The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Profile of Origin
  3. Show Posts
  4. Thanked Posts
  • Profile Info
    • Summary
    • Show Stats
    • Show Posts
      • Messages
      • Topics
      • Attachments
      • Thanked Posts
      • Posts Thanked By User
    • Show User Topics
      • User Created
      • User Participated In

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

  • Messages
  • Topics
  • Attachments
  • Thanked Posts
  • Posts Thanked By User

Messages - Origin

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 7
1
New Theories / Re: It Can Apply + the Newton III Law of Motion as Cycle System in a Motor Engine?
« on: 22/05/2023 14:21:42 »
Quote from: monterrey on 22/05/2023 04:01:07
"Changing rotation inside a mass makes it possible to change its inertial properties. It is the equation for a jet motion without rejection of any mass.? Albert Einstein.
I never said that.
 -Albert Einstein
The following users thanked this post: Bored chemist, Zer0

2
New Theories / Re: Grand Canyon Formation By Anti-matter
« on: 07/05/2023 18:23:29 »
Quote from: acsinuk on 06/05/2023 16:11:46
Asteroids can attain velocities of 50 km/second which means the Grand Canyon could have been formed in just 5 seconds but the annihilation of the adjacent atmosphere would have certainly sucked all trees and vegetation out of the ground tens of kilometres around the site and the Colorado river later forced to find a new way inside the canyon.
If the asteroid were a 25 km cube then around 5x10^14 tons of planetary matter would have been annihilated resulting in what we see now.
Ignoring the kinetic energy aspect, the energy release from that much antimatter annihilating with matter would be about 4 x 10^19 megatons of TNT or the total energy of the output of the sun for several hundred days.  All life would be eradicated and a good portion of the earth would be blown out into space.  So I think your idea needs some tweaking. 
The following users thanked this post: Zer0

3
Just Chat! / Re: Return of Baal/Marduk. The Requirement to Kill Your Child, Teach your Children..
« on: 29/04/2023 16:17:40 »
Quote from: Europan Ocean on 29/04/2023 10:15:45
Things are progressing like a cancer in government, like Nazi Germany. In California, abortion can be after birth by 48 hours and now there is talk of weeks after. They are sourced for spare organs like spare parts. It is a tragedy. I recall at age 11 attending the funeral of a still born cousin. And how grieved a friend was when he also lost a daughter. But some people abort for a career choice. Where is the love in that? For some money and pleasure are what guides them. Like with Maslow's chart of motivations, physiological needs at the bottom. It can imply greed.

Without personification Baal and Marduk are back. Sacrifice for fertility of the fields... but in another form.

Now it is possible a soldier with conscience and faith can be sent to fight for democracy, and his wife and children are hindered from going to church, at school taught queer theory, secular humanism, and abortion as a right, and the wife may be under pressure to kill her baby. He is not given a birth certificate. He returns home to tragedy. What did he fight for?
This whole post is unhinged.  You need to stop listening to right wing radio.
The following users thanked this post: paul cotter

4
New Theories / Re: How black hole really works
« on: 17/04/2023 14:17:50 »
Quote from: Dave Lev on 17/04/2023 10:55:57
Please answer if based on the above data do you confirm that:
1. There are lot of particles in the wind between the BH and the star
Yes Or No?
2. The BH "isn't a great eater and not many particles are crossing its event horizon" which means that we don't observe that it eats any particle from outside.
Yes or No?
3. If the BH doesn't eat all the particles Infront of his mouth, then its gravity force isn't strong enough to grab them.
Yes or No?
4. As the BH' gravity force it too weak to grab even those free nearby particles, then it is very clear that it also doesn't have enough gravity force to kick any particle from the companion star.
Yes or No?
5. Therefore, all the lot particles have not been ejected from the star due to the poor BH gravity force
Yes or no?

6. So how can we explain the existence of all the particles that are there in the stellar wind next to the mouth of the BH?

7. How long are we going to dream about Bhs that eat food/Particles from outside, while BHs refuse to eat any?

8. It is stated: "We don't know why that is, but we want to find out!"
Don't you think that it's time to tell those puzzled scientists that their imagination about BH that could kick out particles from its companion star with its poor gravity force and eat them for breakfast is just incorrect?

