[marzosia2 (OP)]

I have very strong argument that PHOTON is not able
has got the same speed for ALL DIRECTIONS in space !

*******************************
1861 J. C. Maxwell, published his theory of electromagnetic fields and radiation,which shows that light has momentum and thus can exert pressure on objects.

*********************************

evidence
In universe exist many stars. Each star is giving EM wave to space
Please use INVERSE SQUARE LAW and please evaluate EM preassure
EM preassure  is giving NOT isotropic RESISTANCE TO PHOTON !

Energy's density is  not ISOTROPIC  !



How big torque is registering mass m ?
 ( please study Inverse Square Law and A-A area )
the mass m is roped to bulb (pendulum )
 please use INVERSE SQUARE LAW to evaluate that mass m is registering not isotropic TORQUE ! 





PHOTON NEED SYMETRY SPACE  TO SYMETRY SPEED  (energy's DENSITY = EM preassure )

someone who is telling You that he confirm all by Michelson Morley  making big mistake !

[puppypower]

If you assume the speed of light is the ground state of the universe; state of lowest potential relative to all inertial references, the question is much easier to answer. The bias of the current traditions, places the inertial earth as the unspoken ground state. This leads to confusion and convoluted logic to justify this tradition.

As an analogy, sea level is the ground state for all the water on the surface of the earth. It does not matter if the water begins as rain in a cloud, begins on a mountain or hill, or begins in a river or stream, or even whether the water is static in a pool, or in motion down a water fall. In all cases, all the water seeks the same ground state; sea level. The ground state is the same for all references since this is where the potential become zero.

In the traditions, we define the big hill; earth, as the zero state. If we assume the earth is V=0 and speed of light is V=C, it seems to make sense. However, it seems odd to common sense, that everything is not ending up on the hill. For some unknown reason, light stays at the speed  of light and does not slow and stop on not the hill. This suggests there must be something giving energy that extra push, so it does not stop on the hill. Convoluted explanations appear to make the hill seem a sound choice.

All the forces of nature give off energy; at the speed of light, as the forces lower potential. The forces of nature are moving matter back to the sea (C) level. The water in the river of energy, is moving inertial debris back to sea level; activation energy.

It takes a little getting used to, but once the use of the C-level ground state becomes second nature, you can do things with a fraction of the effort. You can also eliminate variables, since you don't needs these to twist logic into a pretzel to explain things that students can't grasp with common sense. 

If you look at gravity, mass causes space-time to contract. At the speed of light, space-time contracts to a point. Even gravity reflects movement toward the reference of the C-level. If we use the earth as the ground state, it is not that simple. You will need pretzel logic and extra variables.

[marzosia2 (OP)]

SPACE IS NOT ISOTROPIC !
SPACE IS ABLE BE FULL ENERGY  and SPACE IS ABLE BE EMPTY

HOW MANY JOULES need PHOTON TO KEEP THE SAME SPEED ?



one more problem

Earth is registering INVERSE SQUARE LOW and is making rotation
IS PHOTON ABLE FEEL THE SAME PROBLEM ?
IS PHOTON ABLE MAKE ROTATION ?

[marzosia2 (OP)]

I learned that light travels at the same given speed no matter if a light source is static in a fixed place or the source is moving towards you in that same space.

What is it that decelarates a photon that is emitted from an object moving toward you with say half the speed of light to come back to exactly the fixed speed of light.

in other words, the photon would leave the lightsource at half the speed of light in order to arive at your position with the exact lightspeed , or am i seeing this wrong?

So 'something' must slow it down otherwise it would arive at one and a half times lightspeed.
What is this 'something'?

[guest39538]

I learned that light travels at the same given speed no matter if a light source is static in a fixed place or the source is moving towards you in that same space.

What is it that decelarates a photon that is emitted from an object moving toward you with say half the speed of light to come back to exactly the fixed speed of light.

in other words, the photon would leave the lightsource at half the speed of light in order to arive at your position with the exact lightspeed , or am i seeing this wrong?

So 'something' must slow it down otherwise it would arive at one and a half times lightspeed.
What is this 'something'?

Go see a doctor dude, you are in a deep state of denial, you have delusions of grandeur, you are desperate to succeed, it won't happen, you are wasting your time, nobody cares or listens, just give up in your mind dude, let go, it is not going to achieve anything.

[marzosia2 (OP)]

21 person (physics )



27 person (physics )



ARE YOU TRYING TO TELL ME THAT TRUE WILL DIE ! ?

[marzosia2 (OP)]

MY POLISH IS BETTER THAN MY ENGLISH !

MY Ytube ( I speaking  about physics )

[chiralSPO]

Go see a doctor dude, you are in a deep state of denial, you have delusions of grandeur, you are desperate to succeed, it won't happen, you are wasting your time, nobody cares or listens, just give up in your mind dude, let go, it is not going to achieve anything.

