Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
"Changing rotation inside a mass makes it possible to change its inertial properties. It is the equation for a jet motion without rejection of any mass.? Albert Einstein.I never said that.
Asteroids can attain velocities of 50 km/second which means the Grand Canyon could have been formed in just 5 seconds but the annihilation of the adjacent atmosphere would have certainly sucked all trees and vegetation out of the ground tens of kilometres around the site and the Colorado river later forced to find a new way inside the canyon.Ignoring the kinetic energy aspect, the energy release from that much antimatter annihilating with matter would be about 4 x 10^19 megatons of TNT or the total energy of the output of the sun for several hundred days. All life would be eradicated and a good portion of the earth would be blown out into space. So I think your idea needs some tweaking.
If the asteroid were a 25 km cube then around 5x10^14 tons of planetary matter would have been annihilated resulting in what we see now.
Things are progressing like a cancer in government, like Nazi Germany. In California, abortion can be after birth by 48 hours and now there is talk of weeks after. They are sourced for spare organs like spare parts. It is a tragedy. I recall at age 11 attending the funeral of a still born cousin. And how grieved a friend was when he also lost a daughter. But some people abort for a career choice. Where is the love in that? For some money and pleasure are what guides them. Like with Maslow's chart of motivations, physiological needs at the bottom. It can imply greed.This whole post is unhinged. You need to stop listening to right wing radio.
Without personification Baal and Marduk are back. Sacrifice for fertility of the fields... but in another form.
Now it is possible a soldier with conscience and faith can be sent to fight for democracy, and his wife and children are hindered from going to church, at school taught queer theory, secular humanism, and abortion as a right, and the wife may be under pressure to kill her baby. He is not given a birth certificate. He returns home to tragedy. What did he fight for?
Please answer if based on the above data do you confirm that:
1. There are lot of particles in the wind between the BH and the star
Yes Or No?
2. The BH "isn't a great eater and not many particles are crossing its event horizon" which means that we don't observe that it eats any particle from outside.
Yes or No?
3. If the BH doesn't eat all the particles Infront of his mouth, then its gravity force isn't strong enough to grab them.
Yes or No?
4. As the BH' gravity force it too weak to grab even those free nearby particles, then it is very clear that it also doesn't have enough gravity force to kick any particle from the companion star.
Yes or No?
5. Therefore, all the lot particles have not been ejected from the star due to the poor BH gravity force
Yes or no?
6. So how can we explain the existence of all the particles that are there in the stellar wind next to the mouth of the BH?
7. How long are we going to dream about Bhs that eat food/Particles from outside, while BHs refuse to eat any?
8. It is stated: "We don't know why that is, but we want to find out!"
Don't you think that it's time to tell those puzzled scientists that their imagination about BH that could kick out particles from its companion star with its poor gravity force and eat them for breakfast is just incorrect?
9. Is there any possibility that we would accept the real meaning of the observation?
1. The BH is the most massive stellar-mass black hole that can be producedThe answers to questions 1 through 4 is no. The answer to number 5 is yes. I would go into detail but you asked for yes or no responses.
Yes or No?
2. The area around the BH is full with gas
Yes or No?
3. The orbital star is also very massive and full with gas
Yes or No?
4. The outwards jet stream from the poles of the BH is very strong and expected to be at almost the speed of light.
Yes or no?
5. It is stated that "the star in that system is slowly being pulled apart and consumed by the black hole".
Yes or no?
If the answers for all the above are "yes" then:They aren't.
So can both massless and massive particles be modeled as excitations of their respective fields?Quantum field theory treats all fundamental particles as field excitations.
So you want to invest in a working prototype?You might want to do a patent search before you get too far ahead of yourself.
Can this be an efficient tool? Can it replace the ordinary hacksaw?IMO it looks like a solution in search of a problem.
Were it not for the fall of the meteorite 66 million years ago, intelligent reptiles would control the Earth now or in the futureThat of course is wild speculation, based on the mistaken belief that evolution 'wants' to produce intelligent beings. Dinosaurs were around for 165 million years (230 million years if we include the avian dinosaurs) without evolving towards an advanced intelligence. Mammals have been on earth for 175 million years and it is only in the last 2 to 3 million years have they shown any advanced intelligence. It seems that animals with advanced intelligence is more of a fluke than a norm.
Is the process of eugenics actually feasible, or is it likely to do more harm than good?That is not an either/or prospect. Eugenics can be both feasible and harmful.
The tidal effect of the Moon on the Earth is roughly twice that of the Sun's, Tidal forces fall off by the cube of the distance, so even with its great mass disadvantage, the much closer distance to the Moon more than compensates.[slaps forehead] Of course. Since the tides are due to the moon (primarily) that should have been a hint to me that I was incorrect...
In my theory the expansion of the earth is linked to the expansion of the universe.You keep making statements but do not back them up with any compelling evidence. It would be helpful if you picked one of your ideas and spent some time showing the evidence for that idea.
Bacteria are made up of endless combinations of viruses.This is not true.
Living cells, on the other hand, consist of an infinite combination of bacteria and viruses.This is not true.
The first living things were formed in this way as a result of biological combinations, each separatelyThis makes no sense at all. How can the first living things be a combination of viruses and bacteria when bacteria are already alive? The first life was made up of things already alive?? Huh?
The theory of evolution is also invalid in this respect.Well, since this is mostly nonsense, I think evolution is not going to be overturned anytime soon.
Coronavirus is the most primitive, oldest and unknown virus.Not true.
If it is not known how a virus originated and how it first got infected, it is very difficult to find the vaccine and control the virus. For this reason, scientists should consider The Biological Combination Theory to find the vaccine and control the corona virus.Apparently you haven't heard that there is already a vaccine.
Biological Combination Theory is a great advance in science.This also is untrue.
They remotely raped me, followed me, sold me to someone for electronic harassment 24/7, have been mentally (and later physically) destroying me.You should discuss this with your doctor if you have not already done so. Good luck.
And you shall not be receiving an answer. This poster was just advertising his site and posting the same stuff on several other forums and social media sites.I guess he got banned because he didn't visualize not getting banned well enough?
Nikola Tesla, the prominent 20th century inventor, stated in his book "My Inventions" that all human movements appear to come from the will but are are actually generated from the outside.Tesla was very smart and an excellent inventor, but let's not forget that he was a bit of a lunatic and came up with many crazy ideas.
So, we can ignore Einstein of 1916 without having to show his erroneous thought.Yes, ignore Einstein. You would be a fool however to ignore SR and GR, since they are extremely robust theories that give a great insight into our universe.