181

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Is there any evidence for aether?

« on: 27/04/2016 13:51:19 »

Where  is  the  evidence  that  the  aether  does  not  exist ?

Occam requires evidence that it does exist.

So it is incumbent on its proponents to define a measurable property or function of aether that cannot be explained by other means.

In a boat double slit experiment are you able to understand the boat travels through a single slit even when your eyes are closed?

It's the same with the particle in a double slit experiment. The particle is always detected traveling through a single slit because it always travels through a single slit. It is the associated wave in the aether which passes through both.

It's thinking the particle doesn't always travel through a single slit which is incorrect.

Occam's razor: In a double slit experiment the particle is always detected traveling through a single slit because it always travels through a single slit.

182

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Is there any evidence for aether?

« on: 27/04/2016 13:18:31 »

Could anything be more telling than the passage quoted by  stacyjones in 2016!

physics.stanford.edu/people/faculty/robert-laughlin

Faculty Type: Active Faculty
Title: Anne T. and Robert M. Bass Professor of Physics

Co-recipient of the Nobel Prize for Physics, 1998

183

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Is there any evidence for aether?

« on: 27/04/2016 12:27:11 »

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aether_theories#Quantum_vacuum

Robert B. Laughlin, Nobel Laureate in Physics, endowed chair in physics, Stanford University, had this to say about ether in contemporary theoretical physics:
It is ironic that Einstein's most creative work, the general theory of relativity, should boil down to conceptualizing space as a medium when his original premise [in special relativity] was that no such medium existed [..] The word 'ether' has extremely negative connotations in theoretical physics because of its past association with opposition to relativity. This is unfortunate because, stripped of these connotations, it rather nicely captures the way most physicists actually think about the vacuum. . . . Relativity actually says nothing about the existence or nonexistence of matter pervading the universe, only that any such matter must have relativistic symmetry. [..] It turns out that such matter exists. About the time relativity was becoming accepted, studies of radioactivity began showing that the empty vacuum of space had spectroscopic structure similar to that of ordinary quantum solids and fluids. Subsequent studies with large particle accelerators have now led us to understand that space is more like a piece of window glass than ideal Newtonian emptiness. It is filled with 'stuff' that is normally transparent but can be made visible by hitting it sufficiently hard to knock out a part. The modern concept of the vacuum of space, confirmed every day by experiment, is a relativistic ether. But we do not call it this because it is taboo.

184

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Is there any evidence for aether?

« on: 27/04/2016 03:54:02 »

The waves which are spoken of in quantum mechanics are not physical waves in that they have no physical reality. They are merely mathematical devices which, e.g. for a photon, are used to define the probability density that the photon will be observed/detected at a particular place at a particular time. If an aether actually did exist then it would be totally unrelated to quantum mechanical waves.

The aether does exist and it is what waves in a double slit experiment.

Q. Why is the particle always detected traveling through a single slit in a double slit experiment?
A. The particle always travels through a single slit. It is the associated wave in the aether which passes through both.

185

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Is there any evidence for aether?

« on: 27/04/2016 00:01:18 »

Where  is  the  evidence  that  the  aether  does  not  exist ?

The Michelson–Morley experiment looked for an absolutely stationary space the Earth moves through. The aether is not an absolutely stationary space. The aether is displaced by the particles of matter which exist in it and move through it. Particles of matter move through and displace the aether. The wave of wave-particle duality is a wave in the aether.

There is evidence of the aether every time a double slit is performed, it's what waves.

'From the Newton's laws to motions of the fluid and superfluid vacuum: vortex tubes, rings, and others'
arxiv.org/abs/1403.3900

This medium, called also the aether, has mass and is populated by the particles of matter which exist in it and move through it

...

... and displace it.

'EPR program: a local interpretation of QM'
arxiv.org/abs/1412.5612

Wave particle duality is described as the compound system of point particle plus accompanying wave (in the æther).

186

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Why does an interference pattern occur when electrons are fired one at time in t

« on: 26/04/2016 23:38:14 »

This is logically impossible. The particle is travelling at a considerable speed (c in the case of photons) and can't move sideways or hang around waiting to interact with itself over time. A single electron or light photon does not have sufficient energy to generate a signal by interacting with a fluorescent screen or photographic film at more than one point, yet the received pattern (generated over time) occupies space.