Said the pot to the kettle...

[guest39538]

Go see a doctor dude, you are in a deep state of denial, you have delusions of grandeur, you are desperate to succeed, it won't happen, you are wasting your time, nobody cares or listens, just give up in your mind dude, let go, it is not going to achieve anything.

Said the pot to the kettle...

LOl Chiral , everyone said I am wrong and deluded etc often enough, this person is sort of producing the same ideas, whether a copy cat or not I  am unsure, but if I am wrong then so is this person.  And lets face it in reality in does not matter if I was right, because I and it would never be accepted.

[guest39538]

ARE YOU TRYING TO TELL ME THAT TRUE WILL DIE ! ?

I have no idea what your persons relate to, but the truth will never be told it is a religion , political thing and science has no real say.

[marzosia2 (OP)]

PEOPLE WHO WORKING and MAKING EXPERIMENTS  are able CHANGE PHYSICS
without any problem

PEOPLE WHO TALKING about PHYSICS
will be TALK ABOUT MY WORK not ABOUT UNREAL
THEORIES !



THIS BOAT  USE ONLY INERTIA


I'm ENGINEER! I LOVE MACHINES !
 ELECTRIC WIRE FLY SYSTEM









300 kg 
80 km/h
25 kW

KAMOW - great person from RUSSIA ( designer )

NICOLA TESLA small fast RPM turbines


MAROSZ ( high pressure AIR is very good and strong medium
very nice special for FIREMAN to protect vehicle and person inside from CO"
zero danger fuel )

















ART wil never DIE !!!
I'm able prepare small local  Earth Quake
I WILL EVALUATE THIS OPTION
IF I WILL SEE THAT PEOPLE FROM LIGO TAKING NOBEL PRIZE ! I WILL DESTROY THIS PIPE
300 000 000  USD ?  cheap small earth quake !

I will not kill anyone only small EARTH QUAKE !
THEY WILL BE ABLE MEASURE !!! HOW SPACE MAKING VIBRATION !!!:)  

MY GRANDFATHER   FIGHTED   WITH HITLER
PEOPLE FROM POLAND LOVE FIGHT
WE HAVE THIS IN BLOD !




 AIRPORTS BOMB ALARM MAROSZ's VERSION
I saw in Berlin problems on Airport ( someone left Bag - policeman stand near BAG he  talked to people lookout danger is here not go near bag .

I ASKED MY SELF WHAT IF BOMB IS THERE ? POLICEMAN ME AND MY FAMILY IS IN DANGER POSITION .
WHY POLICE NOT COVERED BAG BY PIPE ?  ( I INVENTED PIPE !)   




ENGINEER / INVENTOR / PHYSICS
EINSTEIN ? WHO  WAS .... EINSTEIN ?

NEW GENERATION SKI BINDING ( dynamic leg protection )

[guest39538]

You keep posting picture after picture, you are not producing any sort of theory that is  understandable to anybody but you.  I recognise some of your ideas yet some of your other stuff is just not understandable.   I do not believe your English is poor, if you can read English you can write English, all your drawings are in English, all your quotation is in English .  I do not think you really understand what you are saying and are hoping you get lucky and a scientist recognises something.

Try slowing down a bit , try presenting better.


I'll ask you this and do not respond with a drawing, what do you think about time?

[marzosia2 (OP)]

you are not producing any sort of theory that is  understandable to anybody but you

MY TARGET IS NOT PRODUCING  THEORIES !
I NOT LIKE WORD THEORY !

I LIKE WORD ( FACT / TRUE /FALSE )

on my pictures You can see that Exist IDEAL GAS around EARTH
THIS IDEAL GAS it is ENERGY ( Electro-Magnetic Pascal )
I ALSO FIND DOPPLER inside MICHELSON MORLEY TEST
 (FACT we not have ZERO on this TABLE )

MICHELSON MORLYE TEST and DOPPLER  INSIDE = THAT SPACE IS ABSOLUTE !!!!

[guest39538]

you are not producing any sort of theory that is  understandable to anybody but you

MY TARGET IS NOT PRODUCING  THEORIES !
I NOT LIKE WORD THEORY !

I LIKE WORD ( FACT / TRUE /FALSE )

on my pictures You can see that Exist IDEAL GAS around EARTH
THIS IDEAL GAS it is ENERGY ( Electro-Magnetic Pascal )
I ALSO FIND DOPPLER inside MICHELSON MORLEY TEST
 (FACT we not have ZERO on this TABLE )

MICHELSON MORLYE TEST and DOPPLER  INSIDE = THAT SPACE IS ABSOLUTE !!!!

The Doppler effect is nothing new, and neither is absolute space, so what do you think you have discovered exactly?