong to any other force "alone".
 Gravity than cannot be related with only one aspect, it is the sum of all aspects, by all effects gravity in here is it's own existence.

 Lets assume that Light(photons A) are but the past of the occurrence of gravity(photons B).
  Photons A, the light as we know are not something real, on the present, our present here on the Earth.
  Photons A, the light has a constant speed. If it is finite or not is not important here.
  Photons A, the light, is space energy. Every single "moment" photons B are occurring they are producing space. That space has physical size, but it does not have references or dimensions.
 
 At the very moment we accept that Photons B are instantaneous from Sun to Earth. we are assuming that gravity not being from the sun as photons A, the light seems to be, with a constant speed.
   Photons B is gravity itself only with a fancy name to suggest correlation.
 Now photons B do have mass. Which means that Gravity has mass.
Although they do not have the meanings for it. They do not experience time and if they don't, they do not know reference or distances, on time. For this very reason the photons B that from gravity are mass less, they have no size, no physical shape, and they only exist in the future of our present. Meaning that light is a event frozen in space time, this is our frame. Where light does not speed up magically on its own properties. Light has none. Light/photons A, are but a past image, no matter the distance they are traveling, or if light is happening at 1 meter of your eyes. Any light is on the past of the next dilatation.

 Light is not at C from it's own, nor is time and space.  Light is limiting itself at C, unwillingly.
 
 C on this speculation would be the constant "rate" in witch time correlates itself with space.

 One has gravity that has a instantaneous state of being, trough out the void.
 One has energy that due size(quanta) receives certain configurations on this void.
 There is a velocity, in witch things can happen, in witch energy can be quantify by space.
  That velocity I supposing to be C.
  C than being why not to say the speed of time!
 It's does not need to be constant when in comparison to any other frame, but must remain constant on its actual frame of existence.

I'm subjecting here that light travels trough gravity, for it represents the past passage of gravity.
  Gravity precedes light. gravity are waves that happened in the first place, without time, and producing space.
  Time arrives to the scene at C, because, of light.

  Light has not a speed of it's own. Gravity occurs because of energy.
 Mass is still not exist at this point nor matter.

 The instantaneous occurrence of gravity from the sun towards the earth on the example, pavement the roads for occurrence of light.
  The very limitation on constant C, introduces a delay on the frame, when in comparison with gravity. This difference of occurrence in between state of gravitational waves, and vector on the energy of the light, results in time.
  Time here is used to represent dilatation caused by energy, that nor causes mass, but that receives mass from light itself.

 Photons B/gravity have being occurring, followed by the occurrence of photons A/light.
 As long light has being occurring, photons A have constantly gain mass at C, and lost mass at a instantaneous speed at gravity. Although this very mass, photonic mass has not being lost.
 That lost mass accumulates within time, helping to expand space at C.
  Space must be expanding at C, for time needs the occurrence of light in order to exist.

 I'm considering the dark matter presented trough out space time as the mass of the future photons A(light) happening on the past... Reason why we cannot detect dark matter at close range. There should be a speed in witch this mass will accumulate and eventually help to form matter.

 Now I believe the main point of the speculation. A question, now ignoring the toughs above.

 Is the mass on matter, at any giving instant on time, presented on the interior of the atomic structure?
 Or the mass of matter is constantly "given" to it by dark matter on the future frame?

 By that I mean, how one does proof, that the mass of any giving atom, at any giving instant, at any given frame of existence, is not given to it, from the next frame of existence?
  I'm assuming here that the future is now, the present is a frozen existence without time which we do not experience. And that the past is a vector, and at the same time it's that past and future are both in correlation with each other, but never with the present...

 Every future frame is already a past frame, at least for energy.
 That matter, that we only exist inside the past future of a instantaneous present of static energy that does not experience time or light.

 I'm suggesting that in the "time" I take to write the word:
 "BUS"
 That on this example, in between I'm writing each of the three letters B-U-S, there was constantly a frozen existence of energy, "trapped" in between Past and Future.
 And that the only reason why I can move, even exist, is because of gravity and motion.