Wave mechanics describes and predicts the effect, but cannot be said to be the cause.

then the particles will build up to form an interference pattern over time.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Double-slit_experiment_results_Tanamura_2.jpg

187

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Why does an interference pattern occur when electrons are fired one at time in t

« on: 26/04/2016 23:33:45 »

Occam's Razor ...

Occam's razor: 'Empty' space has mass which is displaced by matter.

What ripples when galaxy clusters collide is what waves in a double slit experiment, the mass which fills 'empty' space.

Einstein's gravitational wave is de Broglie's wave of wave-particle duality, both are waves in the mass which fills 'empty' space.

The mass which fills 'empty' space displaced by matter relates general relativity and quantum mechanics.

188

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Why does an interference pattern occur when electrons are fired one at time in t

« on: 26/04/2016 19:32:00 »

And yet, when we "strongly interact" by putting a fluorescent plate or photographic film behind the slits, we see what looks like an interference pattern.

If you "strongly interact" with the particle prior to it arriving at the detection screen you destroy the particles cohesion with its associated wave in the strongly interacting dark matter and the particle no longer creates and interference pattern. For example, if you detect the particle as it exits the slit you destroy its cohesion with its associated wave exiting both slits and the particle will not create an interference pattern. If you are detecting the particle after it has been guided by its associated wave exiting both slits then the particle will build up to form an interference pattern over time.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Double-slit_experiment_results_Tanamura_2.jpg

I recommend you watch all of the following video. The double slit experiment is at the 2:43 mark.

youtube.com/watch?v=W9yWv5dqSKk

189

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Why does an interference pattern occur when electrons are fired one at time in t

« on: 26/04/2016 17:07:31 »

In de Broglie's double solution theory there are two waves. There is the wave-function wave which is statistical, non-physical and is used to determine the probabilistic results of experiments. It is a mathematical construct only. It doesn't physically exist. There is also a physical wave in a hidden "subquantic medium" which guides the particle.

John Stewart Bell
en.wikiquote.org/wiki/John_Stewart_Bell

While the founding fathers agonized over the question 'particle' or 'wave', de Broglie in 1925 proposed the obvious answer 'particle' and 'wave'. Is it not clear from the smallness of the scintillation on the screen that we have to do with a particle? And is it not clear, from the diffraction and interference patterns, that the motion of the particle is directed by a wave? De Broglie showed in detail how the motion of a particle, passing through just one of two holes in screen, could be influenced by waves propagating through both holes. And so influenced that the particle does not go where the waves cancel out, but is attracted to where they cooperate. This idea seems to me so natural and simple, to resolve the wave-particle dilemma in such a clear and ordinary way, that it is a great mystery to me that it was so generally ignored.

NON-LINEAR WAVE MECHANICS A CAUSAL INTERPRETATION by LOUIS DE BROGLIE

Since 1954, when this passage was written, I have come to support wholeheartedly an hypothesis proposed by Bohm and Vigier. According to this hypothesis, the random perturbations to which the particle would be constantly subjected, and which would have the probability of presence in terms of [the wave-function wave], arise from the interaction of the particle with a “subquantic medium” which escapes our observation and is entirely chaotic, and which is everywhere present in what we call “empty space”.

"The interaction of the particle with a “subquantic medium”" is another way of describing a strongly interacting dark matter.

Dark matter is not a clump of weakly interacting stuff that travels with the matter. Dark matter fills the space unoccupied by particles of matter and is displaced by the particles of matter that exist in it and move through it.

'Interpretation of quantum mechanics by the double solution theory - Louis de BROGLIE'
aflb.ensmp.fr/AFLB-classiques/aflb124p001.pdf

When in 1923-1924 I had my first ideas about Wave Mechanics I was looking for a truly concrete physical image, valid for all particles, of the wave and particle coexistence discovered by Albert Einstein in his "Theory of light quanta". I had no doubt whatsoever about the physical reality of waves and particles.

any particle, even isolated, has to be imagined as in continuous “energetic contact” with a hidden medium

The hidden medium of de Broglie wave mechanics is the strongly interacting dark matter.

For me, the particle, precisely located in space at every instant, forms on the v wave a small region of high energy concentration, which may be likened in a first approximation, to a moving singularity.

A particle may be likened in a first approximation to a moving singularity which has an associated wave in the strongly interacting dark matter.

the particle is defined as a very small region of the wave

The particle occupies a very small region of the associated wave in the dark matter.

Wave-particle duality is a moving particle and it's associated wave in the strongly interacting dark matter.

