0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I don't think you'll get a lot of response to your theory because you're not basing it on science. It's not really worth debating the scientific merits of a new theory when it doesn't have a basis in science. It's true that dark matter is a big question in current theories, but if you want to replace current theories with a new one, it has to (a) agree with current observations and (b) predict or explain something unknown. Predicting and explaining generally also means needing equations and quantitative values.Since you asked, here are a few problems with what you're saying:QuoteALL MATTER HAS A RESONATE VIBRATION, LIKE A SINGER BREAKING A GLASS, AT RIGHT FREQUENCY THE MASS LONGER CAN CONTAIN ITS STATE.There's no evidence for this.QuoteLET ME KNOW IF YOU NEED ME TO BE ANY MORE CLEAR, AND BEFORE YOU SAY NO, LOOK FOR PROOF OR EXPERIMENT YOURSELF.Science doesn't work by assuming you're right until someone else disproves it. You need to provide the proof if you want your ideas to be accepted.QuoteIF DARK MATTER IS MATTER WE CANT SEE EXPLAIN WHY WE SEE ANYTHING, WE SEE A SHORT SPAN OF THE LIGHT SPECTRUM (IN BETWEEN ULTRA AND INFRA),IF DARK MATTER IS JUST MATTER THAT CANT BE SEEN THEN ONE COULD SEE IT IN XRAY OR INFRA RED, THE FACT WE CANT SEE IT IN ANY SPECTRUM IS PROOF THERE IS MORE TO IT THAN JUST MATTER WE CAN NOT SEE.EVERYTHING IS ENERGY"See" is just a term that's used to mean that we can't observe it in any range of the electromagnetic spectrum, be that light, radio waves, infra red, etc.QuoteTHEY EMIT SOUND WAVES VIBRATING,No, they don't. You can't emit sound in space, for example.
ALL MATTER HAS A RESONATE VIBRATION, LIKE A SINGER BREAKING A GLASS, AT RIGHT FREQUENCY THE MASS LONGER CAN CONTAIN ITS STATE.
LET ME KNOW IF YOU NEED ME TO BE ANY MORE CLEAR, AND BEFORE YOU SAY NO, LOOK FOR PROOF OR EXPERIMENT YOURSELF.
IF DARK MATTER IS MATTER WE CANT SEE EXPLAIN WHY WE SEE ANYTHING, WE SEE A SHORT SPAN OF THE LIGHT SPECTRUM (IN BETWEEN ULTRA AND INFRA),IF DARK MATTER IS JUST MATTER THAT CANT BE SEEN THEN ONE COULD SEE IT IN XRAY OR INFRA RED, THE FACT WE CANT SEE IT IN ANY SPECTRUM IS PROOF THERE IS MORE TO IT THAN JUST MATTER WE CAN NOT SEE.EVERYTHING IS ENERGY
THEY EMIT SOUND WAVES VIBRATING,
if matter is energy at a slow vibration, what happens with no vibration?would matter not vibrating be super dense?can vibration replace dark matter in equations?
1.I don't think you'll get a lot of response to your theory because you're not basing it on science. It's not really worth debating the scientific merits of a new theory when it doesn't have a basis in science.THIS THEORY, QUESTION IS OBVIOUSLY BASED IN SCIENCE, SHOULD I ASK A CHEF?
2.It's true that dark matter is a big question in current theories, but if you want to replace current theories with a new one, it has to (a) agree with current observations and (b) predict or explain something unknown. Predicting and explaining generally also means needing equations and quantitative values.AGAIN DARK MATTER IS ONLY A VARIABLE.
3.There's no evidence for this.MRI FOR ANOTHER EXAMPLE
4."See" is just a term that's used to mean that we can't observe it in any range of the electromagnetic spectrum, be that light, radio waves, infra red, etc.AGAIN DARK MATTER IS ONLY A VARIABLE, YOU CAN ONLY SEE A VARIABLE ON PAPER.
5."Furthermore, there is no such thing as matter that isn't vibrating, since even particles with the least possible energy still vibrate."YOUR CLAIM IS FALSE. THE PROOF IS HERE."At the very lowest temperature possible—Absolute Zero (0 degrees Kelvin or 0o K)—all motion stops and the atoms and molecules do not vibrate or even spin."http://www.school-for-champions.com/science/matter_states.htm
If you dont know, just say so, or say nothing, or you never learn anything.
If you dont know, just say so, or say nothing, or you never learn anything."The laws of thermodynamics state that absolute zero cannot be reached because this would require a thermodynamic system to be fully removed from the rest of the universe. A system at absolute zero would still possess quantum mechanical zero-point energy. While molecular motion would not cease entirely at absolute zero, the system would not have enough energy for transference to other systems. It is therefore correct to say that molecular kinetic energy is minimal at absolute zero."My question asks, could such a mass be created with the extreme condensation of matter in gravity as powerful as something like a collapsing star, past the point of heating it self due to molecular fiction. Would such a mass be super dense resulting in super gravity?
Quote from: UndergroundRisingUnited on 18/05/2010 02:59:37If you dont know, just say so, or say nothing, or you never learn anything.Public WarningURU,I have already warned you not to insult other posters yet you persist with insults like the one above. You seem to be more interested in picking fights to promote your own agenda than debating any real points of science.This is your last warning. Any more unacceptable behavior and we will ban you from this forum.(BTW - Any more ALL CAPS will be considered shouting, and that will get you banned too.)Geezer (Moderator)
Sounds like you are starting to understand the question.My question asks:If the mass that makes black holes would be super dense matter condensed past the point of fusion at low temp. due to shear size?
URU, if you were asking about black holes why didn't you mention them in the original post?
Yes, I know.I am asking about the actual singularity.Is what makes this awesome gravity called a black hole a form of mass with particles so tightly condensed due too:"The laws of thermodynamics state that absolute zero cannot be reached because this would require a thermodynamic system to be fully removed from the rest of the universe. A system at absolute zero would still possess quantum mechanical zero-point energy. While molecular motion would not cease entirely at absolute zero, the system would not have enough energy for transference to other systems. It is therefore correct to say that molecular kinetic energy is minimal at absolute zero."Would this system be super dense matter with minimal kinetic energy, yet so dense its gravity is black hole powerful?
Quote from: UndergroundRisingUnited on 18/05/2010 06:59:28Yes, I know.I am asking about the actual singularity.Is what makes this awesome gravity called a black hole a form of mass with particles so tightly condensed due too:"The laws of thermodynamics state that absolute zero cannot be reached because this would require a thermodynamic system to be fully removed from the rest of the universe. A system at absolute zero would still possess quantum mechanical zero-point energy. While molecular motion would not cease entirely at absolute zero, the system would not have enough energy for transference to other systems. It is therefore correct to say that molecular kinetic energy is minimal at absolute zero."Would this system be super dense matter with minimal kinetic energy, yet so dense its gravity is black hole powerful?No. A system at absolute zero doesn't necessarily become a black hole. The amount of energy (or vibration) in a system isn't given by its density. Forming a black hole depends on how much mass you have crammed into a certain volume of space. If you turn the question around and ask how much the singularity at the center of an existing black hole is "vibrating" on a quantum level--which is what absolute zero is about--I don't think anyone has the answer to that, since no one knows how gravity behaves on the quantum level.