  I do not believe in that in the first place, that's why is a question.
 I'm basically suggesting that any frame of observation we do, is on the past, doesn't matter in which direction we decide to observe things, matter, light nor energy, we will be always looking into a future previous frame...

 Many believe that interstellar travel will be achieved by speeding up to C.
 Many times I tend to consider that consider if is not the opposite. That would be slow down something to make it gets near the present frame, and let gravity do it's job.

 Has being proven that acceleration "towards the distant past" reduces mass for the object is considered to be smaller.
 I wondering that something considerable more practical could be achieved by slowing down nearby the present frame.

9

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Is the brightness of Venus changing?

« on: 07/12/2016 23:59:30 »

Hello. Talking from Southern Brazil.
  After a few weeks down here, Venus is developing an "absurd" brightness..
  I'm looking at it on the last 7 day and it's brightness is very unusual, to the point if I did know what it was(Venus) I would swear that it is very distant nova...

 Now I do not have a telescope anymore, also I lost contact with the few Brazilian astronomers that share the habit with me back there, so I would like to ask if someone can take a look at it...  I'm looking to some other recent pictures world wide and maybe due poor cameras it's not even close of the naked eye brightness I'm observing from here...

 So for the sake of curiosity, I would like someone to take a look on Venus itself with a telescope.
 And also to do some calculation and take a look on the "position" where Venus should be passing by over my region(Rio Grande do Sul/Southern Brazil) with the the Atlantic ocean to my left(south) I'm observing towards the region which would be (West/Northwest) 07/12/2016 10:00PM (-Brasilia)...

 My remaining cameras are not good and they cannot capture the brightness my eye sight is experiencing...

 I'm not sure what event is taking place, no longer I can't confirm that It Venus or something much beyond our system that is giving the impression to be Venus... The brightness variate in no time, from strong to pale, but it does produce the same effect the sunset and sunrise does...
  I've already saw Venus as a bight planet, but not with such patterns, I only seeking confirmation that this is not the incoming light of a past event much beyond our system...
  There's a event happening there, being it a local event on Venus, or beyond, but something is producing that, It's just like as being watching sun from a higher distance in lower scale...

10

The Environment / Might sub-sea volcanoes be the main cause of climate change?

« on: 30/10/2016 17:28:02 »

What's the chance of the climate change and increasing co2 on the atmosphere being more related with undersea vulcanic activities than with our production of co2?

 What I mean is this week I step on some reports of oysters dying on nurseries. The embryos were not developing their shelters cause the PH of the water was too low. The water, salt water, was to acidic for them...
 If that species do not reproduce, it can cause a chain reaction on the food chain tat could end up being catastrophic for marine life...

 The question remains, as sum of many reports and dates, isn't the acidic water and co2 levels, much more higher than predicted, being possible related with volcanic activity, including the sea levels rising?
 Could be the case, for the ocean being so vast and depth, that we may not have found a possible "second" source for this events, right bellow our oceans?
 What I want to know is. Predicting the hypothetical scenario that at the bottom of an ocean there is occurring strong volcanic activity, is there any chance that the detritus being mixed with the salt water, rising up to the surface and evaporating into the atmosphere? Also why not?

11

Just Chat! / Solar panel and battery stuff (off grid doubts)

« on: 01/10/2016 00:35:26 »

I have:
1 plasma tv 50° – max consumption 275w
1 pc gamer(without monitor) consumption between 30w-500w-load
2 led light bulbs (low wattage)

Now, I bought myself a battery 12v 400a (stationary-deep cycle)
also, 1x 315w 24v canadian solar panel

I’ll run all this on a pure sine wave inverter 1000w(nominal),
I intend to keep the bank 12v(even if paralel), and the controler a 60a mppt (for upgrade)…

also I intend to run this system almost every single night for about 6 hours, and 1 hour during the morning, it remains the whole day completly turned off…

Now down here in south Brazil, I can achieve I believe 5 to 6 hours of sun peak per day, also since I’m a glazier its very simple to me to set the painel with some sort of chain, so I can control the inclination, to maximize the performance of it, wherever, to the point…
How many batteries will I need to be able to run this system each night for the periods decribleds above, and how much 315w panels to be able to charge those very batteries, being ready for each night? Do I need more than 1 battery and one 315w solar?