In a double slit experiment the particle travels through a single slit. It is the associated wave in the strongly interacting dark matter which passes through both. As the wave exits the slits it creates wave interference. As the particle exits a single slit the direction it travels is altered by the wave interference. This is the wave guiding the particle. Strongly detecting the particle causes a loss of cohesion between the particle and its associated wave, the particle continues on the trajectory it was traveling and it does not form an interference pattern.

The wave of wave-particle duality is a wave in the strongly interacting dark matter which fills 'empty' space.

190

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: How do we know the Universe is expanding, and expanding into nothing?

« on: 26/04/2016 17:00:20 »

Our visible Universe is a larger version of what is represented by the blue lines in the following.



'Supermassive Black Holes Transport Matter into Cosmic Voids, Astronomers Say'
sci-news.com/astronomy/supermassive-black-holes-matter-cosmic-voids-03658.html

“Some of the matter falling towards the holes is converted into energy. This energy is delivered to the surrounding gas, and leads to large outflows of matter, which stretch for hundreds of thousands of light years from the black holes, reaching far beyond the extent of their host galaxies,” the astronomers explained.

At the scale of our Universe the energy referred to above is dark energy. A Universal black hole is powering our visible Universe causing the galaxy clusters to accelerate away from us.

191

New Theories / A Universal black hole powering the Universal lobe we exist in is dark energy

« on: 02/04/2016 15:55:00 »

'Black holes banish matter into cosmic voids'
spacedaily.com/reports/Black_holes_banish_matter_into_cosmic_voids_999.html

But Haider's team also found that a surprising fraction of normal matter - 20% - is likely to be have been transported into the voids. The culprit appears to be the supermassive black holes found in the centres of galaxies. Some of the matter falling towards the holes is converted into energy. This energy is delivered to the surrounding gas, and leads to large outflows of matter, which stretch for hundreds of thousands of light years from the black holes, reaching far beyond the extent of their host galaxies.

At the scale of our Universe the energy described above is dark energy.  A Universal black hole is powering the Universal lobe we exist in.

192

New Theories / Re: Double Slits how it works ?

« on: 01/04/2016 16:44:19 »

Dark matter as a weakly interacting clump of stuff that travels with the matter is incorrect. Dark matter fills 'empty' space and is displaced by matter. Dark matter strongly interacts with matter. Dark matter is displaced by matter.

Particles of matter move through and displace the dark matter. A moving particle has an associated wave in the dark matter. The wave of wave-particle duality is a wave in the dark matter.

In a double slit experiment the particle is always detected traveling through a single slit because it always travels through a single slit. It is the associated wave in the dark matter which passes through both.

193

New Theories / Re: Dark Energy - is it a farce?

« on: 30/03/2016 06:34:59 »

We are in the Universal lobe powered by a Universal black hole. The Universal black hole continuously emits energy into the Unviersal lobe. This energy causes the matter at great distances from us to accelerate away from us. This energy is dark energy.

Our Universe is a larger version of the following.

'Black holes banish matter into cosmic voids'
Article at spacedaily.com

"But Haider's team also found that a surprising fraction of normal matter - 20% - is likely to be have been transported into the voids. The culprit appears to be the supermassive black holes found in the centres of galaxies. Some of the matter falling towards the holes is converted into energy. ... This energy is delivered to the surrounding gas, and leads to large outflows of matter, which stretch for hundreds of thousands of light years from the black holes, reaching far beyond the extent of their host galaxies."

At the scale of our Universe the energy described above is dark energy. A Universal black hole is powering the Universal lobe we exist in.

194

New Theories / Re: New Theory of Dark Energy

« on: 29/03/2016 23:01:47 »

We are in the Universal lobe powered by a Universal black hole. The Universal black hole continuously emits energy into the Unviersal lobe. This energy causes the matter at great distances from us to accelerate away from us. This energy is dark energy.

Our Universe is a larger version of the following.

'Black holes banish matter into cosmic voids'
Article at spacedaily.com

"But Haider's team also found that a surprising fraction of normal matter - 20% - is likely to be have been transported into the voids. The culprit appears to be the supermassive black holes found in the centres of galaxies. Some of the matter falling towards the holes is converted into energy. ... This energy is delivered to the surrounding gas, and leads to large outflows of matter, which stretch for hundreds of thousands of light years from the black holes, reaching far beyond the extent of their host galaxies."

At the scale of our Universe the energy described above is dark energy. A Universal black hole is powering the Universal lobe we exist in.