9. Is there any possibility that we would accept the real meaning of the observation?

The title of this thread is "How black holes really work", but you haven't said anything about how they 'really' work.  Are you ever going to address the title of the thread or just post off topic criticisms about the current mainstream theory?
The following users thanked this post: Zer0

5
New Theories / Re: How black hole really works
« on: 12/04/2023 19:01:04 »
Quote from: Dave Lev on 12/04/2023 15:47:46
1. The BH is the most massive stellar-mass black hole that can be produced
Yes or No?
2. The area around the BH is full with gas
Yes or No?
3. The orbital star is also very massive and full with gas
Yes or No?
4. The outwards jet stream from the poles of the BH is very strong and expected to be at almost the speed of light.
Yes or no?
5. It is stated that "the star in that system is slowly being pulled apart and consumed by the black hole".
Yes or no?
The answers to questions 1 through 4 is no.  The answer to number 5 is yes.  I would go into detail but you asked for yes or no responses.
Quote from: Dave Lev on 12/04/2023 15:47:46
If the answers for all the above are "yes" then:
They aren't.
The following users thanked this post: Zer0

6
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Are both electrons and photons modeled as excitations in a field?
« on: 10/04/2023 15:24:54 »
Quote from: geordief on 10/04/2023 15:03:35
So can both  massless and massive particles be modeled as excitations of their respective fields?
Quantum field theory treats all fundamental particles as field excitations.
The following users thanked this post: Eternal Student

7
New Theories / Re: The two-blade hacksaw
« on: 03/04/2023 14:11:52 »
Quote from: Yahya A.Sharif on 03/04/2023 13:21:42
So you want to invest in a working prototype?
You might want to do a patent search before you get too far ahead of yourself.
The following users thanked this post: Zer0

8
New Theories / Re: The two-blade hacksaw
« on: 02/04/2023 18:52:17 »
Quote from: Yahya A.Sharif on 02/04/2023 17:48:57
Can this be an efficient tool? Can it replace the ordinary hacksaw?
IMO it looks like a solution in search of a problem.
The following users thanked this post: Yahya A.Sharif

9
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: How a photon is absorbed by matter.
« on: 02/04/2023 00:40:04 »
Photons are typically absorbed by an electron when interacting with atoms.  The electron that absorbs a photon will move to a higher energy orbital.
The following users thanked this post: Eternal Student

10
New Theories / Re: New theory of evolution
« on: 25/03/2023 15:48:59 »
Quote from: cpu68 on 24/03/2023 14:26:58
Were it not for the fall of the meteorite 66 million years ago, intelligent reptiles would control the Earth now or in the future
That of course is wild speculation, based on the mistaken belief that evolution 'wants' to produce intelligent beings.  Dinosaurs were around for 165 million years (230 million years if we include the avian dinosaurs) without evolving towards an advanced intelligence.  Mammals have been on earth for 175 million years and it is only in the last 2 to 3 million years have they shown any advanced intelligence.  It seems that animals with advanced intelligence is more of a fluke than a norm.
The following users thanked this post: Zer0

11
Plant Sciences, Zoology & Evolution / Re: Is eugenics possible?
« on: 13/02/2023 13:51:04 »
Quote from: Petrochemicals on 13/02/2023 11:40:42
Is the process of eugenics actually feasible, or is it likely to do more harm than good?
That is not an either/or prospect.  Eugenics can be both feasible and harmful.
The following users thanked this post: Zer0

12
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Will tidal power cause the moon to crash into us?
« on: 08/02/2023 22:37:30 »
Quote from: Janus on 08/02/2023 16:48:59
The tidal effect of the Moon on the Earth is roughly twice that of the Sun's, Tidal forces fall off by the cube of the distance, so even with its great mass disadvantage, the much closer distance to the Moon more than compensates.
[slaps forehead] Of course.  Since the tides are due to the moon (primarily) that should have been a hint to me that I was incorrect...
The following users thanked this post: Zer0