 For the record, the TV is by definition 220v - 1,25a - max 275w
 The pc setup I'm not sure about amps, but the wattage is 30w-110w idle/ 500w load

 Since my battery bank, is and will remain 12v, my tv DCamp is 16.5a / the wattage on Eco function is bellow 175w...
   The PC, considering that is variable lets presume that the DCamp of it would be about 10a, the wattage would 80% of the time being 110w...
 Also considering that I can but I wont drawn my battery to bellow 40% never, witch let me with only 260a at best, my sun hours would be trully around 10hrs cause I'm from Brazil, I mentioned 5 horus only to be more realistic with the math...
 Since I do not require more than 90centimeters of solar cables from the panels to the charger controller, I thinking about go pwm, but this is another doubt of my own, if in my case an mppt would really compensate from the price...

12

New Theories / Trap "space" into a sphere, heat it up, what then?

« on: 03/09/2016 02:06:57 »

Perhaps a not so simple answer as the question may be...

 If one, by reasons we will ignore, was to build a empty sphere on the vacuum of space, lets ignore the composition of the sphere's walls, and subsequently one starts to heat up the interior of this very sphere to the limits, universe limits, this without ever melt of deform the sphere, what would become of the among of space fabric trapped inside of it? And what would be the reaction of the other space onto the presence of such object?

obs.: Such sphere may not be able to to exist, if so, lets reduce the among of space on it's interior, and increase the quantity of matter, that forms the sphere's walls, simulating something like a celestial body, such as planet Earth, what then?

13

That CAN'T be true! / Eyes on the sky, no fear, be safe everyone...

« on: 12/07/2016 04:55:53 »

Every day, I see the sun rising two times, of course my brain does know not to be the sun, but the thing that has being erasing and cleaning the world back to the stone age, every 6 tousands earth solar years..
 Wishing all the luck for Europe too, your army is a way well trained, not to blame they didn't told us earlier, that thing, there was nothing to be done... No weapon or techoledge could have stoped that thing, the sumeriun knew, the maias down here, every single top civilization this planet have ever created knew, and recorded it on stone, dated it, and now its time...
 The gregorian callendar made they miss for a few years, but as far as I concern, it's finally, here, one could say,,,

 All those sounds during the night, the earthquakes at the sun and planets, the rings of Jupter, the temperatures on Neptune, the weakened magnetosphere on earth, every single question will be awnsered until october first...

 Here this is one of our best views from the south emisphere, i do sujest one jump the cra... straig to 1:05 minutes... This is my morning during the last few mounts, now its a little bit away and the plasma sphere the governments are trying to create to prent the electromagnetism of earth to interact with that thing, also trying in the same process to block the radiation that could destroy our equipments...
 No need to blame your government, they also know that their mountains would not be enought to stay under water for long...


                                  youtube.com/watch?v=Fv4H8ShqVuw
                                                       (Update)
                                  youtube.com/watch?v=gZK7QCIngkM

I would like to say that its a flare like I wanted to believe back in 2012, cause it was commig from behind the sun, looking to be a flare, but now I'm positive sure, simple cause there are too many fotages over water, and a flare on the came lens do not produce reflaction of light over the water, in real time, in a different area to the right of the sun, not even the moon, not refraction of light in the same direction as we've seen, this effect can only be caused by a pale withe red dwarf star, deflecting the suns light by being behind of it. and it's geting bigger every mount...
 Means that it entered in 2012, along with ison and other commets, eneter from up and hidded behind the sun, moving forward from saturn reagions in a straight line heading to escape near Earth's orbit....
 There is nothing to disscus about len flares anymore, flares do not cause refractions, they are only refletion on the lens, the refraction must be caused by something that is actually there, on the eliptical....

This is my source of observation from the last few years...
 Also what you guys call as chemtrails, is working in a imaginary line crossing the sun, the object...
 A few of my daily spots,

14

New Theories / A Pale Blue Dot, reminder of why...

