1
New Theories / Dark energy and Expansion
« on: 08/04/2020 14:14:42 »You know The way they explain expansion - they blow up the balloon, its wrong. The balloon is infinite and you pinch it all over. I tend to get no argument on this Dark energy Idea.
This is the Simple mistake Physics has made. Something that can be done different but visually produce the same result
This Idea gives Dark energy and when you let this argument sink in and wonder what it means you will realise there should or has to be this other stuff you can not see for obvious reason yet infer its there by its gravitational effect.
It took very smart people 40 years to accept Big Bang. It made no sense that the whole Universe came out of a small speck. It did not.
My serious Question to Physics - You can not ignore this argument.
I don't think the universe will end. I think it will evolve. I think its infinite and is pooling everywhere. We see that locally. If I go somewhere else its pooling. No matter where you go its pooling. Yet those areas of local pooling are being pulled farther and farther apart.
As the local areas pool they compress the space they occupied into a smaller and smaller area Stretching space between them. For this stretching to happen between these local areas of pooling the universe has to be infinite. There has to be Anchors for each area of pooling to keep the universe from collapsing in on itself. The anchor is infinity or the gravity of everything pulling it in every direction.
an infinite universe working like this would appear to stretch a lot Locally, By this use of locally I would encompass the Whole visible universe. The thing is, Its not expanding The space between the local groups of Pooling is being stretched Nothing more.
The average rate of pooling taken from thousands of groups of Galaxy clusters and the history of change in that should Relate to the universes expansion rate over time.
I have my own ideas of what the universe was before BB and will be like Way in the future. Ill keep that to myself for now. Sticking with Dark energy and an infinite Universe argument for now. Once physics gets past that Everyone will have to ask some questions. You all see a flat earth IMO I don't
I'm pretty sure if I Flew off 1 trillion parsecs in any direction and looked around I would basically see what I see here. Slightly different but basically the same. do that a trillion times over in the same direction and see the same.
Bored Trying not to think about you know what. Week three at home. If and When if ever this sinks in You will all of a sudden know what dark matter is and why you can't find it yet know its there. First comes dark energy.
https://interestingengineering.com/one-day-the-universe-will-end-researchers-have-a-couple-ideas-of-how-it-will-happen?fbclid=IwAR0KOygn5ETe8aWS_OY46zZrkFVasbW5lpDSBBWFPR-Xkp-oeHETfHeX9Ww
Woody comments -----So you are saying that by only considering the observable universe
we are being fooled into thinking the whole universe is expanding,
because our thinking (in an actually infinite universe) is too parochial.
It is only our observable patch that is expanding?
I make an argument to all Physics
Kind of. Instead of Blowing up a balloon its getting pinched all over so the space between every pinch is stretched.. Relating to blowing up a balloon to explain expansion. The visual would be the same How its done different.
By looking at the dead end in regards to Dark energy and dark matter I wondered if there was another way to create the visual of expansion and Not go against Most common Physics. I know where the error is but not exactly what or the whole piece of what. Not an argument I'm out to make ATM. Just trying to point out that the lack of being able to explain 2 things and the possibility to explain ONE thing differently that when you do and then think about it leads to there must be this other thing Dark matter and even the realisation of why you can't see it yet infer its there due to gravity. This Raises Serious Question