13
New Theories / Re: Biblical Flood
« on: 02/02/2023 14:31:36 »
Quote from: Yaniv on 02/02/2023 09:57:51
In my theory the expansion of the earth is linked to the expansion of the universe.
You keep making statements but do not back them up with any compelling evidence.  It would be helpful if you picked one of your ideas and spent some time showing the evidence for that idea. 
The following users thanked this post: The Spoon

14
New Theories / Re: How did life begin? Viruses and bacteria. Biological Combination Theory?
« on: 27/01/2023 16:02:51 »
Quote from: biologicalcombination on 27/01/2023 14:31:17
Bacteria are made up of endless combinations of viruses.
This is not true.
Quote from: biologicalcombination on 27/01/2023 14:31:17
Living cells, on the other hand, consist of an infinite combination of bacteria and viruses.
This is not true.
Quote from: biologicalcombination on 27/01/2023 14:31:17
The first living things were formed in this way as a result of biological combinations, each separately
This makes no sense at all.  How can the first living things be a combination of viruses and bacteria when bacteria are already alive?  The first life was made up of things already alive??  Huh?
Quote from: biologicalcombination on 27/01/2023 14:31:17
The theory of evolution is also invalid in this respect.
Well, since this is mostly nonsense, I think evolution is not going to be overturned anytime soon.
Quote from: biologicalcombination on 27/01/2023 14:31:17
Coronavirus is the most primitive, oldest and unknown virus.
Not true.
Quote from: biologicalcombination on 27/01/2023 14:31:17
If it is not known how a virus originated and how it first got infected, it is very difficult to find the vaccine and control the virus. For this reason, scientists should consider The Biological Combination Theory to find the vaccine and control the corona virus.
Apparently you haven't heard that there is already a vaccine.
Quote from: biologicalcombination on 27/01/2023 14:31:17
Biological Combination Theory is a great advance in science.
This also is untrue.
The following users thanked this post: paul cotter

15
Chemistry / Re: Which radioactive elements have the longest and shortest half lives?
« on: 17/01/2023 18:58:25 »
We've been on the edge of our seats for almost 12 years waiting for that reply....  :)
The following users thanked this post: Zer0

16
New Theories / Re: New theory of social evolution and social structure
« on: 17/01/2023 15:01:08 »
How about an even shorter synopsis.
The following users thanked this post: Zer0

17
New Theories / Re: Is remote neural monitoring possible?
« on: 31/12/2022 14:01:38 »
Quote from: feti on 31/12/2022 11:20:46
They remotely raped me, followed me, sold me to someone for electronic harassment 24/7, have been mentally (and later physically) destroying me. 
You should discuss this with your doctor if you have not already done so.  Good luck.
The following users thanked this post: paul cotter

18
Physiology & Medicine / Re: Quantum Manifestation Code Review
« on: 30/12/2022 19:57:24 »
Quote from: Halc on 30/12/2022 17:27:53
And you shall not be receiving an answer. This poster was just advertising his site and posting the same stuff on several other forums and social media sites.
I guess he got banned because he didn't visualize not getting banned well enough?
The following users thanked this post: Zer0

19
New Theories / Re: "New" theory of human movement as described by Tesla
« on: 23/12/2022 14:44:54 »
Quote from: robertwills on 22/12/2022 18:20:10
Nikola Tesla, the prominent 20th century inventor, stated in his book "My Inventions" that all human movements appear to come from the will but are are actually generated from the outside.
Tesla was very smart and an excellent inventor, but let's not forget that he was a bit of a lunatic and came up with many crazy ideas.
The following users thanked this post: Zer0, paul cotter

20
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Why does "aether" still haunt alt science?
« on: 10/12/2022 13:21:41 »
Quote from: hamdani yusuf on 10/12/2022 09:32:48
So, we can ignore Einstein of 1916 without having to show his erroneous thought.
Yes, ignore Einstein.  You would be a fool however to ignore SR and GR, since they are extremely robust theories that give a great insight into our universe.
The following users thanked this post: paul cotter

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 7
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.371 seconds with 68 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.