« on: 08/07/2016 22:49:04 »

Look again at that dot. That's here. That's home. That's us. On it everyone you love, everyone you know, everyone you ever heard of, every human being who ever was, lived out their lives. The aggregate of our joy and suffering, thousands of confident religions, ideologies, and economic doctrines, every hunter and forager, every hero and coward, every creator and destroyer of civilization, every king and peasant, every young couple in love, every mother and father, hopeful child, inventor and explorer, every teacher of morals, every corrupt politician, every "superstar," every "supreme leader," every saint and sinner in the history of our species lived there--on a mote of dust suspended in a sunbeam.

The Earth is a very small stage in a vast cosmic arena. Think of the rivers of blood spilled by all those generals and emperors so that, in glory and triumph, they could become the momentary masters of a fraction of a dot. Think of the endless cruelties visited by the inhabitants of one corner of this pixel on the scarcely distinguishable inhabitants of some other corner, how frequent their misunderstandings, how eager they are to kill one another, how fervent their hatreds.

Our posturings, our imagined self-importance, the delusion that we have some privileged position in the Universe, are challenged by this point of pale light. Our planet is a lonely speck in the great enveloping cosmic dark. In our obscurity, in all this vastness, there is no hint that help will come from elsewhere to save us from ourselves.

The Earth is the only world known so far to harbor life. There is nowhere else, at least in the near future, to which our species could migrate. Visit, yes. Settle, not yet. Like it or not, for the moment the Earth is where we make our stand.

It has been said that astronomy is a humbling and character-building experience. There is perhaps no better demonstration of the folly of human conceits than this distant image of our tiny world. To me, it underscores our responsibility to deal more kindly with one another, and to preserve and cherish the pale blue dot, the only home we've ever known.

-- Carl Sagan, Pale Blue Dot, 1994

15

New Theories / Could a Black hole be irradiating particles for mass production of photons?

« on: 05/07/2016 01:06:43 »

Could photons be considered as "deactivated matter"?

16

New Theories / "Theory of celestial bodies inner core expansion"

« on: 21/06/2016 03:30:44 »

"Theory of celestial bodies inner core expansion"

Use this to ear it, drivetts.ehubsoft.net/, will save you a lot of time, and will compensate my limited english

I'll start this theory by explaining what is trully a black hole, its function on the galaxy, what galaxies where before became galaxies, in order to this I'll explain my concept of how to trigger a super nova, and what kind lead to a black hole and what to a neutron star, I'll try by observation reveal that dark energy does have density, what are solar winds, and at the end I'll reserve a space for a few prediction about earth weakened magnetosphere, and how all this can be related with the melt of the polar caps and the global warm....

  As a begining I'll will ignore the equation E=MC2, it explained many things, but I consider this equation reveal to us the correct awnser but without understand the question for it,

 My concept of youniverse, will be more easy to understand if I explain like this, Einstein used a sheet to simulate the fabric of space, he than put a heavy object on the middle of the sheet, assuming that the Weight" of the mass of the object had bended space fabric, and that other spherical objects that get to close to this negative fluctuation would start to orbit the other...

 I got a different scenario, in my point of view, I observe a black hole and I get to the conclusion that it is not a deep depresion on space, and to the conclusion that they do not swallow, actually this is probably the only thing that they will never do, the only thing that can virtually enter a black hole is a massive object moving in a straight line or another blackhole, simple because, black hole is not a hole, it is made of "expansion", we will get there...
 I do believe that space fabric and dark energy are the same thing, the only difference the one they tough they found around Pluto is simple because there is because at the edge of the heliosphere the solar winds, their heat are already to weak, in other words I atesting that space fabric can be bended by heat and cold, and that it is made of dark energy...
  My space fabric model is a little different from Einsteins concept, I was focused on the black hole expansion, the SMBH (super massive black hole), at the center of our galaxy once in a much newer universe was belonged to a ancient super massive star, each galaxy was one at the period on expansion that they could be, this universe is probably a new one, it had no past, it was probably not formed by the colision of two particles with oposit charges, but it was formed by the "flood" between two other dimensions, that eventually colide one with the other, you can call it exposion, but since as the dimmension is still expanding, I do believe that this dimmension could be represented as two circles that slowly star to transpose one the other, at the center has fomed a dimmension the size of a particle, a sphere, and as the flood continued it soon expanded to a more eliptical shape. Each dimmension was carring opposit charges, one was carring anti-mater and another was carring mater, both dimmensions where not made from both, they wehere simple carrying those maters inside of them. At the moment this new dimmension started to form, the flood caused a rupture something resambling the eye of a hurricane, at the same monet it splited on two, at the horizontal edges of the new dimmension, each rupture, is acting like a sink flooding one the other with water, but both dimmensions where made of dark energy, and were also self contained by it, compressed by it, cold dark energy, much more dense then the one our solar system have....
 At the very moment the flod started to occur the collison of mater with anti-mater started to happened and this trigered a reaction that started to destroy one another, and in the process generating imensurables amoungs of heat, the heat started to heat up the dark energy and the interaction of both triggered a expansion of dark energy density, forccing the new dimmension to expand itself and as much it grows and as faster it was expanding more collisions of mater with anti-mater it triggered, the effect growed exponentially, and still expnding to this very day...
 Now part of this is common knoledge, I simple adapted it to my theory, because it make total sense, the dimmension was very very hot, because it was expanding fast, as the dimmension was growing bigger the heat has disipating itself, dark energy was no longer super hot, and as it started to cool down the dark energy expansion started to reduce itself, and eventually became cold again and slowlly returning to it normal state of compresion, but the expansion that was happening at the edges of the new dimmension was still happening, and the same heat released from the flood of the two dimmensions was still happening, and heating up dark energy, and the same heat that forces the dimmension to expand also is aceptable that is compressing wherever is inside of it from outside in, isn't it?
  Back there the speed of the expansion was slower so time occured much more faster then it does now, the lower dimmension and soon as it started to cool down at the center, it was still subjected to a much great compression, as result the matter was gathered much more faster, also the stars that where formed back there where a lot more eliptical than now, so their live were very short, this is because the new dimmension, as the flood continues was growing much more eliptical, eventually it reached a point it started to became more spherical, and dark energy had now much more space and started to cool down much more faster at the center, the compression was stil strong, and the planets and stars that where formed back there where a lot bigger, but due the expansion the comprssion is everytime less stronger, and with less coprssion from outside in the space within the atoms are too, back there the gravity compession were more strong and so stars could be much more bigger than now, but they also exploded really fast and so it goes....

 Now lets advance the universe to our time, the universe is still expanding and fast, as the compression "gravity" is getting weaker, planet ad stars are being distanced one from the other, but not only them everyhting is, now I'm assuming that the milkyway galaxy, with collison of two gaies or not its irrelevant here, that each galxy once where a super massive planet at the time in expansion they could be...

 Now the reason that lead me to believe that the black hole is a self contained mass of pure expansion, my super nova cannot only occur with starts it can occur in every single celestial body that has a magnetosphere, which means have dense material objects at the outer core, the super nova is not a simple explosion, in the normal scenario dark energy is the thing that is compressing mater, but a planet or star they are formed with one single purpose, the one of heat up dark energy on their interior, is the universe itself trying to reborn, you cold say...
  The supper nova can be triggered by a super massive star that is to big to this period in expansion, being big it atract more compression, but eventually the compression start to win against the density of the outer layers and start to penetrate it, this process, in the case of stars force them to slowlly grow bigger and eventually the outercore is reached, but it can also be triggered by a wrong burn at the iner leayers that resulted in a shockwave that cracked the crost and alowed the dark energy to penetrate...
  Super nova "expansion" is triggered at the exact moment that, by any means, cold dark energy from the outside is able to reach the inercore, the interaction of the cold dark energy with the super hotted outercore triggers an temporally expansion of the dark energy on the area, exposing the outhercore, it ejects the crost with so much speed and so instantly that for a brief moment, is matter that "expanded" dark energy on the are, expanded it away, but it also compressed the outer core from outside in against the inercore, the exposion act in both directions with the same force, this expansion ao triggers a massie compesion towards the inercore compresing it, if not enoght mteria fal into the reagion  around the expose neutron  star it il b cooled down by the cold of space and it will remain as a super massive floating dead star, exept that the othercoe is not important, wha's important is haening at the iner core and now that things became intristing...

 If enought materia fall in the area around the outhercore, it will be atracted by the neutronstar and will form some sort of a new layer, one that will prevent the inercore to cool down to fast, the neutron star will start once again to heat up, NOW, free of the crost it will start to do what it was doing its whole life start to spin at a tremendows speed, the layer doesn't need to be a perfect one, the blackhole doesn't need to be borned imediatlly the neutron star only needs to keep the inercore heating up, a zombi one will also do it, if the iner core is heated up to a "specific temperature" and it will start to do what every single star or planet is doing t their iner cores, "heating up trapped dark energy" from their formation plus the one that was splited from the atoms on the outercore and iner layers, in the case of the neutron star is so hot in there that the expansion is transfered to the neutrons and different from a planet or star with a dense crost to hide this shockwave that is constantly happening, it will expand much beyond the crost that it should still have, the expansion now will find no density and will spping freely and very fast and its trying to expand and release the heat traped inside of it, at the same time as stronger the expansion, more stronger is the compression from outerspace, and space is too vast and also the black hole is also in moviment so the outerspace woun't heat up and will keep the compression, and as long as it does the pressure over the neutron star will increase and so will the heat, the heat is leaked at the same time it is produced, te anomality there is that different than a planet that can transfer the heat by its crost, how will the dark energy traped inside the neutron star cool down if space cant touch its surface anymore, that is what I mean by vitualy untouchable, it will eventually spread the heat as soon as the universe has expanded enought, wich can be in a gazilion years, so it will sty there, this compresison against expansion virtualy, forever...
 This expansion is als the reason why they are blck, because nothing can ever go in, a qasar closes its vortexes compresson over the event horizon, but insde the black hole is stll the str that colapsed over its own expansion and its there vtually unable to loose heat....

 Now lets go back a little, why dark energy traped inside the inner core?
 Well its prety simple and acceptable that during the planet formation, it was forming over space fabric, dark energy as I state, and is expected that with a constant compression of 360°, inevitable as the planet glows and the compression increases the coold dark energy around it, as the rocks, gases and other materials start to melt, a certain quantity of dark energy will be imprisioned on the core, trapped by the dense atomic structure of the object, see I theorize that if light cant pass trough a solid was to inside a room, means that is not the photon that can't pass, the photon simple travel trough space fabric, so it's more like tha due atomic structure and eletromagnetic field, and also by observation of each galaxy and how they seem to gather mater only at the horizontal disk, at least in the case of the ones with the smbh at the center, is aceptable that dark energy can't pass trough dense atomic structure, than it occured me...

  Such as the probabilitie of oxygen be traped inside the othercore to form magma, how did it get there? ok compression ok, but what than would be the lighter element to remain at the center of a planet in formation that is under compression? Dark energy/space fabric... See do a experiment, seal a vaccum sphere made of glass or any other material you want, trun a ligt on, if you can see, means that you traped dark energy inside of it, space fabric, so, if dark energ in its cold state is able to compress, we heated up it should certanly be able to expand! And if it does, its prof that it does have density and can be controled, than I tough about the magnetosphere, why we dont have dust around us, or any other comet or asteroid, and if we don't have one how the moon got stoped there, and what about the heliosphere what is all that asteroids stoped around it forming the ort cloud? how they get stoped there?

 The only possibility is that they where formed there, gradually, or that the sun pushed them away, but why they smeem to be STOPED there, than the question became my prof, they where pushed there by the lower density from inside out the heliosphere, solar wnds, what they trully are, how can heat be able to push things and keep them out?

 ok I describling this as good as I can, because I don'rt want to be missunderstood, from here on out its where I needed to change Einstein point of view, the sheet example, for me, its half of it, and probably will not work for much longer...
 
 My model of the galaxy, based on observation of all these and many other events that I will state later, is simple to explain, double Einstein sheet, put one on the floor and one on the celing, one against the other, now release the planet inside, and it won't fall, nor climb up, but it will inddeed from two "positive" fluctuations, one up and one down, this without the planet never fall from the center, it can't there it has no "weight", how?

 The super massive black hole, is a shrinked neutron star, not one that falled over its on mass, but one that heated up the space fabric traped inside its inercore to a point that the "inner space expansion, compressed itself against the outer space compression", like you tring to push a car, the shrink effect is triggered by the own neutron star as it keeps trying to expand itselv over a much bigger force of compression, as result the source of the epansion, the center of the event recieves its own expansion, untill it can't be more compressed, but the heat is still there, and you can't be more compress cause you expand, and you cant expand cause youre being compressed and so it goes, being a sphere and the fact that was spinning the dark energy around of it, will start to be stretched towards the event, but the star inside there has a polarity as you know it had, north and south, there is where the eletromagnetism will leak, and eletromagnetism produces heat, this will eventually form two vortexes flowing the poles, the dark energy there will stretch itself around the center, and than will be splited in two, the superior will climb the inferior will also climb but in the oposite dirrection, this vortexes are made by super thin dark energy being pushed away from the black hole, but the interior of the vortex is made of pure expansion, is a positive climb, that will acent upp in something that resamls a possitive hyper parabole, eventually the heat will be dispersed and the vortex will start to decline into a negative parale towards the edge of the horizontal disk, there it will be twisted back against the center of the event, the same thing will happen from the opossit dirrection, this will form the galaxy, all this process will cause the density of dark energy be lower inside the galaxy and will inevitable gather all the mater on the area and push it all to the horiontal disk, now different from the heliosphre, the horizontal disk is very large, as the galaxy is, and its also other space, the horizontal disk is submited to the twisted dark energy towards the center, but not on itself, it is outerspace, is hard to explain so imagine hat the horizontal disk is outer space, but that over it and under it, exist one invisible edge made of dark energy desnsity difference, the other side is colder, and so we are at the horizontal disk, but the smbh form a invisible barrier around us, that grant the flux at the horizontal disk, but at the same time don't let us to climb or fall from it, gathering us at the center, aprisioning us, giving us rotation and orbits, but we will get there....

 As we have the magnetosphere, and the heliosphere, lets call the galaxy as super massive black hole sphere, the heliosphere is differente its more rounded,but look out there and you will notied the many shapes of the galaxies, depends on the smbh power to form a large or short horizontal disk, its all about density, the heliosphere indded when it was activated, at the point the dark energy splited from the space within the atom sof the outercore was inevitable pushed to the only place they could poissible go, the center, of each planet, star or sphere like object, when it was heated enought it started to expand, this are the solar winds, the sun is less dense than a rocky planet so the epansion can leak to the surface and be ejected in form of winds, forming the heliosphere, pushing all the trash back, forming a horizontal disk too, so if the blackhole is made of "exposed expansion" and it forms a horizontal spiral disk, what is the moon doing here, what are the saturn rings, why thise patherns on such distinglish objects?

17

New Theories / How to postulate a theory?

« on: 20/06/2016 17:01:25 »

Good afternoon, a simple question. I formulate a theory by observation, I'm no pyshisist, I'm a glassier, but the theory based on observation is of my own, spreaded arounda few foruns and channels, no one took a solid stand about it, I believe I'm on to something related with space, in general, actually my theory is about what black holes actually are, from that point on is based on pure observation, and I need to change Einstein "explanation" about the fabric of space, its a very long explanation, I will eventually point some wondering due the new concept, but in the specific issue I'll be more than clear about what is happening there, so even if I miss some actions in the atomic level, if I'm correct about what they are and what they do? Would I recieve the credit, or I would need to postulate the equations and formulas? I'm not good with math, I'm more self-aware than anyother thing, but if I post the observation in here, and someone else do the math and re-postulate it, who will recieve the credit? Thanks in advance...